Finally, the name came to me :-):
https://www.xkl.com/
Looks like they are still in business.
Mark.
On 10/6/23 16:02, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 10/6/23 15:52, Dave Bell wrote:
Smartoptics?
https://smartoptics.com/
Not them.
I want to say they had an "X" in their name, but memory is fuzzy.
On 06/10/2023 16:07, Mike Hammett wrote:
I have found that for low end DWDM solutions,
https://www.packetlight.com/ has always been the cheapest available.
Regards,
Hank
I've been using various forms of passive WDM for years. I have a couple
different projects on my plate that require me
On Sat, Oct 7, 2023 at 9:27 AM Willy Manga wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 06/10/2023 16:00, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
> > From: Matthew Petach
> [...]
> >
> > There's significantly less pressure to deaggregate IPv6 space right now,
> > because we don't see many attacks on IPv6 number resources.
> >
Hi,
I wanted to drop a quick question as I would like to evaluate the FastNetMon
solution to do DDoS protection and wanted to see what other companies are using
it out there so I can have a base of how much should I recommend this.
Thanks in advance for your responses
Kind regards,
Javier
On 10/7/23 14:32, Willy Manga wrote:
How about we educate each other to not assume you must deaggregate
your prefix especially with IPv6?
I see 'some' (it's highly relative) networks on IPv4, they 'believe'
they have to advertise every single /24 they have. And when they start
with IPv6,
Hi.
On 06/10/2023 16:00, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
From: Matthew Petach
[...]
The IPv6 FIB is under the same pressure from more specifics. Its taken 20
years to get there, but the IPv6 FIB is now looking stable at 60% opf the
total FIB size [2]. For me, thats a very surprising outcome in
6 matches
Mail list logo
