On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:49 46PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Also, the CC is required to at least skim every post. So believe me, they
know what is happening - more than most since they can't plonk the k00ks.
That was one of the better side-effects of my departure from the IESG and all
WG
On Apr 8, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Michael Dillon wrote:
and what makes you think that there is anyone looking after the
mailing lists any more. There have been few network operational
threads in recent months, and the Jim Fleming IPv3 bot is given free
rein on the NANOG lists.
[snip]
I guarantee
I guarantee you the Communications Committee is on the job. What's more,
they are doing a GREAT job - for no money and apparently no gratitude. It is
worse than thankless, no matter what they do they will be derided. Filter
someone and they get flamed. Leave someone allowed to post and
On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:39 45PM, Michael Dillon wrote:
I guarantee you the Communications Committee is on the job. What's more,
they are doing a GREAT job - for no money and apparently no gratitude. It
is worse than thankless, no matter what they do they will be derided.
Filter someone
[Reply-to set.]
On Apr 8, 2010, at 6:39 PM, Michael Dillon wrote:
I guarantee you the Communications Committee is on the job. What's more,
they are doing a GREAT job - for no money and apparently no gratitude. It
is worse than thankless, no matter what they do they will be derided.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dillon [mailto:wavetos...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 3:40 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Cheers to the Communication Committee [was: Likely /8
Scenario - Carriers will TAKE what they want ?]
I guarantee you the Communications
6 matches
Mail list logo
