Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

It’s been absurd for a while now…Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways...On Oct 6, 2023, at 1:15 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 2:58 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: The Disability Advocacy Community has been extensively involved with CMAS/WEA

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 2:58 PM, Sean Donelan wrote: > The Disability Advocacy Community has been extensively involved with > CMAS/WEA since President Bush signed the WARN Act, passed by a republican > house and republican senate, in 2006. > > The dozens of disability groups helped design the

RE: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

I'll throw another in the hat for SmartOptics... great products and support. We have a good deal of their stuff for local regional deployments and it's super reliable, even at over 100km on a mediocre dark fiber span. From: NANOG On Behalf Of Joe Freeman Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 9:01 AM

Re: U.S. test of national alerts on Oct. 4 at 2:20pm EDT (1820 UTC)

The Disability Advocacy Community has been extensively involved with CMAS/WEA since President Bush signed the WARN Act, passed by a republican house and republican senate, in 2006. The dozens of disability groups helped design the sound and vibration cadence (which is different than EAS),

Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG UKNOF, TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to

Re: Using RFC1918 on Global table as Loopbacks

On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 1:42 PM, Niels Bakker wrote: > * gutierr...@westmancom.com (Javier Gutierrez) [Thu 05 Oct 2023, 19:25 > CEST]: > > I have recently encountered some operational differences at my new > organization that are not what I have been exposed to before, where the > loopback of

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

Well, and that's kinda where I was going. I've used FS passive systems for years. FS has an active platform or two (that I understand, they just whitebox). Does it really do everyone one would need to do? How much of a step is it to get something more? - Mike Hammett Intelligent

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

On 10/6/23 15:53, Dave Cohen wrote: My experience is primarily with the traditional carrier-grade folks like Ciena, Infinera, etc. but over the last decade all of those vendors have focused on improving how they scale down without sacrificing (most of the) quality and functionality - to

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

On 10/6/23 15:52, Dave Bell wrote: Smartoptics? https://smartoptics.com/ Not them. I want to say they had an "X" in their name, but memory is fuzzy. Mark.

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

I have several of the Smart Optics DCP-M40’s in place. If you are using coherent 100G DWDM optics, you can push the M40-ZR’s to 100-120km. The exact reach depends, of course, on the quality of the fiber plant in use. From: NANOG on behalf of Dave Bell Date: Friday, October 6, 2023 at 9:54

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

Solid Optics? -- https://www.solid-optics.com/product/edfamux-multiplexer-amplifier-dispersion-compensation-dwdm-mux-edfa/ Ryan From: NANOG on behalf of Dave Bell Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 6:52 AM To: Mark Tinka Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Low to

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

On the same topic, anyone have experience with the stuff from fs.com? On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 9:53 AM Dave Bell wrote: > Smartoptics? > > https://smartoptics.com/ > > Regards, > Dave > > On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 at 14:43, Mark Tinka wrote: > >> >> >> On 10/6/23 15:07, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >> > I've

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

One of my clients is Calient Technologies: https://www.calient.net/ Their S320 optical switch is entirely photonic — no electrical transceivers in any optical path at all — using 3D MEMS technology. It’s great for reliable multi-lambda provisioning, and sports built-in power monitoring and

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

My experience is primarily with the traditional carrier-grade folks like Ciena, Infinera, etc. but over the last decade all of those vendors have focused on improving how they scale down without sacrificing (most of the) quality and functionality - to varying degrees of success. There are also

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

Smartoptics? https://smartoptics.com/ Regards, Dave On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 at 14:43, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 10/6/23 15:07, Mike Hammett wrote: > > > I've been using various forms of passive WDM for years. I have a couple > different projects on my plate that require me to look at the next

Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

On 10/6/23 15:07, Mike Hammett wrote: I've been using various forms of passive WDM for years. I have a couple different projects on my plate that require me to look at the next level of platform. In some projects, I'll be looking for needing to have someone long distances of glass

Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

I've been using various forms of passive WDM for years. I have a couple different projects on my plate that require me to look at the next level of platform. In some projects, I'll be looking for needing to have someone long distances of glass without any electronics. Some spans could be over