Re: [External] Re: Meta outage

On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 10:38 AM Chris K wrote: > see: Status and outages of Meta business products (metastatus.com) Things seem to be returning now, aside from the status page, which still appears blank. Interesting. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1C +1 256 824 5331 Off

Re: [External] Fiber aggregators and such

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 12:37 PM Tom Beecher wrote: >> I think there is >> a very careful attitude around making sure not just anyone can get >> this information, especially after the Nashville bombing on Christmas >> Day 2020. > > Keeping fiber location info close to the vest is nothing new. I'm

Re: [External] Fiber aggregators and such

organization. I think there is a very careful attitude around making sure not just anyone can get this information, especially after the Nashville bombing on Christmas Day 2020. Maybe there could be a public aggregator of those who aggregate the information privately...?? Not sure what the answer is her

Re: [External] Re: IPv6 uptake

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:16 AM William Herrin wrote: > > There isn't really an advantage to using v4 NAT. > I disagree with that one. Limiting discussion to the original security > context (rather than the wider world of how useful IPv6 is without > IPv4), IPv6 is typically delivered to "most

Re: [External] Re: IPv6 uptake

On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 10:22 AM William Herrin wrote: > Yes and no. The client application has to be programmed to understand > link-local addresses or it can't use them at all. You can't just say > "connect to fe80::1." Even if there's an fe80::1 on your network, it > doesn't work. The client

Re: [External] Re: IPv6 uptake

he route if it's not working. This is definitely something that a COTS SOHO dual WAN router, that Joe would buy, could and should do by default (hopefully they do; I just haven't checked). -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1C +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of A

Re: [External] Re: IPv6 uptake

r. This already works with mDNS and link-locals today.) -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1C +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering

Re: [External] Re: The Reg does 240/4

"routing" suddenly stopped working. Maybe this document refers to the literal configuration of a /31. But I always configure them as point to points, as I mentioned before. But there again, in the documentation, that ability is totally missing... great. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jo

Re: [External] Re: The Reg does 240/4

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:05 AM Bryan Holloway wrote: > Let me know when they support /31s. A /31 is configured in RouterOS as a point-to-point interface. You put your IP in the "address" field and their IP in the "network" field. That's how I've been doing it since I started using RouterOS in

Re: [External] Re: Diversity in threading, Diversity of MUAs (was Re: How threading works

d. (This is probably why Google threadbreaks when the subject line changes. If the subject of the conversation changed, then it's a new conversation.) When the subject line is changed but we have NOT changed topics, that is when it becomes confusing to me. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey V

Re: [External] Re: Caveat emptor: avoid Inseego 5G products unless you still believe in classful routing

v6 support is good, actually! I am using it to good effect. The classful part is very surprising. This site doesn't use a lot of v4 so I hadn't given that much thought. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1C +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama

Re: [External] Newbies Question: Do I really need to sacrifice Prefix-aggregation to do BGP Load-sharing? (the case of Multi-homed + Multi-routers + Multi-upstreams)

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 1:29 AM Pirawat WATANAPONGSE via NANOG wrote: > 1. Do I really have to “de-aggregate” the address blocks, so I can do the > “manual BGP load-sharing”? Why not prepend toward the commercial ISP? Seems that should make the path longer and less desirable. -- Hunter

Re: [External] Re: Longest prepend( 255 times) as path found

I would imagine the "long as-path" one would handle excessive prepends too, right? 50 prepends is silly but doesn't really hurt my feelings. But >100 is absurd. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1C +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The Universi

Re: [External] Re: Google Abuse

, and T-Mo filters all goo.gl URLs, some might conclude that "T-Mobile filters links to right-leaning news outlets." -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1C +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering On Wed, Aug 17,

Re: [External] Re: Google Abuse

, factually, throw away messages based on their content. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1C +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:46 AM Tom Beecher wrote: > > It's a pretty serious claim

Re: [External] More product suggestions: small/cheap IS-IS or VXLAN devices?

Router (their VM). https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/VXLAN Hard to beat the price point on either. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1A +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 5:45 PM Adam

Re: [External] Re: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?

s its humor entirely with the introduction of bomb threats. Seems like a script kiddie taking things way too far. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1A +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:57 AM Sadiq Sai

Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more

holing of traffic. What it does allow is for *deliberate* blackholing for traffic; if you null-route a prefix, you now block incoming traffic from that subnet as well. This can be useful and it is how we are using URPF. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1A +1 256 824 5331 Office of Infor

Re: [External] Re: 1G/10G BaseT switch recommendation

technology. I agree, and I love Ruckus switches. But if they intend to maintain a customer base in this market, they should maintain a competent and at least minimally helpful/knowledgeable TAC for their switches. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH M-1A +1 256 824 5331 Office of Informa

Re: [External] Re: OOB management options @ 60 Hudson & 1 Summer

nd wants to do this sort of OOB trade, hit me up off-list, please. lol -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering >

Re: [External] Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

on NANOG-L to understand these idiosyncrasies. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering

Re: [External] Re: Parler

f days ago. Of course, Amazon could ding Epik for being Parler's registrar, but that would truly be a reach, since they aren't Parler's Web host. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineeri

Re: [External] DMVPN via Internet or Private APN

using Ansible or whatever. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:55 AM Sean Kelly wrote: > > Hello Nanog's > > I offer a questio

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

It runs well on a PC-type platform. -- -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering

Re: [External] Re: 10g residential CPE

rb4011igs_rm > > That has 1 10g port. How can that be a 10g CPE? It would meet some customers’ needs because multiple people could use 1G of service at a time. I think it is interesting to distinguish “>1G CPE” from “true 10G CPE” and I suspect many / most customers are looking f

Re: [External] Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-export-to" marker - Any ASN reserved to "export-only-to"?'

e-maps we already applied to the other peers/providers, and thus, less desirable. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering

Re: [External] Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-export-to" marker - Any ASN reserved to "export-only-to"?'

at it. The ideal situation is that we can google "RFC-compliant config" and get something that helps us get in line with best practices as smoothly as possible. -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Network Engineering

Re: [External] Contact at Ubiquiti Networks?

This thread has taken a very NANOG turn. Whether the company has or hasn't fallen apart, I'm sure someone is still there to contact. Some say the poster is still looking for a contact at Ubiquiti to this day... -- Hunter Fuller (they) Router Jockey VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office

Re: [External] Re: Don't email clients have a kill file?

For those on Google Mail, enable keyboard shortcuts and hit 'm' to mute a thread. Cheers.

Re: [External] Re: Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

nah. We do up to 10m on knockoff 40G DACs in production. It's no problem. On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:44 AM Randy Bush wrote: > since we're at this layer, should i worry about going 3m with dacs at > low speed, i.e. 10g? may need to do runs to neighbor rack. > > randy >

Re: [External] Hi-Rise Building Fiber Suggestions

If you can go fully dynamically routed, Layer 3 only, this problem becomes much, much easier to solve given the constraints you mention. Among others, Ruckus switches will stack over fiber, but nowhere near 30 units. I think the max is 12 and I would not recommend going over 8. If you need L2,

Re: [External] Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT residential

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:42 PM Jared Mauch wrote: > I can already hear the QUIC WG types blaming the network in abstentia, > because well, why would an operator want to keep their network functioning? > :-) In fairness, it's not actually functioning. For one thing, it's passing some traffic

Re: [External] Re: QUIC traffic throttled on AT residential

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 3:45 PM Jared Mauch wrote: > I can think of many legitimate cases, but i think this is where you have > internet for everyone and internet for the tech-savvy/business split that > becomes interesting. > > I’ve generally been willing to pay more for a business class

Re: ECN

It is certainly odd, but it's definitely a "thing." https://archive.nanog.org/meetings/nanog37/presentations/matt.levine.pdf On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:24 AM Matt Corallo wrote: > > This sounds like a bug on Cloudflare’s end (cause trying to do anycast TCP > is... out of spec to say the

Re: OT: Tech bag

I carry this. It's a preference I gained in my past life: https://www.kleintools.com/catalog/tool-storage/tradesman-pro-backpack I put my notebook (Surface Pro) in a sleeve and sandwich it between the halves. It hasn't gotten crushed to death yet. I'll admit this is not optimal. This one has

Re: a quick survey about LLDP and similar

On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 8:26 AM Anderson, Charles R wrote: > > We require LLDP/LLDP-MED to configure our VOIP phones. > > For trunk links, it is extremely helpful to verify correct topology. > > For datacenters, it is EXTREMELY helpful to verify hypervisor connectivity. I'd say it's extremely

Re: ICMPv6 "too-big" packets ignored (filtered ?) by Cloudflare farms

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 10:09 AM Bjørn Mork wrote: > Stephen Satchell writes: > > Did you submit a bug report? > > I believe this was fixed 5 years ago (in Linux v3.17): > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=cb1ce2ef387b01686469487edd45994872d52d73 > >

Re: 2FA, was A Deep Dive on the Recent Widespread DNS Hijacking

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 PM Keith Medcalf wrote: > I did write my own TOTP client. However, why do you assume that I am talking > about a TOTP client and not the referred webpage which requires the > unfettered execution of third-party (likely malicious) javascript in order to > view?

Re: A Deep Dive on the Recent Widespread DNS Hijacking

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:02 PM wrote: > So what registries/registrars are supporting 2FA that's better than SMS? > Or since 98% of domain names are Bait type, is nobody bothering > to support something for the 2% that could use it? If Joe's Bait and Tackle buys from Namecheap, they can utilize

Re: skype attack

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:12 PM Randy Bush wrote: > > an update to skype will pop up and ask you > > > deny. you will have to deny repeatedly. there is no reason in the > world skype should have access to your icloud, contacts, ... Was there meant to be a screenshot or some explanation of what

Re: Extending network over a dry pair

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 4:22 PM Dan Hollis wrote: > Repeaters are standard for T1s. > > I strongly suggest looking at wireless. There is almost guaranteed to be a > spot you can put a repeater up to bridge you to your gateway. > > Maybe this has been mentioned, and I missed it, but: A hybrid

Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 11:27 Sean Donelan wrote: > On Wed, 1 Aug 2018, Aaron Gould wrote: > > As you all have said, to confirm, I use ssm Mcast to distribute TV from > > satellite down links in the headend, out to a few different remote head > > ends. From there it's converted back to RF video

Re: Tunable QSFP Optics

king - I didn't have a meter handy. I certainly learned something about the tighter spacing of 100G colors. > > -- -- Hunter Fuller Network Engineer VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Systems and Infrastructure

Re: Tunable QSFP Optics

anecdotally, but there could be other explanations, I am admittedly not an expert. -- -- Hunter Fuller Network Engineer VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 <(256)%20824-5331> Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Systems and Infrastructure

Re: BGP in a containers

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:46 PM Mike Hammett wrote: > I wonder which part of the proposal people find offensive. I have no idea. All - You know no one is trying to make *you* run BGP inside of a container, right?

Re: Email security: PGP/GPG & S/MIME vulnerability drop imminent

ere near the end of the priority list. I know that's where it resides on mine. -- -- Hunter Fuller Network Engineer VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Systems and Infrastructure

Re: USB Ethernet Adapters

t USB to Ethernet adapter do you recommend and why? > > Ideally it would be compatible with Windows 10, and have the ability to > set > > speed, duplex and VLAN IDs if possible. > > > -- -- Hunter Fuller Network Engineer VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Systems and Infrastructure

Re: Suggestion for Layer 3, all SFP+ switches

e the > MPLS code is. Pricing I've seen is pretty good for what you get, but > again it may be overkill. > > Juniper has some nice boxes in the EX series with at least MPLS > L2-endpoint functionality that might also be an option for this sort of > thing, but I don't know any mod

Re: Juniper Config Commit causes Cisco Etherchannels to go into err-disable state

;mode active" on all our Port-channels. So if there is a misconfiguration, the LAG does not come up for that port on either end, and we're good. Hope that helps. -- -- Hunter Fuller Network Engineer VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alab

Re: 40G reforming

zCOgJFRZ5nmZOVEPBovGYNTtdQ_pCE=. > And finally the reformed signal can be transported using anything including > DWDM modules such as > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.fs.com_products_44058.html=DwIDaQ=Hlvprqonr5LuCN9TN65xNw=Iw8ah1pcqZhOErIjaFRfuA=wWoshgttJT0E6q6-qJzP_Zc

Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32

P in a dedicated range (172.31.0.0/24 for > example). > > I would to hear everyone's thoughts on this, as this the first IP address > in an RFC1918 range. > > Thanks, > > -- > Ryan Hamel > ryan.ha...@quadranet.com | +1 (888) 578-2372 <(888)%20578-2372> > Qua

Re: Long AS Path

the end of > time about this; what is the difference between operating on > superstition and trying to be pro-active? Both for me fall under the > category of "risk management". > > Cheers, > James. > -- -- Hunter Fuller Network Engineer VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of Information Technology The University of Alabama in Huntsville Systems and Infrastructure

Re: PCIe adapters supporting long distance 10GB fiber?

r anyone who may be going down this road, if you have a two-port Intel NIC, I discovered you have to pass "allow_unsupported_sfp=1,1" or it will only apply to the first port. Hope that helps someone. -- -- Hunter Fuller Network Engineer VBH Annex B-5 +1 256 824 5331 Office of In

Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent

I think the implication is that, on Cogent, there isn't. :) On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 14:00 Chuck Anderson wrote: > Define "good" vs. "bad" transport of bits. As long as there is > adequate bandwidth and low latency, who cares? > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 08:30:37PM +0100, Baldur

Re: "Defensive" BGP hijacking?

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:25 AM Bryant Townsend wrote: > I also wanted to let Hugo (who started the thread) know > that we harbor no hard feelings about bringing this topic up, as it is > relevant to the community and does warrant discussion. Hugo, you may owe me > a

Re: Nat

You are using a Cisco what for NAT? And which products are you considering? On Tuesday, December 15, 2015, Ahmed Munaf wrote: > Dear All, > > We are using cisco for natting, we'd like to change it to another brand > like A10 or Citrix. > > Please any advice regarding

Re: AW: Uptick in spam

The trouble is that this is not the NAMSOG (North American Mail Server Operators Group). ;) On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Peter Beckman wrote: > Wouldn't that be interesting -- you can't join NANOG unless your email > domain publishes an SPF record with a -all rule. > >

Re: WiFI on utility poles

Wow, it is like they are actively sabotaging us. Sigh... None of that in this area yet - I'm sure it's only a matter of time though. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Michael T. Voity wrote: > Sorry folks, attachment didn't work. Here is the link - > >

Re: WiFI on utility poles

Ehh... All that content is going over Internet2 for us anyway. I'd suspect that's a somewhat common thread (though not ubiquitous). On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Mike Lyon wrote: >> And it's not

Re: WiFI on utility poles

25 traffic usually, where Netflix and Google are normally within the top 5. On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Jim Popovitch <jim...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hunter Fuller <hf0002+na...@uah.edu> wrote: >> Ehh... All that content is going over In