-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Why are you sending me this crap...please stop. I've reached out to your NOC
to no avail.
Sep 7 19:11:19 web4.domainmail.net nginx: 172.68.1.193 - _ "POST
/dms2/services2/ServerMMS2 HTTP/2.0" 400 150 "-" "Agent-Probe"
Sep 7 19:11:19
On Sat, 2023-09-02 at 13:10 -0400, John Levine wrote:
>
> It's like changing your password, it sort of made sense in the 1980s
> when networks meant coax Ethernets and bored students could sniff
> passwords, and now it's cargo cult security. These days the only
> sniffable shared media left is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 10:16 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> and i just have to wonder about sending passords over the net in
> cleartext in 2023. really?
>
> randy
For those that wish to do something about it...
$ ~/mailman/debian/patches$ cat
On Tue, 2022-08-02 at 11:24 -0700, Michael Thomas via NANOG wrote:
> On 8/2/22 11:18 AM, Chris Adams via NANOG wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
> > > Once upon a time, Jared Mauch said:
> > > > Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC please, it’s
> > > > problematic as if
On Sat, 2022-05-28 at 11:36 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> > I am not in the ARIN region but I have attended few Arin meetings.
> > As a comment, I live a country were mobile roaming does not
> > exists,
> > therefore, when 2FA only works with SMS I can not use the service.
> > Having
> > said
On Sun, 2022-05-08 at 12:01 +, Mel Beckman wrote:
> The plaintiff’s won a default judgement, because the defendants didn’t show
> up in court. But they could not have shown up in court, because they were
> only listed as “John Does” in the lawsuit. Thus no defendant could have
> “actual
On Fri, 2021-09-10 at 10:31 -0400, Jason Kuehl wrote:
> For whatever reason Comcast Xfinity is blocking my VPN URL.
Not certain that this applies, but Concast Advanced Security (setup in
your Comcast gateway) only allows outbound VPN connections to UDP ports
500, 4500, and 62515 and TCP port
On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 09:30 +0200, Markus wrote:
> Am 27.04.2021 um 16:46 schrieb Brian Turnbow via NANOG:
> > Hi Dominque,
> >
> > And sign up for snds
> >
> > https://sendersupport.olc.protection.outlook.com/snds/index.aspx
> >
On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 16:24 -0700, Edward McNair wrote:
> I don’t understand the impact. Those who are comfortable with using
> the mailing list via email would just keep doing what they are doing
> now. With the exact same email address. There should be no procedural
> changes. In theory, we
On Thu, 2020-10-22 at 18:04 +, Paul Nash wrote:
> Autocorrect changed a misspelled recipient to “nanog”.
>
Not quite. What happened was sometime in the past Brian sent an email
to NANOG from a domain publishing a DMARC record. Mailman on nanog@
wraps such an email and (like it or not) sets
On October 1, 2019 9:39:03 PM UTC, Matt Palmer wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 04:50:33AM -0400, Jim Popovitch via NANOG
>wrote:
>> On 10/1/2019 4:09 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> > possible that this is various AWS customers making
>iptables/firewall mistakes?
&
On 10/1/2019 4:09 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
possible that this is various AWS customers making iptables/firewall mistakes?
"block that pesky rfc1918 172/12 space!!"
AWS also uses some 172/12 space on their internal network (e.g. the
network that sits between EC2 instances and the AWS
On January 31, 2019 1:55:26 AM UTC, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:41 PM Jim Popovitch via NANOG
>
>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 17:22 -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
>> > Any chance this could wait until say the Tuesday
>> > *after* t
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 17:22 -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
> Any chance this could wait until say the Tuesday
> *after* the Superbowl, when we aren't cutting an
> entire religion's worth of potential workers out of
> the workforce available to fix issues in case it
> turns out to be a bigger
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 18:30 +, Phil Lavin wrote:
> > We are seeing DNS requests for A and to 8.8.8.8 come back with
> > erroneous replies resolving to 146.112.61.106 when sent via FiOS
> > circuits in the northeast. Anyone else seeing issues with DNS on
> > FiOS in Northeast? Issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 11:19 -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> 1. They needed to stop doing so a few decades ago. Anybody still
> doing it today is doing it on purpose, which of course leads directly
> to the question: why?
One reason as to "why" is
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Octavio Alvarez
wrote:
>
>
> On 10/27/2015 05:09 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Octavio Alvarez
>> > wrote:
>>
>> On 26/10/15 11:38, Jürgen Jaritsch
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Larry Sheldon <larryshel...@cox.net> wrote:
> On 10/25/2015 10:35, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>
>> All in favor of 9x5 network operations say aye.
>
>
> "9x5"?
Well who really works 8 hours a day?
-Jim P.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> It isn't a quick flip of a switch would be my guess.
>
It is indeed much simpler and can even be done via a mobile device
from anywhere in the world. The magic sauce: Moderate the user
account being abused to
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> I have 521 messages that match:
> To: nanog*
> Subject:new message
>
> In the last week. Obviously that includes things like Jay’s message below,
> but still a lot more than 100.
>
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> If all the complaining waits until Monday morning, why fix it over the
> weekend?
If people only looked at received headers..
-Jim P.
All in favor of 9x5 network operations say aye.
Geeze.
-Jim P.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> It looks like someone's trying to make a point.
The takeaway is:
1) NANOG doesn't seem to do simple inbound spam filtering :-)
-Jim P.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
> And it's not free, unless you are a Comcast or TW customer :(
But it is free to the children of C customers who then can watch HD
content while away at Uni without sapping the EDU bandwidth.
-Jim P.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Hunter Fuller wrote:
> Ehh... All that content is going over Internet2 for us anyway.
I'm genuinely curious, is that is optimized for HD delivery from TW
and C, or such services as Netflix/YouTube, etc.
-Jim P.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Phill Twiss ph...@daa.com.au wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
De-lurking
Hi Rafael and everyone else :}( sorry the cross-post )
You should really have captcha's configured for your mailman lists
Some shady actors out
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Leonardo Oliveira Ortiz
leonardo.or...@marisolsa.com wrote:
So, you guys recommend replace Bind for another option ?
The humorous thing is that the security researcher who showed the
recent bind9 error (note: it isn't a vulnerability or a hack, it's
just a way to
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
On Jul 14, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:22 PM, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
No. My DNS (using the roots) gets it right. ;-)
so if you choose google DNS
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
There is
And there isn't
~$ dig -t www.microsoft.com +short
toggle.www.ms.akadns.net.
www.microsoft.com-c.edgekey.net.
www.microsoft.com-c.edgekey.net.globalredir.akadns.net.
e10088.dspb.akamaiedge.net.
~$
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
There is
And there isn't
~$ dig -t www.microsoft.com +short
toggle.www.ms.akadns.net.
www.microsoft.com-c.edgekey.net
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:30 PM, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
And there isn't
its your DNS ;-)
No. My DNS (using the roots) gets it right. ;-)
The failure is somewhere between Google Public DNS's IPv4 servers and Akamai.
See my earlier post.
-Jim P.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:22 PM, a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:
Hi,
No. My DNS (using the roots) gets it right. ;-)
so if you choose google DNS you dont see the right stuff..in which case its
your DNS
and not microsoft or Akamai not doing IPv6 ;-)same true for OpenDNS?
likely...
Hello,
I haven't seen anything to explain this, so I'm asking a larger
audience. Did anyone notice any unusual NTT or HE routing this AM?
Here's what I saw:
2.|-- xe-0-1-0-17.r04.atlnga05.us.bb.gin.ntt.net 0.0%200.8
0.7 0.6 0.9 0.1
3.|-- ae-2.r20.atlnga05.us.bb.gin.ntt.net
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Darden, Patrick patrick.dar...@p66.com wrote:
Good point. It's a massive job, and sometimes it is best to look at those
piecemeal. Start with small goals, and pick low hanging fruit--your example
of the server room is good. Set it up with and IDS, a
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Naslund, Steve snasl...@medline.com wrote:
There is an OM budget created for the day to day operation and maintenance
of IT systems. This is approved along with your department's budget
annually. If you classify updating equipment as an OM function (which
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote:
What's out there for setting up your own looking glass? I saw lots of lists
of dead projects or projects that hadn't received any love in years. Being as
most the people I work with don't run Cisco, Juniper, etc. for
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Shane Ronan sh...@ronan-online.com wrote:
This would be even more AWESOME if you added routing table lookup.
I'll suggest that to the author.
-Jim P.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Here's a relatively new and fresh perspective on it:
https://github.com/ramnode/LookingGlass
You can see it in action here:
http://lg.nyc.ramnode.com/
looking glass without routing, indeed a new perspective :(
But routing is
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Here's a relatively new and fresh perspective on it:
https://github.com/ramnode/LookingGlass
You can see it in action here:
http://lg.nyc.ramnode.com/
looking glass without routing, indeed a new perspective :(
with a bit more
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:18 AM, James R Cutler
james.cut...@consultant.com wrote:
“please let me manage my business and don’t take away my tools just to
satisfy your prejudices.”
There are probably several ways to interpret that in ways you hadn't
considered for this discussion, I can think
There's a surprising amount of GMail (yes, including me) and new-ness
in this thread.Should I be impressed with the freshness or
concerned about astroturfing? :-)
Bah Humbug!
-Jim P.
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Harald Koch c...@pobox.com wrote:
Y'all are way too trusting ;)
Or we are much more comfortable with our knowledge. Six in one,
If I recall from a brief experiment yesterday, three of the four options on
that page are variations on I'd like to bypass
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Markus unive...@truemetal.org wrote:
Did you know that anyone, anywhere in the world can get into a gmail account
merely by knowing its creation date (month and year is sufficient) and the
last login date (try today)? What a joke.
We don't even know if this
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Keith Medcalf kmedc...@dessus.com wrote:
No test/plain? Delete without further ado.
In the past year or so it seems that all RAA Verification emails, or
at least the ones I see, contain no plain text. :-(
-Jim P.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Ca By cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Good news (that i have not personally verified) !
Verizon
This is not new for VZW, they've been defaulting to IPv6 since my
first Galaxy Nexus (2011).
-Jim P.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Ken Chase m...@sizone.org wrote:
http://blog.erratasec.com/2015/01/obams-war-on-hackers.html
Therefore, immediate end of this thread? Are all subscribers to this list now
to be inconvenienced at airports? (Sorry, my bad.)
Do we all need a CCNP
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote:
On Jan 14, 2015, at 12:19 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Ken Chase m...@sizone.org wrote:
http://blog.erratasec.com/2015/01/obams-war-on-hackers.html
Therefore, immediate
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Ramnode is like $24 a year. They have a Netherlands cluster. I'm running
CentOS6 and get both IPv4 and v6. They use OpenVZ for the really cheap
stuff so depending on what you're doing you may run into issues.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:57 PM, * turm...@privacyrequired.com wrote:
Poettering's own blog for example even misleads on how systemd
and sysvinit work http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/why.html
Oh look... he's related to PulseAudio and Avahi .
If you've ever tried above average audio on
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Mike. the.li...@mgm51.com wrote:
On 10/23/2014 at 10:56 AM Randy wrote:
|I've enjoyed kernel hot patches (ksplice) until now.
|
|So my primary concern is that updates to systemd appears to require
a
|full reboot:
|
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu eu...@imacandi.net wrote:
I think systemd wants to become the next Emacs ;))
Or the next user activity collection point. Systemd really is a
black hole to 99.9% of the people who will use/deploy it... seems
perfect for lots of things.
-Jim P.
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:51 PM, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote:
RFC 1591.
It is extremely unlikely that any other TLDs will be created.
My how times have changed.
-Jim P.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Royce Williams ro...@techsolvency.com wrote:
What other theory about their motivation makes sense?
Most of the DMARC backers offer one or more services that compete with
traditional mailinglists.
-Jim P.
debian/ubuntu admins may want to apt-get update/upgrade or whatever
debian/ubuntu aren't really all that immediately impacted.
$ grep bash$ /etc/passwd | wc -l
2
^^ both of those are user accounts, not system/daemon accounts.
-Jim P.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Brandon Whaley redkr...@gmail.com wrote:
The scope of the issue isn't limited to SSH, that's just a popular
example people are using. Any program calling bash could potentially
be vulnerable.
Agreed. My point was that bash is not all that popular on
On Sep 24, 2014 6:39 PM, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
On 9/24/14, 3:27 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Brandon Whaley redkr...@gmail.com
wrote:
The scope of the issue isn't limited to SSH, that's just a popular
example people are using. Any program calling
On Sep 24, 2014 7:00 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 18:50:05 -0400, Jim Popovitch said:
If someone is already invoking #!/bin/bash from a cgi, then they are
already doing it wrong (bash has massive bloat/overhead for a CGI
script).
You sure you don't have *any
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:29 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Jackson f...@mindspring.com wrote:
On 09/24/2014 07:22 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
That won't automatically invoke bash on Debian/Ubuntuunless someone
intentionally changed default
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:49 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
You have done something wrong/different than what appears on a
relatively clean install:
Since you didn't read it, I'm gonna repeat it:
If you
On Sep 24, 2014 10:56 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
I *did* read that, and it doesn't change anything about what I wrote.
Debian didn't make those changes for you.. Debian has never set
root's shell
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 05:35:45PM -0700, Scott Weeks wrote:
One day, hopefully, telecommuting really takes off [...]
It often strikes me as incredibly ironic that companies which *would
not exist* were it not for the Internet
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Miles Fidelman
mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
Methinks all of the arguments and finger-pointing need to be recognized as
being mostly posturing for position.
.. at the expense of the customer.
-Jim P.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Miles Fidelman
mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
Randy Bush wrote:
And, of course, one might ask why Netflix isn't ... making use of a
caching network like Akamai, as many other large traffic sources do
on a routine basis.
they do. netflix rolls their own
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
it's not clear (to me at least) that hotmail has deployed any DMARC
Don't let that stop others from offering leftfield advice. :-)
According to MailOP, Yahoo had acceptability issues as well this AM.
-Jim P.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a heads up to interested parties... Google seems to now be
bouncing where From: is another gmail account. But it seems to be
inconsistent. If you are reading this on a gmail account please let
me know.
-Jim P
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Steven Saner ssa...@hubris.net wrote:
We run several mailing lists for customers. We frequently get feedback
reports from AOL saying that the AOL user has flagged the message as
spam. So, we remove said user from the list. They then complain that
they have
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a heads up to interested parties... Google seems to now be
bouncing where From: is another gmail account. But it seems to be
inconsistent
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Clayton Zekelman clay...@mnsi.net wrote:
Can someone please check the NANOG mailing list Universal Translator? I
think it is broken.
I think you mean a NANOG liver is broken.
-Jim P.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.netwrote:
On 4/16/2014 11:19 PM, Private Sender nobody snovc com wrote:
Does that raise any alarms?
Of course it does. http://whois.domaintools.com/snovc.com
computerguy0...@yahoo.com Bret Taylor
-Jim P.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Private Sender nob...@snovc.com wrote:
On 04/14/2014 03:47 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com
wrote:
7-April: Monday, Yahoo's dmarc
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com wrote:
So, I take it you prefer a world in which there's no sender
validation, and receiving floods of spoofed sender email
spam is just part of the price of being on the internet?
That is clearly not what this issue is
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
The obvious ones would have been to announce a flag day somewhere far enough
in advance to give list software devs time to adapt, and to
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Matthias Leisi matth...@leisi.net wrote:
They could have communicated, as in listen folks, we are going to make a
critical change that will affect mailing lists (etc...) in four
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 04/14/2014 01:38 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
The obvious ones would have been to announce a flag day somewhere far
enough
in advance to give
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
if you're going to do something that has the potential to affect (say,
for example) email to a wide set of people, most of which are NOT your
direct users, how do you go about making that public?
'the
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Miles Fidelman
mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
Matthias Leisi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
Whilst I don't agree with the
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
They could have made the change not late on a Friday afternoon (or well
into the weekend for most of the world).
On the weekend before tax
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
7-April: Monday, Yahoo's dmarc change kicks everyone in the groin, the
last full week before the US tax filing deadline.
The change was made
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com wrote:
Question:
Years ago Yahoo! bought major mailing list provider egroups formerly
onelist, eventually absorbing it into yahoo clubs and making something
called yahoogroups.
Does this break yahoogroups too? How are THEY
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Miles Fidelman
mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 10:12:09 -0400, Miles Fidelman said:
It occurs to me that Yahoo's deployment of DMARC p=reject, and the
choice of several big mail operators to honor that, has
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Dave Crocker d...@dcrocker.net wrote:
On 4/12/2014 2:38 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Miles Fidelman
mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
someone needs to get a legal opinion wrt
the DMARC group's effort to have all mailinglists
Confirmed across a variety of Mailman lists I administer.
Mailman can be patched to reject/discard posts from members with p=reject.
https://code.launchpad.net/~jimpop/mailman/dmarc-reject
I'm sort of glad that Yahoo did what they did, people are now seeing
the dark side of DMARC. WooHoo!!
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 5:15 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:05 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I'd say it's pretty badly broken if Yahoo intends for their web mail
to continue to be a general purpose mail system for consumers. If
they want to make it
The most sane out-of-mind response should only be sent *if* the
out-of-mind person is named explicitly as a recipient in the RFC822
header. Anything To: somelist@somehost does not qualify :)
Funny story: When I was at IBM I filed that as a bug with Lotus
Notes. The Notes team rejected the
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:22:51 -0500
From: Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net
Organization: Maybe tomorrow
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:12 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 6:11 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
and just how is an algorithm supposed to detect that
jeff-k...@utc.edu is a single human and not a list?
If the autoresponder is sane, it
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
nit
Not all of 41/8 is served by South Africa :-).
/nit
nit
But a significant portion of it routes through London :-)
/nit
*cough *cough co.tz to co.za, etc., etc.
-Jim P.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:21 AM, David Hofstee da...@mailplus.nl wrote:
There must be a good reason for people to get of their asses and start
implementing things like DMARC. All the banks (!$%^) I talk to do not have
any reason to implement it swiftly (they turn on p=none and then all
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Brielle Bruns br...@2mbit.com wrote:
On 3/25/14, 11:23 AM, John Levine wrote:
Large mail providers all agree that v6 senders need to follow good
mail discipline, but are far from agreeing what that means. It
certainly means proper rDNS, but does it mean SPF?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz las...@heliacal.net wrote:
The usefulness of reverse DNS in IPv6 is dubious. Maybe the idea is to
cause enough pain that eventually you fold and get them to host your email
too.
Heh, I say the same things about DMARC where a lot of the major
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Naslund, Steve snasl...@medline.com wrote:
Nice idea, too bad no one can make any money on building infrastructure but
not selling the services on top of it. Remember Global Crossing? You are
asking one company to put up all the capital expense and then try
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Naslund, Steve snasl...@medline.com wrote:
What do you mean by average monthly bill?
What is the average monthly (non-subsidized) access cost that your
friends and family pay each month?
-Jim P.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
This email is the reason I spend money with digital ocean. :)
You should too.
uhh, no. It's the 21st century. I prefer to spend my money with those
that, at a bare minimum, provide IPv6.
-Jim P.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Eric Tykwinski eric-l...@truenet.com wrote:
Just wanted to add something to the discussion:
http://www.renesys.com/2013/10/google-dns-departs-brazil-ahead-new-law/
Basically, they are claiming possible new laws in Brazil have left Google to
shut down DNS
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Private Sender nob...@snovc.com wrote:
I would recommend you go a step further and use DKIM, ADSP, and DMARC.
Don't do DMARC if you expect to have end-users forward emails, or
subscribe to mailinglists. Despite the removal from the current DMARC
spec, the
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't be the only one to have been following this 12.8TB of neat-o-ness:
http://www.bricscable.com/
34 000 km, 2 fibre pair, 12.8 Tbit
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
In article ee045d19-797d-4346-8793-b854e528f...@email.android.com you write:
The balkanizing of the Net?
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
In article ee045d19-797d-4346-8793-b854e528f...@email.android.com you
write
Hello,
A desperate plea, since apparently VZ still doesn't have a public
routeserver. :-(
I need a trace from a VZ FIOS connection in Southern California, to
96.44.148.54 (Quadranet, DFW).
Private replies are welcome and encouraged.
Thank you, sorry for the noise.
-Jim P.
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Aaron Wendel
aa...@wholesaleinternet.net wrote:
Not just a Canadian issue...
Nor even a North American one.
-Jim P.
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo