Re: Max-Prefix from IX Route-Servers - from where to get it?

By Suggestion of a colleague I opened an issue about it on PeeringDB Github https://github.com/peeringdb/peeringdb/issues/755 Em qui., 25 de jun. de 2020 às 11:59, Douglas Fischer < fischerdoug...@gmail.com> escreveu: > We are creating some auxiliary to help on the deploy of our BGP Sessions. >

Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection

On 2020-06-26 01:32, Mike Hammett wrote: IPv6? - By some reason my smart TV doesn't use IPv6 for Netflix, even everything else in same network using it properly (even developed for ESP8266/ESP32 - IPv6 enabled apps). And what is worse: "Netflix Kimberly The Network settings is to

Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection

IPv6? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Denys Fedoryshchenko" To: "Dave Temkin" Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 2:44:43 PM Subject: Re:

Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection

On 2020-06-25 19:20, Dave Temkin via NANOG wrote: If you or others are not receiving a satisfactory reply from us (Netflix) on this issue, please feel free to reach out directly and I'll make sure it gets handled. So far as we know, we handle CGNAT (and IPv6) appropriately. Sometimes ranges get

Re: Microsoft SNDS contact with a clue?

Unfortunately, that's the generic SNDS support email I have been talking to.  They don't appear to be able to actually fix anything. On 6/25/2020 3:03 PM, Udeme Ukutt wrote: Brian, try msn-s...@microsoft.com . It's been awhile I've had to use it, but it's worth a

Microsoft SNDS contact with a clue?

Is there anyone around from Microsoft that can help me with a SNDS verification issue? I'm having problems where the verification system is trying to use the wrong WHOIS server, and the responses I'm getting from support don't really indicate they understand the issue. I also have a

Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection

If you or others are not receiving a satisfactory reply from us (Netflix) on this issue, please feel free to reach out directly and I'll make sure it gets handled. So far as we know, we handle CGNAT (and IPv6) appropriately. Sometimes ranges get reassigned and the data that we have gets stale -

Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection

Actually it's a good thing that Netflix does support IPv6 for this. As any device using Netflix via IPv6 from your ISP would likely correctly be protected as not a VPN or proxy. The problem is the ISPs that deploy CGNAT without also deploying IPv6 is ridiculous. They are directly affected by the

Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection

On 25/Jun/20 16:45, Christian wrote: > wow. blaming support for IPv6 rather than using cgnat is a huge > stretch of credibility I have no idea what's going through Netflix's mind - it's all, as my American friend would say, conjecturbation on my part. CG-NAT isn't new, and if Netflix are

Re: Ensuring RPKI ROAs match your routing intent

So in the ARIN world, Krill only works with "delegated" RPKI, not "hosted" RPKI - do I understand that correctly? If so, are there any plans to allow Krill's analytics and rules to monitor ARIN Hosted RPKI ROAs? -Adam Adam Thompson Consultant, Infrastructure Services [[MERLIN LOGO]] 100 -

Max-Prefix from IX Route-Servers - from where to get it?

We are creating some auxiliary to help on the deploy of our BGP Sessions. Most of the information we are getting from Peering DB. For Bilateral Sessions(over Private media, or over MPLA vlan), we use the max-prefix defined on PeeringDB profile of the partner. (And other information also, like

Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection

wow. blaming support for IPv6 rather than using cgnat is a huge stretch of credibility On 25/06/2020 10:20, Mark Tinka wrote: On 25/Jun/20 11:08, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: Did anybody noticed that Netflix just became useless due to tons of proxy/unblocker false detection on CGNAT ranges?

Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection

On 25/Jun/20 11:08, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > Did anybody noticed that Netflix just became useless due to tons of > proxy/unblocker false detection on CGNAT ranges? > Even my home network is dual stack, i am absolutely sure there is no > proxy/vpn/whatsoever (but ipv4 part is over CGNAT) -

Ensuring RPKI ROAs match your routing intent

Hi everyone, Over the last two years NLnet Labs has been working on free, open source RPKI software and research for the community, supported by the RIPE NCC Community Projects Fund, Brazilian NIR NIC.br and Asia Pacific RIR APNIC. I have an update that we’d like to share. When creating a ROA

Re: netflix proxy/unblocker false detection

Try the contact information on this page to resolve it: http://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/ - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Denys Fedoryshchenko" To: nanog@nanog.org

netflix proxy/unblocker false detection

Did anybody noticed that Netflix just became useless due to tons of proxy/unblocker false detection on CGNAT ranges? Even my home network is dual stack, i am absolutely sure there is no proxy/vpn/whatsoever (but ipv4 part is over CGNAT) - and i got "proxy/unblocker" message on my personal TV.