On 2010-05-14-03:59:33, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
anyone have reccos for fiber
from 60 hudson
to 454 broadway
From a cursory look at POP and GIS data not covered by NDA, I'm not
finding any vendors currently built into 454 Broadway. The usual
suspects for dark in the area include
Here in the New York Metro, XO's collocation offering is pretty solid.
No frills, but competently managed, and offered under a reasonable
pricing model for retail collocation.
I've had similarly positive experiences with their transport side of
the house. I've not looked at the IP product...
I
On 2010-07-21-15:08:10, Zaid Ali z...@zaidali.com wrote:
I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards the final stage in
discussions I was told
On 2010-12-15-12:15:47, Kevin Neal ke...@safelink.net wrote:
Also assuming the backbone and distribution upgrades required between
their data centers and their customers costs nothing. It's not free
to get bandwidth from Point A (port with TATA) to Point B (Customer).
I don't see how this
+1 on the CUBO recommendation. In addition to muxes, we've worked
with them as a supplier of (Finisar) colored optics; our dealings have
been extremely favorable on all fronts.
-a
On 2010-12-22-19:44:31, Drew Weaver drew.wea...@thenap.com wrote:
Yes, sorry I should've specified 10Gig-E and I would like to avoid
using CWDM/DWDM optics if possible I would just like to use regular LR
optics.
The common misconception is that, just because you're not installing
colored
On 2011-01-24-17:04:25, Andy Ashley li...@nexus6.co.za wrote:
Im looking for a little advice about DSL circuits in New York,
specifically at 111 8th Ave [...]
You can get a CLEAR WiMAX fixed modem with static IP address for $50
(USD) monthly, or less if you opt for the low-bandwidth plan.
We (voxel.net, AS 29791) offer dual-stack on all server and cloud
products. As others have pointed out, SoftLayer is an excellent
example of a hosting provider that Gets It on a large scale.
Sadly, v6 support on popular cloud-only services is suspiciously
absent. Terremark vCoudExpress, Savvis,
Constantine,
I'm afraid you might be confusing the NANOG list with
supp...@linode.com (which, incidentally, I've found to be good at
providing timely assistance, more often than not).
In any event, I've found that commercial GeoIP services rely on data
from RIRs and the global routing table a
On 2009-07-10-14:21:49, Duane Waddle duane.wad...@gmail.com wrote:
I am searching for opinions on OEMs of X2 form factor 10G LAN PHY
optics. We've found that most router/switch vendors mark these
particular items up significantly just to provide their own
sticker/EEPROM ID. As such, we'd
On 2009-07-10-12:42:24, Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote:
[...]
What projections are you using regarding the default free zone over the
next 5 years when picking new hardware?
Geoff Huston, et al provide some useful trending:
http://bgp.potaroo.net/index-bgp.html
With that said, I've
On 2009-07-12-06:09:12, Arie Vayner arievay...@gmail.com wrote:
Unless you are a major transit operator (which beats the small ISP
requirement), you don't really need a full view, and can do we a
limited view with a default route.
Disagree. Protection against big-provider depeerings,
On 2009-10-22-16:19:53, Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net wrote:
Could a clueful AS1299 engineer please drop me a line? Dealing with
the Level 0 technicians that are offered to IC clients is completely
useless in diagnosing a rather serious issue.
r...@telia.net is a good place for
On 2009-11-08-10:23:41, Blake Pfankuch bpfank...@cpgreeley.com wrote:
Make sure they operate their own network for last mile
[...]
I wouldn't sway from the big names for your primary connections
either.
Because ownership of the provider/subsidiary delivering the last mile
means one hand is
On 2009-11-25-09:42:29, Marshall Eubanks t...@americafree.tv wrote:
There is a new carrier neutral exchange space opening up December 1st
at 165 Halsey in Newark, NJ. This space will be operated by Tishman
Hotel Realty LP :
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
Isn't it just more of the same, or am I brainnumb today?
What's changed is the introduction of bit miles as a means of
calculating equality, where traffic ratios might previously have been
used. Explained further, as
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Kevin Loch kl...@kl.net wrote:
We have always accommodated temporary ACL's for active DDOS attacks. I
think that is fairly standard across the ISP/hosting industry.
Indeed. We'll do it; ditto
I've had similar experiences to Mr. Petach.
Depending on order of operations, you can look at this from a
different prospective as well -- why go with a soulless entity for
your transit (or transport, collocation, ...) requirements, when you
can keep it in the family and engage a peer who already
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:58 PM, James Wininger jwinin...@ifncom.net wrote:
We are a smaller ISP in Indiana. We are growing quite rapidly (yeah for
us). We have a need for a customer notification system. We have simply
out grown the ability to send emails to our customers manually. We need
to
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:02 PM, chris tknch...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to look into dsl in the RDU area and att customer service has
been exceedingly unhelpful only telling me no service available, we have
no idea when services will become available, check back periodically.
I would
http://www.voxel.net offers web-orderable servers and VMs, with BGP
support (IPv4 and IPv6) available as a paid add-on in all service
locations.
I'm honestly surprised we don't see this supported by more folk in the
space. The configuration is relatively trivial to automate, with IRR
data
Another vote for APC here. We've deployed many hundreds in various
receptacle configurations, and n'er any failures. The build quality
is definite cut above the competition, some with interiors that look
like they were assembled from duct tape and Radio Shack kits. :-)
As a word to the wise
On 2008-11-02-10:14:14, Matthew Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But seriously, it shouldn't be necessary to have two connections at
work [...]
This is less than clear, and largely dependent on a specific
organization's [in]ability to function if their internets go down.
End-site multihoming
As Facebook might caution us, it's complicated.
It's not uncommon for a 2.5G wave to be protocol-agnostic most of the
way through, and then required to pass through a SONET/SDH framer at
the end...
You've be well-served to find somebody at your carrier clued on their
transport platform, or
On 2008-09-22-15:01:35, Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody have a preferred supplier for 10GE XFPs, multimode and
singlemode?
Fluxlight (www.fluxlightinc.com) is good source for 10GBASE-SR and LR
XFPs. They tend to keep an inventory, often able to ship on the day
of order; their web
On 2010-04-07-14:50:14, Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote:
I manage some IP space that's provided by an ISP but is owned by XO. I
am trying to have rDNS configured but their contact email
(ipad...@eng.xo.com) in the whois does not grace me with a response (yet).
Does anyone know if
Realize also that China Telecom is congested both internally and on
certain peering interfaces.
While DPI is a likely culprit, be sure to not overlook a good
old-fashioned inability to manage capacity, combined with certain
hashing algorithms...
-a
Also absent from this discussion is that the RIRs are still issuing
address space, and interface addressing is perfectly reasonable
justification.
-a
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Joe Freeman j...@ngn-networks.com wrote:
If there's an ATT contact on the list, or if anyone knows how to get a
prefix filter updated, I'd appreciate a response.
You'll want to mail rm-awmis at ems.att.com, following up with a phone
call to +1-888-613-6330,3,2
I'm sorry to interrupt the discussion of how long is your rack? and
what do you do when your home ISP is down? with something impacting
some folks' cost and manner of selling services, however Level 3 just
published its new peering guidelines, buried in comments on the L3/GX
merger:
What are thoughts on public disclosure limited to capacity constraints?
There is ample business reason for making the terms of specific
interconnects private. On the other hand, knowing definitively that
{mon,du}opoly broadband provider A is running its connections to
transit provider B hot
I've heard of folk in and around the NYC metro getting set up for v6
by escalating through their commercial account teams, or the field
service managers who went out to their homes to supervise their
early-adopter [X]GPON ONT installations. This isn't to say the
process was particularly easy or
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I've heard of folk in and around the NYC metro getting set up for v6
by escalating through their commercial account teams, or the field
'commercial account teams' == business customers?
Sorry, yes, that is
How is this considered even remotely relevant to the NANOG list?
VoiceOps, I can sort of see...
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tim Donahue tim.dona...@gmail.com
We ported this to an underlying carrier (the guilty party
I think the confusion by Jay and others is that there is a plethora of
commercial options available for sending traffic to Comcast or Verizon, at
scale and absent congestion. I contend that there is not.
I, too, have found Netflix highly responsive and professional, as a peering
partner...
and Verizon’s customers?
-P
On Jul 23, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Adam Rothschild a...@latency.net wrote:
I think the confusion by Jay and others is that there is a plethora of
commercial options available for sending traffic to Comcast or Verizon, at
scale and absent congestion. I contend
look to the
Tata situation (congested for multiple years), which was a textbook case of
poor execution and damage control by all involved, as a recent example. Fool
me once...
On Jul 24, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Livingood, Jason
jason_living...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
On 7/23/14, 1:18 PM, Adam
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Andy Ringsmuth a...@newslink.com wrote:
[...]
Interestingly enough, it seems Apple primarily used it's own, new, CDN for
the iOS 8 release:
http://appleinsider.com/articles/14/09/18/apple-chose-to-handle-ios-8-rollout-with-own-content-delivery-network
I
Provided without commentary, in case this impacts some operations:
https://www.facebook.com/Tinetworkers/
https://twitter.com/TinetStrike/with_replies
I interpreted the FCC press release[*] to apply these provisions to
broadband access providers only -- that is to say, not hosters, nor
CDNs. It will indeed be interesting to see how this works once the
full documentation is released.
FWIW,
-a
[*]
may be that there will be ambiguity that may only be sorted
out as case law develops around each of these areas. But IANAL so I¹m just
guessing like the rest of us for now! ;-)
- Jason
On 2/27/15, 3:44 PM, Adam Rothschild a...@latency.net wrote:
I interpreted the FCC press release
Hey!
New message, please read <http://ankitstudygroup.com/former.php?5f>
Adam Rothschild
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hey!
New message, please read <http://nlp2.onnet.edu.vn/everybody.php?5u>
Adam Rothschild
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
I believe this isn't the actual process, however recent reorganization
has brought with it a new tier of "entry level" order/service
management that's not fully up to speed on things.
You'll want to ask your account team for a dedicated project manager
to help with the process.
HTH,
-a
On Fri,
I think tunnelbroker.net is an great community service, and a
significant factor in global IPv6 adoption. For one, it's allowed me
to experiment with v6 from my home ~5 miles from NYC, where there are
still no options for native connectivity. Hats off to Mike and the
entire HE team for
I think a fresh conversation is needed around what makes up a
"minimally viable" feature set for an IXP:
The days of an IXP "needing" to engineer and support a multi-tenant
sFlow portal, because the only other option is shelling out the big
bucks for Arbor, have long passed -- overlooking the
I have no horse in this race, however one need only look at the NYIIX
outages list to see how well the Brocade/Extreme SLX platform works on
at-scale service provider networks...
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:55 PM Blake Hudson wrote:
>
>
> Chris Welti wrote on 11/1/2018 10:03 AM:
> > Nicolas Fevrier
On 2008-03-02-18:05:11, Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks, I'm seeking some commentary on the following document that may
help us to make incremental improvements in the operation of the
mailing list.
http://www.fugawi.net/~hannigan/nanog-mlcp1-1.pdf
For those of us
48 matches
Mail list logo
