Thanks for your response and three I received off-list.
Multi-tech confirmed that none of their models can do SMS and EDGE at the
same time. They have to be out of PPP mode to send and receive SMS.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Adam Kennedy [mailto:adamkenn...@omnicity.net]
Sent:
This might help you:
http://www.bing.com/community/forums/p/653511/9573859.aspx
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Schiller, Heather A (HeatherSkanks)
[mailto:heather.schil...@verizonbusiness.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 11:47 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Geolocation contact for
Keep selling them the NAT router, just don't tell them that it applies only
to IPv4 only and not to IPv6. 99.9% of consumers don't know about NAT, they
just want to plug it in and be connected. That's why having a stateful
firewall as standard element of an IPv6-capable router specification
We offer an optional internet content filtering service to our residential
and business customers using M86's appliance
(http://www.m86security.com/products/web_security/m86-web-filtering-reportin
g-suite.asp).
I've been in conversation with them since Q1 regards IPv6 support, but the
update I
: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Looking for suggestions for an internet content filtering appliance
On 2010-08-23 20:52, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
We offer an optional internet content filtering service to our residential
and business customers using M86's appliance
(http://www.m86security.com
A combo WISP and pre-DOCSIS cable system we bought four years ago in a
relatively rural area had exactly such a setup with Sprint and
UUNet/Verizon/MCI. They had just one T-1 with each provider and a very
simple BGP configuration. I just checked, and see that their ASN has been
reused.
Frank
Well, on the RSP720, the show interface byte counters are definitely not
every second, though I can't say it's been as long as 9 seconds. I
typically look at them while making changes and they definitely stand still
for a few seconds.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Ross
Fuji 4500 gear, depending on the card, software release, and configuration,
can support or not support tagged traffic, which might also be
distinguishing aspect that your vendor may not be aware of.
Let me know if you need a bit more details, and I can ask our consultant who
works with these
Yes: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r25190780-Optonline-outage-12-12-2010
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Ben C. [mailto:bc-l...@beztech.net]
Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 7:55 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: cablevision?
Hi all,
Does anybody know anything about a large cablevision
This is not Amazon per se, but if you look at http://status.aws.amazon.com/,
and choose the Europe tabm, Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Ireland), Amazon
Simple Notification Service (Ireland), and Amazon Simple Queue Service
(Ireland) are having performance issues.
Frank
-Original Message-
The wikileaks.info press release points to Google's Safe Browsing page for
wikileaks.info
(http://www.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=wikileaks.info), which
comes up clean.
While I tend to trust Steve and Spamhaus because of their built up
reputation, it would be helpful if some concrete
MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not for nothing, but Spamhaus wasn't the only organization to warn about
Heihachi:
http://blog.trendmicro.com/wikileaks-in-a-dangerous-internet-neighborhood/
FYI,
- - ferg
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Frank Bulk - iName.com
frnk...@iname.com wrote
Looks like AS13722 (Default Route, Inc), is advertising both
2607:ff08:cafe::/48 and 2607:ff08::/32.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tancsa [mailto:m...@sentex.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 6:19 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
On 12/21/2010
Uhm, D-CATV is not IP just quite yet. Sometimes I wish that's the case, but
it's still very much RF.
There are several vendors that sell GPON solutions that support RF over fiber,
and there's always IP TV.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com]
Sent:
That's not my understanding.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com]
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 10:25 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style
- Original Message -
From: Frank Bulk - iName.com frnk...@iname.com
Ethostream seems to have a good market share. That's what three hotels in
our area are using for control.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2010 1:36 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Hotel Internet?
-Original Message-
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 9:11 PM
To: Jared Mauch
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Muni Fiber Last Mile - a contrary opinion
On Dec 26, 2010, at 4:37 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
You are likely already at the mercy of some
Looks like an operational issue:
Frank
-Original Message-
From: William Herrin [mailto:b...@herrin.us]
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 10:04 PM
To: g...@1337.io
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: regions.com down??
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:50 PM, mailto:g...@1337.io
What's missing in this dialogue is the video component of an offering. Many
customers like a triple (or quad) play because the price points are reasonable
comparable to getting unbundled pricing from more than one provider, and they
have just throat to choke and bill to pay.
But few IP TV
4:38 PM
To: Frank Bulk (iname.com)
Cc: Jay Ashworth; NANOG
Subject: Re: Will wholesale-only muni actually bring the boys to your yard?
Management has asked us why we can't do RF overlay on our AE system. :)
We've had to explain a few times why that would be too expensive even if it
were
Fletcher:
Many rural LECs are homerunning their fiber back to the CO, such that the
optical splitters are only in the CO. It gives them one management point,
the highest possible efficiency (you can maximize any every splitter and
therefore PON) and a pathway to ActiveE.
Frank
-Original
There's only 83.5 MHz to work with at 2.4 GHz, while in most countries you
have at least two hundred MHz in the 5 GHz range
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U-NII). So if you choose to have 40 MHz
channels for increased throughput, you can have many more (non-overlapping
ones) at 5 GHz than 2.4 GHz,
My understanding is that because IPv6 has a minimum MTU of 1280 and dial-up
maxes out at 576, that special measures must be taken for IPv6 to work over
a dial-up connection.
Please correct me if someone has this working out of the box.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Mark Jeremy
The good news is that source address spoofing does seem to fail with most CPE's
NAT.
At the end of the day, just turn on uRPF and/or use ACLs. It's amazing how
much destination 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24 our ACLs also block.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jay Ashworth
CGN works for eyeball networks, but not for hosting. From the remarks at
this week's ARIN meeting, that's where ARIN has seen an uptick in requests.
So those who sell virtual machines, IPv4 addresses are critical if they want
make their offering viable in the near-term.
Frank
-Original
A few others I would check:
- Akamai (you can contact them via their web page, but there are also people
on this listserv that can check, too)
- Google (if their search pages comes up in American English, you're good to
go, otherwise there's info in their help that will let you fill out a form)
-
There's more to data integrity in a data center (well, anything powered,
that is) than network configurations. There's the loading of individual
power outlets, UPS loading, UPS battery replacement cycles, loading of
circuits, backup lighting, etc. And the only way to know if something is
really
As one of the workshops discussed, does the definition of underserved and
unserved include the clause for a reasonable price?
If the price is unreasonable, do you think its government money well-spent
to subsidize bringing a competitor to a market that couldn't make it before?
Or are there
Estimates to bring FTTH to all of America is in the $100 to $300B range.
So yes, the $7.2B is a drop in the bucket.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Sean Donelan [mailto:s...@donelan.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 9:53 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: FCCs RFC for the
Others commented on things I already had in mind only the username/password
thing of PPPoE. We use the same username/pw on the modem as the customer
users for their e-mail, so a password change necessitates a truck roll (I
know, I know, TR-069). We started with PPPoE for our FTTH, because we
For telco-delivered IPTV, the multicast channel, bi-directional control
channel, and video are transmitted on different VP/VC. For VDSL2, I'm
guessing it would be a different VLAN.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009
assigned to the PPP device.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Sean Donelan [mailto:s...@donelan.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 3:14 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: RE: PPPoE vs. Bridged ADSL
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
Others commented on things I already had in mind only
Here's a screenshot from 15 months ago:
http://www.fix6.net/archives/2011/02/21/ipv6-live-on-verizons-lte-network/
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Randy Carpenter [mailto:rcar...@network1.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 9:07 PM
To: PC
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Current IPv6 state
I don't think there would be a concern about off-shore support if we
couldn't tell it was off-shore. That term has all derogatory bias of
describing of persons with foreign accents who are difficult to understand
and provide support for consumer-oriented products but have the most
rudimentary
We were assigned a new block from ARIN two weeks ago and are getting several
reports from end users that the Spanish and German versions of Google's
search page are coming up.
IP2Location and Maxmind are mostly correct, but there appears to be no way
for me to verify that Google and Akamai have
Comtrend DSL modem use iptables in their code. I discovered this while
trying to understood why small-MTU FTP breaks when issuing the PORT command.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Ricky Beam [mailto:jfb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 4:01 PM
To: Owen DeLong
Cc:
I generally find datacom closets looking a lot worse than telecom closets.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Bowden [mailto:ja...@photon.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 8:27 AM
To: Steve Church; NANOG list
Subject: RE: World famous cabling disasters?
The main telephone room
It was my understanding that (most) cable modems are L2 devices -- how it is
that they have a buffer, other than what the network processor needs to
switch it?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org]
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 9:10 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
I believe there is an ITU standard for testing that could be looked at, but
if you went with the same test gear that SPs use to test their circuits, I
think you would be safe. Hence my mention of JDSU, but I could also add
Agilent (more engineering focused), Anritsu, EXFO, Fluke (more enterprise
There's a big difference between signing that the books are right (it
matters!) and filling out paperwork for ARIN. The first is one of his
primary duties as an officer of the company, the second won't even make his
secretary's to do list.
It appears that ARIN wants to raise the IP addressing
I've been impressed with what I've seen from SolutionInc
(http://www.solutioninc.com/). They're the only multi-site product I would
feel comfortable pursuing at this time. Most others require managing each
site or AP separately, which is not my idea of scalable.
Frank
-Original
We offer it, but practically speaking we haven't gotten much higher than 1.5
Mbps on the upstream.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Luke Marrott [mailto:luke.marr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 4:03 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: ITU G.992.5 Annex M - ADSL2+M Questions
and to add, OTDR at several wavelengths, just in case you want to do
xWDM in the future.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: ML [mailto:m...@kenweb.org]
Sent: Friday, January 01, 2010 6:24 PM
To: Mike
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: dark fiber and sfp distance limitations
On 1/1/2010
(was RE: ITU G.992.5 Annex M - ADSL2+M Questions)
Frank Bulk - iName.com frnk...@iname.com wrote:
We offer it, but practically speaking we haven't gotten much higher than
1.5
Mbps on the upstream.
Sorry that I'm coming into this thread late (I have just subscribed),
but since I see people
Considering that there are likely more than a handful of Calix customers in
this list, I'd like to advertise a new listserv to talk about all things
Calix, namely calix-nsp.
If you're interested, you can sign up here:
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/calix-nsp
Regards,
Frank
I reached out to the inside sales of Linksys just as recently as last week,
and they wrote me back:
We did a little further research to see how we were currently
roadmapping RFC3633 and it looks like we have no current router
models that will be coming out over the next
I checked the documentation for two models (Linux model and highest-end
non-Linux model), and there's no mention of IPv6.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:16 PM
To: Joel Jaeggli
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: New Linksys
Linksys CPE, IPv6 ?
It's not in the wrt610n docs either yet the code was unambiguously in
the box, complete with 6to4 that your couldn't shut off.
On 03/31/2010 01:26 PM, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
I checked the documentation for two models (Linux model and highest-end
non-Linux model
Don't forget the home gateway aspect -- it's a huge gaping hole in the IPv6
deployment strategy for ISPs. And don't talk to me about Apple's Airport
Extreme. ISPs want (once the volume of IETF IPv6-related drafts has settled
down) for every router at Wal-mart to include IPv6 support. If they
We're an ISP that has four access technologies. Both cable and DSL modem
link times are affected by configured rate and sync rate, respectively.
My home CM is at 15/1 Mbps and one-way latency is 4 to 5 msec. My home DSL
modem is at 15/1 Mbps (with interleaving) and has a one-way latency of 15
Here's a few more resources:
http://www.ipdeny.com/ipblocks/
http://www.nirsoft.net/countryip/
Frank
-Original Message-
From: shawn wilson [mailto:ag4ve...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2013 11:27 PM
To: i...@cymru.com
Cc: North American Network Operators Group
Subject: Re: Geoip
It's listed as being on a BOGON at HE, too:
http://bgp.he.net/net/66.185.0.0/20
Not sure who HE uses to make that designation.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Kenny Kant [mailto:akennyk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:07 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: IP allocations /
DIP switches?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Saku Ytti
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 3:21 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: MACsec SFP
On (2014-06-24 09:59 +0200), Pieter Hulshoff wrote:
Hi Pieter,
I've seen this request from
A third option is to use a transparent caching box, so it caches what's seen.
At $20/Mbps I suspect all the popular vendors would find three year or less ROI.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Todd Lyons
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 12:17
54 matches
Mail list logo
