I've always been a little less harsh than What Jared mentions, but my theory is
like within say 5-7 ms is probably reasonable as long as the endpoint is closer
than the next major IX both are present on. I don't really know what folks
think they are getting by peering across the world. I
Similarly, the carrier that employed me when 40G debuted did in fact offer
40G, but did its best to steer customers clear of it. By the time 40G
client optics were available to us from our optical vendors, those same
vendors were already making it clear that we were going to see a lot more
>
> I would agree with that. We've had gear with 40-gig ports for many years
> (>6)? Never found a CDN or transport network that would do 40.
Many 40G hardware options never made a ton of economic sense in CDN land
with shared ASIC lanes for 40G and 100G ports. Using anything 40G blocked
the
Sounds more like a Huawei roadmap oops, didn't mean to mention names :)
On Sun, 27 Aug 2023, 07:02 Mark Tinka, wrote:
>
>
> On 8/27/23 04:52, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> > I sincerely doubt there is much demand for *new* 40G these days.
> >
> > Look at the population of 40G members on major IXes.
>
I would agree with that. We've had gear with 40-gig ports for many years (>6)?
Never found a CDN or transport network that would do 40.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Tinka"
Look at the population of 100G ports at the SIX in Seattle as well. I think
there's a total of maybe four 40G members out of hundreds. 100G really is
the new 10.
On Sun, Aug 27, 2023, 10:56 PM Daniel Marks via NANOG
wrote:
> (Enterprise AS for context)
>
> This hasn’t been my experience in the
On 8/28/23 07:55, Daniel Marks wrote:
(Enterprise AS for context)
This hasn’t been my experience in the US, however we mostly deal in
tier 2 markets (I.e. Detroit, Miami, Dallas, etc…) and we have plenty
of 40G private interconnects. I don’t doubt 40G is going away, I’ve
just never had
7 matches
Mail list logo
