Michael Thomas writes:
> I really don't see why people think it's so different that v4. To me
> back then it mostly seemed like v4 with bigger address.
Then I suppose, like me, you were in favor of the TUBA proposal? :)
-tih
--
Most people who graduate with CS degrees don't understand the
Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe writes:
> What else is like that and easy to remember and isn’t 1.1.1.1 ?
1.1 :)
-tih
--
Most people who graduate with CS degrees don't understand the significance
of Lisp. Lisp is the most important idea in computer science. --Alan Kay
John Levine writes:
> I have signed all 300 zones on my DNS servers, but only about half of
> them have working DNSSEC because there is no practical way to install
> the DS records.
Sounds like ICANN, having told us for a very long time that they want
DNSSEC everywhere, should attempt to get a
Jeroen Massar via NANOG writes:
> No, not even kidding. For many organisations DNSSEC is 'scary' and a
> burden as it feels 'fragile' for them.
Unfortunately, yes. And those of us who use it know that this is a
myth. With modern software, DNSSEC is quick and easy to set up, and
works just
Andrey Kostin writes:
> Could be true very soon. When supporting cable infrastructure will
> become too expensive they will cut it in lieu of mobile, like many
> railways were decomissioned earlier. Must be a local tipping point in
> each area but it shouldn't be long to wait.
It's happening
Karl Auer writes:
> I think the point about email is that it is inherently store-and-
> forward, so it can relatively easily be moved off a network, stored,
> moved by other means, and put back on a (possibly different) network.
It's trivial to set up a mail transport between physically
Damian Menscher via NANOG writes:
> "This experiment will be done in collaboration with DNS providers who
> already support DoH, with the goal of improving our mutual users’
> security and privacy by upgrading them to the DoH version of their
> current DNS service. With our approach, the DNS
7 matches
Mail list logo
