On Mon, 24 May 2010, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
At the Seattle Internet Exchange we have both IPv4 and IPv6 peering, via
discrete addresses, on the same interface.
That's how we do it here as well.
jms
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, June 28, 2010 05:46:00 pm Christopher Morrow wrote:
The broadband plan stuff mostly covers consumers, not enterprises,
most of the (amazon as the example here) cloud folks offer
disk-delivery options for businesses.
One successful BTOP
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010, Andrew Kirch wrote:
On 7/24/2010 7:44 PM, Ryan Rawdon wrote:
Can you provide information to back this up? At first glance glance I am
having a hard time believing this is anything but speculation, but would
be
interested to hear more.
That is because n3td3v is a
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Tarig Yassin wrote:
I want to show you some obstacles that some countries face them every day.
For example when users from Sudan trying to access some web site they
will get a *Forbidden Access Error* message.
And some messages say: you are forbidden to access this web
On Sun, 25 Jul 2010, Tarig Yassin wrote:
And why not the ICCAN take this reponsibity as an International
organization not USA government?
ICANN has no authority to tell sovereign nations how to run their IP
connectivity.
jms
From: tariq198...@hotmail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Who
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Abello, Vinny wrote:
Any pointers on real world experience on this topic would greatly be
appreciated. What are people using successfully out there as far as third
party SFP's go to hit a distance of approximately 115km? This would be for a
Catalyst 6506. Cisco's solution
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Thomas Weible wrote:
the setup with two media-converters works but has a major drawback. If
you want to see the overall line (digital diagnostic) you always have to
take into consideration that there are actually 3 physical links
involved in the overall link. Looking from
Just out of curiosity, is anyone here recycling old cabling and plant
infrastructure for their raw materials, or engaging a recycler to handle
those materials? Where I work, there is almost always a renovation
project going on. This provides opportunities to rip out
Cat3/Cat5/long-abandoned
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Deric Kwok wrote:
I don't have two fibr card so that I can't test it
If i have one setting as mode NOT negot, one is using AU To mode
What kinds of cards are you talking about? Gigabit? 10G? 100baseFX?
I'm also assuming since you mentioned negotiation that you're
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a peering point setup to pass traffic to
credit card processes such as First Data and or the ATM interexchange
networks?
If you're talking about exchanging IP traffic with a payment processor, I
don't think there is an
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Positively Optimistic wrote:
Do any of our fellow nanog members have experience with cable management on
6509/6513 cisco switches? We're upgrading infrastructure in some of our
facilities,.. and until it came to cable management, the switches seemed to
be a great idea...
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Matthew Topper wrote:
Maybe I'm thinking about this the wrong way, but it seems to be that
that would be a huge problem when you need to change out a cable or
move something. Do the benefits outweigh the headaches with this kind
of setup?
Keeping the 'unseen'
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Are you suggesting that ARIN does _NOT_ publish data or that
ARIN doesn't keep the data current, or something else?
I already said what I meant, twice, and quite clearly, I think.
If you don't get it after two repetitions, then I
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Joel Esler wrote:
Now, if we could get everyone that has these gigantic /8's (or multiple
of them) that aren't using them to give some back, that'd be great.
Thank you interop for setting the example.
Sure, it would be a nice gesture if MIT/HP/Ford/Xerox/Halliburton/etc
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Michael Sokolov wrote:
Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com wrote:
Thick or Thin?
Thin. I *so* wish I had thick coaxial Ethernet, but alas, my present
physical facility is just too small for that: my present coax Ethernet
network is contained within a single machine room
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Richard Graves (RHT) wrote:
Kinda makes me miss the old 6544 cluster controller that I turned into
a kegerator/end table/lamp.. ;-)
I know of a DEC PDP-11 and a Wellfleet BCN that met a similar end :)
jms
-Original Message-
From: George Bonser
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Jay Farrell wrote:
My workplace migrated the last customer off SMDS maybe about 2 or 3
years ago, but most of them were moved several years before that. My
understanding is Vz could no longer buy gear to support SMDS and
pretty much had to cannibalize existing equipment to
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Greg Whynott wrote:
when I looked at the logs I was a bit confused at what i was looking
at... why is it there are multiple AS's in the path that appear to be
the same AS? I expected an AS path comprised of mostly unique ASs.
instead of this:
476330: Nov 10
On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Paul Vixie wrote:
i think all of us who place infrastructure in places away from our offices
should label them clearly as to who to call if they get hit by cars, or if
not that, make sure google will tell observers how to find us.
Indeed, and along those lines, try to
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Jay Ashworth wrote:
No, I'm pretty sure he means across the 2 high legs of a 120/208 3ph
Wye service, and I'd never heard that idea suggested before. I can see
why it reduces the amount of copper you need to run, but it seems as if
it would have compensating disadvantages,
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Jack Bates wrote:
On 12/13/2010 11:07 PM, Backdoor Santa wrote:
Ever wonder what Comcast's connections to the Internet look like? In the
tradition of WikiLeaks, someone stumbled upon these graphs of their TATA
links.
Forgive me for being the skeptic, but I presume
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, JC Dill wrote:
Sure, Comcast's customers are also paying Comcast. But Comcast wants to get
paid from the content provider. I think they are betting that in the long
run it's easier to make money from content providers (and have the content
providers charge customers or
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Anonymous List User wrote:
For architectural and building management reasons we cannot mount our
antennas in a rooftop or outdoor location at either end. The distance
between two buildings is 1.5 km, and the fresnel zone is clear. Antennas
need to be located indoors at
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Brent Jones wrote:
Note, Comcast Ethernet runs on their fiber network, which sometimes
uses aerial lines, I've heard of others having some disconnects when
poles get hit and stuff.
That's not really specific to Comcast. Aerial fiber runs are very common
in many places,
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
1. Block packets destined for your point-to-point links at your
borders. There's no legitimate reason someone should be
Most networks do not do this today. Whether or not
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Brandon Kim wrote:
Would you say that it's fair to say that if you are serious at all
about being a service provider that your core equipment is Cisco based?
I would not necessarily say that. Granted, most of the places I've worked
are Cisco shops to a large extent,
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, Brandon Kim wrote:
For those that have been Cisco focused, do you stay fully objective,
and are you willing to pitch another vendor knowing that you will have
to learn a new IOS? And that that will be your time that you'll have to
spend to understand the product and
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Lynda wrote:
On 1/12/2011 8:04 AM, Greg Whynott wrote:
list, sorry for this but this is getting a little annoying. I've
tried sending Randy email without luck.. think i'm black listed by
his kit, so if someone would kindly forward this to him?
Well, here it is.
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Michael Ruiz wrote:
Yeah another thing I love about the JUNOS is the rollback command. Whew
I can tell you a few times where that has saved my bacon a few times and
the commit and check command. :-)
Definite +1 for rollback and commit check - and also show | compare
jms
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, Max Pierson wrote:
From the provider perspective, what is the prefix-length that most are
accepting to be injected into your tables?? 2 or so years ago, I read where
someone stated that they were told by ATT that they weren't planning on
accepting anything smaller than a
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Jeremy wrote:
Has there been any discussion about allocating the Class E blocks? If this
doesn't count as future use what does? (Yes, I realize this doesn't *fix*
the problem here)
I think it has been discussed at various levels, but would likely have
been dismissed for
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Dave Israel wrote:
I completely agree that, when interoperating, you have to follow the rules,
and I would (naively) hope that customers cannot reach me because of my
configuration choice is sufficient incentive to fix the problem for the
majority of network operators.
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Franck Martin wrote:
The biggest complaint that I hear from ISPs, is that their upstream ISP
does not support IPv6 or will not provide them with a native IPv6
circuit.
I know of a few regional ISPs that don't (yet) support IPv6.
As far as carriers go, some seem to
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Santino Codispoti wrote:
Is it possible to order a ISDN BRI line from the LEC and have them
look at the design of a DS1 and have them if possible design the ISDN
BRI lineon a devurse path or at lest different equipment within the
CO?
I suspect that, particularly for
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, George Bonser wrote:
Note to providers: That might have worked a couple of years ago but
when we hear that today, we know it is false. Please be honest in your
responses to that question. If you aren't going to deploy it for
another year or two, just say so. The notion
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:52:37AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
What I have done on point to points and small subnets between routers
is to simply make static neighbor entries. That eliminates any
neighbor table exhaustion causing the desired
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Robert Shimonski wrote:
I would like to opt out of this news list.
A link that includes mailing list management functions, including the
ability to unsubscribe yourself from the list, is append to the end of
every email that's posted to the list. Using that link would
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
I just thought this is amusing that in CSI: New York – Season 7,
Episode 17, they do a 'Remote Desktop' hack and they enter in the
following details…
http://www.eintellego.net/public/CSINY.s07e17-fakev6.jpg
Promoting IPv6 = Win!
Dodgy Address =
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Ravi Ramaswamy wrote:
Hi All - I am new to this mailer. Hopefully my question is posed to the
correct list.
I am using 2.5 Tbps as the peak volume of peering traffic over all peering
points for a Tier 1 ISP, for some modeling purposes. Is that a reasonable
estimate?
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Pedersen, Sean wrote:
We're evaluating several tools at the moment, and one vendor wants to
dynamically scan our network to pick up hosts - SNMP, port-scans, WMI,
the works. I was curious if anyone had any particularly gruesome horror
stories of scanning tools run amok.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Christopher Morrow wrote:
apologies, I forgot the emoticons after my last comment. i really did mean
it in jest... I don't think VZ has harnessed weather-changing-powers.
(yet).
Well, they ARE The Phone Company!
Makes me want to watch The
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Michael Thomas wrote:
I was looking at a Raspberry Pi board and was struck with how large the
ethernet
connector is in comparison to the board as a whole. It strikes me: ethernet
connectors haven't changed that I'm aware in pretty much 25 years. Every
other
cable has
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Ram Mohan wrote:
I'm looking for a contact in Level3, regarding a client who is having
reachability issues with a few sites in the East coast of the US and Asia
(sites are reachable via Level3 on the West Coast).
Has the client contacted Level3's NOC? That would seem to
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I would like to post it here to solicit feedback on it. Feel free to use it
to tell your vendor account teams you want this if you feel it useful. I've
already sent it to one vendor.
Ethernet/Serial/USB management is useful, but I would not be in
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, fredrik danerklint wrote:
From the article:
Faced with the shortage of IPv4 addresses and the failure of IPv6 to take
off, British ISP PlusNet is testing carrier-grade network address translation
CG-NAT, where potentially all the ISP's customers could be sharing one IP
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Joe Loiacono wrote:
Tim Calvin tcal...@tlsn.net wrote on 01/16/2013 05:51:11 PM:
PowerEdge R610 -
2x Intel E5540, 2.53GHz Quad Core Processor
32GB RAM
2x 300gb 10k 2.5 SAS HDD
Since netflow processing is generally I/O bound, you may want to invest in
15K
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Doug Barton wrote:
On 1/28/2013 7:27 AM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
- configure IPv6 firewall rules (mostly a mirror of the IPv4 rulesets)
Hopefully that did not included filtering ICMPv6? :)
The level of IPv6 support in firewalls has been all over the place, even
from
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Christopher Rogers wrote:
Does anyone have any sort of performance numbers for the jnpr MX10 series
running dual stack ipv4/ipv6? I'm specifically interested in how many BGP
prefixes it can handle in dual stacked mode. I've got an environment
currently taking 4 full ipv4
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, David Barak wrote:
Comcast removed the no IPv6 excuse? That removal somehow skipped my
house in Washington DC where they installed (last October) a router
which does not even support it (an Arrus voice gateway- the one where
you can#39;t turn of the crummy 2.4g wireless
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, David Barak wrote:
On Jan 30, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
The update you sent is lovely, except I can tell you that the one (also
an Arris, running DOCSIS 3.0) which was installed in late October in my
house in Washington simply does not run v6
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Ray Wong wrote:
My impression is mostly that people are left feeling uncomfortable by
a massive upgrade of this sort with so little communication about why
and so on. Emergency work for five hours and 30 minutes
disconnection that turns out to take longer than 30 minutes of
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, George Herbert wrote:
Our Visio guy's opinion concurred with mine; it's custom drawing, not
off-the-shelf capability, and would most likely have been in a
graphics program (though he thinks it might have been possible with
Visio, it would have been much easier in for
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
Would it be the ONT ? (since beyond the ONT, the end user has no ability
to test the line).
I would tend to think the ONT is treated as the demarc point. Most
carriers I've seen treat them as the optical equivalent of copper NIDs or
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
I am having some speedtest results that are difficult to interpret.
Some of my customers have begun complaining that they are not getting the
proper speeds. They are using speedtest.net and/or speakeasy.net to test
the results.
Take the speedtest
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013, Derek Ivey wrote:
It would be nice to get an update from them regarding their IPv6 plans. Their
IPv6 support page still says they will start deploying 3Q12 :(.
I've been trying to get some information from internal contacts, but so
far, no go.
jms
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
http://www22.verizon.com/Support/Residential/Internet/HighSpeed/General+Support/Top+Questions/QuestionsOne/ATLAS8742.htm
One minor typo in this one, that I've emailed Verizon's webmasters about
in the past.
A /56 does not give you 56 LANs...
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Derek Ivey wrote:
Thanks for all the hard work getting IPv6 deployed! I signed my company up
for the trials. Can't wait to test it out :).
I agree, I wish Verizon would wake up and announce something. It's pretty sad
that their IPv6 support page still says 3Q12 and
Google and gmail look fine from here (University of Pittsburgh)... no
loss, ~30ms RTT, reachable through TransitRail.
I'm guessing whatever the issue is has been resolved, or the storm has
passed?
jms
On Thu, 14 May 2009, and...@arsenaleartisans.com wrote:
Sessions time out or fail from
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Justin Shore wrote:
Every time we tried to take this position we got the same old line of
we've got everything in the path configured correctly; you'll get the
full 200Mbps to which I'd reply with a reminder that we got the same
assurance when we turned up the 100Mbps with
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Charles Mills wrote:
Trying to sort through the marketecture and salesman speak and get a
definitive answer.
I figure the NANOGers would be able to give me some input.
Is XO Communications a Tier 1 ISP?
Do the best of my knowledge, no. The definition of 'Tier 1' is
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Joe Provo wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:30:47AM -0400, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
1. The provider does not buy IP transit from anyone - all traffic is moved
on settlement-free public or private interconnects. That's not to say
that the provider doesn't buy non-IP
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, h...@efes.iucc.ac.il wrote:
a) they were smoking something and indeed decided to use EIGRP rather than
BGP.
b) they were testing out 4 byte ASNs and had a software issue in their IOS
c) someone in Cisco wanted to download a new IOS and got frustrated with
their new site so
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Leland Vandervort wrote:
Would anyone happen to have an operations contact at Facebook by
anychance? Our systems are being overwhelmed by a facebook application
that we were neither aware of nor condoned.
You might be able to reach the right people at o...@facebook.com
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Jason Bertoch wrote:
We're considering adding a Verizon connection to our network in Florida, so
I've been looking unsuccessfully for a map of Verizon's fiber network in the
southeast to verify that I'll have diverse paths with my other providers.
Does anyone know if such
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Jay Nakamura wrote:
Looking for input on Alcatel-Lucent VPN Firewall Brick. I can look up
spec and other published information but, as always, the devil is in
the detail and you just never know what wall you run into until you
actually try it so I wanted to see if anyone
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Justin M. Streiner
strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Jay Nakamura wrote:
Looking for input on Alcatel-Lucent VPN Firewall Brick. I can look up
spec and other published information
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Jerry Dixon wrote:
The Federal Communications Commission Wednesday will lay out the case for
expanding broadband Internet service, outlining current obstacles to making
it widely available. The agency is considering whether to force Internet
providers to share their
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
The problem we ran across is that ISP in US does not wish to accept
prefixes longer then /48 from us.
Need your advice: is this normal to distribute /48 by /56 parts across
locations or should we obtain separate /48 for each of them? Or maybe
we need
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote:
case 2: extranet like multiple POPs interconnected with VPNs
- get greater then /48 block (like /44) so each POP gets its /48 part
- each POP announces its corresponding /48 prefix to their local ISPs
- decide if you wish that traffic from Internet to
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Gary Steers wrote:
Is anyone else having major issue's tonight/this morning?
We our having issue's and our upstream provider is reporting route
flaps, the say its affecting quite a few networks but just checking if
anyone else is having issue's???
You'll generally get
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Sam (Walter) Gailey wrote:
My question is this; Is there an appropriate standard to specify for
fiber-optic cabling that if it is followed the fiber will be installed
correctly? Would specifying TIA/EIA 568-C.3, for example, be correct?
I'm envisioning something like;
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Bielawa, Daniel Walter wrote:
My team is in the process of putting some documentation
together to justify a bandwidth upgrade. I am asking if you would be
willing to reply back to me, with how you decide that it is time to
upgrade your bandwidth. On-line or
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Leo Bicknell wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:04:23PM -0500, Michael R. Wayne
wrote:
After negotiating with multiple prospective buyers, Cerner Corp.
agreed to buy the Internet addresses for $12 each. Other bids were
as low as $1.50 each,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011, David Radcliffe wrote:
I do have to say to anyone planning to work from home, make sure you have a
proper work space. I have a computer room. It contains a dozen systems,
electronics gear and parts (I used to have time for that hobby), and
comfortable and ergonomic work
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Jared Mauch wrote:
I recall some bay networks gear you could only program with the proper OID
as the cli was basically a SNMP-SET operation on the device.
The mere mention of Bay Networks and Site Manager (read: Site Mangler or
Site Damager) is enough to get my blood
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Holmes,David A wrote:
Some firewall vendors are proposing to collapse all Internet edge
functions into a single device (border router, firewall, IPS, caching
engine, proxy, etc.). A general Internet edge design principle has been
the defense in depth concept. Is anyone
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Randy Carpenter wrote:
Tried that. I agree with others that it is an NDP issue. NDP for the
GUA is fine, but just not for the link local. Is there something that
would block only link local by default?
Do you have any possibly-overly-strict firewall filters applied to the
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On a personal note , it is one of my least favorite terms because it is
overused and generally used by people selling things, and defense in depth
means throw eveything and the kitchen sink at the problem instead of
matching threats / risks /
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Matt Taylor wrote:
On 14/12/2011 2:13 PM, IPv4 Brokers wrote:
We are paying up-front (or escrow) for the use of networks that are not
used. The networks are used for honeypots and other research.
The networks may be used for a month or longer, you are paid an agreed
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Leigh Porter wrote:
I love the anti v6 stuff on some of their sites!
http://www.iptrading.com/news/news.htm
Some of which seems to float between fear-mongering, possibly
mis-appropriated quotes, half-truths and information that is flat-out
wrong. I would not trust the
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Holmes,David A wrote:
From time to time some have posted questions asking if BGP load
balancers such as the old Routescience Pathcontrol device are still
around, and if not what have others found to replace that function. I
have used the Routescience device with much
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Keegan Holley wrote:
inappropriate. We are attempting to use Juniper single-mode SFPs (LX
variety) across multi-mode fiber. Standard listed distance is always
for SFPs using the appropriate type of fiber. Does anyone out there
know how much distance we are likely to get?
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Keegan Holley wrote:
2011/12/14 oliver rothschild orothsch...@gmail.com
How did you end up with a MM run this long? SX optics are only rated at
500 meters at best. Even with mode conditioning jumpers more the 1km is a
risk. I'm glad it held up during testing though.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, David Conrad wrote:
I'm confused. When justifying 'need' in an address allocation request,
what difference does it make whether an address in use was allocated by
an RIR or was squatted upon? Last I heard, renumbering out of (say) RFC
1918 space into public space was
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Glen Kent wrote:
In the service provider networks, would we usually see a large number
of /128 prefixs in the v6 FIB tables?
If you have /128s on the loopbacks of your routers, your other routers
could learn the /128s for the loopbacks of your other routers
through your
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Joe Loiacono wrote:
Is a good knowledge of either origin-AS, or next-AS with respect to flows
valuable in establishing, monitoring, or re-enforcing a security posture?
In what ways?
If I'm understanding your question correctly, I think it can be helpful,
to a degree.
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Deric Kwok wrote:
When we get newip, we should let the upstream know to expor it as
there should have rule in their side.
Correct. Ideally, two things happen:
1. You tell your upstreams and peers about the new space, and they update
whatever prefix filters they have in
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Philip Dorr wrote:
But the TV should only be receiving one stream at a time, unless there
is pip. Each stream would probably be around 5mbps.
If multicast is used it shouldn't take 150pbps, it should be much lower.
That could be one of the things that helps spur v6
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul Kaminsky wrote:
We are at a stage where we need an all-out uplink vendor to fuel our business
endeavor. The bells and whistles we need are:
1. 1 Gbps link with complete block of UDP/ICMP protocol
2. BGP session with our AS
3. Ability to blackhole (no route to host)
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 08:01:58AM -0500, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012, Paul Kaminsky wrote:
1. 1 Gbps link with complete block of UDP/ICMP protocol
One question:
1. Not knowing anything about your business
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, Ted Fischer wrote:
Thanks for the replies so far, but not what I was looking for.
I should have specified that I've done several ns dig lookups just to
make sure.
We were supposed to have lit up the last of IPv4 last year. I would have
presumed that meant that there was
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012, Rhys Rhaven wrote:
Is full disclosure expected on NANOG, or is it just polite? Like
mentioning that Chuck Reynolds is a salesman for QualiSystems, and not
just another network operator passing on what they might think will help?
I think it's reasonable to expect that
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Deric Kwok wrote:
Could you tell me more about routing registries?
I would like to learn it
In a nutshell, Internet Routing Registries (IRRs) are places where
networks can store information that describes their routing policies.
Other networks can query this information
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
My question is when is FiOS going to get v6 natively? could we get the
engineers there to actually do something as opposed to trials of
non-production systems that'll never actually get deployed? :)
I wonder when Comcast and Verizon will get into
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Joel jaeggli wrote:
On 1/18/12 15:56 , Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
I wonder when Comcast and Verizon will get into an IPv6 advertising war.
v6... smhee-6! Ditch that cable modem and switch to Fios!
LTE has V6 natively
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Eric C. Miller wrote:
I'm looking for a best practice sort of answer, plus maybe comments on
why your network may or may not follow this.
First, when running a small ISP with about the equivilent of a /18 or
/19 in different blocks, how should you decide what should be
Is anyone using ULA (RFC 4193) address space for v6 infrastructure that
does not need to be exposed to the outside world? I understand the
concept of having fc00::/8 being doled out by the RIRs never went
anywhere, and using space out of fd00::/8 can be a bit of a crap-shoot
because of the
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Ray Soucy wrote:
We've used RFC1918 space for years (without NAT) for non-routed device
management (switches, printers, IP phones, etc).
And we've done the same.
The idea behind the random bits was to avoid conflicts should organizations
making use of ULA merge.
I'm
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Dale W. Carder wrote:
We have one customer in particular with a substantial non-publicly
reachable v6 deployment with globally assigned addresses. I believe
there is no need to replicate the headaches of rfc1918 in the next
address-family eternity.
The one big issue I
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Tei wrote:
Can internet in USA support that? Call of Duty 15 releases may 2014
and 30 million gamers start downloading a 20 GB files. Would the
internet collapse like a house of cards?.
I don't see a problem with supporting this. As other posters have said,
any
1 - 100 of 383 matches
Mail list logo
