Hey!
New message, please read <http://adhocdesign.ro/young.php?hr6f>
Michael DeMan
cycles spent
forwarding it onwards?
As always, I could imagine that although I think this is simple it could be a
politically charged debate.
Cheers and please fix if possible,
- Michael DeMan
I take this back.
Spam I received was not via anybody sending to/from nanog@nanog.org but rather
directly to my subscribed e-mail address.
- Mike
On Apr 24, 2014, at 1:29 AM, Michael DeMan na...@deman.com wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry being a bit off-topic and having a boring subject, but we really
infrastructure in turn uses these NTP servers and only
these NTP servers.
- Michael DeMan
On Feb 6, 2014, at 2:27 AM, Alexander Maassen outsi...@scarynet.org wrote:
www.pool.ntp.org
Oorspronkelijk bericht
Van: Notify Me notify.s...@gmail.com
Datum:
Aan: nanog@nanog.org list nanog
Hi,
I think I might have already deleted subject matter a few days ago in re: BCP38.
What exactly are you trying to do?
I agree my general comment about the recent NTP weaknesses should be addressed
via IPv6 RFC may have been mis-understood.
I meant mostly that with IPv6 NAT goes away, all
The recently publicized mechanism to leverage NTP servers for amplified DoS
attacks is seriously effective.
I had a friend who had a local ISP affected by this Thursday and also another
case where just two asterisk servers saturated a 100mbps link to the point of
unusability.
Once more - this
On Feb 2, 2014, at 10:02 PM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Feb 3, 2014, at 12:45 PM, Michael DeMan na...@deman.com wrote:
From a provider point of view, given the choices between contacting the
end-users vs. mitigating the problem, if I were in TW position if I
What I have done in the past, and this presumes you have a /29 or bigger on the
peering session to your upstreams is to check with the direct upstream provider
at each and get approval to put a linux box diagnostics server on the peering
side of each BGP upstream connection you have -
AsI think as we all know the deficiency is the design of the DNS system overall.
No disrespect to anybody, but lots of companies make money off of the design
deficiencies and try to position themselves as offering 'value add services' or
something similar. Basically they make money because the
We have seen some spottyness with IP and cel phone connectivity in this area.
It has been going on for several hours now.
Thanks,
- mike
.
- mike
Duh - area is Vancouver WA area
On Jul 11, 2012, at 9:42 PM, Michael DeMan wrote:
We have seen some spottyness with IP and cel phone connectivity in this area.
It has been going on for several hours now.
Thanks,
- mike
We have found it effective at least for things like DNS and MX-backup to simply
swap some VPS and/or physical colo with another ISP outside our geographic
area. Both protocols are designed for that kind of redundancy. Definitely has
limitations, but is also probably the cheapest solution.
-
Sorry for being ignorant here - I have not even been aware that it is possible
to buy a '*.*.com' domain at all.
I though wildcards were limited to having a domain off a TLD - like
'*.mydomain.tld'.
Is it true that the my browser on a windows, mac, or linux desktop may have
listed as trusted
It ismy understanding also that most commercial grade gensets have built into
the ATS logic that when utility power comesback online, that the transfer back
to utility power is coordinated with the ATS driving the generator until both
frequency and phases are within a user specified range?
-
On Jun 25, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote:
On 6/25/2011 7:43 PM, Paul Graydon wrote:
Take a guess what the datacenter our equipment is currently hosted in uses.
Yet another reason to be glad of a datacenter move that's coming up.
Why can't we just all use DC
if it is very accurate or up to date? If nothing else, it is
kind of fun to play with since you can slide around and zoom in/out with it and
stuff.
http://www.cablemap.info/
- Mike
On Jun 15, 2011, at 4:50 PM, Michael DeMan wrote:
Hi All,
I guess this is a bit off-topic since
16, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Janne Snabb sn...@epipe.com wrote:
Hello from Cambodia. I am familiar with the situation in Cambodia
and some surrounding countries.
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Michael DeMan wrote:
Basically looking for tips on what cities/countries/locations
have as much (mostly submarine
and colocation options.
Also, if anybody offhand has any tips on political stability and/or the risk of
some kind of unwanted censorship by a given country, that would be helpful as
well.
Feel free to post back on-list or off-list.
Thanks,
- Michael DeMan
Call me and old 'hard case' - but I prefer that when I get information via
email, that if possible, the relevant information show up immediately.
Call me lazy I guess - but I would expect that most folks on this list have
also understood good user interface design, and that the least amount of
Hi Paul,
Your point is taken - but actually this is a bit of a conundrum, at least for
me.
Generally what I see is that younger people who grew up using email when they
were children desire to bottom post or post inline whereas folks that
originally utilized email primarily to communicate
to be an 'archive' - I wholly
disagree.
On Apr 11, 2011, at 11:49 PM, Tim Chown wrote:
On 12 Apr 2011, at 07:33, Michael DeMan wrote:
Call me and old 'hard case' - but I prefer that when I get information via
email, that if possible, the relevant information show up immediately.
Call me lazy
On Mar 25, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
They can only get them _at all_ if they can document need. All
receipt of address space, whether from the free-pool or through a
transfer, is needs-based. Anything else would be removing a
Wasn't this announced on the news already?
That because the infrastructure in Japan was hit (no highly publicized) but
still working, that the US military also said they were blocking u-tube and
other high bandwidth sites in order to conserve resources?
I am definitely not one to be outside of
Is that the FFA or the FAA?
On Jan 4, 2011, at 8:57 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
Can they simply extend the mandate? We need to setup new connectivity
to the FFA and was hoping to go IPv6 right out of the gate.
Cheers
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Oberman
, but it is a really good idea.
- Michael DeMan
On Dec 19, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Personally I think the right answer is to enforce a legal separation
between the layer 1 and layer 3 infrastructure providers, and require
that the layer 1 network provide non-discriminatory access to any
company who wishes to
On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Original Message -
From: Adrian Chadd adr...@creative.net.au
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010, Ken Chase wrote:
And if they come and ask the same but without a court order is a bit
trickier and more confusing, and this list is a good place to
wikileaks.no and wikleaks.se seem to accept requests on port 80 but appear to
be having troubles generating responses, perhaps just overloaded.
On Dec 3, 2010, at 12:45 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 12:52:29AM -0500,
Ken Chase k...@sizone.org wrote
a message of 24
Hi,
I have been following this thread, and am mostly curious - can somebody (or
preferably several folks) define what is meant by 'Enterprise DNS' ?
Thanks,
- Mike
On Oct 16, 2010, at 3:03 AM, Ken Gilmour wrote:
Hello any weekend workers :)
We are looking at urgently deploying an
I have seen software based routers (FreeBSD+Quagga) in production at pennies on
the dollar compared to Cisco for quite some years.
Up front, as other people have noted, you need to know what you are doing.
There is no 'crying for help 24x7'. By the same token, if you know what you
are doing
Yes.
On Oct 12, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Ben White wrote:
Does anyone else also see trouble reaching .se domains at the moment?
--
Ben
31 matches
Mail list logo
