are trying to do, this is just another
suggestion.
./diogo -montagner
JNCIE-SP 0x41A
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 09:53, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) <
lyn...@orthanc.ca> wrote:
> Nick Hilliard writes:
>
> > No need to reinvent that wheel:
> >
> > root@foo>
cancel the contract because 1 or n network outages. In
theory, if the customer SLA is not being met consecutively, there is a
potential probability he will cancel the contract.
Regards
On 8/2/12, Darius Jahandarie wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Diogo Montagner
> wrote:
>> A misc
ering
> University of Nevada, Reno
> 1664 N. Virginia Street, MS 171, Reno, NV 89557.
> Phone: +1 (775) 327 2246, Fax: +1 (775) 784 1877
> E-mail: yuk...@cse.unr.edu
> Web: http://www.cse.unr.edu/~yuksem
> ========
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
./diogo -montagner
JNCIE-SP 0x41A
u
still need to assess his soft skills.
Regards
On 7/6/12, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
> --- diogo.montag...@gmail.com wrote:\
> From: Diogo Montagner
>
> For screening questions (for 1st level filtering), IMO, the questions
> has to be straight to the point, for example:
>
hanks,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
> --
> William D. Herrin her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. .. Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
./diogo -montagner
JNCIE-M 0x41A
, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> Yes, u will have to connect the fibers in a cross manner..and setup one side
> to generate the clock..
>
> Faisal
>
> On May 16, 2012, at 8:09 AM, Diogo Montagner
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> sorry for this dumb que
Hello,
sorry for this dumb question.
Is it possible to connect two routers like below ?
RouterA/cstm1 dark fiber cstm1/RouterB
The interfaces used in this case are channelized STM1 in both sides.
Between RouterA and RouterB I would like to create many low-speed
interfaces ranging from
Hi Chris,
I never got this answer.
Chris, Tim, Anton and Martin,
thank you for all inputs. Really appreciate them.
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Anton Kapela wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 a
Hello,
I am looking for industry standard parameters to base the SLA of one
network regarding to voice, video and data application.
Which are the the accepted values for jiiter, delay, latency and
packet loss for voice, video and data in a IP/MPLS ?
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
tions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measuring_network_throughput
http://www.speedguide.net/bdp.php
HTH
./diogo -montagner
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Eduardo Schoedler
wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> This is my first post here in Nanog.
> First of all, sorry my bad english -- I'm
mp counters.*
>>>
>>>> https://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/fundamentals/command/reference/cf_r1.html#wp1067159
>>>>
>>>
>>> The "Usage Guidelines" are instructive. :-)
>>>
>>> Although the update interval defaults to 5 seconds, it still appears
>>> to update every 9 seconds on my boxes.
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>>
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
./diogo -montagner
hanks
./diogo -montagner
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Holmes,David A wrote:
> EXFO also sells the BRIX SLA verifier, which calculates RTT, packet
> loss, and jitter for various applications running on top of the link
> layer.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim
we cannot guarantee that attachments are virus-free or compatible
> with your systems and do not accept any liability in respect of viruses or
> computer problems experienced.
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
./diogo -montagner
Hello everyone!!!
Thank you for all answers. These answers are really what I was looking for
Regards
./diogo -montagner
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Tim Jackson wrote:
> Each KM does not ad 4.9ms..
>
> More like ~1msec per 100km...
>
> 1/4/msec usually per
checked all MEF specifications and I only find something related to
performance for Circuit Emulation over Metro-E (which is not my case).
Appreciate your comments.
Thanks!
./diogo -montagner
Hi,
thanks for the link.
This was the best compilation that I found before. Unfortunately, this
presentation is a little bit old (2006). I am supposing that most of
commercial tools have improved your IPv6 support.
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:07 PM, nanogf . wrote
Yes. This one. But also looking for IPv6 support for tools like
OpenView, Infovista, Concord eHealth.
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Patrick Darden wrote:
>
> I think he was looking for something more in the nature of network
> monitoring/analysis sys
Hello,
I am looking for monitoring tools that already have support to IPv6. I
am looking for both freeware and commercial tools.
Please, do you know what network management system are already
supporting IPv6 ?
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
Also there is the JRadius: http://coova.org/wiki/index.php/JRadius
Very easy to run it and also it is developed in Java.
But I never tested its scalability in large environments.
regards,
./diogo -montagner
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> Hello John -
>
&
migrate IP addressing to the IANA assigned ip
> addresses?
> how can i achieve that?
>
> regards
> Devang Patel
>
--
./diogo -montagner
20 matches
Mail list logo