I'm getting ready to prepare an RFP for our next generation WAN, and would like
feedback from anyone else who has 100+ MPLS nodes on their quality of account
service and technical performance.
My current landscape includes ATT, Sprint, and Verizon. I'm almost completely
happy with Sprint-
Well, traceroutes and other ICMP functions would break. It is occasionally
useful to be able to address a specific router interface from someplace other
than its connected peer.
-Gabriel
-Original Message-
From: Mike Jones [mailto:m...@mikejones.in]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Note that /127 is strongly discouraged in RFC5375 and RFC3627. 3627 suggests
using /112 for router links, or /126 at the very most.
-Original Message-
From: Fred Baker [mailto:f...@cisco.com]
...
I see no reason you couldn't use a /127 prefix if the link was point to point.
...
Chuck, you're right that this should not happen- but the reason it should not
happen is because you have a properly functioning stateful firewall, not
because you're using NAT. If your firewall is working properly, then having
public addresses behind it is no less secure than private. And if
Google for NAT is not a security feature and review all the discussions and
unnecessary panic over a lack of NAT support in IPv6. If your SCADA network can
reach the public internet then your security is only as good as your firewall,
whether you NAT or not. If your SCADA network is completely
Google for team cymru secure bgp template for a good starting point.
-Original message-
From: Edward avanti edward.ava...@gmail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wed, Nov 2, 2011 01:01:37 GMT+00:00
Subject: BGP conf
Halo,
First, I accept this might not really right list for
The alternative to centralization is enclosure: segmentation and private
ownership of portions of the formerly common resource. Since the internet is
already thus enclosed, with each portion completely owned by one autonomous
agent or another, the problem at hand is not a commons problem at all
I'm getting ready to do an eval of Monolith Software's monitoring/management
product. They have some very nice multi-tenant dashboarding and reporting
capabilities and are extremely scalable.
-Gabriel
-Original Message-
From: Alex Nderitu [mailto:nderitua...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday,
ActiveSync on Android allows corporate to force compliance with security policy
and allow remote wipe. User cannot complete the exchange account setup without
permitting the controls. If the user doesn't agree their sync isn't enabled.
Moreover, if corporate requirements change sync is disabled
9 matches
Mail list logo
