-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/20/2012 1:20 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
I was looking at a Raspberry Pi board and was struck with how large the
ethernet
connector is in comparison to the board as a whole. It strikes me:
ethernet
connectors haven't changed that I'm aware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2011 5:41 PM, Chad Burnham wrote:
HI,
Our GigaPOP (Front Range GigaPOP) and our own Akamai cache server's
traffic
jumped significantly today. The theory (no data) is the Apple updates
released today.
Chad Burnham
University of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/3/2012 10:16 AM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Joseph Jackson wrote:
I have cacti graph the amount of prefixes announced and withdrawn
from a BGP peer on each BGP router.
+1
Note that not all router OSs support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/5/2010 3:36 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
A dark fiber path was recently ordered to a remote location on our
network, and to my surprise, the engineering report on the path is
coming back at around 130 km, which is substantially longer than I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/12/2010 11:26 AM, Scott Berkman wrote:
So have other people noticed that the Ookla/Speedtest.net/Speakeasy
Bandwidth test often comes up VERY short on upload bandwidth results for
anything other than residential-grade asymmetrical services?
On 5/24/2011 1:48 PM, Rogelio wrote:
Can anyone share a working model / solution for EAP-SIM authenticated
smart phones on Wi-Fi networks? (Or even EAP-AKA?)
i.e. instead of having to login a portal with a user / password or
pre-authenticate MAC addresses, have it be seemless if they are
On 7/21/2014 2:58 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, William Herrin wrote:
The only exception I see to this would be if localities were
constrained to providing point to point and point to multipoint
communications infrastructure within the locality on a reasonable and
Greetings:
In the past few months, I've spoken with, or heard second hand, from a
number of organizations that will not or cannot sign ARIN's RPKI Relying
Agreement. Acceptance of this agreement is required in order to gain
access to ARIN's Trust Anchor Locator (TAL).
Given the size and
,
the agreement will stand.
On 12/4/2014 10:04 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 09:57:05 -0500, Andrew Gallo said:
In the past few months, I've spoken with, or heard second hand, from a
number of organizations that will not or cannot sign ARIN's RPKI Relying
Agreement.
Do we
On 12/4/2014 11:22 AM, William Herrin wrote:
On Dec 4, 2014, at 7:35 AM, Andrew Gallo akg1...@gmail.com wrote:
In my informal conversations, what I got was that lawyers read
the agreement, said 'no, we wont sign it' and then dropped it. If
specific legal feedback isn't making it back to ARIN
Am I correct in thinking that the SIDR work going on in the IETF takes the
registries out of the real-time processing of route
authentication/attestation?
Is RPKI a stop-gap while we wait for full path validation? Should we be
focusing our energies in that area?
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:19 PM,
There have been 28 response to the survey I put out last week.
The key numbers are:
We have read and will not sign the agreement 10 36%
We are considering signing the agreement 1 4%
We haven't yet read it 5 18%
and
Our legal staff has reviewed and rejected the agreement. 7 25%
We
What's even better is that if you can get the feedback button on the
lower right to do anything, this is the response:
HTTP ERROR 404
Problem accessing /standards-ra-web/pub/%5Bappln.feedback.link%5D. Reason:
Not Found
On 12/9/2015 10:32 AM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
They’ve made
Looks like we'll have another second in 2016:
http://www.space.com/33361-leap-second-2016-atomic-clocks.html
Time to start preparing
On 3/6/2017 3:55 AM, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:59:53AM -0800, Hal Murray wrote:
Any suggestions for gear and/or software that works with WWV (or CHU)?
Or general suggestions for non GPS sources of time?
Hey Hal!
In North America, WWV and CHU are pretty
On 2/16/2021 2:37 PM, John Kristoff wrote:
Friends,
I'd like to start a thread about the most famous and widespread Internet
operational issues, outages or implementation incompatibilities you
have seen.
Which examples would make up your top three?
I don't believe I've seen this in any
On 8/18/2021 5:33 AM, Lars Prehn wrote:
As I understand by now, it is highly recommended to set a max-prefix
limit for peering sessions. Yet, I can hardly find any recommendations
on how to arrive at a sensible limit.
I guess for long standing peers one could just eyeball it, e.g., current
17 matches
Mail list logo
