The trouble is that this is not the NAMSOG (North American Mail Server
Operators Group). ;)
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Peter Beckman wrote:
> Wouldn't that be interesting -- you can't join NANOG unless your email
> domain publishes an SPF record with a -all rule.
>
>
Wow, it is like they are actively sabotaging us. Sigh...
None of that in this area yet - I'm sure it's only a matter of time though.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Michael T. Voity wrote:
> Sorry folks, attachment didn't work. Here is the link -
>
>
Ehh... All that content is going over Internet2 for us anyway. I'd
suspect that's a somewhat common thread (though not ubiquitous).
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
>> And it's not
25 traffic usually, where Netflix
and Google are normally within the top 5.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Jim Popovitch <jim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hunter Fuller <hf0002+na...@uah.edu> wrote:
>> Ehh... All that content is going over In
You are using a Cisco what for NAT? And which products are you considering?
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015, Ahmed Munaf wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> We are using cisco for natting, we'd like to change it to another brand
> like A10 or Citrix.
>
> Please any advice regarding
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:25 AM Bryant Townsend
wrote:
> I also wanted to let Hugo (who started the thread) know
> that we harbor no hard feelings about bringing this topic up, as it is
> relevant to the community and does warrant discussion. Hugo, you may owe me
> a
I think the implication is that, on Cogent, there isn't. :)
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 14:00 Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Define "good" vs. "bad" transport of bits. As long as there is
> adequate bandwidth and low latency, who cares?
>
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 08:30:37PM +0100, Baldur
the end of
> time about this; what is the difference between operating on
> superstition and trying to be pro-active? Both for me fall under the
> category of "risk management".
>
> Cheers,
> James.
>
--
--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Systems and Infrastructure
r anyone who may be going down this road, if you have a two-port Intel
NIC, I discovered you have to pass "allow_unsupported_sfp=1,1" or it will
only apply to the first port. Hope that helps someone.
--
--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of In
P in a dedicated range (172.31.0.0/24 for
> example).
>
> I would to hear everyone's thoughts on this, as this the first IP address
> in an RFC1918 range.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Ryan Hamel
> ryan.ha...@quadranet.com | +1 (888) 578-2372 <(888)%20578-2372>
> Qua
t USB to Ethernet adapter do you recommend and why?
> > Ideally it would be compatible with Windows 10, and have the ability to
> set
> > speed, duplex and VLAN IDs if possible.
> >
>
--
--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Systems and Infrastructure
ere near the end of the priority list. I know that's
where it resides on mine.
--
--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Systems and Infrastructure
anecdotally, but there could be other
explanations, I am admittedly not an expert.
--
--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331 <(256)%20824-5331>
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Systems and Infrastructure
king - I didn't have a meter handy. I certainly
learned something about the tighter spacing of 100G colors.
>
> --
--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Systems and Infrastructure
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:46 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> I wonder which part of the proposal people find offensive.
I have no idea. All - You know no one is trying to make *you* run BGP
inside of a container, right?
zCOgJFRZ5nmZOVEPBovGYNTtdQ_pCE=.
> And finally the reformed signal can be transported using anything including
> DWDM modules such as
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.fs.com_products_44058.html=DwIDaQ=Hlvprqonr5LuCN9TN65xNw=Iw8ah1pcqZhOErIjaFRfuA=wWoshgttJT0E6q6-qJzP_Zc
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 11:27 Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Aaron Gould wrote:
> > As you all have said, to confirm, I use ssm Mcast to distribute TV from
> > satellite down links in the headend, out to a few different remote head
> > ends. From there it's converted back to RF video
;mode active" on all
our Port-channels. So if there is a misconfiguration, the LAG does not come
up for that port on either end, and we're good.
Hope that helps.
--
--
Hunter Fuller
Network Engineer
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alab
e the
> MPLS code is. Pricing I've seen is pretty good for what you get, but
> again it may be overkill.
>
> Juniper has some nice boxes in the EX series with at least MPLS
> L2-endpoint functionality that might also be an option for this sort of
> thing, but I don't know any mod
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:22 PM Dan Hollis wrote:
> Repeaters are standard for T1s.
>
> I strongly suggest looking at wireless. There is almost guaranteed to be a
> spot you can put a repeater up to bridge you to your gateway.
>
> Maybe this has been mentioned, and I missed it, but: A hybrid
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:02 PM wrote:
> So what registries/registrars are supporting 2FA that's better than SMS?
> Or since 98% of domain names are Bait type, is nobody bothering
> to support something for the 2% that could use it?
If Joe's Bait and Tackle buys from Namecheap, they can utilize
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 PM Keith Medcalf wrote:
> I did write my own TOTP client. However, why do you assume that I am talking
> about a TOTP client and not the referred webpage which requires the
> unfettered execution of third-party (likely malicious) javascript in order to
> view?
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:09 AM Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Stephen Satchell writes:
> > Did you submit a bug report?
>
> I believe this was fixed 5 years ago (in Linux v3.17):
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=cb1ce2ef387b01686469487edd45994872d52d73
>
>
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 8:26 AM Anderson, Charles R wrote:
>
> We require LLDP/LLDP-MED to configure our VOIP phones.
>
> For trunk links, it is extremely helpful to verify correct topology.
>
> For datacenters, it is EXTREMELY helpful to verify hypervisor connectivity.
I'd say it's extremely
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:12 PM Randy Bush wrote:
>
> an update to skype will pop up and ask you
>
>
> deny. you will have to deny repeatedly. there is no reason in the
> world skype should have access to your icloud, contacts, ...
Was there meant to be a screenshot or some explanation of what
I carry this. It's a preference I gained in my past life:
https://www.kleintools.com/catalog/tool-storage/tradesman-pro-backpack
I put my notebook (Surface Pro) in a sleeve and sandwich it between
the halves. It hasn't gotten crushed to death yet. I'll admit this is
not optimal.
This one has
It is certainly odd, but it's definitely a "thing."
https://archive.nanog.org/meetings/nanog37/presentations/matt.levine.pdf
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:24 AM Matt Corallo wrote:
>
> This sounds like a bug on Cloudflare’s end (cause trying to do anycast TCP
> is... out of spec to say the
If you can go fully dynamically routed, Layer 3 only, this problem
becomes much, much easier to solve given the constraints you mention.
Among others, Ruckus switches will stack over fiber, but nowhere near
30 units. I think the max is 12 and I would not recommend going over
8.
If you need L2,
nah. We do up to 10m on knockoff 40G DACs in production. It's no problem.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:44 AM Randy Bush wrote:
> since we're at this layer, should i worry about going 3m with dacs at
> low speed, i.e. 10g? may need to do runs to neighbor rack.
>
> randy
>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:45 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
> I can think of many legitimate cases, but i think this is where you have
> internet for everyone and internet for the tech-savvy/business split that
> becomes interesting.
>
> I’ve generally been willing to pay more for a business class
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:42 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
> I can already hear the QUIC WG types blaming the network in abstentia,
> because well, why would an operator want to keep their network functioning?
> :-)
In fairness, it's not actually functioning. For one thing, it's
passing some traffic
For those on Google Mail, enable keyboard shortcuts and hit 'm' to
mute a thread. Cheers.
at it. The ideal situation
is that we can google "RFC-compliant config" and get something
that helps us get in line with best practices as smoothly as possible.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
e-maps we already applied to the other peers/providers, and thus,
less desirable.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
This thread has taken a very NANOG turn. Whether the company has or
hasn't fallen apart, I'm sure someone is still there to contact.
Some say the poster is still looking for a contact at Ubiquiti to this day...
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office
rb4011igs_rm
>
> That has 1 10g port. How can that be a 10g CPE?
It would meet some customers’ needs because multiple people could use 1G of
service at a time. I think it is interesting to distinguish “>1G CPE” from
“true 10G CPE” and I suspect many / most customers are looking f
It runs well on a PC-type platform.
--
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
f days ago.
Of course, Amazon could ding Epik for being Parler's registrar, but
that would truly be a reach, since they aren't Parler's Web host.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineeri
using Ansible or whatever.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:55 AM Sean Kelly wrote:
>
> Hello Nanog's
>
> I offer a questio
on NANOG-L to understand these
idiosyncrasies.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
nd wants
to do this sort of OOB trade, hit me up off-list, please. lol
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH Annex B-5
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
>
s its humor entirely with the introduction of bomb
threats. Seems like a script kiddie taking things way too far.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1A
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:57 AM Sadiq Sai
holing of traffic.
What it does allow is for *deliberate* blackholing for traffic; if you
null-route a prefix, you now block incoming traffic from that subnet
as well. This can be useful and it is how we are using URPF.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1A
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Infor
technology.
I agree, and I love Ruckus switches. But if they intend to maintain a
customer base in this market, they should maintain a competent and at
least minimally helpful/knowledgeable TAC for their switches.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1A
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Informa
Router (their VM).
https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/VXLAN
Hard to beat the price point on either.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1A
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 5:45 PM Adam
I would imagine the "long as-path" one would handle excessive prepends
too, right?
50 prepends is silly but doesn't really hurt my feelings. But >100 is absurd.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The Universi
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 1:29 AM Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG
wrote:
> 1. Do I really have to “de-aggregate” the address blocks, so I can do the
> “manual BGP load-sharing”?
Why not prepend toward the commercial ISP? Seems that should make the
path longer and less desirable.
--
Hunter
, and T-Mo filters all goo.gl URLs,
some might conclude that "T-Mobile filters links to right-leaning news
outlets."
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
On Wed, Aug 17,
, factually, throw away messages based on their
content.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:46 AM Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> It's a pretty serious claim
v6 support is good, actually! I am using it to good effect.
The classful part is very surprising. This site doesn't use a lot of v4 so
I hadn't given that much thought.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama
"routing" suddenly stopped working.
Maybe this document refers to the literal configuration of a /31. But
I always configure them as point to points, as I mentioned before. But
there again, in the documentation, that ability is totally missing...
great.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jo
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:05 AM Bryan Holloway wrote:
> Let me know when they support /31s.
A /31 is configured in RouterOS as a point-to-point interface. You put
your IP in the "address" field and their IP in the "network" field.
That's how I've been doing it since I started using RouterOS in
r. This already works with mDNS and
link-locals today.)
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
he route if it's
not working. This is definitely something that a COTS SOHO dual WAN
router, that Joe would buy, could and should do by default (hopefully
they do; I just haven't checked).
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of A
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:22 AM William Herrin wrote:
> Yes and no. The client application has to be programmed to understand
> link-local addresses or it can't use them at all. You can't just say
> "connect to fe80::1." Even if there's an fe80::1 on your network, it
> doesn't work. The client
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:16 AM William Herrin wrote:
> > There isn't really an advantage to using v4 NAT.
> I disagree with that one. Limiting discussion to the original security
> context (rather than the wider world of how useful IPv6 is without
> IPv4), IPv6 is typically delivered to "most
d. (This is probably why Google threadbreaks when the
subject line changes. If the subject of the conversation changed, then
it's a new conversation.)
When the subject line is changed but we have NOT changed topics, that
is when it becomes confusing to me.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
V
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 10:38 AM Chris K wrote:
> see: Status and outages of Meta business products (metastatus.com)
Things seem to be returning now, aside from the status page, which
still appears blank. Interesting.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331
Off
organization. I think there is
a very careful attitude around making sure not just anyone can get
this information, especially after the Nashville bombing on Christmas
Day 2020.
Maybe there could be a public aggregator of those who aggregate the
information privately...?? Not sure what the answer is her
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 12:37 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
>> I think there is
>> a very careful attitude around making sure not just anyone can get
>> this information, especially after the Nashville bombing on Christmas
>> Day 2020.
>
> Keeping fiber location info close to the vest is nothing new. I'm
ave the
older desktops laying around.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Lead Router Jockey
VBH M-1C
+1 256 824 5331
Office of Information Technology
The University of Alabama in Huntsville
Network Engineering
I certainly don't blame you for your frustrations with abusing MikroTiks as
a serial console. The additional computer (Pi or otherwise) is, imo, a
must. Unless you are just using the MIkroTik as an ssh jump box into the
OOB network, which isn't so bad.
--
Hunter Fuller (they)
Lead Router Jockey
62 matches
Mail list logo