On 12/14/2012 9:50 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 08:48:07PM -0800, David Conrad wrote:
On Dec 14, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Joe Ableyjab...@hopcount.ca wrote:
Other root servers have renumbered out of institutional, general-purpose
networks into dedicated networks
On 9/19/2012 10:52 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 9/19/12 10:42 AM, Jo Rhett wrote:
And second, have you ever worked on a private intranet that wasn't
connected to the internet through a firewall? Skipping oob networks
for equipment management, neither have I.
Plenty of people on this list have
On 9/13/2012 7:29 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
I know without a doubt that this is a problem NANOG PCs deal with 3 times a
year; is there any collected wisdom on the web already about how this has
been dealt with, that I can pore over? Pointers to good archive threads?
I'm surprised (well,
I changed the subject header on this since I'm quite sure most folks
ignored it due to the problem emails. Not only was this one off (and
late by a few hours), but I never saw a sign that the BGP report was
even sent (and it's not in the archives, either).
On 7/13/2012 10:52 PM, Patrick W.
On 7/13/2012 10:46 AM, Grant Ridder wrote:
if the admins are not going to moderate this list... give me the admin
password to the list serve and i will set it up right.
These emails seem to be originating from comcast (75.144.246.6). Please
note I said seem to be since it's very easy to forge
On 6/30/2012 12:11 AM, Tyler Haske wrote:
On 6/29/2012 11:07 PM, Roy wrote:
I am not a computer science guy but been around a long time. Data centers
and clouds are like software. Once they reach a certain size, its
impossible to keep the bugs out. You can test and test your heart out and
On 6/13/2012 3:05 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
NANOG, i strongly desire to restrain this slimeball idiot's trade.
please tell me if you have any ideas on how to do so.
I have plenty of ideas. Unfortunately, I am not permitted to do those
things. I promise it would not be painful, though. I'm not
On 6/9/2012 12:06 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
In response to my comment about:
If I'm not supposed to not tell anyone, why is it even printed where I can
read it?
(Sorry for the extra not in there.)
The CVV number is simply to prove that the card is in your possession.
The percentage of the
On 6/7/2012 8:58 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Jun 7, 2012, at 2:14 AM, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
Imaging signing up for a site by putting in your email and pasting
your public key.
I'm imagining my mother trying this, or trying to help her change it
after the hard drive dies and the media in
Sorry to be the bearer of such bad tidings. Please note that I'm doing a
quick copy/paste from a notification I received. I've edited it a bit.
Please note that LinkedIn has weighed in with a carefully worded blog post:
http://blog.linkedin.com/2012/06/06/linkedin-member-passwords-compromised/
On 5/23/2012 6:35 PM, Brett Watson wrote:
On May 23, 2012, at 18:27, George Herbertgeorge.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
Please don't make me remember hosts.txt before I've had a chance to
wrap up work, go home, and get some Scotch in...
Come on George, hosts.txt was the good old days :)
I
I received a notification timestamped last night (3/27/2012 11:30PM),
that said the main page of the NANOG Wiki had been changed by Snowing
and since that didn't sound like anyone on NANOG, I looked.
It's now devoted to advertisements. Luckily there are no drive by links,
but I suppose that's
On 3/28/2012 8:24 AM, Joe Provo wrote:
It has been this way for ages. Auto account creation
was spamifying it into uselessless since at least 2009.
After unspamming and reporting a couple times and the
contact address I used for contributing getting placed
on loads of spammer lists, I just
On 3/28/2012 10:59 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
And they need to do anyway, if they want to keep the contract:
http://www.ipv6tf.org/index.php?page=news/newsroomid=8494
This really points out one of the biggest impediments to moving to IPv6.
I just briefly looked at the list of registrars
On 3/28/2012 11:51 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Lyndashr...@deaddrop.org said:
This really points out one of the biggest impediments to moving to IPv6.
I just briefly looked at the list of registrars that are able to create
glue records for any domain I might have that I wanted to
On 1/26/2012 9:24 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:07:19 EST, Lamar Owen said:
What's interesting here is that this is the third book I've seen on Amazon
where the used price is higher than the new;
Off-topic, but this usually happens when the book has a new price
On 1/17/2012 11:59 AM, Mike Lyon wrote:
Was curious to see if anyone on the list has ever been successful with
setting up SPF records on their domains that are hosted on GD
nameservers... It appears they only let you configure TXT spf records, not
actual SPF records.
Let me quickly reiterate
Normally, I wouldn't top post, but this one has me stumped. It's
*damned* early for me, and I don't yet have the human qualities I might,
later in the morning, but I'm pretty sure I didn't sign up for this, and
would be absolutely *fascinated* to hear what it was all about
(including the
On 11/17/2011 9:35 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Um,
Can someone explain this one to me?
1. Why was such a list created?
2. Why was I automatically subscribed to it?
3. Why was this done without notice to the community?
Before this erupts in yet another thread, this was already asked
On 10/15/2011 4:26 AM, Geoff Huston wrote:
While I am at it, does anyone read this report, or is this weekly report also
just part of the spam load on this list?
I read both of them, and also the Weekly Routing Report. I will regret
the loss, and consider all three to be far more valuable
, and that I was trapped into
replying to the list.
It's you, Lynda. Really. :-)
Well, *now* I know it's not mailman, but it's not me, either. Not
exactly. What I noticed was that *some* of the email to Nanog, today,
had this set, but not all. I was very confused (it's not the first time
I've been
I started with UNIX back when it arrived at school, on reel to reel
tapes, and it was loaded on to the PDP 11/45. I learned to write C from
the original KR (which I still have, of course).
Dennis was one of the good ones. A kind and generous person, who changed
all our worlds.
Rest In Peace
On 9/22/2011 8:31 AM, Jason Baugher wrote:
On 9/22/2011 9:58 AM, JC Dill wrote:
[re: horses]
Other livestock aren't as likely to cause fatal injuries to car
occupants if they are hit, because the animal's body is lower to the
road, less likely to come over the hood.
That's interesting to
On 9/16/2011 2:43 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
hass...@hushmail.com wrote:
@ Everyone else: thank you for the useful information. I didn't
mean to come off as being bratty with my competition notation, it
was meant as a bump to the posting and not an insult at anyone.
Oldie but goodie:
On 8/17/2011 10:57 AM, u...@3.am wrote:
However, Senderbase, apparently used in Cisco's Ironport, will let you look up
your IP and tell you that your reputation is poor, but offers no way to get
delisted. It refers you to Spamcop, which I imagine they rely on for listings,
but not delistings.
On 8/16/2011 10:25 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Cameron Byrnecb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Really, any phone you buy free and clear without
subsidy and contract should work fine as a phone with a prepaid sim
coughexcept for the fact that mobile carriers CAN
On 7/12/2011 6:59 AM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
Hello All:
We're back on the old configuration for now. I will send an update later
this afternoon once I speak with AMS about the issues we experienced over
night.
Please explain WHY we can't just stay on Mailman? I know you explained
On 6/11/2011 1:59 AM, Don Gould wrote:
Your responses clearly demonstrate by asking a few simple questions, and
allowing those with a few clues to be creative, that there are any
number of ways to get things done if you really want to perhaps this
is a new concept for people in rural
On 5/23/2011 8:16 PM, Ryan Malayter wrote:
(stuff about XO and IPv6)
This was sent to nan...@googlegroups.com instead of to Nanog, and my
mail client conveniently marked it as spam. In the old days, when a
mailing list was gatewayed to Usenet, I think it may have been simpler
for people to
On 4/22/2011 4:01 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
On 4/23/11 10:41 , Alex Brooksaskoorb+na...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Franck Martinfmar...@linkedin.com
wrote:
What is the DKIM check result for those messages?
Non existent, it's SPF only.
My point.
Nearly all of the
On 4/13/2011 12:44 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
sorry for the noise, but my contact at Syngenta says
they have 147.0.0.0/8 168.0.0.0/8 and 172.0.0.0/8,
and pigs fly
Well, sometimes they do.
http://wardsci.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_IG0035229
[Flying Pig: Unforgettable Fun with Physics]
--
The person
On 3/3/2011 8:07 AM, isabel dias wrote:
The only reason why you feel that way is cause you haven't been made aware and
your network of friends is not helping you at all so do speak up and make
yourself heard!
No, don't speak up. Please don't pollute NANOG any further than it
already is, and
On 2/8/2011 2:46 PM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Before arin etc it was possible to request ip space and on the
form specify you would not be connecting to the Internet.
So those off net users can't complain if ARIN allocated the
same ranges on net. Not that it's worth doing so now.
I hoped I
On 1/12/2011 8:04 AM, Greg Whynott wrote:
list, sorry for this but this is getting a little annoying. I've
tried sending Randy email without luck.. think i'm black listed by
his kit, so if someone would kindly forward this to him…
Well, here it is. Perhaps you might consider getting a
On 1/2/2011 6:00 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Jan 2, 2011, at 8:39 PM, Corey Quinn wrote:
On Jan 2, 2011, at 1:24 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
In the early 90's a friend of mine got a box of 10 HP cards with
all the same MAC address.
In my early days of network admining, a coworker told
I see that as of October, the statement on the donor's page is:
Important note: Although NewNOG, Inc. has applied for 501(c)(3)
nonprofit status in the US, there is no guarantee that this will be
granted. Therefore, there can be no guarantee that individual donations
will be tax deductible.
I
On 12/5/2010 11:32 AM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
Pretty much, I no longer care what you wrote. Go away. Seriously. Just
GO AWAY. Alt.politics is -- thataway.
*plonk*
--
Die gedanken sind frei.
On 11/2/2010 12:43 PM, Chris Boyd wrote:
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
And FDDI and X.25 and every single legacy protocol
Are there still any commercial X.25 nets in operation? I had some
peripheral involvement with Tymnet in the MCI/Concert conversion, and
hear it
Warren Kumari wrote:
On Jul 29, 2008, at 10:43 PM, Darryl Dunkin wrote:
Hubs sure are fun...
This might be a stupid question, but where can one get small hubs these
days? All of the common commodity (eg: 4 port Netgear) hubs these
days are actually switches.
True enough. For those
This is also being covered over on the Defcon Forums. Jeff Moss has said
that he'll post the link to the interview that Kaminsky is doing right
now, after it's over. Here's the link to the Forum discussion:
https://forum.defcon.org/showthread.php?t=9547
The forum link also has a link to Dan's
becoming a pointy-clicky world. I don't like it much, either.
On Jul 8, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Lynda wrote:
This is also being covered over on the Defcon Forums. Jeff Moss has
said that he'll post the link to the interview that Kaminsky is doing
right now, after it's over.
Here's the direct link
Jim Wise wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've seen a surprising number of attempted recursive DNS requests
against unpublished non-recursive DNS servers in the last 24 hours or
so, many of them obviously probes of some sort (query for . IN NS,
eg).
Is anyone else
Joe Abley wrote:
On 8 May 2008, at 09:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the NANOG list sprouted a reply-to header, I'd be very unhappy.
To echo an earlier comment, how much development work would be
involved in allowing list members to individually specify whether
they
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On May 5, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 07:20:17AM -0700, Lynda wrote:
It is something that mailman offers, but there was certainly no
need to use it. I manage mailing lists that do, and ones that don't.
Personally, I'm in favor
John Payne wrote:
Heh, just reread the message. It's actually not clear that you
aren't doing the import.
Sorry about the noise clarification requested.
I think that Betty et al might want to consider a follow up message. I
misread this as well, John. Until you commented, I thought
I'm hoping that this just gets through. For two or three years, I've
been relaying all deaddrop.org email through pair.com, which has
apparently made it onto mail-abuse's blacklists. Unfortunately, it joins
gmail, which is my usual backup. I'm afraid to even try my old
rocketmail account.
46 matches
Mail list logo
