Rubens Kuhl wrote:
> I don't think that "companies with tons of lawyers" should be a factor in
> making resource allocation policies. But considering either small or big
> networks, an escalation path would reduce friction and increase overall
> compliance... for instance, failure to have func
John Curran wrote:
...
> As I have noted previously, I have zero doubt in the enforceability of the
> ARIN registration services agreements in this regard – so please carefully
> consider proposed policy both from the overall community benefit being
> sought, and from the implications faced a
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:13:48PM +0300, Scott Christopher wrote:
> > Because it will get spammed if publicly listed in WHOIS.
>
> Yes. It will. Are you telling us that Amazon, with its enormous financial
> and personnel resources, doesn't ha
Sandra Murphy wrote:
> Scott, you might want to read "Policy Development Process (PDP)”
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/ in order to discover just
> exactly what John means by “If the community developed a policy”.
>
> You might also want to join the Public Policy Mailing List,
Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:36:08 -, Richard Williams via NANOG said:
>
> > To contact AWS SES about spam or abuse the correct email address is
> > ab...@amazonaws.com
>
> You know that, and I know that, but why doesn't the person at AWS whose job it
> is to keep the
John Curran wrote:
> Scott -
>
> Alas, you have a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of ARIN… we
> don’t do anything other than implement policies that this community wants. If
> the community developed a policy to require Abuse POC’s validation, and said
> policy made clear that
Christoffer Hansen wrote:
> On 30/07/2019 11:59, Chris Knipe wrote:
>
> > Then update your ARIN records to reflect that. Fully agree with Dan on
> > this one.
> >
>
> Imagine ARIN did a take from RIPE NCC [Policy Proposal Idea?] and a
> policy came into effect of validating ALL 'OrgAbuseEmail'
Dan Hollis wrote:
> >>> RCPT To:
> <<< 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected.
> 550 5.1.1 ... User unknown
> >>> DATA
> <<< 503 #5.5.1 RCPT first
Try j...@amazon.com
--
S.C.
Gary E. Miller wrote:
> Is it no longer required to monitor the postmaster@ ?
>
> Did RFC 822 and RFC 5321 get repealed? Or is M$ more special than the
> rest of us?
Not just M$ but Cloudflare too: https://www.cloudflare.com/abuse
Worse is that you might need to complete a CAPTCHA just to get
M. Omer GOLGELI wrote:
> There are also variants of it with subjects like
>
> " Ref Id: %VARIABLE% "
> and
> "%Domain.tld% Ref Id: %VARIABLE% "
>
>
>
> And as Bryan said, we are increasingly getting more and more as well.
I wonder if this crap corresponds positively with the price of Bitcoin
Dan Hollis wrote:
> Phishing scheme didn't happen.
>
> fedex has had a number of major compromises so it's not a stretch that
> their user database was stolen and sold to spammers.
The other possibility is that your one-off email scheme is predictable, and
someone knows you use FedEx, and tha
Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:17:31AM -0700, Brian Kantor wrote:
> > Anne, the way that such addresses are often harvested is that one of
> > the spammers (or his agent) becomes a member of the list and simply
> > records the addresses of persons posting to the list. They the
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
> Question: Is the member list with email addresses public?? Otherwise,
> one has to wonder how they got these addresses?
https://marc.info/?l=nanog&r=1&w=2 and https://lists.gt.net/nanog/ mangle email
addresses in the headers but do nothing about email addresse
Owen DeLong wrote:
> I’m quite aware of this. If you’ll note, the thing I was replying to
> said he was ALSO looking for a good contact within CALDOT.
My bad - I didn't read this thread thoroughly.
But my email client is at fault too... it hid all the quoted text under
a button "Show quoted text"
No :)
BART is Bay Area Rapid Transit, a public transportation system with its
own bureaucracy and publicly elected board.
Caltrans is a separate State bureaucracy, though it has a big office in
the city of Oakland near BART Headquarters.
And then there is Caltrain which is the commuter rail that r
Mark Tinka wrote:
> I hope the U.S. does catch-up. If we were swipe-based here, we'd all be
> broke :-). I know a number of major merchants in the U.S. now use PIN's,
> and I always stick to those when I travel there.
In the U.S., pin codes are required for EFTPOS transactions (called debit) ove
Robert Kisteleki wrote:
> (this is probably OT now...)
>
> > I'm pretty sure the "entire point" of inventing CVV was to prove you
> > physically have the card.
>
> Except that it doesn't serve that purpose. Anyone who ever had your card
> in their hands (e.g. waiters) can just write that down a
Christopher Morrow wrote:
> Whether it actually 'costs' that much to pull a x-connect and maintain
> that x-connect is probably not as important as 'gosh it's really hard
> to be 'close' to ' right? which is what they are
> capitalizing on here.>
> Hank, how far away is the next closest large ne
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On 18/09/2018 08:02, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>> it's funny/possible that x-connect costs affect where peering appears
>> in the landscape, right?> Not this time. Just price gouging since moving a
>> number of cabinets
> to a different location is a nightmare.
Sure
Scott Weeks wrote:
> --- s...@xopher.net wrote:
> From: Scott Christopher
>
> I think the solution is legislation + regulations.
> -
>
> For sure dude, because, you know, they do such a
> great job of all the other stuff they touch!
>
Mark Andrews wrote:
> but we do have the tech to do this.
I wholeheartedly agree.
> All it takes is a couple of transit providers to no longer accept
> word-of-mouth and
> the world will transition overnight.
This is the hard part.
It seems trivial - being probably only a handful of transit
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> 2. Create a domain called acme-corp.com and a user called peering
Or one could register aсme.com
(If the reader can't tell the difference between acme.com and aсme.com ,
the reader is using one of the multitude of email clients and/or fonts
that presents Unicode poorly
Sean Donelan wrote:
> But, its odd to send diplomats to remote areas of the country, if you are
> not trying to survey geographic infrastructure in the middle of the
> country.
It's just "for show."
If they really wanted to be invisible, they could do so without using
diplomats - a group that
Rod Beck wrote:
> Altice is in the States and going public soon. They have been producing
> superior financial results. Appears to know how to run these cable
> networks better than the standard American management.
They don't actually lay any cable though, nor do they build their own
network. T
https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/114865/hetzner-and-other-traffic-passing-cogent-rerouted-over-moscow#latest
A report that all Cogent traffic got re-routed into Moscow. Looks
innocent but happened right after UA blocked RU websites (e.g.,
VKontakte, Yandex, etc)
Any thoughts ?
--
Regards,
On Mon, May 1, 2017, at 10:49 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> I didn't see any mention of this here. Any comments?
>
> [...]
>
> https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/04/russian-controlled-telecom-hijacks-financial-services-internet-traffic/
Governments mopping up signals and data isn't a
26 matches
Mail list logo
