I have trouble understanding why an ARIN record for a network regularly
receiving new, out-sized IPv4 allocations on the order of millions of
OrgName:Cellco Partnership DBA Verizon Wireless
CIDR: 97.128.0.0/9
Comment:Verizon Wireless currently has 44.3 Million
Comment:
such.
No, this information must be available in *one* place. It's called a
DHCP server. As an operator, this is clearly what I want, both for
IPv4
and IPv6.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
James R. Cutler
james.cut...@consultant.com
considering all the business
management requirements that end user systems must meet. They are all
correct, but not right.
James R. Cutler
james.cut...@consultant.com
do that.
randy
James R. Cutler
james.cut...@consultant.com
to divulge]
that they have accomplished this . One would think that someone would at least
pipe up just for the bragging factor .
Twyl , JimL
--
+--+
| James W. Laferriere | SystemTechniques | Give me VMS
Arbor had a good writeup on the traffic that they saw.
http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2009/01/the-great-obama-traffic-flood/
Regards,
James Pleger
On Jan 21, 2009, at 7:14 PM, Ong Beng Hui wrote:
Is there a general study done on the overall impact of inauguration
streaming traffic ?
any
Yes :)
James
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Dayman [mailto:den...@thenose.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 5:30 PM
To: Nanog
Subject: Test
this still working?
Final-Recipient: rfc822;den...@thenose.net
Action: failed
Status: 5.5.0
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 failed to meet SPF requirements
I wish I could help :)
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Dayman [mailto:den...@thenose.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 5:48 PM
To: Nanog
Subject: List
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 10:27 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 09:55:20PM -0600, Gadi Evron wrote:
A legal botnet is a distributed system you own.
A legal DDoS network doesn't exist. The question is set wrong, no?
kind of depends on what the model is. a
an issue on the Verizon network.
--
James Michael Keller
nanog-requ...@merit.edu?body=unsubscribe
To Unsubscribe.
James Thomas
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Jay, DOH [mailto:jay.mur...@state.nm.us]
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 5:31 PM
To: Springer, Dennis D; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: unsubscribe
Jay Murphy
IP Network
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Scott Morris s...@emanon.com wrote:
I would guess (hope?) that most, if not all, providers filter the RFC1918
space addresses from entering or leaving their networks unchecked. But just
my two cents there...
All sites (not just providers) should, but many
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 December 2008 14:10:02 Drew Linsalata wrote:
Drop me a note off-list if possible.
We have a business line from them
Urm no Wikipedia this morning - hmm - I think the IWF is self destructing.
--
James Enck
Senior Associate
Telco 2.0 Initiative
http
It's also not effective in various situations.
The bad behavior is not disabling abused domains, it's the method used to do it
(by giving no answer instead of actively giving a negative answer).
When a http client asks recursive resolver A for an A RR, and no
response is received,
the client
on government for more regulation. No one can help you but
yourself in ensuring your uptime-- so perhaps look at your own setup and
decide that you need that 2nd connection to back you up when first one
fails. This is a simple business logic.
James
about uptime.
James
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But according to Sprint, this isn't a peering spat. This is a customer
who didn't pay their bill.
Probably useful to keep that in perspective.
-M
I would say it's a peering spat, because Cogent's press releases
stated
on behalf of anyone else.
James
Very well said.
James
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 5:23 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: YAY! Re: Atrivo/Intercage: NO Upstream depeer
It is clear to me -- at least -- that this entire criminal
operation
and technology of the mandate is inherent in the title of this
paragraph.
JimL
James R Lindley
Senior Computer Engineer
Advanced Technical Analysis Team
IT Security Architecture and Engineering
Internal Revenue Service
An unquenchable thirst for Pierian waters.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin
Hmmm Seems Pacific bit the bullett around 2:25 est all annoucements were
dropped.
http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595v=4view=2.0
I would ask for comment by Intercage staff but they don't have email. Emil
is unresponsive via phone,
James
Emil,
You have a lot of loyal legit customers. What's your plans? Seems like your
taking action against the bad clients which is great. Where does this leave
Intercage? You seeking alternative routes currently? Offering refunds to
those loyal clients?
James
-Original Message-
From
has done everything in his power to bring his network back to
normal operations. Looks great the past 2 weeks, I wish both of you the best
of luck its hard to determine who is a solid friend and who is not. Like
emil said... It only will make you stronger.
James
-Original Message-
From
.
Subba Rao
Hth, JimL
--
+--+
| James W. Laferriere | SystemTechniques | Give me VMS |
| NetworkSystem Engineer | 2133McCullam Ave | Give me Linux |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Fairbanks, AK. 99701 | only on AXP |
+--+
that you know yourself.
[1]: Almost every network that I help manage is operated with BCP38 either
with uRPF or even with automatic-scripted SAV (source address
verification/filtering)/ ACL's.
james
a
report of all Hostfresh/Intercage traffic from my network was a couple
porn sites. Everything else was malicious communication.
I am sure if I looked into it more I could find some exploits related
to the sites.
Thanks,
James
to keep the house clean.
However, what you have said in this topic has not been useful or
brought anything that might be interesting to light at all. Please
come back when you have something useful or productive to say.
Thanks,
James
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED
, protecting your own box (cp-policer/control
plane filtering) is far more important IMO than implementing BCP38 when much
of attack traffic comes from legitimate IP sources anyway (see botnets).
james
I personally think about BCP38. It appears
you are the first member of I am an asshole club by the strict title
definition.
james
On Sep 4, 2008, at 7:24 AM, James Jun wrote:
Indeed... In today's internet, protecting your own box
(cp-policer/ control
plane filtering) is far more important IMO than
implementing BCP38 when much
of attack traffic comes from legitimate IP sources
anyway (see botnets).
I'm
On Sep 4, 2008, at 10:14 AM, james wrote:
OK, I'm an asshole. I'm sure BCP38 can prove to be
useful I guess being an asshole is not so bad given that
I have plenty of company.
It is unfortunately true that you do have lots of company.
If I could get away with dropping all routes
cp-policer works quite well on pfc3 based 6500's.
This is ofcourse a very important feature (more important than uRPF in
today's internet IMO) that appears to be missing in f10 gear which is what
Paul was saying earlier.
james
These are the dates I have for Cisco platforms:
IOS XR 3.4 - September 2007
IOS 12.0(32)S11 - November 2008
IOS 12.2SRE - December 2008
IOS 12.5(1)T - April 2009
-Original Message-
From: andy lam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL
Perl provides some cleaner methods for interpreting/displaying IPs.
There isn't a formal standard notation for an IP that looks like a string of
decimal digits with no dots though.
I.e. no RFC will define the host byte order and tell you that 127.0.0.1
corresponds to the decimal integer
and RSP 720 for Catalyst 6500/Router
7600 series perform both of these features in hardware. The article
mentioned in this thread compares Force10 E against the 6500 series.
james
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080817-were-running-out-of-ipv4-addresses-time-for-ipv6-really.html
Well, on reading it, it's more an IPv6: It's great -- ask
for it by name! piece.
IPv6 gives me brain ache. I hear I'm not alone in that. I'd
v6 tomorrow if I didn't have to think
There are several things that you can do with open source solutions,
however looking at the data may be a bit more difficult than something
like Network Generals or Solera Networks capture appliances. It is
still doable and is definitely much much cheaper...
Something you might want to look into
performance issue, or is there some logical
explanation?
Frank
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a week for 2-3 minutes .
Hth , JimL
--
+--+
| James W. Laferriere | SystemTechniques | Give me VMS |
| NetworkSystem Engineer | 2133McCullam Ave | Give me Linux |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Fairbanks, AK
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Service providers who buy between one Gigabit and 10 gigabits will enjoy a
three-year contract rate of $5 a meg, and those that consume a full 10
gigabit port can pay as little as $4 a meg on a three-year contract.
A cynic would say that they are trying to book
Call for Presentations - AusNOG-02
-
AusNOG-02 is to be held in Sydney, Australia between 21st and 22nd of
August 2008
The AusNOG meeting provides the Australian community with a forum to
exchange information and experiences on a number of issues relating to
the
apps will work that way, so I don't have an issue internally, but I'm
looking for a broader base opinion on that.
Thanks a lot!
-James
)
--
___
NANOG-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to provide more information regarding our environment and other systems
we're looking into. Thanks
James Baldwin
___
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
So, in economic terms, the list will be more costly to maintain, as
well as less pleasant to maintain. Who is going to pay?
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 8, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
In the end everybody wins...
except the guys/gals who have to maintain
?
^^
Hear , Hear ! I second the motion .
Sorry about the 1-2 line response , But I beleive it was needed .
Twyl , JimL
--
+--+
| James W. Laferriere | SystemTechniques | Give
://www.crypto.com/papers/paa-ieee.pdf
Among other things, it discusses technical hazards of the act.
--Michael Dillon
James R. Cutler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 4, 2008 6:02 PM, Rick Astley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know large mostly unused pools of client IP's make it more difficult to
use traditional worm propagation methods in IPv6[1], but if customers move
from IPv4 firewalls to IPv6 routers, we still lose an important layer of
security.
On Dec 31, 2007 3:26 PM, Church, Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
like a natural choice, leaving 80 bits for network addressing. This
waste of space seems vaguely familiar to handing out Class A netblocks
20+ years ago. We'll never run out... Maybe it's just me though.
The comparison is
Possible scenario...
Subscriber bandwidth caps are in theory too high, if the ISP can't support it --
but if the ISP were to lower them, the competition's service would look better,
advertising the larger supposed data rate -- plus the cap reduction would hurt
polite users.
In the absence of
Andreas Ott wrote:
Hi,
since when does ftp://ftp.arin.net/info/asn.txt contain dotted
AS numbers? Where is the new formatting documented, asn.h ?
It just broke a scriptology we use to generate AS lookups for 'offline'
customers (please don't ask :) ).
On 7/22/07, Steven M. Bellovin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest not underestimating the ingenuity and persistence of
the bad guys
to escalate the neverending war, when a new weapon is invented to use
against them. If there's a way around it, history has shown, the new
weapon quickly
Does anyone have further information on the Vericenter Denver outtage?
Support is aware of the issue, however, they could not feed me a
problem description at the time of ticket creation or an ETR?
James Baldwin
Outtage with the primary sprintlink connection. Still no ETR.
James Baldwin
On Jul 9, 2007, at 2:09 AM, James Baldwin wrote:
Does anyone have further information on the Vericenter Denver outtage?
Support is aware of the issue, however, they could not feed me a
problem description
On 6/4/07, David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posit that a screen door does not provide any security. A lock and
deadbolt provide some security. NAT/PAT is a screen door.
This is a fine piece of rhetoric, but it's manifestly false and seriously
misleading.
Hi, David
I think the
evening and
hopefully should resolve pMTU problems in reaching www.ietf.org. If you
continue to experience trouble in reaching thru OCCAID via IPv6, please
don't hesitate to drop me a line in private.
Regards,
James
we are seeing big issues between sbc/att and anything connected to level3...
James
-Original Message-
From: Gregori Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: RE: qwest backbone
Date: Mon May 21, 2007 1:36 pm
Size: 676 bytes
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Savvis is also reporting severed
901 - 957 of 957 matches
Mail list logo
