Re: Where to buy Internet IP addresses

to be able to reach it from the internet. this is for testing and development purposes and will expect several servers on Load-balancer. The 5 static IP addresses just won't be enough. Thanks in advance Louis -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/2...@fido)

Re: Level3/GTEI well-known DNS down?

://4.2.2.1, 4.2.2.2 http://4.2.2.2? Suddenly started getting no responses from them for a couple of our side apps. I hope these servers stick around forever, they're kind of an Internet legend. Cheers, Randal -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/[EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [NANOG] Unique v6 (video) content

___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman

Re: So why don't US citizens get this?

in this technology and business, please, contact me off-list. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: https://asahi-net.jp/en/service/ftth.html -- hmm?br -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/[EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Internet Traffic Begins to Bypass the U.S.

around the world is cheaper in most cases. -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/[EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: A case against vendor-locking optical modules

Hello, TheWorldMainBusinessRule says: Don't work with morons!!! Never. In any way. Even if it seems for the first look they give you prices and offers times better than normal people. Just don't even think. :) On 17.11.14 20:11, Jérôme Nicolle wrote: Hello, I'm having a discussion with

Re: Anyone else having trouble reaching thepiratebay.se? AS39138

Work for me, but with awful trace. Is it possible to arrange the direct peering with AS39138? Please contact me off-list if there are admins of AS39138. On 26.11.14 19:41, Javier J wrote: Name: thepiratebay.se Address: 194.71.107.27 Its reachable from some places and not others. Is it

Google contact: apps vs IPv6 issue

Hello! Could someone advice a good contact inside Google? I'm operating a IPv6 tunnel broker http://tb.netassist.ua/ Now there are a number of complaints tunnel broker users can't access Google Apps with the reason We're sorry, but this service is not available in your country. IPv4 access to

Re: ASN Domain for rDNS

We use just .as domain, like our 29632.as ;) On 10.12.14 02:30, Keefe John wrote: I've been seeing more and more carriers(and even small ISPs) using as.net as their domain for rDNS on IP space. What are the pros and cons for doing this versus using your primary business domain name?

Re: Provider to Blend with Level3

Hi! If you have he.net there - it will be the best choise. On 06.02.15 19:26, Colton Conor wrote: We have a network that is single homed with Level3 at this time in Dallas. They already have BGP and their own ASN and IP setup. Who would you recommend for a second provider in Dallas to blend

Re: FTTx Active-Ethernet Hardware

We are using TP-LINK for ETTH, and it seems very good with a fair price. Only the problem is they like to make completely another device and sell it as the same part number but another hardware revision which is only written by small letters on the device itself. So you have to keep an eye on it.

Re: something strange about bgp community

Hi Song, that's normal. This is a signat to AS702 to do some special with this route when it will see this route. Community is transistive by its design, so you don't need to be directly connected to AS702 to send some signal to it. For example: you-AS101-AS102-AS103-target

Re: Peering and Network Cost

That's generally good idea, but average TCP session speed depends not only your side of connection, but another side as well. On 18.04.15 07:58, Mark Tinka wrote: On 17/Apr/15 15:05, Max Tulyev wrote: One more interesting thing. If you buy IP transit, mostly you are paying by exact

Re: Peering and Network Cost

Choose another IX to peer. Or even make your own ;) Kiev have 3 major IXes, and price is about $100 for 10GE port. On 19.04.15 12:23, Baldur Norddahl wrote: So why is IX peering so expensive? Again if I look at my local IX (dix.dk) they have about 40 networks connected. Each network pays

Re: Peering and Network Cost

Hi Roderick, transit cost is lowering close to peering cost, so it is doubghtful economy on small channels. If you don't live in Amsterdam/Frankfurt/London - add the DWDM cost from you to one of major IX. That's the magic. In large scale peering is still efficient. It is efficient on local

Re: Peering and Network Cost

-il.com - Original Message - From: Max Tulyev max...@netassist.ua To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:50:41 PM Subject: Re: Peering and Network Cost Hi Roderick, transit cost is lowering close to peering cost, so it is doubghtful economy on small

Re: Peering and Network Cost

, this mean if your customer download some file using IX way, speed will be much higher that same file reachable by IP transit. So more peerings your uplink use - better performance of your network connection you have ;) On 04/15/15 23:12, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: On 2015-04-15 19:50, Max Tulyev wrote

Re: Peering and Network Cost

actually using and not $/megabit of capacity. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net To: Max Tulyev max...@netassist.ua Cc: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 1

Re: Peering and Network Cost

For sure, that's the main reason of peering, not a cost saving ;) On 04/15/15 23:12, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: Please keep in mind that some companies peer despite it offers no savings for them and at the end of the day it might be even more expensive. They do it because of performance and

Re: Fixing Google geolocation screwups

We operate IPv6 tunnel broker tb.netassist.ua, so /48 from our /32 is spread all around the world. Google change geo of our WHOLE /32 from time to time to another cute random place ;) One time Google decided we are in IRAN and block a lot of content as not available in your country o_O

Re: Fixing Google geolocation screwups

On 04/08/15 14:56, Jeroen Massar wrote: That stated, properly providing a WHOIS entry for each prefix (inetnum/inet6num) is a good idea as that kind of indicates that that prefix is fixed in that location and not just moving around. [skip] Do make sure though that you do not show any foreign

Re: BGP offloading (fixing legacy router BGP scalability issues)

Hello! Very good idea is to sell that and change it to softrouter based on PC/Linux/BIRD. Config can work like 6500/SUP750 will cost much less than $1k. On 04/01/15 20:01, Frederik Kriewitz wrote: We're wondering if anyone has experience with such a setup?

Re: Low Cost 10G Router

Last config I touched: 2xIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz, 12 Gbit summary, 5% each core load. On 19.05.15 21:06, Piotr Iwanejko wrote: Wiadomość napisana przez Max Tulyev max...@netassist.ua w dniu 19 maj 2015, o godz. 19:58: We are using softrouters based on Supermicro chassis, E5v3

Re: Spamhaus BGP feed experiences?

How much false positives (i.e. blackholing traffic users want to reach)? On 18.05.15 21:04, Marco d'Itri wrote: On May 17, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: Any ISPs out there (big or small) ever used the Spamhaus BGP feed to prevent against botnet, spam, etc? If so, how has your

Re: Low Cost 10G Router

1.4Mpps now. On 19.05.15 21:32, Oleg A. Arkhangelsky wrote: 19.05.2015, 21:26, Max Tulyev max...@netassist.ua: Last config I touched: 2xIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz, 12 Gbit summary, 5% each core load. And what PPS rate (in+out)? -- wbr, Oleg. Anarchy is about taking

Re: Youtube / IPv6 / Netherlands

Hi, +1. Our 2a01:d0::/32 is floating by Google's geo all around the world, it was Iran, now it is Russia... and I can't do anything with it, and have no human contact in Google for complaint. On 25.06.15 15:33, Marco Davids wrote: Hi, Would anyone from Google care to explain to me off-list

Re: Anycast provider for SMTP?

I see no major problems to use anycast for that. The problem will be in rare case when particular routing chain from client to one of your servers will be changed until TCP stream is active. SMTP have short connections. Even if it happens, it will look as just broken connection for client, and

Re: BGP in the Washngton Post

Is there *IN THEIORY* any possibility to make BGP secure enough now? Yes, RPKI protects from fat fingered people, but NOT protects from people doing hijacks knowlingly. The global routing registry really can be the solution, but it automatically gives one authority a power to cut off any

Re: Low Cost 10G Router

We are using softrouters based on Supermicro chassis, E5v3 cpu, Linux/BIRD and Intel 10G NICs. And VERY happy. On 19.05.15 20:22, Colton Conor wrote: What options are available for a small, low cost router that has at least four 10G ports, and can handle full BGP routes? All that I know of are

Re: Peering + Transit Circuits

My solution is: 1. Don't care. 2. If some peer steal your transit, and it is noticeable amount of traffic causing some problems for you - investigate and terminate that peer. On 18.08.15 15:29, Tim Durack wrote: Question: What is the preferred practice for separating peering and transit

Re: BGP Update Report

Unassigned ASN is used and even is in top of the list? WTF?! On 25.07.15 01:00, cidr-rep...@potaroo.net wrote: Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 2 - AS22059 140461 3.6% 70230.5 -- -Reserved AS-,ZZ

Re: IPv6 Irony.

Well, especially our copmany hire admins already familiar with IPv6. But yes, some of our friends company had to upgrade admins too. On 13.10.15 13:22, Stephen Satchell wrote: > On 10/13/2015 02:56 AM, Max Tulyev wrote: >> So upgrade hardware and network admins are NOT sufficient

Re: IPv6 Irony.

On our network, we had to spent times more money in people than in hardware. Customer support, especially network troubleshootings and so on... So upgrade hardware and network admins are NOT sufficient for IPv6 adoption ;) On 13.10.15 06:17, Ca By wrote: > On Monday, October 12, 2015, Donn

Re: United Airlines is Down (!) due to network connectivity problems

I noticed there are days when different nets has no links with each other became faultly. It magically happens. We usually stop all our planned works this days. On 08.07.15 19:50, Matthew Huff wrote: Once is happenstance Twice is coincidence Three times is enemy action… Serious, could all

Re: internet visualization

Really nice! How can I do zoom in/zoom out? On 06.09.15 03:15, Jared Mauch wrote: > > OT: hit delete, or shameless plug disclaimer > > one of my colleagues just posted this visualiation > of the internet from the as_path view of 2914. if you are on > a mobile, you have to physically

Re: Can't reach RIPE WHOIS via IPv6 ?

Same for me from 2a01:d0::/32 telnet whois.ripe.net whois Trying 2001:67c:2e8:22::c100:687... Connected to whois.ripe.net. Escape character is '^]'. % This is the RIPE Database query service. % The objects are in RPSL format. % % The RIPE Database is subject to Terms and Conditions. % See

Script for NAT timeout detection

Hello All, I have some devices connected under NAT that is not under my control. Is there some software/script to detect NAT session timeout to adjust keepalives? Thank you!

Re: AW: /27 the new /24

Which routers? DIR-300 with OpenWRT/Quagga? :) I think all above-the-trash level routers supports >1M routes, isn't it? On 02.10.15 17:45, Jürgen Jaritsch wrote: > Hi, > > this would at least help to get rid of many old routing engines around the > world :) ... or people would keep their

Re: Skype off line ??

For me yes, it is down for several hours. BTW, is there any Jabber/XMPP client with similar usability? I need just scroll up to view all history and one click to join someone to multiuser conference in fact. On 21.09.15 11:32, Marco Paesani wrote: > Hi, > do you have sone news about it ? > Best

Re: Skype off line ??

un...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Max Tulyev > Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 1:27 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Skype off line ?? > > For me yes, it is down for several hours. > > BTW, is there any Jabber/XMPP client with similar usability? > > I need just scroll up

Re: Skype off line ??

.net wrote: > On 2015-09-21 12:58, Max Tulyev wrote: >> Google hangouts and jit.si are services, not a client of open protocol. >> >> Feel the difference. > > Well you can set a server wide default for Jabber/XMPP MUC chats at > least with ejabberd. > https://www.process

Re: Transit Options in the UK?

It seems some time if you want a good uplink you have to rent a L2 channel to another country for that ;) So that can be an option too. On 17.09.15 23:49, Gary T. Giesen wrote: > I have a customer who's trying to decide whether to renew their existing > transit contract or not for a POP they have

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

On 04.12.15 01:19, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > On 1 December 2015 at 20:23, Max Tulyev <max...@netassist.ua> wrote: >> I have to change at least one of my uplinks because of it, which one is >> better to drop, HE or Cogent? >> > > Question: Why would you have to drop

IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

Hi All, we got an issue today that announces from Cogent don't reach Hurricane Electric. HE support said that's a feature, not a bug. So we have splitted Internet again? I have to change at least one of my uplinks because of it, which one is better to drop, HE or Cogent?

Re: IPv6 Cogent vs Hurricane Electric

Just hit it for first time... Is there any other similar splits in IPv6 world? On 01.12.15 21:33, Christopher Morrow wrote: > hasn't this been the case for ~10 yrs now? > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Max Tulyev <max...@netassist.ua> wrote: >> Hi All, >&g

Re: de-peering for security sake

Come on, keep calm and wait a year: Russia and China will de-peer with all the world for their security (AKA censorship) reasons! ;) On 25.12.15 01:44, Colin Johnston wrote: > see > http://map.norsecorp.com > > We really need to ask if China and Russia for that matter will not take abuse >

Re: Measuring the quality of Internet access

nished keyboard. > > No dia 13/06/2016, às 20:11, Max Tulyev <max...@netassist.ua > <mailto:max...@netassist.ua>> escreveu: > >> Hi All, >> >> I know there are many people from many countries. >> >> Do you know something about mandatory measu

Re: Measuring the quality of Internet access

Well, that was MY question! =) What who where (goverment/regulators) define as the quality? On 13.06.16 23:38, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:11:47 +0300, Max Tulyev said: >> Is it possible in general to measure the quality of Internet access? And >&g

Re: Measuring the quality of Internet access

All results will be very depend of target choise, as we can understand. So that's the main point. On 13.06.16 23:58, Collin Anderson wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Max Tulyev <max...@netassist.ua > <mailto:max...@netassist.ua>> wrote: > > But I can

Measuring the quality of Internet access

Hi All, I know there are many people from many countries. Do you know something about mandatory measurements of Internet access quality from country telecom regulators? If yes, could you please share that information with me? I found ETSI EG 202 057-4 standard

Re: Measuring the quality of Internet access

t; From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Max Tulyev > Sent: June 13, 2016 3:12 PM > To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Measuring the quality of Internet access > > Hi All, > > I know there are many people from many countries. > > Do

Re: Binge On! - get your umbrellas out, stuff's hitting the fan.

(chewing my pop-corn) Eh... I would like to have that kind of problems! Here we sell a residental 1Gbps for $5/mo with really unlimited traffic, and have a lot of complaint calls if there is slightly less than 1Gbps for that particular users. THAT is how the high competitive market works! ;) On

Re: Team Cymru BGP bogon status ???

Looks good for me too (Ukraine/Kiev). But no IPv6, only IPv4. Is it a bug or a feature? ;) On 31.01.16 19:23, Tom Storey wrote: > Working just fine from Virgin Media. > > On 31 January 2016 at 17:19, Daniel Corbe wrote: >>> On Jan 31, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Matthew Huff

Re: Cogent & Google IPv6

If you connected to Internet ONLY through Cogent - there is no other way. If you have another upstreams - Google should be reachable. On 24.02.16 21:46, Matt Hoppes wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but if Cogent isn't peering with Google IPv6, > shouldn't the traffic flow out to one of their

Re: RADb Outage?

People do prefix filtering based on *DB may think twice... On 23.01.16 07:42, Larry J. Blunk wrote: > >Service for the RADb whois protocol has now been restored. We were > experiencing > extensive DDOS activity directed at the whois service host(s). > > Regards, >Larry Blunk >

Re: Cogent <=> Google Peering issue

If my telepathy still works fine and I understood your question well - then the answer is "NO, that is not a global well-known issue" ;) On 17.02.16 18:15, Fred Hollis wrote: > Anyone else aware of it? >

Re: Softlayer / Blocking Cuba IP's ?

Why Crimea still not in the list? On 20.02.16 02:57, frnk...@iname.com wrote: > Official statement here: > https://knowledgelayer.softlayer.com/faq/softlayer-network-wide-ip-blocking > > Frank > > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+frnkblk=iname@nanog.org] On

Re: algorithm used by (RIPE region) ISPs to generate automatic BGP prefix filters

Hi Martin, well, not only as-set and route. Assuming only legitimate owner of inetnum and aut-num have passwords for mntner from that objects can modify their RIPE DB objects and can create routes. So to create a route object, you have to have access for inetnum and aut-num objects (that can be

Stop IPv6 Google traffic

Hi All, I need to stop IPv6 web traffic going from our customers to Google without touching all other IPv6 and without blackhole IPv6 Google network (this case my customers are complaining on long timeouts). What can you advice for that?

Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic

Thank you! I think it is what I need now ;) On 10.04.16 17:50, Niels Bakker wrote: > You can add a reject route at your borders rather than nullroute. That > will cause ICMP Unreachables to be sent by your routers back to your > customers so their applications will know immediately to retry

Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic

That's the problem. Nobody want to say which customer (IP) violates which policy. On 10.04.16 18:31, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote: > give clients their own bigger blocks - or identify the clients violating > policy (what the policy > they are violating?) - you'll probably find the ones getting

Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic

Customers see timeouts if I blackhole Google network. I looking for alternatives (other than stop providing IPv6 to customers at all). On 10.04.16 16:50, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:29:39 +0300, Max Tulyev said: > >> I need to stop IPv6 web traffic go

Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic

if you block something, there will be a timeout in getting >>> to it. >>> >>> What is broken that you're trying to fix by blackholing them? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Comp

Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic

kholing them? > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Max Tulyev" <max.

Re: Stop IPv6 Google traffic

Every have /56 or /48, depending on type of service. All our /32 allocation is affacted. On 10.04.16 17:35, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Assign your customers larger v6 prefixes so one customer's bad > behavior doesn't affect the others? > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 05:27:53PM +0300, Max

Re: Major IX bandwidth sharing

Hello, I'm sure in this case they will pay for 100G every month, not for 10-20G ;) On 21.04.16 20:25, Pavel Odintsov wrote: > Hello! > > If you want cheaper price just ask any TIER-1 provider for link with commit > 10ge and burst up to 100GE. It will be definitely cheaper and simpler than >

Re: Major IX bandwidth sharing

onditions. > > On Thursday, 21 April 2016, Max Tulyev <max...@netassist.ua > <mailto:max...@netassist.ua>> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm sure in this case they will pay for 100G every month, not for > 10-20G ;) > > On 21.04.16 20:25, Pavel Odintso

Re: Question on peering strategies

Hi All, I wonder why a "VLAN exchange" does not exists. Or I do not know any? In my understanding it should be a switch, and people connected can easily order a private VLAN between each other (or to private group) through some kind of web interface. That should be a more easy and much less

Re: Question on peering strategies

If you dig into hijacking topic more, you will see that hijacks through Tier1 is same or even more popular than through IXes. And if someone want to make me a transit offer for the price of DE-CIX (I do not even ask the price of DTEL-IX peering ;) ) - please, contact me off-list, I will be really

Re: Question on peering strategies

I'm right here at RIPE 72 now, so I saw it of course ;) The problem is not peering itself, but more general problem of filtering nets, and it was told in the presentation. On 24.05.16 13:19, Jared Mauch wrote: > >> On May 24, 2016, at 6:11 AM, Max Tulyev <max...@netassi

Re: Passive Optical Network (PON)

Hi, using in rural area, it works. Much cheaper than ETTH. On 21.01.17 18:44, Kenneth McRae wrote: > Greeting all, > > Is anyone out there using PON in a campus or facility environment? I am > talking to a few vendors who are pushing PON as a replacement for edge > switching on the campus

Re: Safe IPv4 Was: Re: premiumcolo.net IP address rental

Very strange. Everytime it was open for all companies need IP network will be used in RIPE region. Not for those having (any? main? branch? legal address?) office in the RIPE region. And it is still possible to open a RIPE LIR for offshore companies like BVI, Belize, Seychelles without any

Re: Facebook more specific via Level3 ?

Hi, got the same from Kiev, Ukraine: dig fbcdn.com fbcdn.com. 300 IN A 31.13.74.1 which is slow and routed through USA and dig fbcdn.com @8.8.8.8 fbcdn.com. 299 IN A 31.13.93.3 which is fast and routed through Germany Same is for IPv6.

Re: CGNAT

BTW, does somebody check how implementing a native IPv6 decrease actual load of CGNAT? On 06.04.17 23:33, Aaron Gould wrote: > Last year I evaluated Cisco ASR9006/VSM-500 and Juniper MX104/MS-MIC-16G in > my lab. > > I went with MX104/MS-MIC-16G. I love it. > > I deployed (2) MX104's. Each

Re: ipv6 accepted & announcement size upto /48 or longer than /48 ?

Yes, but that's not a policy, that's a BCP. On 27.04.17 16:47, root wrote: > Am i right ? > > Policy for ipv4 accept and send upto /24 > Policy for ipv6 accept and send upto /48 >

Re: PCIe adapters supporting long distance 10GB fiber?

We use Intel NICs with SFP+ holes. It works good with long and short range SFP+ modules, including CWDM/DWDM. On 15.06.17 12:10, chiel wrote: > Hello, > > We are deploying more and more server based routers (based on BSD). We > have now come to the point where we need to have 10GB uplinks one

Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week?

All know. Nobody care. On 02.05.17 08:49, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > I didn't see any mention of this here. Any comments? > > "On Wednesday, large chunks of network traffic belonging to MasterCard, Visa, > and more than two dozen other financial services companies were briefly routed >

USA local SIM card

Hi All, sorry for possible off-topic, I really did not know where to ask this. I'm going to visit USA for two weeks. I want to buy a local prepaid SIM card mostly for IP access. Is it possible in USA to buy a prepaid SIM as a visitor, without long term contract? I need a public (can be

Re: IPv6 migration steps for mid-scale isp

Hello, for my point of view, the start question is do you control CPEs (can re-configure and re-flash it), or users buy and own CPEs themself? On 13.09.17 15:08, Fredrik Sallinen wrote: > Hello, > > Recently we have decided to start IPv6 migration in our network. We > have ~1K BNGs and

Re: USA local SIM card

or private IP address? IPv6? On 17.09.17 22:52, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote: > On 2017-09-17 13:07, Max Tulyev wrote: > > > AT's $45 prepaid pans and its more expemsive sibbling (I think $65) > allow over 6GB of data at LTE speeds, and the rest is unlimited but at >

Re: Free access to measurement network

So for my point of view, better solution is to push some law that ease access to the buildings for ISPs. 15.12.17 19:40, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu пише: > On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:47:42 -0500, Dovid Bender said: >> What kind of internet are these devices on? With Net Neutrality gone here >> in the US

Re: Email security: PGP/GPG & S/MIME vulnerability drop imminent

I did a lot. Centralized proprietary messenger with a lot of noise around. Unlike for example clear p2p tox, federalized own jabber server, with TOR to hide a metadata. 15.05.18 19:36, John Levine пише: > In article <47acebac-7df1-0dbb-9584-27062a945...@netassist.ua> you write: >> Really? Use

Re: Subsea availability

May be there is something similar, but with the sales contact for each cable system? ;) 22.05.18 08:54, Reid Fishler пише: > Not to mention: > https://www.cablemap.info/ > > Reid > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:46 AM james jones wrote: > >> Not interactive but cool

Re: Email security: PGP/GPG & S/MIME vulnerability drop imminent

Really? Use extremely centralized closed source "solution"? LOL. 15.05.18 18:47, John Levine пише: > In article <240538927.8145.1526388210820.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck> you > write: >> Encrypted e-mail is so incredibly niche, this won't affect almost everyone. > > Bruce Schneier's blog

Re: FW: Satelite Internet Provider

Uses Yamal 402 Russian (spy)service ;) 07.06.18 08:35, Itay Fisher пише: > Dear Edwin, > > IO-SAT is a Vsat internet provider for both fixed and > maritime purposes. > Please share with us what exactly do you need and the estimate capacity you > are looking for. > > >

Re: BGP in a containers

bird is better than quagga! (runs away) ;) 14.06.18 21:56, james jones пише: > I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best > option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs > and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not

Re: SIP fax sending software?

Hi All, Looking for similar, but other one. Have Asterisk with E1 connection to PSTN (not VoIP). Is there some software to let it work as a fax and modem? 30.05.18 23:13, John R. Levine пише: > Can anyone recommend software that sends faxes over SIP?  I have plenty > of inbound fax to email

Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of many connectivity providers

RPKI? BGPsec? 26.06.18 21:27, Mike Hammett пише: > Any solution to that? Yell at the IRRs more? > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > Midwest-IX > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > - Original Message - > > From: "Job

Re: Proving Gig Speed

Hi! Here I have http://www.speedtest.net/result/7475546550 from my notebook right now. It is i5-2540M CPU. First of all, NIC is much more important than CPU. Intel NIC can give 1Gbps easy, while Realtek or Broadcom probably never gives you more than ~300mbps. Linux times faster than Windows in

Re: Question about great firewall of China

Hi, even in China it is not possible to block content from people proactively want to reach it (VPN, TOR, etc). So terrorists, child pornographers, drug dealer, copyright violators and other s*it are in safe. Only can really do the Internel Censorship is to decrease of circle of spreading

Re: Should ISP block child pornography?

Remember what I said... If the censorship system will be created FOR ANY, ANY REASON - you will forget the initial reason very quickly. 11.12.18 19:34, Aaron1 пише: > Right... When would it ever be wrong to stop terrible internet activity > such as this?! > > Aaron > > On Dec 11, 2018, at 10:43

Re: Facebook doesn't have a route to my ISP's (Cogeco) IPv6 space?

Well known problem. You can use our tunnel broker connection (tb.netassist.ua) as a workaround. 17.12.18 22:01, Brian J. Murrell пише: > I've been trying to figure out why I can reach an IPv6 address at > Facebook (2a03:2880:f012:3:face:b00c:0:1) through (only) one of my two > Internet

Re: Should ISP block child pornography?

...and you will see the TOR exit nodes instead of crime home IP if censorship is implemented. 11.12.18 19:35, Aaron1 пише: > ... The only thing I can think of is the idea that I’ve heard before is > the way to catch someone is to watch them well they are accessing, the > concept of honeypots

Re: Should ISP block child pornography?

os, LEOs in the US have to ascertain if this is CP > or photo shopped.  > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:54 PM Max Tulyev <mailto:max...@netassist.ua>> wrote: > > ...and you will see the TOR exit nodes instead of crime home IP if > censorship is impl

Re: Should ISP block child pornography?

Hi All, we are fighting with censorship in our country. So I have something to say. First, censorship is not just "switch off this website and that webpage". No magic button exist. It is more complex, if you think as for while system. Initially, networks was build without systems (hardware and

Re: Should ISP block child pornography?

victim sites will be blocked. This trolling is very popular in Russia, for example. 08.12.18 19:41, Hank Nussbacher пише: > On 07/12/2018 20:48, Max Tulyev wrote: >> Yes, you may nullroute some IP with some site, but as the collateral >> damage you will block part of Cloud

Re: Should ISP block child pornography?

Because of USA does not have any block lists for example ;) 08.12.18 22:29, Keith Medcalf пише: > >> They put IP of some government or critical (for example, >> VISA/Mastercard processing) sites in their blocked >> domain - and those victim sites will be blocked. >> This trolling is very

Re: Dnssec still inoperable on the internet ?— was ARIN NS down?

It's because you see problems it causes, and do not see problems it solves ;) 11.01.19 17:58, Ca By пише: > Thanks for the update that dnssec STILL causes more real world problems > than it solves.  > > . > > That said, arin is a pro outfit. If they can screw it up, like nasa, so > can you.

Re: Webzilla

It's quite conveniently to have all botnets C in several known ASNs. More pain if it will be spread through thousands regular residential customers, like when use fast(double)flux or peertopeer technologies ;) Joke. Really, there were a lot of cases all upstreams had disconnected some ASN

Re: IPv6 and forensic requests

you want the customers are able to use old IPv4 apps and devices, NAT64 is not sufficient, you need also CLAT at the customer premises (so they can run 464XLAT). Regards, Jordi -Mensaje original- De: NANOG en nombre de Max Tulyev Fecha: domingo, 10 de febrero de 2019, 14:26 P

  1   2   >