On 9/12/2013 3:25 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:
Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected.
A small choice of attitude-reflecting language.
I expect 100.000%
I'll accept 99.999% or better.
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
On 9/8/2013 2:38 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
Hi Matthew
Interesting experience.
first into a black hole, and then bouncing with permanent failures.
What you mean by permanent failures? Can you share error you saw in bounce
report?
RFC 2505 Anti-Spam Recommendations
On 9/6/2013 5:23 AM, Bryan Tong wrote:
That and ignoring it will only continue to affect the code/silicon arena.
Social problems are always affected by who throws the biggest fit.
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
We engineers built the Internet – and now we
On 9/6/2013 8:08 AM, John Peach wrote:
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 07:46:59 -0500 Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/05/government-betrayed-internet-nsa-spying
The US government has betrayed the Internet. We need to take it back
Who is we
I have to ask--
On 8/28/2013 6:49 PM, Eric wrote:
There's also the bug RE data center
Really. Now a feature?
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57598978-93/google-outage-reportedly-caused-big-drop-in-global-traffic/
How big is the Internet?
Depends in whether Google is up or not?
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System
On 8/20/2013 12:29 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
I'm curious; do people really think that the difference in material
indexed between Google, Yahoo/Bing, and others is really that
big? I don't mean the heuristics and algorithms used to return
the results in a particularly useful order; I mean the
On 8/15/2013 9:05 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
On Aug 14, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net
wrote:
Once you define what you mean by how bit is the Internet, I'll be
happy to spout off about how big it is. :)
Arbitrary definition time: A Internet host is one that can send and
On 8/15/2013 8:53 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
On 2013-08-15 19:00, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Is anyone here stupid enough not to put the management interfaces
behind a firewall/VPN?
---
Pain is a great teacher...
The problem is getting the one that
On 8/14/2013 10:31 AM, Anthony Williams wrote:
One segment is the number of people on the planet with a mobile device
that can connect to the Internet? Throw in laptops, workstations,
servers, routers, toasters, etc and the number starts to get pretty big.
The NSA will need some more hard
On 8/14/2013 1:29 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
To paraphrase Douglas Adams...
The Internet is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly,
hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way
down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space!
It occurred
On 8/14/2013 8:24 PM, Zachary McGibbon wrote:
I noticed my bandwidth graphs were a little out of whack tonight and after
much digging through pcap files I found that my chrome tab with 'cnn.com'
had a live stream of cnn playing on the right side halfway down.
It seems this started around 8am
On 8/7/2013 2:58 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 03:07:04 -0700, Paul Ferguson said:
Having said that, there are quite a few documented cases of it being
done intentionally, and for nefarious purposes.
Do I need ECC on my brain to stop the bitrot, or was there a
On 8/4/2013 11:13 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
I got hit the same.
me too. e, me two.
No clues as to what the messages were that I could see.
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi
On 7/31/2013 4:29 PM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
It works better to fix the design issues than to play whack a mole
by blocking every imaginable service to your customers that responds
to the public with data larger than a FIN. Like getting their
providers to more proactively police their spew,
On 7/20/2013 11:26 PM, Yang Yu wrote:
It appears AS3549 is announcing 10.0.0.0/8. I noticed it from an
AS3549 customer.
I wonder why people don't drop any update that contains stuff like RFC
1918 space.
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
On 7/11/2013 10:32 AM, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
It all depends on the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow, and
varies if it is African or Eurpoean.
In all seriousness, you need to know the speed and latency of the link
before that question can be answered.
At 10:04 AM 11/07/2013, Luan
On 7/11/2013 11:41 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
If the definition of FQDN in some RFCs (Informational or not)
always included the trailing dot, I'd be inclined to agree with you.
But that's not the case, so protocol slots have been established for
FQDNs that are actually domains qualified relative
On 7/9/2013 10:28 PM, Erik Levinson wrote:
As some may know, yesterday 151 Front St suffered a cooling failure
after Enwave's facilities were flooded.
One of the suites that we're in recovered quickly but the other took
much longer and some of our gear shutdown automatically due to
overheating.
On 7/4/2013 8:02 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
And this was true when the v6 and DEC requirements entered the DAG?
OK, I 'fess to terminal stupidity--in this contest: DEC? the DAG?
Why are the people who don't follow the shitty process so full of
confidence they have all the clue
On 7/2/2013 6:30 PM, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
So I've got a bunch of Ciena 6200 kit in, with some of their professional
services folks onsite, helping with the initial setup. I know nothing of this
kit, other than from what I'm being told, it's pretty bleeding edge, so much so
that not even many
Makes me wonder if concern for routing table size is worrying about the
right thing.
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
On 7/2/2013 11:39 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net
wrote:
Makes me wonder if concern for routing table size is worrying about
the right thing.
Because obviously, the problems of scaling router memory and scaling
DNS servers
On 6/27/2013 10:00 PM, Mark Jeftovic wrote:
As per our post:
http://blog.easydns.org/2013/06/27/dnsresolvers-open-resolvers-will-be-shut-down/
The DNSResolvers.com free and open public resolvers will be shut down,
imminently (like tonight, if we get DDoS-ed against them again).
We'll keep
On 6/25/2013 9:52 AM, Anthony Williams wrote:
Also a Usenet posting (who still uses that, right?) to
comp.protocols.time.ntp will also help get the word out.
There is a fair amount of on-topic traffic of recent vintage on that froup.
What is it about people that makes them free-load on
On 6/23/2013 9:18 PM, Glen Turner wrote:
On 23/06/2013, at 1:21 PM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
What security protocols are folks using to protect SONET/SDH? At
what speeds?
Excuse me NSA, can I have export approval for one KG-530 SDH
encryptor? What are the odds :-)
And how would we
On 7/19/2010 17:21, Joe Hamelin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
..in other news (that seems to have attracted little attention)...
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2010/07/73000-blogs-shu.html
73000 Internet sites where shutdown
On 7/19/2010 17:36, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
None of this is going to help configure any routers.
Yeah. We gotta configure routers. Why do I keep hearing a phone ring
and ring and ring?
On 7/15/2010 11:39, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:33 PM, Joe Greco wrote:
Provided with a counterexample where this isn't true, you simply ignore it.
I've yet to see a counterexample involving a software-based edge router in a
realistic testbed environment being
Oops--itch trigger finger
[a round of the on-going and growing tedious micturation tournament]
Is this squalling fest really more operational than a conversation
dealing with a disabling spam attack?
Really?
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on
On 7/8/2010 09:59, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I think that there needs to be a balance.
I think it needs to be the purview of the custodian of the facility.
Not some political wonk.
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom
On 7/3/2010 18:32, Scott Berkman wrote:
I really wouldn't use the word legacy to describe SONET and OC-3's.
The word legacy is applied to any product that has actually shipped
On 7/2/2010 07:28, William Hamilton wrote:
On 02/07/2010 13:20, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
At the very bottom of each message, you will see
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
If you go there, you can unsubscribe.
Regards
Marshall
Was it really necessary to quote the
On 7/1/2010 00:43, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Jul 1, 2010, at 1:41 AM, Michael Painter wrote:
As randy said not too long ago, First they came for...
The felons?
Strangely, I am not moved to defend them.
+1
According to the article, they didn't even take the physical
computers
On 7/1/2010 08:45, Franck Martin wrote:
This is all political, and not suitable for nanog, but it opens a can of
worms...
If NANOG is truly about Operations and not just BGP knob twiddling and
searches for free service, it would be well to recognize at long last
that the world we operate in
On 7/1/2010 18:14, Matthew Walster wrote:
On 1 July 2010 23:17, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
In 1996 a certain inventor of the Internet decided that the universal
service fund needed to pay for PCs in rural schools (the E-Rate
program) instead of improving rural communications...
As
On 6/29/2010 09:17, Lamar Owen wrote:
On Monday, June 28, 2010 06:50:10 pm Randy Bush wrote:
you are comparing LAN to WAN, never a bright idea
Even ATM years ago blurred that arbitrary line.
Why does there even need to be a line between local and wide in terms of
networking?
As with
On 6/19/2010 17:46, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
[Tomas L. Byrnes] The issue is more that everyone who DOES have access
has more than one device, and that many of those devices move around. I
won't get into the NAT breaks the Internet war, but it certainly does
limit the type of applications you
On 7/17/2010 23:59, Larry Sheldon wrote:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/new-bill-gives-obama-kill-switch-to-shut-down-the-internet.html
Highlights:
The federal government would have “absolute power” to shut down the
Internet ... figurative “kill switch” to seize control of the world wide
web
On 6/18/2010 00:16, Tom Wright wrote:
What ever happened to this?
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3271.txt
Every thing in that RFC from enabling freedom of speech to high volumes
of untaxed dollars is anathema to the current administration.
And yeah, that is politics and not BGP fine tuning.
But
On 6/13/2010 07:50, Owen DeLong wrote:
Generally speaking, it will be treated as damage and routed around.
Nothing to see here. Move along. Nothing to worry about. Have a nice day.
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom
On 6/13/2010 08:47, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 00:21:49 CDT, Larry Sheldon said:
For example--what happens when name-service information for a part that
is not shutdown comes from a part that is?
It's always been a BCP good idea to have your DNS have secondaries
As so often happens, I forgot to note what my client picked up for a
return address. This is the first of several items that I meant to send
to the list.
My apologies to Mr Greco.
On 6/13/2010 14:17, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 6/13/2010 14:07, Joe Greco wrote:
On 6/13/2010 08:47, valdis.kletni
On 6/13/2010 14:59, Joe Greco wrote:
What happens? The master zone simply doesn't get updated until someone
FedEx's a floppy. You know, some of us made these sorts of contingency
plans long ago, back in days when the Internet actually wasn't all that
reliable, and it wasn't completely
On 6/13/2010 14:59, Joe Greco wrote:
How about the case where the master zone file has be amputated and the
secondaries can no longer get updates?
Mea culpa.
That was suppose to say How about the case where the master zone file
has beEN amputated and the secondaries can no longer get updates?
On 6/13/2010 14:59, Joe Greco wrote:
Yes, but unreachability is basically only a problem for those who have
failed to design and plan for it. You can engineer for unreachability.
You're a lot more screwed if we start talking about government mandates
and the contents of your zone.
I meant
On 6/13/2010 15:54, Joe Greco wrote:
If we want to be pedantic, Sony this year announced that it is shutting
down its production of floppy disks by next year. Of course, the choice
of floppy disk is irrelevant, and I'm guessing you know it. If your
devices are more comfortable with CD-ROM
On 6/13/2010 18:09, Brett Frankenberger wrote:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:23:06PM -0500, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 6/13/2010 14:59, Joe Greco wrote:
How about the case where the master zone file has be amputated and the
secondaries can no longer get updates?
Mea culpa.
That was suppose
On 6/13/2010 20:21, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Paul Baran's rand paper was on survivable networks. The arpanet was not
that network.
I worry now if it will survive the people that operate it.
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
http://volokh.com/2010/06/13/32843/
What happens when the US shuts down part of its part?
Depends on what part it shut down, of course.
But what are the available boundaries for the parts in question?
Will that have to change?
For example--what happens when name-service information for a part
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/06/homeland-securitys-cyber-bill-would-codify-executive-emergency-powers/57946/
http://tinyurl.com/2gyezyg
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional
On 6/9/2010 01:11, JC Dill wrote:
Owen DeLong wrote:
Heck, at this point, I'd be OK with it being a regulatory issue.
What entity do you see as having any possibility of effective regulatory
control over the internet?
Doesn't matter as long as it enables radial outbound finger pointing.
On 6/9/2010 01:14, Paul Ferguson wrote:
To cut through the noise and non-relevant discussion, let's see if we can
boil this down to a couple of issues:
If I may offer a few edits and comments .
1. Should ISPs be responsible for abuse from within their customer base?
1. Should ISPs be
On 6/9/2010 06:11, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:11 PM, JC Dill wrote:
Owen DeLong wrote:
Heck, at this point, I'd be OK with it being a regulatory issue.
What entity do you see as having any possibility of effective regulatory
control over the internet?
The reason we
On 6/9/2010 06:14, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To cut through the noise and non-relevant discussion, let's see if we can
boil this down to a couple of issues:
1. Should ISPs be responsible for abuse
On 6/9/2010 07:39, Jorge Amodio wrote:
1. Should ISPs be responsible for abuse from within their customer base?
Not sure, ISPs role is just to move packets from A to B, you need to
clearly define what constitutes abuse and how much of it is considered
a crime.
If I call your home every
On 6/9/2010 07:39, Jorge Amodio wrote:
1. Should ISPs be responsible for abuse from within their customer base?
Not sure, ISPs role is just to move packets from A to B, you need to
clearly define what constitutes abuse and how much of it is considered
a crime.
If I call your home every
On 6/9/2010 08:05, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, JC Dill jcdill.li...@gmail.com said:
I'm still truly amazed that no one has sic'd a lawyer on Microsoft for
creating an attractive nuisance - an operating system that is too
easily hacked and used to attack innocent victims, and where
On 6/9/2010 08:08, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Alexander Harrowell a.harrow...@gmail.com said:
No, but we can and do require cars to have functional brakes and minimum
tread depths, and to be tested periodically.
Not in this state.
You might not have the state inspection rip-off,
On 6/9/2010 08:09, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jorge Amodio jmamo...@gmail.com said:
That's why at least in the US by *regulation* you must have insurance
to be able to operate a car, instead of mitigating the safety issues
that represents a teenager texting while driving we deal with
On 6/9/2010 08:21, Joe Greco wrote:
Your car emits lots of greenhouse gases. Just because it's /less/ doesn't
change the fact that the Prius has an ICE. We have a Prius and a HiHy too.
Did Godwin say anything about rand discussions degenerating to
mythologies like gorebull warming?
--
On 6/9/2010 10:58, Owen DeLong wrote:
What happened to the acronyms AUP and TOS?
I'm not sure what you mean by that. I'm talking about an ISPs liability to
third party victims, not to their customers.
Acceptable Use Policy and Terms of Service
AUP/TOS are between the ISP and their
On 6/9/2010 12:17, Joe Greco wrote:
What I don't want to see which you are advocating... I don't want to see
the end users who do take responsibility, drive well designed vehicles
with proper seat belts and safety equipment, stay in their lane, and
do not cause accidents held liable for the
On 6/9/2010 13:35, JC Dill wrote:
IMHO it is impossible to regulate the internet as a whole.
Exactly so.
That is precisely why you don't want somebody else to attempt it.
The only hope is for everybody to take personal responsibility for their
little piece of it.
--
Somebody should have
On 6/9/2010 14:37, Karl Auer wrote:
[good stuff]
Try thinking about what *could* happen rather than what *can't* happen.
Even better: Think here is what I can do. And then do it.
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom
On 6/9/2010 15:56, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jun 9, 2010, at 8:26 AM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
On 6/9/10 6:27 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
Going back then to a previous question, do we want more/any regulation ?
Laws and regulation exist because people can't behave civilly and be
expected to respect
On 6/9/2010 18:04, Joe Greco wrote:
On 6/9/2010 14:37, Karl Auer wrote:
[good stuff]
Try thinking about what *could* happen rather than what *can't* happen.
Even better: Think here is what I can do. And then do it.
Some of us already do:
Implement BCP38
Implement spam scanning for
On 6/8/2010 15:44, J. Oquendo wrote:
Brielle Bruns wrote:
Problem is, there's no financial penalties for providers who ignore
abuse coming from their network.
DNSbl lists work only because after a while, providers can't ignore
their customer complaints and exodus when they dig deep into the
Lots of finger pointing.
Lots of discussion about who should pay, and so forth.
How about we just take responsibility for our own part. Don't malicious
traffic in or out.?
If it can't move, it will die.
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have
On 6/8/2010 23:22, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Again, you can all continue to dance around and ignore the problem chance
the probability that the U.S. Government will step in and force you to do
it.
Pick your poison.
Or the world government will (note misspelled NATO in the Subject:).
--
On 5/28/2010 07:37, Mark Hermsdorfer wrote:
Having said that, If the JunOS based SRX platform does not do session
tracking in the same was as the SSG platform it would seem that the most
reasonable solution would be to NAT the traffic as has already been pointed
out.
Gonna really highlight
On 5/27/2010 06:10, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/05/27/internet.crunch.2012/index.html?hpt=T2
I am guessing that once the Obama Administration has taken control of
this public utility, all of the problems will be resolved.
I for one will be afraid to use it.
--
Somebody
On 5/27/2010 06:40, Eric Van Tol wrote:
In other news, I understand that the Americans have won their
independence .
Have we?
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb
On 5/27/2010 07:07, James Bensley wrote:
Disgraceful scaremongery, CCN should be ashamed.
CNN too. Does anybody take them seriously? Watch them?
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional republic is a
On 5/27/2010 07:30, Charles Bronson wrote:
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 07:10:54 -0400 From: Dorn Hetzel
dhet...@gmail.com Subject: thoughts? To: nanog@nanog.org
Message-ID:
aanlktinafob1k2nxycwmh7o6ni0ffouckcdfwon0j...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 5/27/2010 10:48, Tim Franklin wrote:
Internet and phone connections across Britain could go into meltdown
as BT workers threaten their first national strike for 23 years...
‘Many business and residential phonelines could go out of action, and
if broadband crashes then thousands and
We are missing the point.
The Administration will, as it has so ably done in the Carbon Dioxide
emergency, declare the the IP layer a hazardous zone and institute taxes
to make the costs skyrocket, thereby reducing usage.
[Note to list nannies: I know. I had stopped. I let several beautiful
On 5/27/2010 19:38, Ken Gilmour wrote:
Wow, very fast responses, Thanks Larry Sheldon and Ricardo Tavares!
On 27 May 2010 18:07, Ricardo Tavares curu...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure if I correctly undestand you but default route its the route
that the packet must follow if it do not have
On 5/14/2010 19:00, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 5/14/2010 16:42, Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
We had a lightning strike nearby yesterday that looks to have come
inside our facility via a feeder circuit that goes outdoors
underground to our facility's gate.
Perhaps there was a move of the earth-level
On 5/13/2010 10:36, Caleb Tennis wrote:
We had a lightning strike nearby yesterday that looks to have come inside our
facility via a feeder circuit that goes outdoors underground to our
facility's gate.
What's interesting is that various POE switches throughout the entire
building
On 5/9/2010 23:17, Scott Howard wrote:
Made it to Slashdot too -
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/05/10/0056228/The-Status-of-Routing-Reform-mdash-How-Fragile-is-the-Internet
As usual I wouldn't recommend reading the comments unless you want your eyes
to bleed...
I go back a step or two--I
On 5/10/2010 15:31, Anton Kapela wrote:
On May 9, 2010, at 11:39 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://skunkpost.com/news.sp?newsId=2327
Just how fragile is the internet?
Rhetoric, much?
Interestingly, the article misses interception and other non-outage
potentials due to (sub) prefix
On 5/10/2010 17:04, Randy Bush wrote:
Interestingly, the article misses interception and other non-outage
potentials due to (sub) prefix hijacking.
you seem to be entering the world of attacks. the AP article's point
was fat fingers.
Interesting. I took it as a set up of why we NEED a
On 5/9/2010 08:32, Steven Bellovin wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/05/08/business/AP-US-TEC-Fragile-Internet.html
It's a pretty reasonable article, too, though I don't know that I
agree about the simplicity of the routing system
I worry about the implications in the article
[The wonderful New And Improved Thunderbird deleted a response and the
message I was responding to--I don't know how or why--seems to have to
do with the arrival of new messages.]
The message I was responding-to seemed to be a rant that the reason Area
Code changes are (were) a hassle was due to
On 5/9/2010 12:50, Larry Sheldon wrote:
[The wonderful New And Improved Thunderbird deleted a response and the
message I was responding to--I don't know how or why--seems to have to
do with the arrival of new messages.]
The message I was responding-to seemed to be a rant that the reason Area
On 5/8/2010 07:36, Phil Regnauld wrote:
Neil Harris (neil) writes:
To fix it, the .eg / .xn--4gbrim TLD registrar needs to contact the
Mozilla Foundation in order to inform the Foundation of their
official IDN name allocation policy, so that the native-script URL
display can then be switched
On 4/28/2010 02:29, Tony Finch wrote:
Bloom filters work that way.
I charge the time to order, index, hash the key space so that can work.
I don't know what a fair distribution of that cost would be.
Tony (on his iPod).
Larry on his.oh, who cares?
--
Somebody should have said:
A
Looking for a sales contact for Comcast enterprise/carrier services for
there Ethernet product thanks.
there as contrasted with here? I don't understand.
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
Freedom under a constitutional
On 4/27/2010 19:50, Richard Barnes wrote:
Naïve question: If you used macro expansion, wouldn't you end up
providing responses for a lot of addresses that aren't in use? Maybe
that's not a problem?
If you get a request, you will have to respond in any case.
I have a theory about data-base
On 4/27/2010 20:25, Richard Barnes wrote:
off-topic
IANADBExpert
Interesting theory, but seems kind of wrong. Wouldn't the time to
look up or fail be tied to the complexity of how the key space is
populated? In any case, it seems like the time to succeed or fail
will usually be about the
On 4/27/2010 20:28, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/27/2010 20:25, Richard Barnes wrote:
off-topic
IANADBExpert
Interesting theory, but seems kind of wrong. Wouldn't the time to
look up or fail be tied to the complexity of how the key space is
populated? In any case, it seems like the time
On 4/25/2010 10:17, Tony Hoyle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2010 03:01, Mark Smith wrote:
I'm a typical, fairly near future residential customer. I have a NAS
that I have movies stored on. My ISP delegates an IPv6 prefix to me with
a preferred lifetime of
On 4/25/2010 15:27, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
- Dynamic addresses is a way to differentiate residential customers
(who pay less) from business customers (who pay more).
Which is both specious and obnoxious.
It is a business choice, which you may or may not agree with.
Given a choice
On 4/25/2010 18:33, Tony Hoyle wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/04/2010 22:06, Larry Sheldon wrote:
The whole idea that DHCP should only be used for (and is absolute proof
of the status of) despised-class customers is just nuts.
I've never seen DHCP used
On 4/24/2010 14:07, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
The patent which bears her and George Antheil's name is by no means (and
about 30 years) the earliest example of this technology.
Few patents are. I can't think of a one, but I suppose there must be
one containing no prior art at all.
Does a movie star
On 4/23/2010 01:50, Steve Bertrand wrote:
This is a no-brainer, because I know that everyone who reads this will
visit the link. All I request is an off-list message stating if you
could get there or not (it won't be possible to parse my weblogs for
those who can't):
http://onlyv6.com
On 4/23/2010 02:35, Larry Sheldon wrote:
From my PC at home (Cox in Omaha) I can't even get a nameserver that
knows the site.
I should point out that I am really stupid about v6--I don't know if I
should be able to find a nameserver or not.
--
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two
On 4/23/2010 02:57, Steve Bertrand wrote:
On 2010.04.23 03:39, Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/23/2010 02:35, Larry Sheldon wrote:
From my PC at home (Cox in Omaha) I can't even get a nameserver that
knows the site.
I should point out that I am really stupid about v6--I don't know if I
should
On 4/23/2010 03:00, Franck Martin wrote:
Go get an airport express, install it get your Internet then click
ipv6 enable box and that's it. Seriously!
OK--I'll but that on the shopping list. (I'll also look around for
something for the wired machinery as well.
--
Somebody should have said:
301 - 400 of 532 matches
Mail list logo
