WEBCAST 17-20 July – Routing Security Summit 2023
Welcome to Routing Security Summit 2023! The kick off tutorial is under way, and sessions proper start tomorrow. All session recordings are available immediately after on the livestream channels. [image: isoc live]On *17-20 July 2023 **MANRS* <https://www.manrs.org/> convenes the *Routing Security Summit 2023 <https://www.manrs.org/event/routing-security-summit-2023/>*. This online event will highlight the importance of routing security and encourage decision-makers and network operators to take real steps toward improving the security and resilience of the global routing infrastructure, bringing together partners from across the Internet routing ecosystem to answer your questions about routing security and the MANRS initiative, discuss successes with implementing routing security measures such as Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI), and share ideas on how to build awareness about routing security among not just the technical community but the wider Internet community. *PROGRAMME https://www.manrs.org/event/routing-security-summit-2023/ <https://www.manrs.org/event/routing-security-summit-2023/>* *Mon 17 July 2023* *10:00-11:00 UTC Tutorial – Routing Security 101* *Massimiliano Stucchi* *Tue 18 July 2023* *7:00-8:00 UTC – Tutorial – How to deploy ROV* *Massimiliano Stucch*i *13:00-14:30 UTC Routing Security as Supply Chain Security: Threats and Opportunities* *Fredrik Korsbäck*, AWS *Matthew Davy*, Visa *Linda Bertz*, FS-ISAC *Antoin Verschuren*, Liberty Global *Joe Abley*, Cloudflare *Benjamin Broersma*, Bureau of the Netherlands Standardisation Forum MOD: *Andrei Robachevsky* *Wed 19 July 2023* *7:00-8:00 UTC – Tutorial – Making the MANRS Observatory Work for You* *Aftab Siddiqui* *11:30-12:30 UTC – It Takes a Community: Exchanging Routing Security Best Practices* *Anand Raje*, India Internet Foundation *Matthias Wichtlhuber*, DE-CIX *Peter Gitau*, Kenya IXP (BBIX) MOD: *Robbie Mitchell* *13:00-14:30 UTC The Role of CSIRTS in Routing Security* *Alain Aina*, Digital Intelligence Services *Barry Greene*, The Shadowserver Foundation MOD: *Jean-Robert Hountomey*, AfricaCERT *Thu 20 July 2023* *11:30-12:30 UTC – The Routing Security Research Roundup* *Romain Fontugne*, IIJ *Khwaja Zubair Sediqi*, Max Planck Institute for Informatics *Thomas Holterbach*, University of Strasbourg MOD: *Amreesh Phokeer* *13:00-14:30 UTC – ROV Research Review* *Cecilia Testart*, Georgia Institute of Technology *Haya Shulman*, Goethe University Frankfurt *Taejoong (Tijay) Chung*, Virginia Tech *13:00-14:30 UTC – Working with Governments to Progress Routing Security* *Gerben Klein Baltink*, Dutch Internet Standards Platform *Veronica Tan*, Cyber Security Agency of Singapore *Doug Montgomery*, National Institute of Standards and Technology (+ Special Guest) MOD: *Ryan Polk* *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/routing-security-summit-2023 <http://livestream.com/internetsociety/routing-security-summit-2023>* *REAL TIME TEXT* (See *ISOC.LIVE <https://isoc.live/16715>*) *TWITTER #RoutingSecuritySummit <https://bit.ly/RoutingSecuritySummit> #RPKI #ROV #SupplyChainSecurity #RoutingSecurity <https://bit.ly/RoutingSecurity> @RoutingMANRS @InternetSociety* *MASTODON #RoutingSecurity <https://mastodon.social/tags/RoutingSecurity>* *SIMULCAST CHANNELS* *https://twitter.com/ISOC_Live <https://twitter.com/ISOC_Live>* *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive <https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive>* *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/* <https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/> (AI Captions) *https://www.facebook.com/RoutingMANRS* <https://www.facebook.com/RoutingMANRS> (AI Captions) *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/routing-security-summit-2023 <https://archive.org/details/routing-security-summit-2023>* *https://www.youtube.com/@RoutingMANRS* <https://www.youtube.com/@RoutingMANRS> *Permalink - https://isoc.live/16715 <https://isoc.live/16715>* - -- -- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -- -
WEBCAST JUL 4-7 – RPKI Week 2022
It's time once again for MANRS' annual series on routing security. Tutorials, updates, panel discussions, it's all here. Real Time Text for Session 1 is https://bit.ly/3Ap4ZTG [image: isoc.live] <https://isoc.live/15564>On *4-7 July 2022* the *Internet Society <https://InternetSociety.org>* will host *RPKI Week 2022 <https://archive.org/details/rpki-week-2022>* to highlight the importance of Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) and encourage network operators to take concrete steps to improve routing security. RPKI helps prevent Internet routing incidents like prefix hijacking and route leaks. It allows an entity to cryptographically verify that an autonomous system (AS) is authorized to originate a prefix, thus reducing incidents that can lead to DDoS attacks, traffic inspection, lost revenue, reputational damage, and more. We will bring together partners from across the Internet routing ecosystem to launch tools, provide educational materials, and facilitate discussion and build awareness about routing security. *SCHEDULE* *4th July 1300-1500 UTC* - RPKI and IRR Explorer Tutorial #1 *5th July 1200-1330 UTC* - Routing Resiliency Research Roundup *6th July 0600-0800 UTC* - RPKI and IRR Explorer Tutorial #2 *6th July 1200-1330 UTC* - Roadblocks to RPKI Deployment *7th July 1200-1400 UTC* - Future Developments in Routing Security *LIVESTREAM http://livestream.com/internetsociety/rpki-week-2022 <http://livestream.com/internetsociety/rpki-week-2022>* *AGENDA https://www.manrs.org/resources/upcoming-events/rpki-week-2022/ <https://www.manrs.org/resources/upcoming-events/rpki-week-2022/>* *PARTICIPATE VIA ZOOM* - See agenda for session links *REAL TIME TEXT* See (ISOC.LIVE <https://isoc.live/15564>) *TWITTER #RPKIWeek <http://bit.ly/RPKIWeek> @RoutingMANRS @InternetSociety @APNIC @AFRINIC @TeamARIN @LACNIC @RIPENCC #RoutingSecurity #MANRS* *SIMULCASTS* *http://bit.ly/RPKIWEEK2022LIVE <http://bit.ly/RPKIWEEK2022LIVE>* (MANRS YouTube) *https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/ <https://www.twitter.com/ISOC_Live/>* *https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive <https://www.twitch.tv/isoclive>* *https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/ <https://www.facebook.com/liveisoc/>* (AI Captions) *https://www.facebook.com/RoutingMANRS/ <https://www.facebook.com/RoutingMANRS/>* (AI Captions) *ARCHIVE* *https://archive.org/details/rpki-week-2022 <https://archive.org/details/rpki-week-2022>* *Permalink https://isoc.live/15564* - -- -- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -- -
Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers
But, presumably, the carriers/providers do have the data. I've heard it suggested (Vint Cerf to broadband.money) that *any* public funding of ISPs should be contingent on them providing it to the regulators. joly On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 11:40 AM Sean Donelan wrote: > > Look at the difficulty the FCC and state PUCs have getting accurate > service maps from carriers and service providers. Its like those wireless > maps, the carriers make jokes about in TV commercials. Their own ad > agencies know their own maps are bogus. > > -- ------ Joly MacFie +12185659365 -- -
Re: "Permanent" DST
WaPo has a been there done that item today. https://www.washingtonian.com/2022/03/15/the-us-tried-permanent-daylight-saving-time-in-the-70s-people-hated-it/ On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 3:11 PM Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > In a unanimous vote today, the US Senate approved a bill which would > > 1) Cancel DST permanently, and > 2) Move every square inch of US territory 15 degrees to the east. > > My opinion of this ought to be obvious from my rhetoric. Hopefully, it > will > fail, because it's likely to be the end of rational time worldwide, and > even > if you do log in UTC, it will still make your life difficult. > > I'm poleaxed; I can't even decide which grounds to scream about this on... > > Hopefully, the House or the White House will be more coherent in their > decision on this engineering construct. > > Cheers, > -- jra > > -- > Jay R. Ashworth Baylink > j...@baylink.com > Designer The Things I Think RFC > 2100 > Ashworth & Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land > Rover DII > St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 > 1274 > -- -- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -- -
Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
My 2c on this is that, in my role as ISOC streammeister, it is frustrating that I have no way of notifying NOs when I have the occasional technical webcast, e.g. http://bit.ly/MANRSTechTalks If discourse might permit that, then bring it on! joly -- -- Joly MacFie +12185659365 -- -
Re: Uganda Communications Commission shutdown order
New ISOC shutdowns page https://insights.internetsociety.org/shutdowns On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 3:05 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > > The Uganda Communications Commission has issued a shutdown order for the > operation of all Internet gateways in Uganda beginning January 13, 2021 > until further notice. > > I can't access the official Uganda Communications Commission website, but > this appears to be a copy of the order > > https://twitter.com/DougColtart/status/1349442878481846272/photo/1 > > -- ------ Joly MacFie +12185659365 -- -
Re: Vint Cerf & Interplanetary Internet
It should be mentioned that the IPN SIG is lately revitalized, had elections, and is actively forming Working Groups. http://ipnsig.org/ On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 7:20 PM Rod Beck wrote: > > https://www.quantamagazine.org/vint-cerfs-plan-for-building-an-internet-in-space-20201021/ > > Roderick Beck > VP of Business Development > > United Cable Company > > www.unitedcablecompany.com > > New York City & Budapest > > rod.b...@unitedcablecompany.com > > Budapest: 36-70-605-5144 > > NJ: 908-452-8183 > > > [image: 1467221477350_image005.png] > -- -- Joly MacFie +2185659365 -- -
Re: NANOG 78 Webcasts
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 6:03 PM Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote: > > Live streams through YouTube are quite different than videos uploaded to > YouTube. > > YouTube doesn't store the live stream for later playback. A separate > copy of the video must be uploaded. > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > > This is absolutely false, in fact the reverse is true! Public VOD on a public livestream is the default. It has to be switched off, either by deleting the streams, or making them 'private'. What is also true is that, as long as a stream is under 8 hrs, YT has an "editor" which permits trimming and "save as new". My guess is that this is some kind of legal red tape, speakers signed off for livestream but not VOD. If just one speaker objects, it can take the whole thing down. I will mention, that in the case of Hosein Badran's presentation, I asked for, and received, permission to simulcast. It is available at https://isoc.live/11782/ joly -- -- Joly MacFie +2185659365 -- -
Re: Reminiscing our first internet connections (WAS) Re: akamai yesterday - what in the world was that
IIRC that 64k was in fact 56k with 8k for overhead. I had one, and it would kick in a second channel if you pushed it, for a whopping 112k. Metered, came out to about $500/mo. Joly On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 6:26 PM Ben Cannon wrote: > I started what became 6x7 with a 64k ISDN line. And 9600 baud modems… > > in ’93 or so. (I was a child, in Jr High…) > > -Ben. > > > -Ben Cannon > CEO 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC > b...@6by7.net > > > > On Jan 24, 2020, at 3:21 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote: > > > On January 24, 2020 at 08:55 aar...@gvtc.com (Aaron Gould) wrote: > > Thanks Jared, When I reminisce with my boss he reminds me that this > telco/ISP here initially started with a 56kbps internet uplink , lol > > > Point of History: > > When we, The World, first began allowing the general public onto the > internet in October 1989 we actually had a (mildly shared*) T1 > (1.544mbps) UUNET link. So not so bad for the time. Dial-up customers > shared a handful of 2400bps modems, we still have them. > > * It was also fanned out of our office to a handful of Boston-area > customers who had 56kbps or 9600bps leased lines, not many. > > -- >-Barry Shein > > Software Tool & Die| b...@theworld.com > | http://www.TheWorld.com <http://www.theworld.com> > Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD > The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo* > > > -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: Colo in Africa
You might want to consider attending AfPIF in Mauritius 20-22 Aug https://www.afpif.org/ -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: residential/smb internet access in 2019 - help?
> and CBRS is eclipsing these licensed operators shortly. Yeah what about that? https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/google-courts-wisps-tailored-cbrs-solutions -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: residential/smb internet access in 2019 - help?
Is there any chance LEO operators like OneWeb etc will make a difference on this front, and, if so, when? joly On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:57 PM Ross Tajvar wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 11:34 PM david raistrick > wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:29 PM Ross Tajvar wrote: >> >> >>> But most likely you're just out of luck. >>> >> >> it's really amazing that this is still the case, with our effectively >> internet based economy now. >> >> > > Agreedthis is why monopolies are bad and municipal fiber is good. > >> -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: Whois vs GDPR, latest news
If of use, last Monday I recorded and posted video of Jonathan Zuck's briefing to NARALO on ICANN's interim plan . > https://youtu.be/9WVI4aFg0Lc -- Joly MacFie President - Internet Society New York Chapter (ISOC-NY) http://isoc-ny.org 218 565 9365
WEBCAST TODAY: ION Durban
This is under way. Unlike many IONs, which are brief afternoon sessions, ION Durban is a full day of technical richness. A good quality webcast too, courtesy of ISOC 's Africa Regional Bureau. ISOC Africa also streamed the SAFNOG-3 Conference the last 2 days, which had many excellent presentations. See https://livestream.com/internetsociety/safnog3 [image: Livestream] <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/iondurban> Today, *Thursday 7 September 2017* the *Internet Society Deploy 360 team <http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/>* will present *ION Durban <http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ion/durban2017/>* alongside the South African *iWeek 2017 <https://www.iweek.org.za/>*. ION Conferences bring network engineers and leading industry experts together to discuss emerging technologies and hot technology topics. Early adopters provide valuable insight into their own deployment experiences and bring participants up to speed on new standards emerging from the IETF. There will be a full-day program covering topics including IPv6, DNSSEC, Securing BGP, and TLS for Applications. The event will be webcast live on the *Internet Society Livestream Channel <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/iondurban>*. Durban is 6 hours ahead of NYC (UTC+2). *What: ION Durban <http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ion/durban2017/>Where: Durban, Kwa-Zulu Natal, South AfricaWhen: Thursday 7 September 2017 09:00-16:45 SAST (UTC+2)Agenda: http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ion/durban2017/agenda/ <http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ion/durban2017/agenda/>Webcast: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/iondurban <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/iondurban>Slides: http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ion/durban2017/presentations/ <http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ion/durban2017/presentations/>Twitter: #ionconf https://bit.ly/ionconf <https://bit.ly/ionconf>* Comment <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/9380#respond>See all comments <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/9380#comments> *Permalink* http://isoc-ny.org/p2/9380 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: Puerto Rico Internet Exchange
Looking forward to updating https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Internet_Exchange_of_Puerto_Rico :) > >>> We are hoping the relaunch to happen sometime in 2018. Thanks in > advance > >>> hope to share more info and traffic data sometime , soon. Watch this > space! > >>> > >>> Mehmet > >>> > >> > > -- > --- > Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast > -- > - >
Re: loc.gov
http://www.isitdownrightnow.com/loc.gov.html It was out for about 45 mins AFAICT On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 5:55 PM, John Levine <jo...@iecc.com> wrote: > In article <CAM9VJk1Y+4_E0egS6STZ4_RWpoYUshJbKm0A_VYUPVucJRd7AQ@ > mail.gmail.com> you write: > >http://www.loc.gov/ > > Works fine for me on Roadrunner in central NY. > > -- Joly MacFie President - Internet Society New York Chapter (ISOC-NY) http://isoc-ny.org 218 565 9365
Re: loc.gov
Oh yes, seems to be fixed. It was a fairly lengthy outage. On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Anne P. Mitchell Esq. <amitch...@isipp.com> wrote: > > > > > I see http://congress.gov/ is out too. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Joly MacFie <j...@punkcast.com> wrote: > > > >> (sorry I'm not on the outage list) > >> > >> Any clues as to what the problem is at the Library of Congress? Appears > to > >> be DNS. Is it a DDOS? > >> > >> http://www.loc.gov/ > > These both load for me. > > Anne > > Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. > CEO/President, > SuretyMail Email Reputation Certification and Inbox Delivery Assistance > http://www.SuretyMail.com/ > http://www.SuretyMail.eu/ > > Attorney at Law / Legislative Consultant > Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law) > Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook > Member, California Bar Cyberspace Law Committee > Member, Colorado Cybersecurity Consortium > Member, Elevations Credit Union Member Council > Member, Board of Directors, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop > Member, Board of Directors, Greenwood Wildlife Rehabilitation > Former Chair, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop > Ret. Professor of Law, Lincoln Law School of San Jose > > Available for consultations by special arrangement. > amitch...@isipp.com | @AnnePMitchell > Facebook/AnnePMitchell | LinkedIn/in/annemitchell > > > -- Joly MacFie President - Internet Society New York Chapter (ISOC-NY) http://isoc-ny.org 218 565 9365
Re: loc.gov
I also noticed an outages-announce - is that for people who don't sub to the other two, or should one do all 3 to be fully notified? j On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Damian Menscher via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > There are two lists, depending on whether you're reporting an ongoing > outage, or just talking about one: > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages-discussion > > Damian > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Nicholas Oas <nicholas@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'd be interested to know the answer to this one as well, as I've gone > > looking for the outages list in the past and found the same result. > > > > Have isitdownorjustme sites simply superceded the need for such lists? > > > > On Jul 8, 2017 6:59 PM, "Joly MacFie" <j...@punkcast.com> wrote: > > > > > Actually, now I go to https://www.nanog.org/list/faq/other > > > > > > I don't see any such thing, just http://www.outages.org/ where the > > latest > > > report is 2013. > > > > > > Also "See *http://www.isp-lists.com/* <http://www.isp-lists.com/> for > > many > > > other topic-specific lists." takes one somewhere else entirely! > > > > > > j > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Doug Barton <do...@dougbarton.us> > wrote: > > > > > > > Isn't that a problem that suggests its own solution? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/8/2017 1:43 PM, Joly MacFie wrote: > > > > > > > >> (sorry I'm not on the outage list) > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> --- > > > >> Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast > > > >> -- > > > >> - > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: loc.gov
Actually, now I go to https://www.nanog.org/list/faq/other I don't see any such thing, just http://www.outages.org/ where the latest report is 2013. Also "See *http://www.isp-lists.com/* <http://www.isp-lists.com/> for many other topic-specific lists." takes one somewhere else entirely! j On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Doug Barton <do...@dougbarton.us> wrote: > Isn't that a problem that suggests its own solution? > > > > On 7/8/2017 1:43 PM, Joly MacFie wrote: > >> (sorry I'm not on the outage list) >> >> -- >> ------- >> Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast >> -- >> - >> >
Re: loc.gov
I see http://congress.gov/ is out too. On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Joly MacFie <j...@punkcast.com> wrote: > (sorry I'm not on the outage list) > > Any clues as to what the problem is at the Library of Congress? Appears to > be DNS. Is it a DDOS? > > http://www.loc.gov/ > > > > -- > ------- > Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 <(218)%20565-9365> Skype:punkcast > -- > - > -- ------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
loc.gov
(sorry I'm not on the outage list) Any clues as to what the problem is at the Library of Congress? Appears to be DNS. Is it a DDOS? http://www.loc.gov/ -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: WEBINAR TUESDAY: Can We Make IPv4 Great Again?
I believe that. However it behooves us to give any of our members' ideas a fair hearing. I'm hoping he'll get some good push back in the session. Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com 218 565 9365 On Mar 6, 2017 11:14 AM, "William Herrin" <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Joly MacFie <j...@punkcast.com> wrote: > > To say that Mr. Chen's EZIP proposal has not, thus far, been received > with > > open arms by the networking community would be an understatement. It is > > seen as delaying the inevitable and introducing an impractical extra > > routing hardware layer that will be hit & miss. Nevertheless, since much > of > > the world is still IPv4 dependent, it just could take off. ISOC-NY is > happy > > to give him the opportunity to expound on its merits. > > We'd welcome some expert respondents. > > > > See: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-ati-ipv4-with- > adaptive-address-space-00 > > Hi Joly, > > If something like this was going to happen, we could have expanded the > v4 address space to 64 bits with IPxl: > http://bill.herrin.us/network/ipxl.html > > At this point IPv6 has enough momentum that it can be safely expected > to happen. That means all proposals for extending the IPv4 address > space are basically dead in the water, especially complicated ones. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > -- > William Herrin her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us > Dirtside Systems . Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> >
WEBINAR TUESDAY: Can We Make IPv4 Great Again?
To say that Mr. Chen's EZIP proposal has not, thus far, been received with open arms by the networking community would be an understatement. It is seen as delaying the inevitable and introducing an impractical extra routing hardware layer that will be hit & miss. Nevertheless, since much of the world is still IPv4 dependent, it just could take off. ISOC-NY is happy to give him the opportunity to expound on its merits. We'd welcome some expert respondents. See: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-ati-ipv4-with-adaptive-address-space-00 == WEBINAR TUESDAY: Can We Make IPv4 Great Again? w/ @AbrahamYChen On Tuesday March 8 2017 at noon EST the Internet Society New York Chapter (ISOC-NY) presents a webinar Can We Make IPv4 Great Again?. Abraham Y. Chen, VP of Engineering, Avinta Communications, will present his EzIP proposal to reinvigorate the diminishing pool of IPv4 addresses. Optional registration at the link below. This will be recorded. What: WEBINAR: Can We Make IPv4 Great Again? When: Tuesday March 8 2017 Noon EST | 17:00 UTC Register + info: https://www.meetup.com/isoc-ny/events/238164448/ Computer: https://zoom.us/j/914492141 Phone: http://bit.ly/zoomphone ID: 914 492 141 Twitter: #ezip Permalink http://isoc-ny.org/p2/9031 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: Distributed Object Architecture versus DNS
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 1:48 AM, Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> wrote: > Is there actually a reason to suspect that this time it will be any > different? Blind backlash from IoT DDoS? Looming billions of rf tagged items? -- Joly MacFie President - Internet Society New York Chapter (ISOC-NY) http://isoc-ny.org 218 565 9365
Re: Distributed Object Architecture versus DNS
Oops, just replied to this on the wrong thread. Here it is again: ISOC released an info paper, back in October ahead of the ITU WTSA https://www.internetsociety.org/doc/overview-digital-object-architecture-doa They are worried (as I understand it) 1) that it could be an ITU end run to grab back numbering, 2) it could be abused by bad actors such as repressive governments who want to use it for digital id. Post WTSA there was this <https://www.internetsociety.org/doc/itu-wtsa-2016-outcomes-internet-society-perspective> : Digital Object Architecture (DOA) WTSA-16 received 10 (ten) resolutions ranging from smart cities, combating counterfeit devices and cybersecurity to e-health, IoT that explicitly and implicitly referenced the DOA. Political momentum quickly grew around the DOA as some member states appeared to seek to alter the ITU’s technology neutral stance by selecting the DOA as the solution for a number of issues, including IoT. Agreement was reached to either replace DOA references with Recommendation ITU-T X.1255 <https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-X.1255-201309-I> (which is based on the DOA) or remove them entirely from the relevant resolutions if agreed text on identity management would be reflected in the summary record of the proceedings. The compromise text was a follows: “*the Plenary recognized that identity management plays an important role in many telecommunications/ICT services and that it can be implemented using a range of technologies and solutions.*” We should expect prolonged debates as DOA has survived with a variety of hooks in Resolutions and Recommendations that will carry into Plenipotentiary 2018. It will be important for governments to consider interoperability, stability, security and scalability (at Internet scale) capabilities of any technologies that are deployed on the Internet to ensure that the Internet continues to remain secure and stable. -- Joly MacFie President - Internet Society New York Chapter (ISOC-NY) http://isoc-ny.org 218 565 9365
WEBCAST TODAY: ION Bucharest 2016
Over the holiday I am taking the opportunity to catch up on some editing. This session, from October, is a series of very informative presentations on the latest in network security practice and IPv6 deployment. I'm afraid the 3rd presentation is in Romanian, but the slides are in English! joly posted: "Today, Wednesday December 28 2016, ION Bucharest 2016 - which took place on October 12 2016 - will be restreamed live on the Internet Society Livestream Channel. The Internet Society's Deploy 360 team host a series of presentations, plus a panel, on the l" [image: Livestream] <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/ionbucharest/>Today, *Wednesday December 28 2016*, *ION Bucharest 2016 <http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2016/10/agenda-speakers-and-webcast-information-for-ion-bucharest-on-12-oct/>* - which took place on October 12 2016 - will be restreamed live on the *Internet Society Livestream Channel <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/ionbucharest/>*. The Internet Society's *Deploy 360 <http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/>* team host a series of presentations, plus a panel, on the latest developments with *DNSSEC*, *DANE*, *MANRS*, and *IPv6* with an emphasis on Romania. *What: ION Bucharest 2016 <http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2016/10/agenda-speakers-and-webcast-information-for-ion-bucharest-on-12-oct/> When: Wednesday December 28 2016 9am-12:30pm EST | 13:00-16:30 UTC Webcast: https://livestream.com/internetsociety/ionbucharest/ <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/ionbucharest/> Slides: http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ion/bucharest2016/presentations/ <http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ion/bucharest2016/presentations/> Twitter: https://twitter.com/hashtag/IONConf <https://twitter.com/hashtag/IONConf>* Comment <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/8870#respond>See all comments <http://isoc-ny.org/p2/8870#comments> *Permalink* http://isoc-ny.org/p2/8870 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: Internet Governance Forum DNS
Thanks. My post got moderated and thus was delayed.. The site came back up about 9:30am ET on Thursday. Just in time for day 3 of the IGF in Guadalajara. I'm guessing some strings may have been pulled. j On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 03:36:03AM -0500, > Joly MacFie <j...@punkcast.com> wrote > a message of 13 lines which said: > > > "www.intgovforum.org’s server DNS address could not be found." > > Welcome to the UN... > > Updated Date: 2016-12-08T14:33:28Z > > It expired and was renewed yesterday (source: Internet governance > civil society mailing list). But the negative TTL of .org is 24 > hours... > -- ------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Internet Governance Forum DNS
"www.intgovforum.org’s server DNS address could not be found." and http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/www.intgovforum.org is negative. Any clues as to what's up? -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: Voice channels (FTTH, DOCSIS, VoLTE)
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <j...@baylink.com> wrote: > That is congruent with my understanding of how cableco voice is > provisioned; > it has different rules WRT VoN -- specifically about 911 -- because the > cable > company segregates it and handles it differently (your cablemodem is > expected > to be tied to your service address -- or whatever terminal device does the > voice). > I've seen some telco types refer to this as VuIP i.e. "under IP" to differentiate from VoIP such as Skype , Vonage, etc Not sure if this applies to LTE. j -- Joly MacFie President - Internet Society New York Chapter (ISOC-NY) http://isoc-ny.org 218 565 9365
DEC-IX Summit New York livestream
https://livestream.com/internetsociety/de-cix -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Ronog livestream today
https://youtu.be/fp3YU6hRlpc Some in English. Agenda http://ronog.ro/ ION Bucharest at 14:00 EEST | 11:00 UTC | 07:00 EDT http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/ion/bucharest2016/ -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: Anyone from Facebook here?
Robert Pepper is now working for fb. Don't have an email. On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > You may want to follow up on this email thread. IPv6 vs IPv4 performance > to m.facebook.com. > > https://www.mail-archive.com/bind-users@lists.isc.org/msg23649.html > > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org > -- ------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Livestream of NYNOG Meetup #2 today
10:45am EDT https://livestream.com/internetsociety/nynog2 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
NYNOG Inaugural meet livestream
http://isoc-ny.org/p2/8521 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
WEBCAST TODAY: NEDASNYC In-Building Wireless Summit
This is the second year I've streamed the NEDAS NYC conference. It's a very high quality event that gets into nuts and bolts of bringing connectivity to mobile devices in dense environments. Last year one panel <https://livestream.com/internetsociety/nedasnyc/videos/93602678> was a fascinating dialog on how best to bring wireless to NYC's subway. The first panel today, already underway, is about how to bring "carrier-grade" upload capability to stadiums. Speakers include engineers who have done the Superbowl and the Olympics. *Agenda: https://www.nedas.com/events/nedas-spring-in-building-wireless-summit-nyc <https://www.nedas.com/events/nedas-spring-in-building-wireless-summit-nyc>Webcast: https://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/nedasnyc2016 <https://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/nedasnyc2016>* -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Fwd: Seeking ISP contacts @ Sabey NYC
Please could appropriate reps from the listed companies contact David below offlist. Thanks. j -- Forwarded message -- From: David Solomonoff <presid...@isoc-ny.org> Date: Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:18 PM Cc: NYC Mesh <nycmeshm...@gmail.com> The NY Chapter of the Internet Society is acting as a fiscal sponsor for NYC Mesh, a wireless community network in lower Manhattan, Brooklyn and Jersey City. They are currently arranging for rack space and rooftop antennas at the Sabey data center in lower Manhattan. ISP's at Sabey include: 1. Lightpath 2. Lightower/ Sidera 3. Axiom Fiber 4. Level 3 5. OCG 6. Time Warner 7. XO Communications 8. Verizon 9. United Fiber Data 10.Zayo/AboveNet 11.Earthlink 12.IGX – Sabey owned/managed (Cogent!) I'd appreciate any leads for contacts at these companies with whom we could negotiate a discount or donation of services to a tax-exempt nonprofit. Thanks, David -- David Solomonoff, President Internet Society of New yorkpresid...@isoc-ny.orgisoc-ny.org -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: Broadband Router Comparisons
Paywalled, but http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/wireless-routers/buying-guide.htm On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Lorell Hathcock <lor...@hathcock.org> wrote: > All: > > Not all consumer grade customer premises equipment is created equally. > But end customers sure think it is. I have retirement aged customers > buying the crappiest routers and then blaming my cable network for all > their connection woes. The real problem is that there were plenty of > problems on the cable network to deal with, so it was impossible to tell > between a problem that a customer was having with their CPE versus a real > problem in my network. > > Much of that has been cleared up on my side now, but customers were used > to blaming us for everything so that they don't even consider that their > equipment could be to blame. > > I want to be able to point out a third party list of all (most) broadband > routers that rates them by performance. Or that rates them by crappiness > that I can send them to so they can look up their own router and determine > if other users have had problems with that router and what can be done to > fix it. > > So far my search has been in vain. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks in advance. > > Lorell Hathcock > > Sent from my iPad -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: interconnection costs
If you haven't already, you should read this http://drpeering.net/core/bookOutline.html On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Reza Motamedi <motam...@cs.uoregon.edu> wrote: > Hi NANOG > > We are a group of researchers and our focus is on the economy of > interconnection in the Internet. My question is mainly about the various > costs of an AS establishing a connection with another AS, including the > costs charged by the colocation providers. I am familiar with most of the > connection options such as public peering on IXP, and private peering > through xconnects. My understanding is that in addition to the cost of > transit that the smaller AS pays to the larger AS, in the former you pay a > monthly fee to establish a link to the switching fabric and then you can > connect to as many ASes that are member in the IXP, and in the later you > need to pay for as many xconnects that you need to connect to as many ASes > that you plan to peer with. Obviously in both cases there is the cost of > being in the colocation and renting a rack or whatever. What are the other > costs involved? How should the AS reach the colocation center in the first > place? I don't think every network can dig a hole an lay cables. Who should > they pay to get from one PoP to another? Do ASes have to pay for xconnect > to connect their PoP in a data center to the rest of their network? > > I think there is no single answer as different businesses may have > different pricing models. I hope the discussion can help me understand the > whole ecosystem a little bit better. > > > Best Regards > Reza Motamedi (R.M) > Graduate Research Fellow > Oregon Network Research Group > Computer and Information Science > University of Oregon > -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: IGF Mandate Renewl
The Internet Society has been very involved in this. Latest report is here: https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/public-policy/2015/12/where-wsis-heading-post-2015 On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Steve Mikulasik <steve.mikula...@civeo.com> wrote: > The UN's Internet Governance Forum is up for renewal at the end of 2015, > without UN approval they will be shutdown. I am relatively new here and > haven't seen much discussion about IGF and UN (attempted) involvement in > the internet. How do people feel about the IGF and should it be renewed by > the UN? I can't really figure out what gap they fill other than being big > conference. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Governance_Forum#2015_mandate_renewal > > > -- ------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: OT: BdNOG announces website blocks
Seems like there's some hardball going on http://www.thedailystar.net/country/cyber-crimes-govt-write-facebook-deal-179314 On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Scott Weeks <sur...@mauigateway.com> wrote: > > > > - > > Md. abdullah Al naser mail.naserbd at yahoo.com > > Wed Nov 18 12:56:15 BDT 2015 > > > > The service of Facebook, Viber and Whatsapp are > > blocked from now till further notice. It has been > > ordered by Begum Tarana Halim, State Minister, Post > > and Telecommunications. > > -- > -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?
Logic tells me that, if the major incumbents content doesn't count against the cap, this leaves more bandwidth for other applications. What am I missing? On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Blake Hudson <bl...@ispn.net> wrote: > It's not. And that's the point. > > This proposal, and ones similar, stifle growth of applications. If there > are additional (artificial) burdens for operating in a field it becomes > harder to get into. Because it's harder to get into, fewer operators > compete. [Note, we just reduced open competition, one tenet of Net > Neutrality] Because there are fewer operators there will be less > competition. Less competition increases prices and fewer customers take the > service. Because few people use the application, the network operator has > no incentive to support the application well. [Note, we just reduced the > freedom to run applications] Because the network doesn't support the > application well, few people use the application. It's circular and it > slows growth. > > Just because there may be inherent challenges to offering an application > (bandwidth, for example), doesn't mean that adding another one (per > application bandwidth caps) is desirable. -- ------- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: Skype off line ??
I like http://zoom.us On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Alistair Mackenzie <magics...@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems fine on mobile in the UK for me too. > On 21 Sep 2015 18:36, "Paul Rolland (ポール・ロラン)" <r...@witbe.net> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 18:21:40 +0200 > > Marco Paesani <ma...@paesani.it> wrote: > > > > > No solution > > > http://heartbeat.skype.com/2015/09/skype_presence_issues.html > > > > Back for me (France): presence updated. Using Skype on Linux > > > > Paul > > > -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast -- -
Re: internet visualization
Crow for lunch today. On Wednesday, September 9, 2015, Larry Sheldon <larryshel...@cox.net> wrote: > On 9/8/2015 21:05, Joly MacFie wrote: > >> 3/10 for spelling >> >> adjancencies >>> >> >> or is that a thing? >> > > http://www.thefreedictionary.com/adjacencies > > > -- > sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Juvenal) > -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: internet visualization
3/10 for spelling > adjancencies or is that a thing? -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
WEBCAST TODAY: NEDAS NYC In-Building Wireless Summit
FYI, I will webcast the NENAS NYC Summit today. What: NEDAS NYC In-Building Wireless Summit When: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9am-5pm EDT | 1300-2100 UTC Agenda: https://www.nedas.com/events/nedas-nyc-spring-building-wireless-summit-agenda Webcast: https://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/nedasnyc -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Phasing out of copper
Invoke Kushnick's Law http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=25868748 * 'A regulated company will always renege on promises to provide public benefits tomorrow in exchange for regulatory and financial benefits today.'* On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca wrote: On 14-12-02 21:16, Owen DeLong wrote: Depends on your desired outcome and goals. However… Context: Canadian incumbents deny to the regulator that they have intentions to turn off copper. (but to shareholders, openly say they will shut it donw, howveer, they plan only to shutdown active equipment and leave copper in the poles. Their fibre is hung off the same steel support line as copper). One reason is that by pretending that copper is here to stay and is competitive, they hope to convicne CRTC that mandating wholesale access to FTTP is not necessary. it makes more sense to explain to regulators why maintaining copper once sufficient FTTP adoption is complete is foolhearty and a waste of money. Yeah, that is the way I am spinning it. (hey, I learn about spin from the best - the canadian incumbents :-) If you’re trying to preserve access to dry copper for some reason, I am the only one in the whole proceeding who is advocating for the earliest possible widthdrawal fo copper. The earlier they can remove irt, the easier it is for them to justify the investment, and the less reasons they have for preventing access to FTTP. The confirmation from someone else in the thread that Comcast stops selling access to copper once FTTP is up is a good point to make. I am up on Thursday morning. Am second to last to speak, so hopefully I can make a good impression. (this is for round two, first round finished today). -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Anyone else having trouble reaching thepiratebay.se? AS39138
Working for me now on FiOS in NYC. -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Anyone else having trouble reaching thepiratebay.se? AS39138
Failing for me from NYC FiOS http://traceroute.monitis.com/index.jsp?url=thepiratebay.setestId=545087 On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:41:07PM -0500, Javier J said: Name: thepiratebay.se Address: 194.71.107.27 Its reachable from some places and not others. Is it being filtered? Is it being hijacked? Email to them bounced from google apps. Are we now officially living in a police state? mtr dies at hop 2 for me: 2. l100.nwrknj-vfttp-134.verizon-gni.net ( 173.70.26.1 ) Is verizon now censoring the internet for me? -- Ken Chase - m...@sizone.org Toronto -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Marconi Society Symposium today
will be webcast. http://isoc-ny.org/p2/7040 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: update
fsf put out a statement https://fsf.org/news/free-software-foundation-statement-on-the-gnu-bash-shellshock-vulnerability -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
FCC Help Wanted
https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/379628100 Job Title:Telecommunications Policy and Technology Specialist (Internet) Agency:Federal Communications Commission SALARY RANGE: $124,995.00 to $157,100.00 / Per Year DUTIES: As Telecommunications Policy and Technology Specialist (Internet), he/she serves as a senior expert consultant and advisor with regard to wireline and wireless broadband technologies used in communications networks, Internet technologies, Internet networking, and traffic exchange evolution issues. Provides expert technical and policy advice on the technology, design, and operations of Internet networks, including changes in network design and traffic exchange practices and policies resulting from emerging commercial practices and strategies. Performs investigative analyses and original research with respect to critical and unprecedented network operations, service provision, traffic exchange, and content delivery issues that involve emerging technologies, services, and commercial incentives; evaluates technical, social, legal, institutional and other related implications of proposed policy decisions on technology adoption, deployment, network operations, communications services provision; and provides input into Commission proceedings that implement those proposed policy decisions. Drafts recommendations, decision memoranda, notices of inquiry, notices of proposed rulemaking, orders, and public notices concerning the technical and business/financial aspects of designing, building, operating, and exchanging traffic among Internet backbone networks, and content delivery and other Internet networks. Drafts correspondence and reports concerning controversial technical aspects of pending or future issues that may warrant Commission actions, requesting additional information as necessary. Initiates correspondence responsive to inquiries from the public, other government agencies, other parts of the FCC, and Congress. Initiates communications with the public (including service providers, trade associations, and consumer groups) concerning technological, business, and operational issues of specific interest or concern to the Commission. Provides guidance and leadership over unusually complex newly emerging technical matters, including those of a precedent-setting nature. Provides expert technical and policy analysis for the Division on any issues relating to advanced communications systems, including broadband systems and the Internet, as assigned by the Division Chief or designees. Facilitates decision and action on such matters by drafting briefing material or rulemaking documents and by briefing the Division and/or Division management on policy or action alternative issues. QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED: Specialized Experience: Applicants must have a minimum of one year of specialized experience equivalent to at least the GS-14 grade level in the Federal service. For this position, specialized experience includes the following: 1) Experience applying knowledge of network management and operations, network architecture, Internet technologies and services, broadband technologies, data communications, and communications network technology; 2) Experience in a variety of communications networks and systems including Internet and broadband networks; 3) Experience performing investigative analyses and original research with respect to unprecedented network operations and service provision issues that involve emerging technologies; and 4) Experience presenting complex technical and policy information to various audiences. -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Muni Fiber and Politics
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: MHO, experience has taught us that the lines provider (or as I prefer to call them, the Layer 1 infrastructure provider) must be prohibited from playing at the higher layers A few years back Fred Goldstein proposed defining a Layer 1 infrastructure provider as a LoopCo, where the local loop is passively provided to service providers to light it as they see fit. He even wrote draft legislation, where the incumbent LEC is divided into a Facilities Entity and a Services Entity: http://www.ionary.com/separationbillproposal.htm That proposal generally requires something like a CLEC to light the wire locally, and makes CLECs viable again. He has also proposed requiring ILECs (and cablecos) to provide low-layer (layer 2, mostly) common carriage on an open basis; as filed in the current NN docket: http://www.ionary.com/separationbillproposal.htm j -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
Now, this is astroturfing. http://www.thenation.com/blog/180781/leading-civil-rights-group-just-sold-out-net-neutrality On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Richard Bennett rich...@bennett.com wrote: This is one of the more clueless smears I've seen. The astroturf allegation is hilarious because it shows a lack of understanding of what the term means: individuals can't be astroturf by definition; it takes an organization. Groups like Free Press are arguably astroturf because of their funding and collaboration with commercial interests, but even if you buy the blogger's claim that AEI is taking orders from Comcast (which it isn't), it doesn't pretend to be speaking for the grassroots. After 76 years in operation, people engaged in public policy have a very clear idea of the values that AEI stands for, and the organization goes to great lengths to firewall fundraising from scholarship. AEI's management grades itself in part on being fired by donors, in part; this is actually a goal. The thing I most like about AEI is that it doesn't take official positions and leaves scholars the freedom to make up their own minds and to disagree with each other. Although we do tend to be skeptical of Internet regulation, we're certainly not of one mind about what needs to be regulated and who should do it. AEI is a real think thank, not an advocacy organization pretending to be a think tank. The article is riddled with factual errors that I've asked Esquire to correct, but it has declined, just as it declined to make proper corrections to the blogger's previous story alleging the FCC had censored 500,000 signatures from a petition in support of Title II. See: http://www.esquire.com/blogs/news/comcast-astroturfing-net- neutrality?fb_comment_id=fbc_734581913271304_735710019825160_ 735710019825160#f35206a395cd434 The blogger came to my attention when he was criticized on Twitter by journalists who support net neutrality for that shoddy piece of sensationalism; see the dialog around this tweet: https://twitter.com/ oneunderscore__/status/489212137773215744 The net neutrality debate astonishes me because it rehashes arguments I first heard when writing the IEEE 802.3 1BASE5 standard (the one that replaced coaxial cable Ethernet with today's scalable hub and spoke system) in 1984. Even then some people argued that a passive bus was more democratic than an active hub/switch despite its evident drawbacks in terms of cable cost, reliability, manageability, scalability, and media independence. Others argued that all networking problems can be resolved by throwing bandwidth at them and that all QoS is evil, etc. These talking points really haven't changed. The demonization of Comcast is especially peculiar because it's the only ISP in the US still bound by the FCC's 2010 Open Internet order. It agreed to abide by those regulations even if they were struck down by the courts, which they were in January. What happens with the current Open Internet proceeding doesn't have any bearing on Comcast until its merger obligations expire, and its proposed merger with TWC would extend them to a wider footprint and reset the clock on their expiration. Anyhow, the blogger did spell my name right, to there's that. RB On 7/22/14, 9:07 AM, Paul WALL wrote: Provided without comment: http://www.esquire.com/blogs/news/comcast-astroturfing-net-neutrality Drive Slow, Paul Wall -- Richard Bennett Visiting Fellow, American Enterprise Institute Center for Internet, Communications, and Technology Policy Editor, High Tech Forum -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
Conflating zero-rating with NN is not necessarily helpful. I somehow doubt that is ultimately what convinced all those groups to suddenly come out against NN at the last minute. The EFF did recently address the issue. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/07/net-neutrality-and-global-digital-divide quote However, we worry about the downside risks of the zero rated services. Although it may seem like a humane strategy to offer users from developing countries crumbs from the Internet's table in the form of free access to walled-garden services, such service may thrive at the cost of stifling the development of low-cost, neutral Internet access in those countries for decades to come. Zero-rating also risks skewing the Internet experience of millions (or billions) of first-time Internet users. For those who don't have access to anything else, Facebook *is* the Internet. On such an Internet, the task of filtering and censoring content suddenly becomes so much easier, and the potential for local entrepreneurs and hackers to roll out their own innovative online services using local languages and content is severely curtailed. Sure, zero rated services may seem like an easy band-aid fix to lessen the digital divide. But do you know what most http://www.oecd.org/sti/broadband/more-competition-essential-for-future-of-mobile-innovation.htm stakeholders http://a4ai.org/policy-and-regulatory-best-practices/ agree http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/2013/27.aspx is a better approach towards conquering the digital divide? Competition—which we can foster through rules that reduce the power of telecommunications monopolies and oligopolies to limit the content and applications that their subscribers can access and share. Where competition isn't enough, we can combine this with limited rules against clearly impermissible practices like website blocking. /quote On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Richard Bennett rich...@bennett.com wrote: So we're supposed to believe that NAACP and LULAC are phony organizations but pro-neutrality groups like Free Press and Public Knowledge that admit to collaborating with Netflix and Cogent are legit? Given their long history, I think this is a bit of a stretch. It's more plausible that NAACP and LULAC have correctly deduced that net neutrality is a de facto subsidy program that transfers money from the pockets of the poor and disadvantaged into the pockets of super-heavy Internet users and some of the richest and most profitable companies in America, the content resellers, on-line retailers, and advertising networks. Recall what happened to entry-level broadband plans in Chile when that nation's net neutrality law was just applied: the ISPs who provided free broadband starter plans that allowed access to Facebook and Wikipedia were required to charge the poor: A surprising decision in Chile shows what happens when policies of neutrality are applied without nuance. This week, Santiago put an end to the practice, widespread in developing countries http://techcrunch.com/2014/05/29/twitters-emerging-market-strategy-includes-its-own-version-of-a-facebook-zero-like-service-called-twitter-access/, of big companies “zero-rating” access to their services. As Quartz has reported http://qz.com/5180/facebooks-plan-to-find-its-next-billion-users-convince-them-the-internet-and-facebook-are-the-same/, companies such as Facebook, Google, Twitter and Wikipedia strike up deals http://qz.com/69163/the-one-reason-a-facebook-phone-would-make-sense/ with mobile operators around the world to offer a bare-bones version of their service without charging customers for the data. It is not clear whether operators receive a fee http://techcrunch.com/2014/05/29/twitters-emerging-market-strategy-includes-its-own-version-of-a-facebook-zero-like-service-called-twitter-access/ from big companies, but it is clear why these deals are widespread. Internet giants like it because it encourages use of their services in places where consumers shy away from hefty data charges. Carriers like it because Facebook or Twitter serve as a gateway to the wider internet, introducing users to the wonders of the web and encouraging them to explore further afield—and to pay for data. And it’s not just commercial services that use the practice: Wikipedia has been an enthusiastic adopter of zero-rating as a way to spread its free, non-profit encyclopedia. http://qz.com/215064/when-net-neutrality-backfires-chile-just-killed-free-access-to-wikipedia-and-facebook/ Internet Freedom? Not so much. RB On 7/27/14, 5:07 PM, Joly MacFie wrote: Now, this is astroturfing. http://www.thenation.com/blog/180781/leading-civil-rights-group-just-sold-out-net-neutrality -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http
Re: [OPINION] Best place in the US for NetAdmins
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote: Telecommuting should not be a rare exception: it should be the default. And corporate headquarters should be as small and inexpensive as possible, staffed (in person) only by a handful of people -- if even that. Automattic (WordPress) works like that. There's a book about it. http://www.amazon.com/The-Year-Without-Pants-WordPress-com/dp/1118660633 j -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity
Personally, I don't get it. To mock the Brett Glass Google obsession (PK.EFF, Susan Crawford etc) - as I do - while casting aspersions on Bennett and the ITIF, is hypocrisy. Astroturfing - defined as paid spoofing of grass roots support for a position - definitely exists, and is heavily practiced by Telecom incumbents, but Bennett isn't it. There is no way he is grass roots. He is a pundit, an advocate, arguably a shill, but astroturf, no. j On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:17 PM, William Allen Simpson william.allen.simp...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/22/14 12:07 PM, Paul WALL wrote: Provided without comment: http://www.esquire.com/blogs/news/comcast-astroturfing-net-neutrality Thanks! This is nothing new for him. There's astroturf from him going back to '08 on NANOG. Remember when he was shilling for ITIF -- a think tank whose board was then co-chaired by conservative congress-critters and dominated by corporate governmental affairs (nee lobbyists)? -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
FCC Counsel Jonathan Sallet spoke at the USA-IGF today - I've pulled it out as a clip https://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/igf-usa-2014/videos/56799195 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Net Neutrality...
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Brett Glass na...@brettglass.com wrote: Estimates of the maximum bandwidths of all the human senses, combined, range between the capacity of a T1 line (at the low end) and about 4 Mbps (at the high end). A human being simply is not wired to accept more input. (Yes, machines could digest more... which means that additional bandwidth to and from the home might be useful for the purpose of spying on us.) What does this imply about the FCC's proposal to redefine broadband as a symmetrical 10 Mbps? --Brett That is per household, not per person. And, in my experience, one needs around double or more of the listed bandwidth for a robust streaming connection. j -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
As far as the LARIATs of this world go, wouldn't the optimum CDN solution be satellite multicast caching? -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
Now we're so far off in the weeds, I can't even see where we started from. ^_^;; What I'd like to know is 1) when does a terminating network become a transit network, and.. 2 )are there, should there, be different peering standards for each, and 3) if so some kind of functional if not structural separation 4) by regulation? j -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
Some good discussion on this at the recent Aspen Institute Net Neutrality panel. http://youtu.be/IEKQmVuqXsg On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: Here's a link to a post from VZN's public policy blog, about Netflix. Now, just as a matter of principle, I tend to assume that anything VZN says in public is a self-serving lie based on a poor understanding of the Real World... but I did in fact read it. Yup. The money quote: One might wonder why Netflix and its transit providers were the only ones that ran into congestion issues. What it boils down to is this: these other transit and content providers took steps to ensure that there was adequate capacity for their traffic to enter our network. their traffic. What, Verizon: Netflix is just sending you that traffic uninvited? No: that's *your customers traffic*. You *knew* that there would be asymmetrical amounts of traffic flowing downhill to your customers, *or you wouldn't have provisioned nearly uniformly asymmetrical last mile links to them*. You just lost the bet on how much traffic that would be. That's why they call it gambling: sometimes you lose. You lost. Man up and provision usable peering. That traffic is your responsiblity. If you decided not to charge your customers enough to provision for it, take it out of retained earnings. Just don't try to convince us all that, somehow, that traffic flow isn't your customers traffic, and thus yours. Netflix's only fault is being popular. http://publicpolicy.verizon.com/blog/entry/why-is-netflix-buffering-dispelling-the-congestion-myth Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth Associates http://www.bcp38.info 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA BCP38: Ask For It By Name! +1 727 647 1274 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Owning a name
But, are ccTLDs licenced by ICANN? I thought they were independent. j On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: On Jun 27, 2014, at 00:07 , Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote: http://joshuapundit.blogspot.com/2014/06/court-ruling-israeli-and-us-terrorism.html Have not seen much discussion about this. That would be a horrifically bad precedent to set. I hope this insanity stops before it get started. -- TTFN, patrick -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: responding to DMARC breakage
Question: Years ago Yahoo! bought major mailing list provider egroups formerly onelist, eventually absorbing it into yahoo clubs and making something called yahoogroups. Does this break yahoogroups too? How are THEY handling it? -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Fwd: [IP] Summary of what I know so far about the Linksys botnet and/or worm
Any comments? -- Forwarded message -- From: Dave Farber d...@farber.net Date: Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:13 PM Subject: [IP] Summary of what I know so far about the Linksys botnet and/or worm To: ip i...@listbox.com -- Forwarded message -- From: *Brett Glass* br...@lariat.net Date: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 Subject: Summary of what I know so far about the Linksys botnet and/or worm To: Eugene H. Spafford s...@acm.org, d...@farber.net d...@farber.net Cc: secur...@linksys.com Gene, Dave: Here is what I know so far about the Linksys router exploit that I've been observing in the wild today. * The exploit has affected Linksys E1000 and E1200 routers that have public IP addresses on our network. Those which we've shielded behind carrier-grade NAT (the majority) have not been compromised. * The routers are rapidly scanning blocks of IP addresses for Web servers on ports 80 and 8080. This choice of ports seems to indicate that they are looking for other routers of their ilk to infect. It's unclear whether, once they find a vulnerable router, they infect it themselves or report its IP address back to a botmaster for later infection. I suspect the latter, though, because infection would require flashing the router with a modified firmware image that would be model-specific and there is not room in a router for multiple images. It's also likely that a central server is coordinating the scans. * All of the E1000s that have been affected have the last version of firmware that was made for this now-discontinued model. The affected E1200s have firmware version 1.0.03 (the last one published for hardware version 1) or 2.0.04 (not the latest for hardware version 2, but close; there's now a 2.0.06. I do not know if 2.0.06 stops the exploit because we have no E1200s running it with public IPs). We have not seen any E900s infected, even though the E900 and the E1200 use the same hardware. * None of the infected routers had default or easily guessable passwords, suggesting that the backdoor or security hole through which the exploit was performed did not require guessing a password. * Re-flashing routers and resetting them to factory defaults SEEMS to clear the malware, but of course one cannot be 100% sure that it does not protect itself from re-flashing. * These routers use Broadcom chipsets and Wind River's RTOS operating system, and it wasn't swapped for a Linux-based one, so the creators of the malware must be skilled in development for this OS -- or at least sufficiently skilled to modify the firmware. At this point, it appears that those who implemented this exploit is still building an army and has not used it for anything yet. However, there are so many millions of these routers in the field, with so many private networks behind them, that there's no telling just how much havoc they could wreak if they were set to invasion of privacy, DoS attacks, etc. I haven't been able to get in touch with anyone at Linksys to talk about this. Their support techs are all in remote call centers in far-flung corners of the world, and I have not been able to get them to escalate. --Brett Glass Archives https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/125534-14f1b966 | Modifyhttps://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=125534id_secret=125534-f26397ecYour Subscription | Unsubscribe Nowhttps://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=125534id_secret=125534-8937d9eepost_id=20140411201339:49F005E2-C1D7-11E3-AB53-859A868D5D56 http://www.listbox.com -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Question re: WordPress
wordpress.com ? On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Ilissa Miller ili...@imillerpr.com wrote: Wondering if anyone in the community could kindly advise. How can someone get a deceased person's blog removed/taken down from WordPress? Please contact me directly offline if you can assist. Thank you Ilissa eMail: ili...@imillerpr.com -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: latest Snowden docs show NSA intercepts all Google and Yahoo DC-to-DC traffic
Judging from this NSA ad, keep an eye out minority disabled females.. [image: Inline image 1] On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:04 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:14:40 +0900, Masataka Ohta said: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: How do you intend to *find* the agents who were hired at a government agency's under-the-table request that never had a written record that the company had access to? By memories of those who are at the table. So one of the two people at the table you don't have a name for because they're not an employee, and the other is either an NSA plant lying about never being at a table, or you just gave your top network troubleshooter a damned good reason to update their resume. Hint: This isn't a children's game of hide and seek, and if there *is* an NSA plant they're not going to just smile and say Oh, you found me. Good job at flushing out those NSA guys. Now who are you going to hire to replace them, and your top troubleshooter? -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Happy Birthday, ARPANET!
and surely no coincidence that Oct 29 is also National Cat Day http://www.nationalcatday.com/ On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote: lo -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Happy Birthday, ARPANET!
It seems the Internet Society is going with October 29. http://www.internetsociety.org/international-internet-day On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: sheldon In fact, not quite. The birthday of the internet proper is generally held to be January 1, 1983, the flag day when tcp/ip was first deployed. /sheldon Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote: On 10/29/2013 10:51 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: The Paley Center for Media reminds us that on this day in 1969 at 2230 PST, the first link was turned up between UCLAs Sigma 7 and SRIs 940. A photo of the laboratory logbook is included in the Wikipedia article: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET Cheers, - jra crap, I'm supposed to be keeping a log book? No one told me... err do I have to log _EVERYTHING_ I do online? :/ Happy Birthday, Internet! Andrew -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: verizon trouble ticket NJ DQ04PWR9 -- is verizon blocking FLOKsociety.org by accident or on purpose?
Yes, working on VZ DSL now. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.netwrote: Seems to be working now from Verizon FIOS in Boston area. Henry Yen wrote: On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 12:30:01PM -0400, William Herrin wrote: Inaccessible via FIOS Washington DC too: traceroute -T -p 80 200.10.150.169 traceroute to 200.10.150.169 (200.10.150.169), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 L300.WASHDC-VFTTP-91.verizon-**gni.nethttp://L300.WASHDC-VFTTP-91.verizon-gni.net(173.73.47.1) 1.804 ms 1.595 ms 1.562 ms 2 G0-6-4-7.WASHDC-LCR-22.**verizon-gni.nethttp://G0-6-4-7.WASHDC-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net(130.81.216.250) 5.321 ms !N * * A little earlier, both FiOS and a uunet/701 connection yielded '!N', but as of this writing both paths are reaching that website. -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. Yogi Berra -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: verizon trouble ticket NJ DQ04PWR9 -- is verizon blocking FLOKsociety.org by accident or on purpose?
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/floksociety.org says it's up. My VZ dsl says no. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Bryan Tong cont...@nullivex.com wrote: Site works on VZW in Colorado. vzw gets transit from places OTHER than 701 in a bunch of places... -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: [Cryptography] Opening Discussion: Speculation on BULLRUN
In case you missed it, Jari Arkko, Chair of the IETF and Stephen Farrell, IETF Security Area Director, just posted: http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/09/security-and-pervasive-monitoring/ -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: [newtech-1] Barclays wifi
One can only speculate on bandwidth, but a further source reveals that they are using multicast wi-fi http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/20/4006836/barclays-center-app-replays-smartphone It's all powered by Cisco's new StadiumVision Mobile, which reps compared to how cable is delivered to your TV: instead of everyone having to crowd onto a single connection, the multicast connection splits the feed and delivers the same thing individually to everyone. That means my stream is the same whether I'm alone in the stadium or surrounded by 19,000 other Nets fans. In practice, it works remarkably well — I didn't get a chance to test it with 19,000 people, but even in a quickly-filling arena my stream never slowed or broke. I switched between a game feed and a stationary camera above the rim, and jumping back into a replay worked seamlessly. The stream is delayed about two seconds from the game itself, which for replays is actually perfect — by the time you look down the play's happening again. It does make it impossible to listen to the TV feed's announcers, though, since they're always slightly behind the game as it unfolds. On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote: Any idea of the data rate required per stream? Sent from my Mobile Device. Original message From: Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com Date: 08/27/2013 8:14 PM (GMT-08:00) To: North American Network Operators Group nanog@nanog.org Subject: Fwd: [newtech-1] Barclays wifi From the NY tech meetup list. Any one here care to comment, off or on list? j -- Forwarded message -- From: Dean Collins Anyone know more about Barclay Wifi - http://www.fastcompany.com/3007452/innovation-agents/brooklyn-nets-barclays-center-slam-cam-puts-every-dunk-your-face ** ** Can they really stream hidef video to 19,000 devices simultaneously in hd via wifi? Surely they are hitting some spatial limits…..? (eg I know when my old company sold a DECT platform to the ASX we ran into bandwidth limits for the number of base stations in a single room) ** ** ** ** ** ** Cheers, Dean ** ** -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- - -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Fwd: [newtech-1] Barclays wifi
From the NY tech meetup list. Any one here care to comment, off or on list? j -- Forwarded message -- From: Dean Collins Anyone know more about Barclay Wifi - http://www.fastcompany.com/3007452/innovation-agents/brooklyn-nets-barclays-center-slam-cam-puts-every-dunk-your-face ** ** Can they really stream hidef video to 19,000 devices simultaneously in hd via wifi? Surely they are hitting some spatial limits…..? (eg I know when my old company sold a DECT platform to the ASX we ran into bandwidth limits for the number of base stations in a single room) ** ** ** ** ** ** Cheers, Dean ** ** -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
WEBCAST: ISOC @ IETF – Improving Internet Experience: All Together Now
This is just about to start. Not on the IETF schedule. The panel will tackle the fundamental questions of how to avoid conflicting congestion fixes that screw up transmission protocols. Should be interesting. ** joly posted: Today, Tuesday July 29 2013 the Internet Society will present a briefing panel at IETF 87 in Berlin, topic: Improving Internet Experience: All together, now. As Internet use and user expectations grow, it is natural that network and service providers, a [image: ISOC @ IETF 87]https://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/ietf87isocbriefingToday, Tuesday July 30 2013 the Internet Society will present a briefing panel at IETF 87 http://isoc-ny.org/p2/5829 in Berlin, topic: Improving Internet Experience: All together, nowhttp://www.internetsociety.org/internet-society-briefing-panel-ietf-87. As Internet use and user expectations grow, it is natural that network and service providers, as well as software developers, are all looking to provide the best experience possible for their users and customers. However, performance issues (especially those related to transient congestion) tend to have collateral effects. This is a case where local optimization strategies may, in fact, not lead to globally optimal network performance for a given activity. In fact, server or client software developers' assumptions about network conditions may lead to disastrously wrong choices in managing network traffic if software elsewhere in the network is making different and countervailing assumptions and choices.This panel will explore some of the different approaches being developed, between website, network transport and server developers, their assumptions about network performance and potential collision of strategies. Panelists will also further elaborate existing work in measuring and developing (and deploying!) standards-based transport layer strategies for robustly improving overall performance. Speakers include Stuart Cheshire of Apple, Jason Livingood of Comcast, and Patrick McManus of Mozilla. Internet Society Chief Internet Technology Officer Leslie Daigle will moderate. The session will be webcast live via the Internet Society livestream channelhttps://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/ietf87isocbriefingand an audio feed will also be available. *What*: Internet Society Briefing Panel @ IETF 87 - Improving Internet Experience: All together, now.http://www.internetsociety.org/internet-society-briefing-panel-ietf-87 *Where*: InterContinental Hotel, Berlin, Germany *When*: Tuesday, 30 July 2013 11:45 am-12:45 pm CEST | 0945-1045 UTC | 0545-0645 EDT *Program*: http://www.internetsociety.org/internet-society-briefing-panel-ietf-87 *Webcast*: https://new.livestream.com/internetsociety/ietf87isocbriefing *Audio stream*: http://www.verilan.com/isoc.m3u *Twitter*: @InternetSocietyhttps://twitter.com/search/realtime?q=internetsociety Comment http://isoc-ny.org/p2/5835#respondSee all commentshttp://isoc-ny.org/p2/5835#comments *Permalink* http://isoc-ny.org/p2/5835 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: One of our own in the Guardian.
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote: It is our Electric provider utility, and much of the build out was tied to Smart Grid power meter integration. I'm not familiar with the politics, but there were some battles over funding and justification. Power Utility issues vis-a-vis fiber were discussed by James Salter at this years F2c http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04b-IzSRh0Mlist=PLuVpWA96MxueWSaBIonLaoJBb6KHM6qGjindex=8 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Google news down
Maybe they are adjusting in preparation for Aug 1. http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/21/google-makes-google-news-in-germany-opt-in-only-to-avoid-paying-fees-under-new-copyright-law/ On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote: Seems to be isolated to the mobile site, if anyone finds it of interest. Sent from my Mobile Device. Original message From: Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com Date: 06/23/2013 11:48 PM (GMT-08:00) To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Google news down Does anyone happen to know what's going on with Google news? Getting an xml parse error for all responses (not well formed) to anything google news related. NSA taking down google news or something? Sent from my Mobile Device. -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Webcasting as a replacement for traditional broadcasting (was Re: Wackie 'ol Friday)
I was at an incentive auction discussion earlier in the week where it was suggested that the broadcasters see a rosy future with ATSC beaming to mobile, but there is still work to be done. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATSC-M/H On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com Anyone besides jra remember the last Super Bowl? Better this year? Worse? I'm sure whomever is listening in would like to know as well. http://www.multichannel.com/blogs/translation-please/multicast-unicast-and-super-bowl-problem Well, in fact, the most recent Massive Failure was the webcast of the Concert For Boston, on 5/31. They were using a vendor called LiveAlliance.tv, who did not appear to be farming it out to Limelight or Akamai or Youtube, as far as I could tell, and they apparently only figured for a scale 5 audience, and then got more than 500k attempts. They got rescued by a vendor named Fast Hockey who are an amateur hockey webcast aggregator, I gather, and *are* an Akamai client. My estimation is that the reason that webcasting will never completely replace broadcasting is that -- because it is mostly unicast -- its inherent complexity factor is a) orders of magnitude higher than bcast, and b) *proportional to the number of viewers*. Like Linux, that doesn't scale. And broadcasters are not prone to think of the world in a view where you have to provide technical support to people just to watch your show. He's at the 40... the 30... the 20... this is gonna be the Super Bowl, folks... the 10... [buffering] Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Fwd: ICANN News Alert -- Security Studies on the Use of Non-Delegated TLDs, and Dotless Names
FYI, since this has been a topic here. -- Forwarded message -- http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-28may13-en.htm Security Studies on the Use of Non-Delegated TLDs, and Dotless Names 28 May 2013 ICANN's mission and core values call to preserve and enhance the operational stability, reliability, security, and global interoperability of the Internet. In pursuing these goals and following the direction of its Board of Directors as well as the advice of the Security and Stability Advisory Committee, ICANN is announcing two studies regarding: 1) the use of non-delegated TLDs and 2) potential risks related to dotless domain names. On 31 January 2013, ICANN security team received the SAC 057: SSAC Advisory on Internal Name Certificates. On 18 May, the ICANN Board directed staff to commission a study on the use of TLDs that are not currently delegated at the root level of the public DNS in enterprises. Today, ICANN is announcing that a study has been commissioned on the potential security impacts of the applied-for new-gTLD strings in relation to namespace collisions with non-delegated TLDs that may be in use in private namespaces including their use in X.509 digital certificates. As part of this study, the expert study team will develop a framework for assessing the risk level and classify the risk level for the strings as identified in the study. The report will also provide options for ICANN as to how to mitigate the various risks and will describe the pros and cons of the options. On 23 February 2012, the SSAC published the SAC 053: SSAC Report on Dotless Domains. A domain name that consists of a single label is referred to as a dotless domain name. Use of dotless names could provide potential innovations to the domain name industry and new gTLD applicants, but their use also raises usability, functionality, security and stability concerns as described in the SSAC report. On 23 June 2012, the ICANN Board directed staff to consult with the relevant communities regarding implementation of the recommendations in SAC 053 and to provide a briefing paper for the Board, detailing the issues and options available to mitigate such issues. During the period of August to September 2012, a public comment period was held regarding the SAC 053 report. The public comment period made clear that dotless domain names are a subject of active discussion in the ICANN community, that no clear conclusion could be drawn, and that a greater effort to identify and explore solutions to the concerns raised before implementing SAC 053 recommendations could be useful. Today, ICANN is announcing that it has commissioned a study on the potential risks related to dotless domain names based on SAC 053 report. The study report will identify and describe the potential risks that dotless names raise with particular focus on those related to security and stability. The report will also provide options for ICANN as to how to mitigate the various risks and will describe the pros and cons of the options. In both cases ICANN intends to deliver the study teams findings before the ICANN 47th meeting in Durban, South Africa. -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: What are you doing about Six Strikes?
Who said it's a law? On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Seth David Schoen sch...@loyalty.org wrote: Jay Ashworth writes: This just in from Lauren Weinstein. This is, of course, today. Have people actually deployed changes to support this? Six Strikes is not a law; it's a private agreement. http://www.scribd.com/doc/91987640/CCI-MOU -- Seth David Schoen sch...@loyalty.org | No haiku patents http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/| means I've no incentive to FD9A6AA28193A9F03D4BF4ADC11B36DC9C7DD150 |-- Don Marti -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
WEBCAST TODAY - FCC Network Resiliency Workshop
I know this is a topic dear to the members of the list. We are webcasting an FCC hearing today in Brooklyn on the topic of network resiliency. http://isoc-ny.org/p2/4783 It will be archived, and transcribed. -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: VIDEO: Mitigating DDoS Attacks: Best Practices for an Evolving Threat Landscape – NYC 12/5 #DDoS
It has been pointed out to me ( Thanks Yuri!) that I screwed up the url for the AMARA translation page for this, it is http://www.universalsubtitles.org/en-gb/videos/lvgGlpwZR0lA/info/mitigating-ddos-attacks-best-practices-for-an-evolving-threat-landscape/#video If I may say a bit more.about captioning in general... The Internet Society recently produced a paper 'Moving Forwardhttp://www.internetsociety.org/doc/internet-accessibility-internet-use-persons-disabilities-moving-forward' on the importance of increasing our efforts on accessibility, and another 'Local Content http://www.internetsociety.org/localcontent' on how important language is in fostering the growth of the Internet. Video captioning is one area where everyone, via crowd-sourcing, can easily contribute, given the tools. AMARA is just such a tool. It's a simple 4 step process. Type, sync, info, and check. One can do as much/little as one can and then leave it for someone else to pick up and continue. It's a practice we can, and should, all learn. j On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com wrote: As promised this is the full video of PIR's recent DDoS event in NYC. I've waited to post it until we got the closed captioning done. If anyone should be willing to volunteer to help translate the captions into other languages they can do so via AMARA - http://www.universalsubtitles.org/en/videos/lvgGlpwZR0lA/info/mitigating-ddos-attacks-best-practices-for-an-evolving-threat-landscape/- it's possible to just contribute as much or as little as you have time to do. ** joly posted: The Internet Society's New York Chapter (ISOC-NY) and the New York Technology Council (NYTECH) joined the Public Interest Registry (PIR) in presenting a midday symposium Mitigating DDoS Attacks: Best Practices for an Evolving Threat Landscape in New Yor [image: Mitigating DDoS Attacks 12/5/2012]http://isoc-ny.org/p2/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/end43.pngThe Internet Society's New York Chapter (ISOC-NY http://isoc-ny.org) and the New York Technology Council (NYTECH http://nytech.org) joined the Public Interest Registry (PIR http://www.pir.org) in presenting a midday symposium Mitigating DDoS Attacks: Best Practices for an Evolving Threat Landscape http://www.pir.org/why/security/ddos in New York City on December 5 2012. Participating organizations included Afilias, Google, Neustar, Symantec, EFF, and De Natris Consult. The event was webcast live via the Internet Society Chapters Livestream Channel. Audio / transcript links are below. English Closed captions are available. MODERATOR Brian Cute - CEO, Public Interest Registry (PIR) SPEAKERS Jeff Greene - Senior Policy Counsel, Symantec Ram Mohan - EVP Chief Technology Officer, Afilias Damian Menscher -- Security Engineer, Google Miguel Ramos - Senior Product Manager, Neustar Danny McPherson - Chief Security Officer, Verisign Jillian York - Director for International Freedom of Expression, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FR0660X9lGc?rel=0 - Download audio : http://isoc-ny.org/ddos/mitigating_ddos.mp3 - Download transcript: http://isoc-ny.org/ddos/mitigating_ddos.txt Comment http://isoc-ny.org/p2/4505#respondSee all commentshttp://isoc-ny.org/p2/4505#comments *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://isoc-ny.org/p2/4505 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- - -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
VIDEO: Mitigating DDoS Attacks: Best Practices for an Evolving Threat Landscape – NYC 12/5 #DDoS
As promised this is the full video of PIR's recent DDoS event in NYC. I've waited to post it until we got the closed captioning done. If anyone should be willing to volunteer to help translate the captions into other languages they can do so via AMARA - http://www.universalsubtitles.org/en/videos/lvgGlpwZR0lA/info/mitigating-ddos-attacks-best-practices-for-an-evolving-threat-landscape/- it's possible to just contribute as much or as little as you have time to do. ** joly posted: The Internet Society's New York Chapter (ISOC-NY) and the New York Technology Council (NYTECH) joined the Public Interest Registry (PIR) in presenting a midday symposium Mitigating DDoS Attacks: Best Practices for an Evolving Threat Landscape in New Yor [image: Mitigating DDoS Attacks 12/5/2012]http://isoc-ny.org/p2/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/end43.pngThe Internet Society's New York Chapter (ISOC-NY http://isoc-ny.org) and the New York Technology Council (NYTECH http://nytech.org) joined the Public Interest Registry (PIR http://www.pir.org) in presenting a midday symposium Mitigating DDoS Attacks: Best Practices for an Evolving Threat Landscape http://www.pir.org/why/security/ddos in New York City on December 5 2012. Participating organizations included Afilias, Google, Neustar, Symantec, EFF, and De Natris Consult. The event was webcast live via the Internet Society Chapters Livestream Channel. Audio / transcript links are below. English Closed captions are available. MODERATOR Brian Cute - CEO, Public Interest Registry (PIR) SPEAKERS Jeff Greene - Senior Policy Counsel, Symantec Ram Mohan - EVP Chief Technology Officer, Afilias Damian Menscher -- Security Engineer, Google Miguel Ramos - Senior Product Manager, Neustar Danny McPherson - Chief Security Officer, Verisign Jillian York - Director for International Freedom of Expression, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FR0660X9lGc?rel=0 - Download audio : http://isoc-ny.org/ddos/mitigating_ddos.mp3 - Download transcript: http://isoc-ny.org/ddos/mitigating_ddos.txt Comment http://isoc-ny.org/p2/4505#respondSee all commentshttp://isoc-ny.org/p2/4505#comments *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://isoc-ny.org/p2/4505 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re:
Is this a song by Engelbert Humperdinck? j On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 7:20 PM, flower tailor samba...@hotmail.com wrote: Delete me -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
facebook down
I know there's an outages list, but seriously! It seems like a DNS prob? -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Solutions for DoS DDoS
By coincidence we have just published the video archive of our Mitigating DDoS Attacks: Best Practices for an Evolving Threat Landscape event last Wednesday. It's at http://youtu.be/FR0660X9lGc We'll have a full transcript up early next week. j On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Mike Gatti ekim.it...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, I'm assisting a non-profit organization to research solutions to secure their network from DOS/DDOS attacks. So far we have gone the route of discussing with their ISP's to see what solutions they have to offer, believing that the carriers are better positioned to block the attack from the source. I wanted to get the lists thoughts on our approach going the carrier route and/or hear about successful implementation of other solutions. Thanks, -- Michael Gatti 949.371.5474 (UTC -8) -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Six Strike Rule (Was: William was raided...)
ISOC-NY ran a half day conflab on 6 strikes (which incidentally - and for reasons that escape me - is a name the Copyright Alert System perpetrators wish would not be used) last November 15. A full archive is available at http://isoc-ny.org/p2/4527 On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.comwrote: We don't do content inspection. We don't really want to know what our customers are doing, and even if we did, there's not enough time in the day to spend paying attention. When we get complaints from the various copyright agencies, we warn the customer to stop. When we hit a certain number of complaints, its bye-bye customer. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote: On 2012-12-04 11:51, Nick B wrote: In a related note, I wonder if the six-strike rule would violate the ISP's safe harbor, as it's clearly content inspection. As performed in France, what happens is that some copyright owner contacts the ISP that IP address a.b.c.d had accessed/served copyright infringing data at date/time dd-mm- HH:mm providing some kind of detail on how they figured that out. That report is a 'strike' and gets forwarded to the user. If that then happens 6 times they are blocked. The ISP as such does not do any content inspection. It is though assumed that some ISPs simply count bytes and that they do some investigation themselves when you reach a certain bandwidth threshold (it seems to correlate that copyright infringers are downloading a lot more than normal webbrowsing users...) Greets, Jeroen -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Mitigating DDoS Attacks: Best Practices for an Evolving Threat Landscape – NYC 12/5
[I wouldn't normally post our event notices to NANOG but I figure this might be of interest. Any of you in the NYC area we'd very much like to see you. I will tape it and post again when that's up -j] The Internet Society’s New York Chapter (ISOC-NY http://isoc-ny.org/) and the New York Technology Council (NYTECH http://nytech.org/) will join the Public Interest Registry (PIR http://www.pir.org/) in presenting a midday symposium “Mitigating DDoS Attacks: Best Practices for an Evolving Threat Landscape http://www.pir.org/why/security/ddos” in New York City on December 5 2012. Participating organizations include Afilias, Google, Neustar, M3AAWG, Symantec, EFF, and De Natris Consult. As a public service PIR are generously covering the $99 fee for all attendees – thus registration is free! The event will be webcast live via the Internet Society Chapters Livestream Channel. Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks are an all-too-common reality in today’s Internet landscape and are an escalating global problem. Whether a DDoS attack is motivated by criminal intent, like cyber extortion, or is executed as an extreme form of free expression, the resulting service interruptions can have wide-ranging effects. This program will address the motives behind and targets of DDoS attacks. It will also explore the various ways attacks are carried out, as well as mitigation techniques and the risks of “unintended consequences.” The goal is to foster a discussion and provide a platform for developing a framework of best practices to mitigate DDoS attacks. *What*: Mitigating DDoS Attacks: Best Practices for an Evolving Threat Landscape http://www.pir.org/why/security/ddos *When*: Wednesday December 5 2012 1000-1300 EST | 1500-1800 UTC *Where*: AMA Executive Conference Centerhttp://www.amaconferencecenter.org/new-york.htm, 1601 Broadway, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10019 *Program*: http://www.pir.org/why/security/ddos *Webcast*: http://www.livestream.com/internetsocietychapters *Register*: http://www.regonline.com/Register/Checkin.aspx?EventId=1108367 * *Twitter*: #DDoS https://twitter.com/search/realtime?q=%23ddos Registration is not required for the webcast, just for in person attendance. Space is limited, please do not register unless you truly intend to come. -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Google/Youtube problems
WIth my limited understanding of such topics I've long been confused by something I read a couple of years back - in an Arbor report perhaps - to the effect that by being the originator of so much traffic, and as they built out their own network, Google were making money on transit. Can anyone elaborate or refute? On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:55 AM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote: On 11/19/12 5:59 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: What I'm trying to say, I can't see youtube generating anywhere nearly enough revenue who shift 10% (or more) of Internet. And to explain this conundrum to myself, I've speculated accounting magic (which I'd frown upon) and leveraging market position to get free capacity (which is ok, I'd do the same, had I the leverage) Or there's a simpler explanation. Which is that it makes money either directly or as part of a salubrious interaction with other google properties. They had about 2.5Billion left over for their trouble in the quarter ending 9/30 which isn't too shabby on a gross of 14 billion. -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Roy Bates, Prince Roy of Sealand, dies at 90.
James Grimmelmann's recent write up is worth reading http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1035context=james_grimmelmann j On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Randy Epstein na...@hostleasing.netwrote: As a Lord of Sealand, I can assure you Sealand is not defunct. :) Randy On 10/11/12 11:12 AM, chris tknch...@gmail.com wrote: Last I heard sealand was defunct I remember the hosting havenco went dark I thought sealand shutdown too On Oct 11, 2012 10:59 AM, jamie rishaw j...@arpa.com wrote: +++ ATH0 http://goo.gl/EdN3C [SealandGov.org] also, http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/oct/10/prince-sealand-dies -j -- sharp, dry wit and brash in his dealings with contestants. - Forbes /* - teh jamie. ; uri - http://about.me/jgr */ California Voter? Vote YES on Prop 34. http://YesOn34.org/ -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Wired access to SMS?
More precisely http://www.twilio.com/sms j On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Tim M Edwards t...@lifelike.com wrote: Twillio.com On Oct 9, 2012, at 12:36 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote: Hi Folks, I'm looking for a way to do wireline access to send and receive cellular phone short message service (SMS) messages. Despite all my google-fu, I have had limited luck finding anyone that meets my needs, so I'm hoping someone here has found the path through. My main criteria are: 1. Low quantity, high reliability. I'll want a few dozen phone numbers and effectively I'll be sending to and receiving from phones I own. 2. Wireline delivery to Honolulu and Northern Virginia. Dynamically move numbers between the two locations for failover purposes. 3. U.S. based carrier. Tying in to the SMS system via Europe isn't acceptable to my customer. 4. Solution must reach phones on all U.S. cellular carriers. 5. Price is a very distant fifth criteria to the preceding four. I can consider Internet based systems where the provider uses U.S. based facilities and ties in to a U.S. phone network, provided that my standards of reliability and redundancy are met by their infrastructure. Alternately, I can also consider a wireless carrier that can provide two SIM-based phones with the same phone number for sending and receiving SMS messages. I'd put the sims in a pair of modems and manage deduplication of the received messages in software. Has anybody had any luck with this kind of requirement? Which vendors should I talk to and who at the vendor? Thanks, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. .. Web: http://bill.herrin.us/ Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: US government gets an F for IPv6 Internet make-over
The ISOC Deploy 360 team has published some analysis at http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2012/09/with-september-30-deadline-looming-us-government-enables-ipv6-for-hundreds-of-websites/ which gives the USG top marks for effort. -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re:
Isn't that by Engelbert Humperdinck? On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:14 AM, flower tailor samba...@hotmail.com wrote: Delete me -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Graphing IPv6 traffic
Hi Joseph, There was a presentation on exactly this topic at AfPIF3 last week by Martin Levy of Hurricane Electric. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpuXcQpfrisfeature=sharelist=PLA8857C20BB1E1F83 and slides http://www.internetsociety.org/sites/default/files/images/AfPIF3_2012_IP_Flows_Martin_Levy_Hurricane%20Electric.pdf HTH joly On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Joseph Muga jpm...@tespok.co.ke wrote: Hi guys, Trying to generate graphs for ipv6 traffic going through an exchange point. Anyone got ideas? Thanks Sent from my iPad -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Asia's Fastest Communications Cable Comes Online
http://www.livescience.com/22538-asias-fastest-communications-cable-comes-online.html The fastest-yet communications cable in Asia came online today (Aug. 20). The underwater fiber optic cable links Japan, Hong Kong, the Philippines, Malaysia and Singapore for high-speed, computerized stock trading. The system transmits information at 40 gigabits per second, three milliseconds faster than any other system in the region, the BBC reportedhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19275490. The gain may sound small, but could prove critical to financial trades made out of the region, according to the report. -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: Copyright infringement notice
The 6 strikes system doesn't kick in til Jan 2013 AFAIK. Does the legal letter make any kind of demand? Usually the sender (aka copyright troll - a technical term) will be looking for personal info to associate with the IP in order to institute a shakedown of some nature. IANAL but I believe one can wait for a subpoena, and even then it's not open and closed. j On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. amitch...@isipp.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:16 AM, groupstudytac groupstudytac groupstudy...@gmail.com wrote: I get copyright notices from companies like Irdeto , saying that one of my customers IP is downloading unauthorized material using bittorent. I also have processes in place to handle such notices . Can anyone share how he handles such notices in his ISP environment , i am ready to adapt some valid steps to improve the existing process. Or should i just ignore such messages ? If you're in the U.S., the process for handling these notices is prescribed by law, specifically the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (search: DMCA takedown notice). It details what the infringement notice must include in order to be actionable and what steps the ISP must take on receipt of an actionable notice. It also prescribes procedures for the alleged infringer to object and for the ISP to restore the material following an objection. Follow the procedures described in the law to retain your immunity as an ISP. Consult a local lawyer if you don't find them sufficiently obvious. The thing that muddies this is that, as I understand it, the notice was not for takedown (i.e. there is not an allegation that they are *hosting* infringing material) - it is a notice that one of their users *downloaded* copyrighted material (IP, do I have that right?) This is part of the RIAA's graduated response program, to which several major ISPs, including ATT, Verizon, and Comcast, have agreed. Basically, the accuser contacts the ISP, and the ISP sends a warning (a copyright alert) to their user (without giving up the user to the accuser). If the same user is accused subsequently, they get another, sterner warning. In total there is a series of six warnings, with mitigation measures accompanying the fifth and sixth warning. If I were counseling an ISP - whether one that was part of the agreement, or not - I would say that the first order is to *put your policy around copyright alerts in writing* - asap - and make it as specific as possible - and then *ALWAYS FOLLOW IT EVERY SINGLE TIME*. It almost (I say almost) doesn't matter what the policy is so long as it's reasonable, but it matters that it be followed to the letter every time, no exceptions. And, if you are an ISP that isn't part of the agreement with the RIAA, it's still not a bad idea to structure your policy to follow the six copyright alert structure, because there is some precedent there, and then you come off looking like you are trying to do the right thing, which will make you a less easy target. These two articles give a pretty good explanation of the deal: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/03/graduated-response-deal-steamrollers-towards-july-1-launch http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/07/major-isps-agree-to-six-strikes-copyright-enforcement-plan/ Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Esq CEO/President Institute for Social Internet Public Policy http://www.ISIPP.com Member, Cal. Bar Cyberspace Law Committee ISIPP Email Accreditation: http://www.SuretyMail.com -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: F-ckin Leap Seconds, how do they work?
Made the press.. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/leap-second-bug-takes-down-reddit-and-a-bunch-of-other-sites/2012/07/02/gJQAlXg1HW_story.html -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: FYI Netflix is down
Good band name. Chaos Gorilla -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: F-ckin Leap Seconds, how do they work?
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote: Someone should write a dastardly system clock daemon to cause the insertion of frequent spurious positive leap seconds, followed by the spurious insertion of negative leap seconds. Chaos time bandit? -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: AAAA's for www.netflix.com
well, something appears to be working.. http://www.betterbroadbandblog.com/2012/06/world-ipv6-daywe-have-liftoff/ Netflix moved up to second in the IPv6 list – as noted above, Netflix has been rolling out IPv6 coverage over the last few weeks. Interestingly, it appears as if Netflix may have created its own IPv6-specific domain which is responsible for almost a third of all IPv6 traffic. If this is the case it might not be in full compliance with the spirit of World IPv6 Day, as the aim should have been for Netflix to operate one single domain with both records for IPv6 and A records for IPv4. On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message 20120607165818.ga30...@srv03.cluenet.de, Daniel Roesen writes: On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 07:52:29AM -0600, Dave Temkin wrote: Just to close the loop on this - UltraDNS has an issue with CNAMEs and their Directional DNS service. We (Netflix) have applied a workaround and it appears stable. Hm, looking at http://v6launch.ripe.net/, whatever you changed didn't improve visibility of the , but decreased it. TTL's of zero don't help. The A query has a TTL of 3600 in the response the query has a zero TTL. This is rocket science. This isn't hard to do correctly. How to handle CNAMEs has been specified 1/4 of a century. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
Re: AAAA's for www.netflix.com
Netflix may have created its own IPv6-specific domain which is responsible for almost a third of all IPv6 traffic. If this is the case it might not be in full compliance with the spirit of World IPv6 Day, as the aim should have been for Netflix to operate one single domain with both records for IPv6 and A records for IPv4. What about that? j On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:31 AM, David Temkin d...@temk.in wrote: On 6/7/12 10:23 PM, Daniel Roesen wrote: On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:11:20PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: $ dig @pdns3.ultradns.org www.netflix.com. A +norec +short wwwservice--frontend-313423742.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com. $ dig @pdns3.ultradns.org www.netflix.com. +norec +short dualstack.wwwservice--frontend-313423742.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com. $ dig @pdns3.ultradns.org www.netflix.com. ANY +short +norec $ Resolving www.netflix.com using ANY RRtype fails with an empty answer section in the DNS response. Which is just plain BROKEN. Yup. This DNS trickery seems to be from the taking a shower, trying not to get wet department. And has adverse effects in corner cases. While playing around, I had periods of time where I couldn't resolve the FQDN at all, possibly due some caching of the empty response. It's not DNS trickery. The trickery is returning different CNAMEs for QTYPE=A and QTYPE=. I'm not sure what's the goal of that is, but it's 4am here so I have an excuse of not seeing the light. :) Best regards, Daniel We've confirmed that UltraDNS had additional issues caused by the push that they fixed for the previously reported problem. We are actively engaged with them to come to a resolution. -Dave -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:punkcast WWWhatsup NYC - http://wwwhatsup.com http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com VP (Admin) - ISOC-NY - http://isoc-ny.org -- -
