Re: NFPA 70 National Electrical Code 2026 first draft changes

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 8:05 AM Jay Hennigan wrote: > On 1/29/24 16:11, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > >> It mostly just renumbers/reorganizes the NEC. Old time electricians will > >> grumble because almost every code number changes. > > > > The NEC is included *by copy* in some state statutes, is it

Re: "Hypothetical" Datacenter Overheating

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 4:10 PM Jay Hennigan wrote: > On 1/15/24 10:37, Pennington, Scott wrote: > > yes but it has been -8 in Chicago plenty of times before this. > > Very interested in root cause... > > Absolutely. My point was that claiming "Global warming" isn't going to > fly as an

Re: Outside plant - prewire customer demarc preference

Thanks Sean! Looks like over priced residential inner duct to me. Sheet rock accomplishes pretty much the same thing. I want reliable home Internet too, but it’s not a CO. I’d install a PVC sleeve on the OSP to ISP transition. The risk of outage isn’t going to materially move one way or the other

Re: Guest Column: Kentik's Doug Madory, Last Call for Upcoming ISOC Course + More

On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 12:30 Tom Beecher wrote: > What network does Nanog-news operate? >> >> Marketing email doesn’t belong on an operational list. Even if its >> NANOG marketing itself. (Ack Kentik non involvement). >> > > This is the right comment. > > The NANOG Mailing List Usage

Re: Guest Column: Kentik's Doug Madory, Last Call for Upcoming ISOC Course + More

What network does Nanog-news operate? Marketing email doesn’t belong on an operational list. Even if its NANOG marketing itself. (Ack Kentik non involvement). Warm regards, -M< On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 20:52 Ryan Hamel wrote: > Randy, > > You're right, the problem is not technical. It's a

Re: NTP Sync Issue Across Tata (Europe)

Same here. Latency and the algo work together. Time outs or un-reachable peers are network issues. Paging Randy Bush. Get Outlook for iOS From: NANOG on behalf of John Gilmore Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 17:01 To: Mel Beckman Cc:

Re: Cogent Abuse - Bogus Propagation of ASN 36471

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 2:34 PM Ian Chilton wrote: > On Thu, 20 Jul 2023, at 7:02 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > Pete, if all the data I see ties together like it looks aren't you able to > take the 15m taxi ride to 60 Hudson and recover the router or shut it off? > It's you

Re: Cogent Abuse - Bogus Propagation of ASN 36471

Pete, if all the data I see ties together like it looks aren't you able to take the 15m taxi ride to 60 Hudson and recover the router or shut it off? It's your router. Right? On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:10 AM Pete Rohrman wrote: > Ben, > > Compromised as in a nefarious entity went into the

Re: About emails impersonating Path Network

On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 11:59 AM J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote: > Your only option is to monitor the generic tld's atp and register them > yourself. Clone attacks are real, impersonation has been around since > centuries and yes, its an attack vector but only impacting your customers. > There is

Re: About emails impersonating Path Network

Is widespread impact confirmed? Unfortunate. Our ASN’s and location contacts in PDB have not received anything from Path. I looked in search engines (quickly) and see nothing negative re: your ASN. I found a reference as new to the platform at AMSIX 7/21 for AS 396998. Lack of mail security bits

Re: txt.att.net outage?

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 9:15 AM William Herrin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 8:09 PM Dan Walters via NANOG > wrote: > > Know this is a longshot, any chance anyone from the txt.att.net domain > might be able to help us with what we believe is a blacklist block or > possibly an outage? > > We

Re: ICANN

[ I know, I know... ] Looks like they have a valid registered agent for service of process in CA: C T Corporation System 33 North Brand Blvd. Suite 700 Glendale, CA 91203 Warm regards, -M< On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 11:24 AM Keith Medcalf wrote: > > Does anyone have contact information (or

Re: MSA’s and network architecture

On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 01:59 Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 5/18/22 03:55, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > > > > > > All, > > > > Why do MSA’s matter as related to network architecture? > > As in "Master Services Agreement"? Admittedly vague

MSA’s and network architecture

All, Why do MSA’s matter as related to network architecture? Thanks all — -M<

Re: Copper Termination Blocks

On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 8:57 PM Shane Ronan wrote: > I think you'd be very surprised if you walked into the central offices of > MANY of the large LECs. > > The majority of the wire frames are gone, replaced with fiber, even where > the service is delivered as copper to the end user, it's

Re: Copper Termination Blocks

Its not ancient. While cooper based products are slowly fading they still matter. Im using 66 blocks to accommodate gauge/voltage for dial tone in all facilities. Lots of OOB still happens via copper dial tone or DSL. Show me one LEC that has torn down their wire frame? We bought new. Im seeing

Re: Cogent pulled out of Russia based on risk analysis

8m20s. On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 8:54 AM Mike Hammett wrote: > Timestamp? > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > Midwest-IX > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > -- > *From: *"Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE" >

Re: Bombs and Hackers are Battering Ukraine's Internet Providers

There's a group of our colleagues working to help out where they can. Keep Ukraine Connected https://nogalliance.org/our-task-forces/keep-ukraine-connected/ FYI, -M< On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 1:22 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > > >

Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia?

On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 5:17 PM Aaron Wendel wrote: > I think you're reading it incorrectly. > > The US government and many other countries have imposed sanctions > against Russia and barred businesses in those countries from doing > business in Russia. Cogent is a US based company and, even if

Re: Cogent cutting links to Russia?

I would argue they don't have much of a choice: "The economic sanctions put in place as a result of the invasion and the increasingly uncertain security situation make it impossible for Cogent to continue to provide you with service." I would expect to see others follow suit if that is the

Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

+1 On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 11:26 Mike Hammett wrote: > *nods* I agree. > > Usually, it's too many spineless people that won't stand up to someone > that couldn't make friends in high school. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions >

Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 11:12 AM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote: > > > On Feb 17, 2022, at 9:02 AM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. > wrote: > > > > I have a note in to some FCC colleagues; I'll report back on what they > say (assuming I hear back). > > > > P.S. In the meantime, the claimed order on

Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 11:22 PM wrote: > > >I believe that should be 19-72A1. > > > >https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-19-72A1.pdf > > > >Essentially, all services must be transitioned to fiber or wireless by > August 2nd, 2022. > > I'm reading that document and that's not what it

Re: LEC copper removal from commercial properties

Looks like its abandon in place "AIP" from the agreement. On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:03 PM L F wrote: > Who becomes the Beneficial Owner of the Copper once Removed? > > > Just Curious. > > > LF > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:01 PM Martin Hannigan >

LEC copper removal from commercial properties

NANOG'ers; At least in Boston, commercial property owners are receiving notices that 'copper lines are being removed per FCC rules' and replaced with fiber. The property owner, not the network operators (or users of unbundled elements if that's even still a thing) are being presented with an

Re: Amazon peering revisited

There are also three different ASNs and different policy decision trees; they all report selective criteria such as minimum of 10GE, multiple locations, specific locations, etc. Not sure it's as simple as 'getting the right person' more than it is about meeting the right conditions. Easier for

Re: [External] Re: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?

regards, -M< On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 9:24 AM Kain, Becki (.) wrote: > So what ever happened to the threatener? Was he caught? > > > > *From:* NANOG *On Behalf Of *Martin > Hannigan > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 20, 2021 11:44 PM > *To:* Omar Haider > *Cc:* nanog

Re: [External] Re: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?

worry. Warm regards, -M< On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 21:18 Omar Haider wrote: > I feel uncomfortable in this newsletter > > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021, 10:56 AM Martin Hannigan wrote: > >> >> >> I put what we received up on pastebin entirely with headers (and r

Re: [External] Re: Anyone else getting the 'spam' bomb threat?

I put what we received up on pastebin entirely with headers (and redacted our info). https://pastebin.com/kLjPm8Nk Warm regards, -M< On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 9:19 AM Radu-Adrian Feurdean < na...@radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2021, at 16:00, Hunter Fuller via NANOG wrote:

Re: FYI: NANOG and ICANN

On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 4:47 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: > > > On Oct 8, 2021, at 12:39 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:39 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG > wrote: > >> I see this as a way to allow NANOG to help channel some of ICANN’s >> incredible excess of funding >>

Re: Rack rails on network equipment

On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 1:34 PM Jay Hennigan wrote: > On 9/24/21 09:37, Andrey Khomyakov wrote: > > > *So ultimately my question to you all is how much do you care about the > > speed of racking and unracking equipment and do you tell your suppliers > > that you care? How much does the time it

Re: The great Netflix vpn debacle!

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 2:19 PM Bryan Holloway wrote: > So I've made some progress, but not on the HBO front. (Hulu and Netflix > have been responsive so far.) > > Tried the e-mail address on Mike Hammett and Co.'s handy web-page, but > got no response after several days. Ironically we were able

Re: An update on the AfriNIC situation

On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 21:13 Rubens Kuhl wrote: > > %s/isolate/move/g functions. That equates to a leadership change. It may > be too soon to suggest that ICANN has any role other than risk analysis and > coordination of mitigation. I'm not even certain if that's their role > seeing how

Re: An update on the AfriNIC situation

On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 8:44 PM Masataka Ohta < mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote: [ clip] As > > ICP-2: Criteria for Establishment of New Regional > Internet Registries > > https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/new-rirs-criteria-2012-02-25-en > 2) The new RIR must

Re: Email and Web Hosting

Sounds like you already know what the decision is. If you can justify it, no need to second guess. If my ISP stopped providing email services I wouldn’t even know. [ may even check if i get bored ] Hope that helps. YMMV, -M< On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:22 PM Steve Saner wrote: > The issue is

Re: DoD IP Space

On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 11:27 AM Mel Beckman wrote: > This doesn’t sound good, no matter how you slice it. The lack of > transparency with a civilian resource is troubling at a minimum. I’m going > to bogon this space as a defensive measure, until its real — and detailed — > purpose can be

Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

Agree. I’ve had it filtered to a casual folder for 5 years now. I appreciate the banter. Abilities to sort and shred would be great. While I miss mail, I’m OK using browser code if it can make nanog-l more relevant. $0.02 only On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 18:31 Matthew Petach wrote: > > On Thu,

Re: Disney+ Geolocation (again)

Hey Seth. I still like SOA for troubleshooting. The older our beloved net gets the less useful old reliable things get, but there can sometimes be good clues. shell01-clt01> dig SOA disneystreaming.com ;; ANSWER SECTION: disneystreaming.com. 3600 IN SOA ns1.p72.dynect.net.

Re: Boston Telecom Hotels

For interconnection? Coresite and Markley. Equals if not soon to be differentiated through Mass-IX being regional and Boston-IX not. As well as costs, yield curves, power costs, etc. Boston is very much a ‘what do you need’ location and not everything will work for everyone. For true carrier

Re: 60 ms cross-continent

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 16:14 Bryan Fields wrote: > On 6/20/20 1:56 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 at 20:52, Wayne Bouchard wrote: > > > >> And thus far, no one has mentioned switching speed and other > >> electronic overhead such as the transceivers (that's the big one, > >>

Re: IPv4 Broker / Service -

For small needs? Honestly, don’t waste too much time. Overhead is expense. The market is competitive. You care about if it is clean, chain of custody and can it legitimately transfer to you. BTW, IPV6? ARIN v6 NAT block? Make sure you exhaust all options before paying. I have never used it.

Re: [EXT] Shining a light on ambulance chasers - Noction

This is overt and more than DB scraping IMHO. It's repulsive. Public pressure is the only way to police _this_. YMMV, -M< On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 4:30 PM Chuck Anderson wrote: > Someone should tell them what happened to Cogent for scraping ARIN WHOIS. > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:13:51PM

Re: Hawaii exchange and connection to mainland pops

Antoni, Search engine or PeeringDB == Dr Fortress // Fred Rodi. Solid. They have the primary IX. Charter and Level3/CL are best option for haulage or IP. #IMHO. Probably cable IRU options, but nit my space. Let me know if no luck. Cheers, and good luck! -M< On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:38

Re: FYI - Suspension of Cogent access to ARIN Whois

On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 08:51 John Curran wrote: > On 7 Jan 2020, at 5:01 AM, Martijn Schmidt via NANOG > wrote: > > > > Out of curiosity, since we aren't affected by this ourselves, I know of > cases where Cogent has sub-allocated IP space to its customers but which > those customers originate

Re: FYI - Suspension of Cogent access to ARIN Whois

— shifting a side thread John, I have no stake in this, so far, but I have a few questions. Can you define exactly what services have been blocked? IRR/ROA/TLA registry updates, etc? Were they blocked ^174 or 174$? This is a precedent AFAIK. I’d like to understand consequences. In case I

Re: Boston Fiber Optic Networks

Definitely good. However, you cant tell shared fiber or sole/joint conduit builds via Infrapedia. You also do not need a referral. That matters in Boston. Boston also has an outstanding shadow conduit system. You do need local help. Talk to Janes and Gavin at Towardex. Let me know if you need an

Re: T-Mobile help!!

Check out STIR/SHAKEN: https://transnexus.com/whitepapers/understanding-stir-shaken/ https://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/Robocall-Strike-Force-Final-Report.pdf For what it's worth, American Express Fraud Department comes up at "Spam Risk" through my provider. There are "recommendations" for labels.

Re: IPv6 Thought Experiment

On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 18:59 Owen DeLong wrote: > > > > On Oct 2, 2019, at 09:33 , Antonios Chariton > wrote: > > > > Dear list, > > First of all, let me apologize if this post is not allowed by the list. > To my best interpretation of the guidelines [1] it is allowed, but may be > in a gray

Re: BGP prefix filter list

Those numbers were subject to fraudulent acquisition. Some end users of these subject prefixes are victims. This blanket approach victimizes them further IMHO. My guess is this direction is why ARIN didn't post the prefixes in their blog post. They are however in the court docs. I don't recommend

ARIN v4 revocations with followup felony indictments

ARIN revokes fraudulently obtained IPv4 numbers: http://www.circleid.com/posts/20190514_735k_fraudulently_obtained_ip_addresses_have_been_revoked/ USAO indicts Micfo founder in South Carolina. https://www.justice.gov/usao-sc/pr/charleston-man-and-business-indicted-federal-court-over-9m-fraud

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

2-65.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a3-64.akam.net. > cia.gov. 86400 IN NS a13-65.akam.net. > > > > On Apr 17, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote: > > > Check the nANOG archives for examples of whitehouse.gov, cia.gov etc. It > certainly is. > > > >

Re: Special Counsel Office report web site

Check the nANOG archives for examples of whitehouse.gov, cia.gov etc. It certainly is. On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 23:34 wrote: > Isn’t this why god invented CDNs? Though, i doubt the govment is > Akamized... > > -Mike > > On Apr 17, 2019, at 20:26, Mark Seiden wrote: > > of course p2p is the

Re: Purchasing IPv4 space - due diligence homework

Jeffrey, Thanks. A good start, but under-scoped. When you are purchasing IP number blocks whatever source you use; a marketplace, a broker, a single source should provide you with a compelling history on a number block REPUTATION that includes all the attributes listed below and then some. Some

Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6 - Update!

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 07:15 Rich Kulawiec wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 08:04:12AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > > ICMP is NOT optional. > > I've pointed folks at this for years: > > ICMP Packet Filtering v1.2 > http://www.cymru.com/Documents/icmp-messages.html > > ---rsk >

Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?

Literally for years, I managed a /9 and a v6 /26 in a text file checked into a vanilla source code control system. Sophistication need depends on your frequency of updates, dynamic allocations and regulatory needs ( read RIR). For low turn over assignments, you may not need much. The options Job

Re: Temp at Level 3 data centers

Hi David, 80F seems ~reasonable to me. What is the inlet temp, the temperature air is going in at? What kind of gear are operating? Routers and switches? Servers? Disk? Is the cabinet top fan working? Most modern equipment should be able to handle those temps. As another poster noted, are these

Re: Find carriers that peer in two IX's

Which will also have dramatically different results. An IX is not a good key for a carrier search. On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:32 Marty Strong via NANOG wrote: > > TELX 60 Hudson and then SIX (Seattle IX) > > IX or building? Telx 60 Hudson is a building and SIX is an IX. > >

Re: Last Week's Canadian Fiber Cut

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > > > On Aug 15, 2017, at 1:22 PM, Rod Beck > wrote: > > > > Did we ever get any resolution on why this was such a big outage? > Appears there were two fiber cuts. Were the fibers damaged

Re: Puerto Rico Internet Exchange

Hi Arturo, Good call. I believe the funds are coming from the USF? (Mike Hammet knows more about this than me). I had conversations with multiple congressional staffers about using USF funds for IXP development. They're in for good projects. The USG and US congress is more than willing to fund

Re: BGP peering question

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:12 PM, craig washington < craigwashingto...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > Newbie question, what criteria do you look for when you decide that you > want to peer with someone or if you will accept peering with someone from > an ISP point of view. > You didn't say

Re: Retarus (AS 48328)

contact them about a SMTP problem and this was the only > working contact. > > Best, > Patrick > > Am 04.05.17 um 06:31 schrieb Martin Hannigan: > > I hate to do this, but I have exhausted _all of my sources of data > > including the SOA (points at VRSN) and domain name

Retarus (AS 48328)

I hate to do this, but I have exhausted _all of my sources of data including the SOA (points at VRSN) and domain name contact addresses for: Registrant Name: Retarus GmbH Registrant Organization: Retarus GmbH Registrant Street: Aschauerstrasse 30 Registrant City: Muenchen Registrant

Re: Interconnection Track

Hi Mehmet, *Great effort here. +1.* I'd suggest that you bring new faces to the game. New ideas are needed. Topic wise: - 'inside' settlement free peering - Content vs. Network Operators, and right sizing where the traffic comes from - Once and for all: Are IXP's as dead as some say? Hope

Re: Purchased IPv4 Woes

Which broker did you use fot the transaction? Did you get a discount for knowingly accepting a dirty block or is this a surprise? Are folks asking for warranties on acquired addresses these days? Cheers, -M< Best, -M< On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:11 Pete Baldwin

Re: Akamai and Instagram Ranges

On Saturday, January 28, 2017, Royce Williams wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 2:22 AM, Shahab Vahabzadeh > > wrote: > > > > Hello Hello, > > Can anybody help me to find out IP Address Ranges of Akamai and > Instagram? > > I wanna do

Re: Safe IPv4 Was: Re: premiumcolo.net IP address rental

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Robert Story wrote: > On Mon, 9 Jan 2017 13:40:23 -0500 Martin wrote: > MH> 2. Apply for and receive a last /22 from RIPE. EVERYONE can do this. > > Not quite everyone. You have to be a RIPE NCC member, which not everyone > can do. > > "Who can

Re: Safe IPv4 Was: Re: premiumcolo.net IP address rental

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Aaron wrote: > The emails I've seen are looking to rent FROM us, not TO us. I've received > an email to every one of our ARIN POCs so I assumed they were scraping > whois data and marked it all as spam. > > Aaron > > If you did have

Safe IPv4 Was: Re: premiumcolo.net IP address rental

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Matt Freitag wrote: > Joel, > > I can't speak to "premiumcolo.net" > Neither can I, but that may not mean much. Perhaps someone else can validate that they're reputable and can execute a transaction end to end? If you need IPv4 addresses for

Re: Google Global Cache Contact

Jason, In case you haven't already heard from the good people at Google: http://bit.ly/2hTJOhX Best, -M< On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Jason Rokeach wrote: > Hi folks, could a contact for GGC contact me off-list? > > Thank you! > - Jason R. Rokeach

Re: Softlayer abuse contact

[ Has been coming up a lot lately. A public response may be useful, YMMV ] After abuse@, which many still do answer, I try the SOA (which is really old fashioned I guess) if I don't get an answer from abuse@ ;; ANSWER SECTION: softlayer.com.900INSOAns1.softlayer.net.

Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11

> On Oct 23, 2016, at 16:26, b...@theworld.com wrote: > > > I'm not sure who you mean when you say "people". My reference was to > manufacturers of IoT devices only. The users are not going to be able to help. You're right, it's all about the manufacturers. If you can remove or reduce

Re: ARIN legacy block transfer process

On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 10:56 PM, John Curran wrote: > On 30 Sep 2016, at 12:49 PM, Bryan Fields wrote: >> [ clip ] > >> I'm thinking of referring both parties to an experienced broker as well. > > That certainly works - there is a list of several

Re: CDN Overload?

Mike, I have the right contact there and I'll flag this thread that way in case they havent already seen it. Best, Martin Hannigan AS 20940 // AS 32787 On Thursday, September 22, 2016, Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Do we have any contacts at Microsoft that we can talk

Re: CDN Overload?

No problem. If you can drop a pcap file somewhere we can reach (and drop me an email where) that was created during the event that'd be great. Thanks again, and great use of the list. Best, Martin Hannigan AS 20940 // AS 32787 > On Sep 21, 2016, at 15:29, Mike Hammett <na...@ics-

Re: CDN Overload?

to fasttcp a few emails ago. Astute man. Best, Martin Hannigan AS 20940 // AS 32787 > On Sep 21, 2016, at 14:30, Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Jdm0dOBf81kSnXEvVfI6ZJbWFNt5AbYUV8CDxGwLSm8/edit?usp=sharing > > > I

Re: Akamai Edgescape query

I do? Drop us a note with your request to peer...@akamai.com and we're happy to see if we can accommodate. Best, -M< AS 20940 / AS 32787 On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Janusz Jezowicz wrote: > Hello, > > We are doing some network research to various cloud/CDNs

Re: IPv4 Broker

Hi Lorenzo, You can obtain a last /22 from the RIPE region as long as you comply with their policy, yes, even if you are "in" the United States. http://bit.ly/RIPE22-20160831 That reduces your need and spend, unless you already received it. Then use the link Marco posted. It's a good list.

Question re: Routing Table Report Was: Re: [pacnog] Weekly Routing Table Report

Phillip, Geoff, et. al. [ trimmed dist, please feel free to expand if you think it's proper ] On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Routing Analysis Role Account wrote: > > Advertised Unallocated Addresses > > > NetworkOrigin AS

Re: Best practices for tracking intra-facility crossconnects

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: > Hey all, > > I am looking to see what the community's experience has been with different > types of labeling systems and XC tracking systems for intra-facility > crossconnects. > I haven't used these in a long time, but

Re: Advertising rented IPv4 prefix from a different ASN.

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Andrew wrote: > Hello List, > [ clip, plenty of advice on these points ] > I feel if we just adverse the prefix it get put on a bogon list for prefix > hijacking. This space is rented long term but they are not interested in > reassigning the

Re: Akamai IPv6 contact needed

Thanks! We'll reach out to you offline shortly. You can also always reach us for peering, v6, or AS specific issues at n...@akamai.com Best Regards, Martin Hannigan AS 209040 / AS 32787 On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:35 AM, Yang Yu <yang.yu.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > Some servers are no

Re: [apops] BGP Update Report

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 6:00 PM, wrote: > 15 - 104.111.200.0/21 6948 0.2% AS16625 -- AKAMAI-AS - Akamai > Technologies, Inc., US > AS20940 -- AKAMAI-ASN1 , US This has been addressed. Appreciated Potaroo Team. Best, -M<

Re: akamai abnormal spike

come close to what we saw from Akamai. > > We have some caching servers and even notice a spike to them as well. Hi Eric, There were two major software updates that spanned Tuesday and Wednesday which are responsible for the increase you saw. Best, Martin Hannigan / AS 20940 / AS 32787

Re: IX in Iran by TIC

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Shahab Vahabzadeh wrote: > Hello Everybody, > I am here to announce that TIC in Iran launched Neutral Internet Exchange > Points. > Right now we have four in: > >- Tehran (tehran-ix.ir) >- Shiraz (shiraz-ix.ir) >- Tabriz

IXP economics Was: Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?

Well. Its complicated. I think this is far more political than about COGS. But hey. Why not? I agree with Dave. Shocking. I know. At least the context. He's right. Thanks for reminding us. We know these things. We'll have to see how IXP communities react now. Perhaps espresso service will be

Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?

> On Jun 16, 2016, at 01:12, Leslie <geekg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:41 PM, Martin Hannigan <hanni...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> SFMIX is great. But poorly distributed. We should support their efforts, but >> how many IXPs do w

Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?

> On Jun 15, 2016, at 22:24, Ca By wrote: > >> On Wednesday, June 15, 2016, Seth Mattinen wrote: >> >>> On 6/15/16 4:03 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: >>> [ clip ] > > I also like sfmix and fl-ix. FL-IX is great. It created real competition in the

Re: Akamai GeoIP

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Can somebody from Akamai contact me offlist about a GeoIP location > change for a block please? > > Thank you. You can always mail n...@akamai.com or peer...@akamai.com for this type of request and we'll help get it

Re: CALEA

Misfire. Sorry, early in the AM. The URL I intended to send is here: http://www.uscourts.gov/statistics-reports/wiretap-report-2014 Best, -M< On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Martin Hannigan <hanni...@gmail.com> wrote: > CALEA isn't a type of request, it's a law that enabled

Re: CALEA

CALEA isn't a type of request, it's a law that enabled par function access for LEO's e.g. "the ladder" pin register, trap+trace, DTMF translation, three-way/off hook ops and the call content (not necessarily in that order). You can see the non national security activity here: On Sat, May 28,

Re: Best Source for ARIN Region /24

There's an option that I forgot to mention: You can still use an RIR and get a last /22 in the RIPE region provided you follow their rules, and no, you do not have to be in Europe. Read carefully: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2013-03 Best, -M< On Mon, Jan 11,

Re: Best Source for ARIN Region /24

If you aren't advised to at least analyze the potential to avoid buying and using v6, you'd be getting bad advice. With that said: For large blocks, >/16, you're going to want to work with a *reputable* broker that understands how the market works. The two I am consistent in pointing to are

Re: IPv4 subnets for lease?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Nick Ellermann wrote: > We have customers asking to lease IP space for BGP transit with us and > other peers. But they are struggling to get at a minimum even a Class C, > even though they have their own ASN. We don't have large

Re: Prefix hijacking by AS20115

Is this related to 104.73.161.0/24? That's ours. :-) We'll take a look and get back to you. Thanks for caring! Best, Marty > On Sep 28, 2015, at 23:08, Seth Mattinen wrote: > >> On 9/28/15 18:30, William Herrin wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Seth

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Chris Boyd cb...@gizmopartners.com wrote: On Aug 15, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Martin Hannigan hanni...@gmail.com wrote: There is reasonable demand for a forum. It might need a little marketing to get a list with traction going. There seems to be some

Re: Data Center operations mail list?

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Simon Lockhart si...@slimey.org wrote: On Tue Aug 11, 2015 at 01:35:28pm -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote: Absolutely feel free to use it; I haven't seen a single message on it in... well, it was 3 years ago I was in datacenters regularly, so I'm goin with 3

OCP Data Center Spec: Ladder Tray

Hi NANOG, The Open Compute Project OCP had, at least that I can recall but now can not find, a ladder tray deployment spec in the data center working group. It called for tray to span the middle of the aisle as I remember it. Anyone recall or have a pointer to it? My favorite search engine and

Re: 'gray' market IPv4

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Matt Kelly mjke...@gmail.com wrote: This list is actual sale prices, http://www.ipv4auctions.com/previous_auctions/ -- Matt On July 14, 2015 at 10:14:05 AM, Justin Wilson - MTIN (li...@mtin.net) wrote: Thes folks (and I am not advertising or

Re: 'gray' market IPv4

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Hank Nussbacher h...@efes.iucc.ac.il wrote: At 15:39 14/07/2015 +0200, Seth Mos wrote: We had the same thing finding a broker for a /24 pi in the RIPE region. Not all of the brokers have the size you want, eg a /20 when you need a /24.

Re: Akamai minimum prefix length issue

Hi Patrick, Correct answer. No surprise. And yes, netsupport-...@akamai.com is still the way to go for these types of issues. Thanks for the help! Best, -M // AS 20940 On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: Akamai does not follow BGP perfectly, for

  1   2   3   4   >