Randy Bush wrote:
except we have a history of it happening
You mean the whole innertubes went down because some dewd haxx0red it? I
believe that was the claim being made in so many words (maybe he was
just trying to land that DARPA job). It's one thing for parts of the
innertubes to go
http://xkcd.com/742/ is a bit funny, especially if you read the alt
text of the image. Especially in the light of ongoing discussions about
IPv6 :-)
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
James Bensley wrote:
Got the below message back from Hotmail when emailing a friend I email
every week. I have never experienced this particular error before, is
this just an indication of high traffic between Google Mail and
Hotmail?
Yes, high traffic of an abusive nature, i.e. google's email
Does anyone know a reputable virtual private server provider in the
Netherlands, which provides static IPs that are located in the
Netherlands according to those pesky geoIP checkers.
It also should provide Debian stable (Lenny right now) and not cost more
than ~$30 a month. Of course the
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Does anyone know a reputable virtual private server provider in the
Netherlands
It also should provide Debian stable (Lenny right now) and not cost more
than ~$30 a month. Of course the company should not have problems
Someone pointed me to http://www.xlshosting.nl
Jeff Young wrote:
you'll need twice as much of Brand X and therefore, the deal isn't quite so
appealing. (By the way HP, Cisco and Juniper are pretty much
interchangeable in this discussion).
If they are interchangeable then why bother getting into a war at all?
It's very tiresome. :-|
--
andrew.wallace wrote:
Article: http://www.economist.com/node/16481504?story_id=16481504
I know it's shortsighted, but any article with the word cyber in it,
used in such a way as being about cyber this-or-that, already lost its
credibility by virtue of using the word. It must be a of rather
Larry Sheldon wrote:
..in other news (that seems to have attracted little attention)...
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010/07/73000-blogs-shu.html
73000 Internet sites where shutdown by somebody, for something.
BurstNet, the Web-hosting company, informed Blogetery's operator that
Kevin Oberman wrote:
That said, the actual, published document has some huge issues. It pays
excellent lip service to net neutrality, but it has simply HUGE
loopholes with lots of weasel words that could be used to get away with
most anything. for example, it expressly excludes and wireless
Mikel Jimenez Fernandez wrote:
Good news for IPV6 fans!
Forwarding on behalf of APNIC.
2010 and will be making allocations from these ranges in the near
future:
49/8
101/8
More netblocks to block against spam I say. :-|
Someone on another list posted this, you may wish to update your
George Bonser wrote:
I believe a network should be able to sell priotitization at the edge,
but not in the core. I have no problem with Y!, for example, paying a
network to be prioritized ahead of bit torrent on the segment to the end
Considering yahoo (as any other big freemailer) is
(apologies for cross posting)
Ernie Rubi wrote:
Anyone else having trouble? We're colo'ed at the NOTA in Miami and directly
peer with them - even though our session hasn't gone down we still can't reach
them.
It will be interesting to see if global spam traffic goes down as well?
Since
Erik L wrote:
Received-SPF: pass ...
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass ...
So the problem is unlikely to be a SPF issue, as mentioned in my first e-mail.
http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html
The lack of SPF records should never be the reason to block an email.
It's about
Jeroen Massar wrote:
(And the spammers will take the rest...)
I am afraid so too.
(PS: There seems to be a trend for people calling themselvesIPv6
Pioneers as they recently did something with IPv6, if you didn't play
in the 6bone/early-RIR allocs you are not a pioneer as you are 10 years
IPv6 newbie
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_address#Special_addresses
an fc00::/7 address includes a 40-bit pseudo random number:
fc00::/7 — Unique local addresses (ULA's) are intended for local
communication. They are routable only within a set of cooperating sites
Deepak Jain wrote:
According to the RFC:
3.2.1. Locally Assigned Global IDs
Locally assigned Global IDs MUST be generated with a pseudo-random
algorithm consistent with [RANDOM]. Section 3.2.2 describes a
Global ID in this case means the 40 bit pseudo random thing. The point here
I battled for a few hours getting IPv6 rDNS to work. The following tool
proved to be quite helpful:
http://www.fpsn.net/?pg=toolstool=ipv6-inaddr
Just in case anyone else would run into similar problems. It's not as
straightforward as IPv4 rDNS.
Greetings,
Jeroen
--
Gary E. Miller wrote:
See also sipcalc.
Thanks, I wasn't aware of the various commandline tools available yet.
Except the dig option to convert IPv6 rDNS. But the tool I mentioned
also creates a whole zone file for you based on what you entered, which
I then used to correct the zone file I
Karl Auer wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 18:48 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
Uh, no... You're misreading it.
Yes - I read the ISP bit, not the end user bit.
It cost me $625 (or possibly less) one-time when I first got it.
That was with the waivers in force. It will soon cost a one-time US
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Gary Baribault g...@baribault.net wrote:
OK, I haven't taken it back out of the box, but anyone still have 8
bit ISA Arcnet with thin coax?
Sorry no, but I have a Commodore 64 1200/75 baud modem, real collectors
item...
--
Curtis Maurand wrote:
Much of Maine is not covered by broadband and companies are still using
dialup routers. Much of the US (70%) is not covered by broadband and
the only internet connection is dialup.
That is kinda bad, but to put it into perspective, you have free, or at
least one flat
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Sorry no, but I have a Commodore 64 1200/75 baud modem, real collectors item...
If it doesn't have an acoustic coupler, it's not a real collector's item. :)
Damn you got me there, almost put it up on ebay hoping
What would be the best way to configure your dns once you've set up IPv6
6to4? Separate the IPv4 and IPV6 domains or let them be the same?
That is, use something like example.com for your existing IPv4 address
and something like 6.example.com for IPv6 (and www.6.example.com etc.)?
Or is it
Mark Andrews wrote:
Firstly I would use a tunnel broker instead of 6to4. Easier to
debug failures.
Thanks all for the helpful response. Using the same names for IPv6 and
IPv4 doesn't appear to be much of a problem, especially considering this
is a trial which concerns office/home ISP
From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 20:00:15 -0500
224/3
Oh. And don't forget to do *bidirectional* filtering of these addresses. ;)
Ahh, not quite. Blocking 224/3 bi-directionally might cause a few issues
if you accept multicast traffic from
Backdoor Santa wrote:
Ever wonder what Comcast's connections to the Internet look like? In the
tradition of WikiLeaks, someone stumbled upon these graphs of their TATA links.
For reference, TATA is the only other IP transit provider to Comcast after
Level (3). Comcast is a customer of TATA
Jay Ashworth wrote:
individual subscriber pushed the complexity up, in much the same way
that flat rate telecom services are popular equally because customers
prefer them, and because the *cost of keeping track* becomes delta.
Can someone then please explain me why the hell in many other
Cruzio in Santa Cruz recently opened a new coloc facility using a newly
installed fiber connection (I believe they share this with UCSC, I am
not sure who owns it in practice). Which in theory should be good news
for the Monterey Bay Area which has been without fiber connectivity before.
I
Matthew Kaufman wrote:
Have you considered simply asking them?
Sadly the person I contacted with regards to some colocation business
wasn't able to answer the simplest of question (i.e. from which netblock
do they assign IPs). Or at least the question was met with silence (he
may still be
Cruzio in Santa Cruz recently opened a little co-location facility. That
makes two of such facilities in Santa Cruz (the other being got.net),
which could be a good thing for competition.
Their 1U offer comes with limited access to your server, only from 10AM
to 6 PM. I find that not
todd glassey wrote:
On 1/12/2011 12:28 PM, Matt Kelly wrote:
When you are talking single or partial rack colo it is generally done
policy. The ISP's limited access policy has to do with their overhead
models and that's all there is to that.
Sorry to bring daylight into this but it is what
Kevin Stange wrote:
I guess what you're saying holds true if the facility doesn't already
offer /anyone/ this access regardless of how much equipment and space
they have.
They offer 24/7 access to 1/3 racks or more.
The price is not that low, $100/month for 1*1U and 1 IP. I'd say that's
not
George Bonser wrote:
Awesome. It's good to know that there are still operations like that around.
That is probably found more often in local providers and not so often in the
big operations. The more community oriented providers would be much more
accepting of such a situation than a large
JC Dill wrote:
Scruz is ~30-45 minutes from the heart of the internet on the west coast
(Silicon Valley). If your $dayjob isn't in scruz, then it's most likely
IN Silicon Valley. So locate your 1U server in Silicon Valley, where
Yes it's in the Valley and I do consider locating it there.
Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
of the ddos-protected hosting solutions companies do.
viagra-shopping .com
potenzmittel-at .com
medicin-24 .com
apothekeohnerezept .at
# whois 208.64.122.234
[Querying whois.arin.net]
[Redirected to rwhois.blacklotus.net:4321]
[Querying rwhois.blacklotus.net]
Nick Hilliard wrote:
Summarising other people positions: a functional abuse desk, a less
defensive attitude when people point out serious abuse going on in your
network, and the slightest inclination to investigate really serious
crap on your network when it's brought to your attention in the
Randy Carpenter wrote:
Touché! That could theoretically happen. I think Apple should buy HPQDEC just
so they can announce 16/7 :-)
Nah, one should buy the other just so they can hand over a /7 to APNIC.
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
Benson Schliesser wrote:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 8:10 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Nah, one should buy the other just so they can hand over a /7 to APNIC.
How would they justify that to their shareholders?
Free advertising, increased goodwill? ;-)
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers
Jens Link wrote:
I never thought it was that bad. In some 3G/wireless networks in Germany
the providers use NAT and transparent HTTP-proxy. But this is only
wireless. I'm not aware of any DSL or Cable provider NATing their
customers.
I guess in the early days of DSL and Cable internet this
A Cruzio employee kindly provided me with the following information
regarding their peering and connectivity. I pasted it below (with
permission) because I thought it might be of use to others:
Cruzio maintains a backbone of wireless points of presence (POP) on
various mountain tops
On 02/09/2011 03:47 PM, George Bonser wrote:
I have yet to see a broadband provider that configures a network so that
individual nodes in the home network get global IPs.
The big providers probably categorise a static IP in their
enterprise/business offerings. But both my provider here
Steve Linford wrote:
APEWS is one of the many fringe hobby DNSBLs run from kids bedrooms.
I don't deny APEWS is pretty much useless, though I disagree with the
(perceived) condescending sentiment about hobby projects. Many
successful enterprises sprung from hobby projects.
Greetings,
Apologies if someone posted it already, but I thought this was quite
funny :-)
http://xkcd.com/865/
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
Phil Regnauld wrote:
http://xkcd.com/865/
Ack, and how did I miss that? ;-)
--
http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html
I was doing some packet scanning on one of my IPv6 enabled servers and I
found traffic such as the following frequently (IPs slightly edited):
02:23:02.410360 IP6 fe80::ff78.546 ff02::2.547: dhcp6 solicit
Not having done too much ipv6 packet scanning yet I am curious to know
if this is a
Randy Bush wrote:
manichi daily still says 7.7. but english language news is not very
current.
maz-san reports at least one fiber break
randy, cleaning up a lot of spilled coffee
It started a few days earlier, I was keeping an eye on it:
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
It started a few days earlier, I was keeping an eye on it:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usb0001r57.php
For a complete list so far:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/145_40_eqs.php
Did you feel it?
http
Michael Painter wrote:
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE wrote:
Pacific tsunami warning centre has confirmed a deep ocean tsunami.
Three dart bouys have detected 2 ft wave fronts. Warnings
up for entire pacific basin except for Alaska/canada/us west coast.
Chris
Tsunami sirens just went off on
Owen DeLong wrote:
I'll point out that Comcast charges $5/month for a static IP on their business
circuits.
I get charged $6 for a static IP for a home internet connection (not a
business account). Although in the Netherlands xs4all will give you one
for free, so it depends.
I am
Michael Thomas wrote:
Gavin Pearce wrote:
*yawn*. A foot and a half isn't going to be all *that* bad
Sorry to continue off topic:
Try to imagine ... a temporary very high tide, rather than a cresting
wave. In addition to the height, it's the wave-length you have to take
into account.
On 10/03/2012 09:52 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
Op 3-10-2012 18:33, Kevin Broderick schreef:
I'll add that in the mid-90's, in a University Of Washington lecture
hall, Vint Cerf expressed some regret over going with 32 bits. Chuckle
worthy and at the time, and a fond memory
- K
Pick a number between
On 10/31/2012 12:24 PM, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
I had to summarize this recently for a news article I was interviewed for, so I
figured I forward:
Of our three datacenters, this is what we saw:
Parsippany 1 (OCT) - The worst we saw here was several sub-second power hits.
UPS's held without
Hello,
Does anyone know a practical and somewhat user friendly way of
connecting to juniper vpn using linux?
I have happily used http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/~massar/vpnc/ a allow
linux users to connect cisco vpn boxes where a crappy cisco vpn client
would be needed otherwise, and it works
On 11/27/2012 07:14 PM, Cody Rose wrote:
I have had great success with the Shrew Soft vpn client and if you are
using Fedora it is only a 'yum install ike' away and works without root
and properly utilizes the tap interface while installing the proper
routes needed to get traffic going.
On 11/27/2012 07:27 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Do you want one for IPSEC or for the SSL VPN Appliance that Juniper is pushing
nowadays?
I just checked, the script i am looking at calls the ncscv tool which I
believe is made by juniper? It needs amongst other things an ssl
certificate. So I
On 11/28/2012 02:03 PM, Edward Dore wrote:
openssl x509 -inform DER -infile -outform PEM -outfile
Thanks, that did the trick.
--
Earthquake Magnitude: 4.6
Date: Thursday, November 29, 2012 02:23:59 UTC
Location: Jan Mayen Island region
Latitude: 71.0240; Longitude: -6.5291
Depth: 13.50 km
On 11/30/2012 02:02 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
OK, there must be a lot more paranoid people out there than I thought
for awhile? I am sure he will let you out to go to the bank, get your
stuff, and leave town. I think you have seen way to many movies.
So if the cops show up at his door
On 12/20/2012 10:41 AM, Wayne E Bouchard wrote:
How many people here have gotten good enough that they can cut a
cable and pop connectors on each end in under 3 minutes? How many have
gotten good enough that the failure rate for *hand made* cables is sub
1:1000? Show me another connector type
On 12/20/2012 01:13 PM, George Herbert wrote:
For some users, even more positive than RJ45 is warranted. I at times
work in and have a number of friends working in various aerospace and
rocketry areas, and RJ45's have been widely known to come loose under
acceleration.
I found that a spliced
Not exactly a nanog subject but I would like to know if there is a
(ideally) locally owned ISP in LA that's knowledgeable, for DSL service.
Something like cruzio in Santa Cruz. Trying to avoid the big ones such
as ATT and comcast.
Thanks,
Jeroen
--
Earthquake Magnitude: 4.0
Date: Tuesday,
On 01/08/2013 08:36 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
- Forwarded message from Lauren Weinsteinlau...@vortex.com -
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 10:35:59 -0800
From: Lauren Weinsteinlau...@vortex.com
To: nnsq...@nnsquad.org
Subject: [ NNSquad ] Mark Crispin - MRC - Inventor of IMAP and a friend for
On 02/09/2013 07:55 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
When you are staying at a 3* hotel, should you have no expectations
that you'll be getting at least a 3Mbps pipe and at least an under
100ms average latency, and won't be getting a balancer that would be
breaking up your ssh sessions?
On 03/05/2013 05:41 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I think it's also important to cover the following topics somewhere in the
process:
1. This will affect the entire organization, not just the IT department and
will definitely impact all of apps, sysadmin, devops, operations, and
Lynda wrote:
Dennis was one of the good ones. A kind and generous person, who changed
all our worlds.
Indeed.
I consider the KR C book as the pinnacle of how a book like that should
be written. Every page, every sentence contains a multitude of
information and there is no redundancy.
The C
Owen DeLong wrote:
It's both unacceptable in my opinion and common. There are even those
misguided souls that will tell you it is best practice, though general
agreement,
even among them seems to be that only 25/tcp should be blocked and that
465 and 587 should not be blocked.
From my
William Herrin wrote:
If your machine is addressed with a globally routable IP, a trivial
failure of your security apparatus leaves your machine addressable
from any other host in the entire world which wishes to send it
Isn't that the case with IPv6? That the IP is addressable from any host
Fyodor wrote:
switched their Nmap downloads back to our real installer. At least
for now. But that isn't enough--they are still infecting the
installers for thousands of other packages!
I am sorry about these problems, it is unacceptable.
Sourceforge, at least a year or 2 ago, did
Fyodor wrote:
switched their Nmap downloads back to our real installer. At least
for now. But that isn't enough--they are still infecting the
installers for thousands of other packages!
I am sorry about these problems, it is unacceptable.
Sourceforge, at least a year or 2 ago, did
Fyodor wrote:
switched their Nmap downloads back to our real installer. At least
for now. But that isn't enough--they are still infecting the
installers for thousands of other packages!
I am sorry about these problems, it is unacceptable.
Sourceforge, at least a year or 2 ago, did
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 04:00:44 PM Douglas Otis wrote:
products are able to provide good returns. In this view, the analogy
holds when price alone is not considered.
And, like Edison, Mr. Jobs fiercely championed his own technologies over all others; just one
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Does your Mom call you up every time she gets a dialog box complaining
about an invalid certificate ?
If she has been conditioned just to click OK when that happens, then
she probably can't.
Everyone I have observed clicks ok or confirm exception (if I
remember the
randal k wrote:
This is a huge point. We've had a LOT of trouble finding good network
engineers who have all of the previously mentioned soft attributes -
anything, can't setup a syslog server, doesn't understand AD much less
LDAP, etc. Imagine, an employee who can help themselves 90% of the
Steven Bellovin wrote:
Note this from the NY Times article:
The Megaupload case is unusual, said Orin S. Kerr, a law professor
at George Washington University, in that federal prosecutors obtained
the private e-mails of Megaupload�s operators in an effort to show they
were operating in
Michael Sinatra wrote:
The words Internet and Web can be used interchangeably
I prefer the term intergophers myself.
--
Earthquake Magnitude: 4.9
Date: Friday, February 17, 2012 14:28:20 UTC
Location: Komandorskiye Ostrova, Russia region
Latitude: 54.5969; Longitude: 168.8863
Depth: 34.70 km
After reading a number of threads where people list their huge and
wasteful, but undoubtedly fun (and sometimes necessary?), home setups
complete with dedicated rooms and aircos I felt inclined to ask who has
attempted to make a really energy efficient setup?
This may be an interesting read,
Leigh Porter wrote:
You dudes need to get with the times and put all this stuff in the cloud.
Ok so I joke a little..
The cloud seems to be a more modern implementation of the mainframe
paradigm (and now I feel soiled having used 2 such words in one
sentence). It has its uses, though it's
Marcel Plug wrote:
I've run a SheevaPlug at home for a few years now. I don't do
anything fancy with it, but it does what I need it to do. Mostly that
I wonder how reliable the storage is in these things. Is it comparable
to modern SSDs?
Oh and I also have native IPv6 on my DSL. I like
Marcel Plug wrote:
No issues so far. As I said though, I don't push it too hard. I
don't have any specs or stats off hand, so I can't get any more
detailed.
What's the speed like?
I'm pretty happy with them, I just wish my DLink would stop requiring reboots...
I assume you connected it
Mike Hale wrote:
If you're located in a major city, I'm sure you can find a community
college that has a networking certificate program you can send your
developer to, along with an in-house training program.
Oh come on!!!1
Investing in your employee by sending them out to courses, for crying
John Mitchell wrote:
rant
I would wholeheartedly agree with this, but I believe its worse than
teaching process is one of learning to program like a monkey, monkey
see monkey do. People are no longer taught to think for themselves, but
instead taught to program in a specific language (PHP,
Jamie Bowden wrote:
Hey now...the time from zero to TS/SCI has gone from over half a decade to a
mere quarter decade. You can totally pay these guys to sit around doing drudge
work while their skills atrophy in the interim. Of course, if you need a poly
on top, add some more time and stir
Randy Carpenter wrote:
Does anyone have any recommendation for a reliable cloud host?
Basic requirements:
1. Full redundancy with instant failover to other hypervisor hosts upon
hardware failure (I thought this was a given!)
Assuming a simple set up as you suggest. If what you want to do
Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
7 - compressed air can to clean dust
dust?!?!? sounds like time to find a whole new colo and move everything
out of there haha.
i've -never- encountered one with dust in it.
that stuff usually gets sucked out before it gets the idea to land on
anything should it
Owen DeLong wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Email_address#Valid_email_addresses
You may have noticed my particular test wouldn't accept foo!bar!ucbvax!user
format addresses, either.
It works well enough for my purposes. I did not claim it was perfect.
Why not leave it to the MTA to
Joe Greco wrote:
The ideal world contains a mix of techniques.
Yes and copying parts of relevant code of an MTA could be one.
You cannot just blindly leave it to the MTA to decide what's valid.
Along that path lies madness. How do you pass the address to the MTA?
Don't do it as a system()
Does anyone know if these crappy dell powerconnect switches (in my case
a 3448p) have a convenient or at least working way of exporting/backing
up the configuration to a different place? The only thing I can find is
using a tftp server but it's not working...
Thanks,
Jeroen
--
Earthquake
Steve Bertrand wrote:
imo, this discussion of outbound SMTP has been sounding akin to me
saying I should let my upstream ensure that all of my BGP announcements
are good, instead of filtering my own outbound.
know whether the address is to RFC or not. Less bugs and changes, I feel
it is
Bill Weiss wrote:
I'm using RANCID against a few 54xx PowerConnect switches, and it's
working well enough. I'm pretty sure my dlogin and drancid came from
http://web.rickyninja.net:81/rancid/drancid and
http://web.rickyninja.net:81/rancid/dlogin .
A number of people suggested that, thanks.
Ryan Malayter wrote:
not designed or coded by a native English speaker. You have to use the
upload link to export config, and put in the address of your TFTP server,
since you are uploading from the switch to the tftp server.
Yes I tried that. However the switch complains with an error about
Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Ryan Malayter wrote:
not designed or coded by a native English speaker. You have to use the
upload link to export config, and put in the address of your TFTP
server, since you are uploading from the switch to the tftp server.
Yes I tried that. However the switch
Joel Maslak wrote:
is not. But there is value in not passing utter garbage to another
program (it has a tendency to clog mail queues, if for no other
reason) - just make sure you do it right.
I fail to see why you wouldn't be able to throttle any abuse of your
webform so it wouldn't clog a
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
The massive drop in latency is expected to supercharge algorithmic stock
market trading, where a difference of a few milliseconds can gain (or lose)
millions of dollars.
But it should be illegal to run a stock market that volatile. This can't end
well.
The
Michael Sinatra wrote:
active class newsgroups. As you can see from examples such as CS 61a (
https://groups.google.com/group/ucb.class.cs61a/about?pli=1),
Can someone help out mrshare?
https://groups.google.com/group/ucb.class.cs61a/browse_frm/month/2010-08
The above link and this one are a
C. A. Fillekes wrote:
I do not think that the closing of a service that's undergone multiple
acquisitions by actual competitors is at all surprising. Did the
closing of Alta Vista a couple years ago after its acquisition by
Yahoo! spell the death of internet search? No.
Well, it's a bit hard
Landon Stewart wrote:
I think we should all just NULL ROUTE all of their IP space on our borders
to get their attention.
Yeah you're free to do that, as well as complain about it and SORBS in
turn is free to put whatever the hell they feel like on their block
lists and not remove it at all,
Brielle Bruns wrote:
Unfortunately, the apathy of providers, backbones, and network operators
in general have created an environment that the almighty buck rules
everything.
I totally agree with pretty much everything in this email.
I also agree that blocking whole /24 or bigger when spam
Leo Bicknell wrote:
But what's really missing is storage management. RAID5 (and similar)
require all drives to be online all the time. I'd love an intelligent
file system that could spin down drives when not in use, and even for
many workloads spin up only a portion of the drives. It's easy
PC wrote:
It exists. Google for unRAID It uses something like Raid4 for Parity
data, but stores entire files on single spindles. It's designed for home
media server type environments. This way, when you watch a video, only the
There may be a performance penalty using raid4, because it uses
Jimmy Hess wrote:
Consider that the probability 16GB of SDRAM experiences at least one
single bit error at sea level,
in a given 6 hour period exceeds 66% = 1 - (1 - 1.3e-12 * 6)^(16 *
2^30 * 8).In any given 24 hour period, the probability of at least
one single bit error exceeds 98%.
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
Do you have reference to recent papers with experimental data about non
ECC memory errors? It should be fairly easy to do
Maybe this provides some information:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECC_memory#Problem_background
Work published between 2007 and 2009 showed widely
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
