Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-14 Thread Christian de Larrinaga
Has there been some assessment of how justified have those seeking the "right to be forgotten" been in becoming forgotten? By doing so does it risk changing the record in a way that is not beneficial to the community and historical record? I warmly second the plaudit and thanks to Brandon for his

Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-14 Thread Chris Russell
Speakers are informed they are going to be recorded. If they have sensitive information, they can choose a track and ask it not be recorded. NANOG has done this in the past, but you should talk to the Program Committee if you are interested in this. We've had this within UKNOF ... sometimes

Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-14 Thread Chris Russell
We record and put on youtube the uknof.org.uk meetings and it still gets bigger every time (around 3x growth since we started streaming). - and we at UKNOF are grateful for Brandon for doing this... :) In terms of UKNOF, we get complaints when we DON'T webcast content or make video's

Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread Brandon Butterworth
On Mon Mar 13, 2017 at 04:52:01PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote: > Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of > any sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of > content (even vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with > vendor consent) would have a

Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread Bob Evans
I have referred to online sessions from the past several times. NANOG is great at preserving information, compared to other conferences. In addition, if you attend a conference, say you have to missed a session due to business distractions, you can usually watch it that evening in your room. If

Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Mar 13, 2017, at 6:06 PM, Steve Feldman wrote: > On Mar 13, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> >> Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any >> sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content

Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread James Downs
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 04:52:01PM -0500, Mike Hammett wrote: > Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any > sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even > vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) would have a >

Re: Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread Steve Feldman
> On Mar 13, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any > sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even > vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) would

Conference Videos

2017-03-13 Thread Mike Hammett
Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content (even vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) would have a catastrophic effect on conference attendance. NANOG doesn't seem to