I'm not very clear on the laws around much of this discussion, but I've been
following this with interest.
I have a tongue-in-cheek question... if the documentation provided by the
plaintiff to the court, and/or the court documentation including the final
ruling, includes the specific URLs to
> Is there any case law where someone has asserted a database right for a DNS
> zone?
German law has something to goes somewhat near it, although closer to
a mandate rather than a right:
https://www.denic.de/en/faqs/faqs-for-domain-holders/#code-154
Rubens
Mel Beckman wrote:
You are confusing "illegal" and "guilty".
The first party publicly transmitting illegal contents
or links to the contents are guilty, which means the
links themselves are illegal.
But, DMCA makes some third party providers providing
illegal contents or illegal links guilty
On 09/05/2022 00:10, Ray Bellis wrote:
Is there any case law where someone has asserted a database right for a DNS
zone?
It seems like a rather stupid thing to do. If someone asserted such a
right, I would make sure not to infringe it by ensuring no entries
from that database entered my
once upon a time at an ietf in ville de québec, i was out to dinner with
a crew of fellow researchers all french, well one belgian. i can
usually read a french menu, but was having serious problems so sought
help from my dinner companions. they were struggling with the same
parts i was.
randy
> Is there any case law where someone has asserted a database right for a DNS
> zone?
> It seems like a rather stupid thing to do. If someone asserted such a
> right, I would make sure not to infringe it by ensuring no entries
> from that database entered my DNS caches or other software.
It
--- Original Message ---
On Sunday, May 8th, 2022 at 21:31, Stephen Fulton
wrote:
> If you are not from Canada and do not speak French
I speak French, but the European one.
I struggled to make myself understood because I was speaking with the "proper"
accent and mannerisms (e.g.
It appears that Ray Bellis said:
>> On March 27, 1991, in a case that transformed the nascent online database
>> publishing industry, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that there is no
>copyright protection for purely factual products such as a telephone directory
>white pages.
>
>I wasn’t
I will add that card cloning is common enough in Canada that one should
take precautions, particularly if just using the magnetic strip instead
of tapping or chip/code. Don't hand your card to anyone to allow them
to swipe either, no matter how nicely they offer.
If you are not from Canada
As a Quebecer, I think it's my duty to say that good Poutine *is *good.
There are plenty of bad poutine (like any other food) in Montreal but
definitely something to try for anyone here for NANOG.
For a portuguese style poutine : http://mapoulemouillee.ca/
And for something a bit more
On 5/8/22 19:48, Warren Kumari wrote:
If zone enumeration was not a real concern, NSEC3 would not exist.
Ackchyually, that's only partly true — a significant amount of the
driver (some would say hte large majority) behind NSEC3 was that it
supports "opt-out". This was important in very
On 5/8/22 11:34, Mel Beckman wrote:
Importantly, poutine is a critical infrastructure
component for network administrators. I would go so far as to say that
it is the only food that can serve all North American Network Operators
as universal sustenance.
You misspelled pizza.
--
Jay
On 08/05/2022 15:28, Laura Smith via NANOG wrote:
but poutine most certainly is not. A culinary abomination that deserves to be
confined to the history books.
It is but the refined variant of 'cheesy chips & [british] gravy' and
no-one will convince me otherwise, especially at 3am following
I’m a Minnesotan, the land of Powder Milk Biscuits, and thus an honorary
Canadian. I can attest that poutine is indeed wonderful, and I would say
essential to withstand the viciously cold northern winters. It originated in
Quebec, and is still very popular there, and also throughout Canada.
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 9:18 PM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 08:58:51PM -0400, Amir Herzberg wrote:
>
> Hi NANOGers,
>
> I have a small question re DNSSEC `proof of non-existence' records: NSEC,
> NSEC3 and the (dead?) NSEC5 proposal.
>
> NSEC3 was motivated as a
> method
In response to feedback from operational security communities,
CAIDA's source address validation measurement project
(https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly
reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which
we received packets with a spoofed source address.
A point of order:
> The plaintiff’s won a default judgement, because the defendants didn’t show
> up in court. But they could not have shown up in court, because they were
> only listed as “John Does” in the lawsuit.
It's actually a lawsuit against "Does 1-10 DBA Isreal.tv", so the
Masataka,
You’re incorrect about the DMCA when you say “DMCA treats ‘linking’ to illegal
contents as illegal as the contents themselves”. You must knowingly link to
works that clearly infringe somebody’s copyright. A link to the Israel.TV
websites themselves is not to a specific work, so it’s
First, I have NOT read this order, however:
> As the order is to those "having actual knowledge of this Default
> Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order
This tells me all that I need to know in terms of the scope of it. A default
judgement means that the defendant never responded. That
Mel Beckman wrote:
But the phrase "or linking to the domain" Includes hundreds, possibly
thousands, of unwitting certain parties:
DMCA treats "linking" to illegal contents as illegal as the
contents themselves, which is why I wrote:
: In addition, it seems to me that name server operators
Masataka,
But the phrase “or linking to the domain” Includes hundreds, possibly
thousands, of unwitting certain parties: anyone who operates search services,
or permits people to post links in discussion groups, for example, would be
included.
I think I am simply right.
The lawsuit is
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, May 6th, 2022 at 13:59, J EMail <70ford...@gmail.com> wrote:
> poutine should be on this list.
God no !
There are many great things about Canada and Québec but poutine most
certainly is not. A culinary abomination that deserves to be confined
Mel Beckman wrote:
The plaintiff’s won a default judgement, because the defendants
didn’t show up in court. But they could not have shown up in court,
because they were only listed as "John Does" in the lawsuit. Thus no
defendant could have "actual knowledge" that they were sued,
As the
On Sun, 2022-05-08 at 12:01 +, Mel Beckman wrote:
> The plaintiff’s won a default judgement, because the defendants didn’t show
> up in court. But they could not have shown up in court, because they were
> only listed as “John Does” in the lawsuit. Thus no defendant could have
> “actual
Having lived in and continue to spend as much time in Montreal as I can.
This list made be laugh, especially for a group where most of us do a lot
of travel.
Other then no right on red. Montreal like any other city. Don't be an ass
and enjoy yourself.
On Thu, May 5, 2022, 9:56 AM Nanog News
The plaintiff’s won a default judgement, because the defendants didn’t show up
in court. But they could not have shown up in court, because they were only
listed as “John Does” in the lawsuit. Thus no defendant could have “actual
knowledge” that they were sued, let alone be serviced with
John Levine wrote:
I agree that the rest of the language demanding that every ISP,
hosting provider, credit union, bank, and presumably nail salon and
coin laundry in the US stop serving the defendants is nuts.
As the order is to those "having actual knowledge of this Default
Judgment and
27 matches
Mail list logo
