Hi Alex,
l...@qrator.net (Alexander Lyamin) wrote:
> Ray mentioned precisely that he wants to monitor BGP announcements and
> route changes.
>
> Leak detection is kind of on a different level. You need a bit more data
> to effectively detect them. ( I kind of know that).
Our use case is
nanog@nanog.org (Alexander Lyamin via NANOG) wrote:
> RIPE RIS
> https://www.ripe.net/analyse/internet-measurements/routing-information-service-ris/
> is also good, but as Job Snijders pointed me out doesn't send emails out
> of the box.
It does provide a filterable live feed that we use for
We also observed this today, UTC morning, esp. across the pond, and our
alternative paths from Europe to the US were suffering from the still unfixed
fibre cut, so I was a bit unhappy with 200 extra ms, and 60% loss.
1299 seems to've found an alternative path in the meantime, looks good to us.
Re Mark,
mark@tinka.africa (Mark Tinka) wrote:
> From our customers, the most we are accepting today is a /24 and a /48. This
> is for transit customers with their own AS and address space.
Oh sure - I was looking at those customers who might need multihoming to their
ISP, but not multihoming
li...@mtin.net (Justin Wilson (Lists)) wrote:
> I think it is going to have to happen. We have several folks on the IX and
> various consulting clients who only need 3-6 Ips but have to burn a full /24
> to participate in BGP. I wrote a blog post awhile back on this topic
>
Volkan,
you are confusing routing and forwarding.
Elmar.
volkan.salih...@gmail.com (VOLKAN SALİH) wrote:
> how would you route 800 Gigabit-ethernet that will soon be released as IEEE
> standart?
>
> we were paying 1 usd per megabit several years ago. now it is as low as 4
> usd cent.
>
> As i
dmi...@interhost.net (Dmitry Sherman) wrote:
> Hello any problems with Linx?
I've seen an "At Risk" notice this morning, about some emergency fibre testing.
Our equipment is not affected, but other locations might be.
If you're a member, https://portal.linx.net/member/maintenance/1670
HTH,
Aaron,
> Would someone from AS3491 please contact me off-list?
if you find one, plesae share...
Thx,
Elmar.
Hello 'body,
I'm looking for a NOC contact for AS 19338, the old Telmex Chile AS.
Anybody have anything?
Thanks,
Elmar.
Hi folks,
my inquiry kind of dead-ended here; I still have trouble in Warsaw (could be
the name of a movie).
Whether I send my prefix with NO_EXPORT, or with the secretly documented
24115:65281 (or 2 or 3)
(from https://ix.equinix.com/portal/resources/mlpe-information), the
routeserver just eats
Re Frank, thanks for the quickie,
ge...@geier.ne.tz (Frank Habicht) wrote:
> it seems to be a not completely agreed/standardised question.
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7947#section-2.2.4
[...]
> https://docs.ixpmanager.org/features/route-servers/#rfc1997-passthru
[...]
Yeah, I know... I
Hi guys (and others),
I couldn't find an official description/explanation of this (EQX docs only
mention that this should behave the same as their "set the no_export" TE
community.
We are using Equinix' IXP platform's routeserver service (MLPE) in a few
locations on the planet, and due to the
joey@gmail.com (Joseph) wrote:
> A good book on the topic of the early internet is "Where Wizards Stay Up
> Late" by Katie Hafner and Matthew Lyon.
+1
The only thing I have to criticize is that the book has way too few pages.
na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) wrote:
> Feasibility of adding some middleware that culls unneeded routes (existing
> more specific and aggregate routes pointing to the same next hop), when that
> table starts to fill?
Well... if that covering prefix goes away, let's hope you still have a
Hi Chris,
ch...@noskillz.com (Chris) wrote:
> I'd personally recommend logging into the portal and opening a case,
I've done that in parallel, of course. (Also, as expected, they don't use their
own documentation, you have to point your finger to it when they want to "find
a physical
Hi folks at Equinix,
your peeringdb entry contact address (servicesupp...@equinix.com) bounces.
Please contact me right away to fix a MAC filter.
Elmar.
dedel...@iname.com (Dave) wrote:
> Folks for most systems, this is a change to a single file. Not a really hard
> thing to accomplish
Well...
1 - I'm surprised anybody is running local timezones on their systems at all
2 - I like how american politics is capable of creating new problems;
Hi guys,
we (1280) have a prefix missing from 701's routing tables that harms us quite a
bit. I've tried contacting the obvious email addresses with details, but got
zero response (I've checked the spamtrap) inside 24 hours.
Is there a better way to contact the actual NOC than
Hi folks,
peeringdb is very quiet about them - does anybody have a NOC email contact for
Telmex Chile (I have them as AS19338)?
Trying to resurrect something...
TIA,
Elmar.
Hi Walt, folks,
> Holt, Marcus
> Has been and is a good contact
Thank you - unfortunately, my emails seem to land in his spam folder (sent half
a dozen over the last year, never heard a peep). Marcus - you reading this?
Elmar.
Hi everyone,
someone from MGMIX in Montgomery, AL, contact me please.
Your official address (supp...@mgmix.net) bounces as undeliverable.
Elmar.
Matt, thank you for the notes, very helpful!
(Also, sorry for dropping out of the BoF, my ISP decided it was time for some
downtime, I hope they'll get it sorted)
Elmar.
avel...@misaka.io (Siyuan Miao) wrote:
> Does anybody know if there's an alternative to Any2 Los Angeles
> with predictable uptime and enough members in LA?
Sure, there's NYIIX LA. Tried searching peeringdb?
Elmar.
e...@4ever.de (Elmar K. Bins) wrote:
> I'm looking for a working email address to contact the OCIX exchange in Sint
> Maarten. Unfortunately, ocix.net points to a single MX without A/
> records...
They moved their MXs yesterday after I got them through telemgroup.sx, so oc
Hi people,
I'm looking for a working email address to contact the OCIX exchange in Sint
Maarten. Unfortunately, ocix.net points to a single MX without A/ records...
Thanks in advance,
Elmar.
bottige...@gmail.com (Bottiger) wrote:
> Does anyone have any contacts at Bharti Airtel? I either get no response or
> full inbox for emails in their WHOIS at AS9498 and AS24560.
Hi, if you get a response, please share...I'm also at a loss there...
Elmar.
Hi guys,
I hope this is only slightly off-topic...
I'm looking for the correct address for AS112, 1...@root-servers.org
keeps bouncing whatever I try.
If anybody can drop me a line...much appreciated.
Cheers,
Elmar.
Hi helpful people around the world,
we are currently at a loss of sourcing Dell servers (R630 etc.) for our Buenos
Aires
datacenter... can anybody here jump in and provide us with hardware there
short-term,
or recommend a local dealer?
We need to upgrade quickly, and estimates for import run
Re Hank,
thank you for the comprehensive info, this kind of help is why I
still consider NANOG a very good community and this mailing list
one of the major tools of the network business.
Not to even mention the really nice people that hang out here.
Thanks again,
Elmar.
Hi Bezeq people,
I hope you're subscribed here, I could use your immediate help, probably
leading to a contract...
Yours,
Elmar.
na...@studio442.com.au (Julien Goodwin) wrote:
> > The first optimisation is to remove any supplied prefixes which are
> > superfluous because they are already included in another supplied
> > prefix. For example, 2001:67c:208c:10::/64 would be removed if
> > 2001:67c:208c::/48 was also supplied.
Re Stephen,
> So, to beat that horse to a fare-thee-well, to be BCP38 compliant I need, on
> every interface sending packets out to the internet, to block any source
> address matching a subnet in the BOGON list OR not matching any of my
> routeable network subnets? Plus add null-route entries
Hey!
New message, please read <http://jitconsultancyzm.com/seemed.php?8ylj>
Elmar K. Bins
Hey!
New message, please read <http://magnet-invest.ru/hopes.php?sbzs>
Elmar K. Bins
eyeronic.des...@gmail.com (Mike Hale) wrote:
We need a pool on what percentage of readers just googled traceroute.
None of course!
piotr.1...@interia.pl (Piotr) wrote:
What's the reason, there are some telecoms,isp that have paths eastbound,
southbound but in routing table they prefer longer path via US ?
Come on - you do know that it's called policy routing for a reason?
Costs, reserved bw/s for high-rollers,
na...@jack.fr.eu.org (na...@jack.fr.eu.org) wrote:
I'm not gonna throw Debian away due to such a mess, without fighting
hard, and I think you should do the same: talk, patch if needed, show
you're here
...and sit it out with wheezy-LTS...
Elmar.
eyeronic.des...@gmail.com (Mike Hale) wrote:
You know what sucks worse than NAT?
Memorizing an IPv6 address. ;)
I agree. But we'll have to live with it until something better comes along.
The assumption behind my original question is that the IP space simply
isn't used anywhere near as
(Fight of the Leos...)
bickn...@ufp.org (Leo Bicknell) wrote:
Users would find it much more convenient and wonder why we ever used
passwords, I think...
Yeah cool. Shame I have three accounts on peerindb.com alone...
Re Ben,
b...@bencarleton.com (Ben Carleton) wrote:
Does anyone have a contact at either DENIC or Fundação IT MEDIA
Universidade de Bissao that can advise if registrations are currently being
accepted for .GW domain names? The IANA admin contact,
ad...@register.gw, is at a domain with no
Morn' Steve,
s...@gibbard.org (Steve Gibbard) wrote:
I have no idea what Cisco equipment Elmar is using, but I wouldn't jump to
the conclusion that it can't withdraw routes when needed.
We use scripts external to both the routing platform and the
service delivery platform to check the
Bill,
wo...@pch.net (Bill Woodcock) wrote:
2. We plan to use this anycasting based setup for DNS during initial few
months. Assuming low traffic for DNS say ~10Mbps on average (on 100Mbps
port) and transit from just single network (datacenter itself) - is this
setup OK for simple
Re Bill,
p...@altadena.net (Pete Carah) wrote:
Well, let's say, using Quagga/BIRD might not really be best practice for
everybody... (e.g., *we* are using Cisco equipment for this)
Actually there is a *very* good reason why many (most?) anycast
instances use quagga/BIRD/gated/etc
to speak
Re Bill,
wo...@pch.net (Bill Woodcock) wrote:
Well, let's say, using Quagga/BIRD might not really be best practice for
everybody... (e.g., *we* are using Cisco equipment for this)
How does your Cisco know whether an adjacent nameserver is heavily loaded,
and adjust its BGP announcements
jer...@unfix.org (Jeroen Massar) wrote:
I am fairly sure that the fake Western Union message and various other
spams that are dripping through are from real subscribers...
Err...
what I find most interesting is that I have received no spam via this list
today. I've checked my spamfilters'
Re,
meh...@akcin.net (Mehmet Akcin) wrote:
But all the traffic on every Equinix and PAIX switch combined, is still
lower than the traffic on any one of the three large exchanges in Europe.
It really is all about the PNIs.
I wonder how is NOTA like, do they ever make the traffic info
Re Harry, Owen and all the others,
first, thank you for your feedback. Seems there is no real
consensus, but people are leaning more towards if it's dynamic,
forget rDNS.
The PowerDNS solution looks nice to me (alas, another chunk of
software the system droids would have to maintain). I am also
andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com (andrew.wallace) wrote:
A British computer expert has been entrusted with part of a digital key, to
help
restart the internet in the event of a major catastrophe.
Paul Kane talked to Eddie Mair on Radio 4's PM programme about what he might
be
called
mle...@he.net (Mike Leber) wrote:
You can get a free IPv6 BGP tunnel from Hurricane Electric at
http://tunnelbroker.net
We have tunnel servers spread through out the world, so typically the
nearest server has reasonably low latency from your location.
Of course our main business is
Re guys,
just to enforce the statement that the ASR is not really in the Kindergarten
anymore:
rt uptime is 22 weeks, 1 day, 17 hours, 33 minutes
Uptime for this control processor is 22 weeks, 1 day, 17 hours, 34 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload at 11:00:33 CET Mon Dec 21 2009
System
Hello altogether,
I'm in kind of a pinch currently - I have to get a Juniper
SRX-210 into China. That got the box stuck at import there,
and they demand the CCC certificate from us.
Unfortunately, Juniper has as yet not been willing or able
to respond to this request (ongoing for weeks), and I
Re Gordon,
gordsla...@ieee.org (gordon b slater) wrote:
...something in the back of my head says they retracted from their
initial stance recently (few month ago?) and said the CCC for IT
security kit was only needed for Gov't Procurement kit - I could be very
wrong, it was a snippet of
ssh...@gmail.com (Lala Lander) wrote:
You should buy locally in China and Juniper's partner in china will provide
you CCC.
Thank you for the insight, Shahid. Can you please send me your time machine? ;-)
Elmar.
Re JOe,
jab...@hopcount.ca (Joe Abley) wrote:
1) Is a private AS typically used for the exchange side of the session?
No. Also many exchange points do not run route servers at all, and expect
participants to build bilateral BGP sessions directly between each other.
...which is a shame.
xbanc...@telconet.net (Xavier Banchon) wrote:
Does anyone have issues with Internet connection through NAP of Americas?
Yes - there's obviously been some failure on the DC power, which
took the peering grid down (and a few ISPs, too). Session's have
come up again around an hour ago.
Btw -
Hello altogether,
I got a couple of freelancers and a few tips which companies
to use. I thought I'd at least share the company recommendations,
of which I'll have the bosses pick.
One other thing - I'll be needing the same thing in Tokyo by the
end of the year. If anyone has recommendations,
Hello friendly NANOGers,
we'll have to move out of a colo in the NYC area (Verizon DC Elmsford)
soon and I need two guys to disassemble half a rack full of equipment,
pack the stuff securely and send it away in two batches (one within the
US, one to Germany).
Packing material needs to be
jcdill.li...@gmail.com (JC Dill) wrote:
Why do they watch and monitor rather than proactively go
out and say watch out, there's an unmarked cable here and keep them
from cutting the cable in the first place?
*snicker*
You ever been to a construction site?
sro...@fattoc.com (Shane Ronan) wrote:
In my experience they are required not only to mark the line, but to
identify it with the initials of the owner.
Hell yeah - but that's not the point I wanted to make.
For any given construction project, the main goal is to
build something without
jvar...@crypticstudios.com (Jake Vargas) wrote:
I stumbled across these, which look like decent alternatives to getting
a 2511 from eBay: http://www.perle.com/products/Terminal-Server.shtml
The 48-port 1U terminal server with redundant power looks particularily
nice.
I've no
dstora...@teljet.com (David Storandt) wrote:
Our engineering team has settled on three $20k/node options:
- Sup720-3BXLs with PS and fan upgrades
Still quite slow CPU wise. RSP's are supposed to be a lot faster
and actually usable.
- Sup2s as switches + ISIS + statics and no BGP, push BGP
mar...@theicelandguy.com (Martin Hannigan) wrote:
1. as-builts designated by the RU
2. physical layer wiring diagram
3. cable run list (optical, fiber, connector type, pots)
4. Bill of materials down to the rack mount kit screws
5. cut view, detailing cabinet details _from the datacenter_.
Re Bruce,
br...@yoafrica.com (Bruce Grobler) wrote:
Using Putty or any other ssh/telnet terminal I find that Ctrl+Shift+6 then X
(on a cisco) works only sometimes after beating your keyboard multiple times
with a hammer, has anyone else come across or had a solution to this problem
?
I
patr...@ianai.net (Patrick W. Gilmore) wrote:
I'm looking for a couple of pictures of the worst cabling
infrastructure ever seem. One Wilshire meet me room comes to mind.
Anyone got any links to their photo albums, etc?
I've always considered this the worst:
Good morning (from here),
lion...@samsung.com (???×?) wrote:
I wonder which percentage is good level of CPU and Memory util of network
equipment ?
In my case, I try to keep under 30% cpu util and 70% memory util. My most
equipment are Cisco product.
I have no technical reference about
h...@efes.iucc.ac.il (Hank Nussbacher) wrote:
- slow-CPU boxes like everything Cisco with SUPs, since the
CPU load _always_ jumps to 100% for short periods of
time - BGP needs something calculated ;-) I get interested
whenever CPU load _stays_ high
Yeah - Cisco would like to
li...@memetic.org (Adam Armstrong) wrote:
CPU load _always_ jumps to 100% for short periods of
time - BGP needs something calculated ;-) I get interested
whenever CPU load _stays_ high
Yeah - Cisco would like to know why as well:
Re Charles,
this is all about control, so you don't lose connectivity in case something
outside your control fails.
The best idea so far is the ebgp-multihop idea with your ISP's transit
provider. This means speaking BGP to them yourself and taking care that
the traffic takes the intended path,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Abley) wrote:
6to4 (for content- or access-focussed networks) is surely a solution
to the problem of I have no good way to acquire IPv6 transit;
It solves another problem as well, like I cannot go v6 to
my servers because my load balancing and packet filtering
black
69 matches
Mail list logo
