A half-day with SQLite, memcached and PHP solved this need for us
(auto-configures Nagios). Tracking a few hundred domains at this point.
Gosh, I really need to cleanup sources, and punt some of these little tools
onto GitHub.
Gregg Berkholtz
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 4:52 PM, Mike Hale wrote:
>
In message <20141125005124.0c4bf243a...@rock.dv.isc.org>, Mark Andrews writes:
>
> In message , Randy Epstein writes:
> > On 11/24/14, 7:16 PM, "George Herbert" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >He didn't hack the registry, he hijacked its records. And this is far
> > >from the first time a registry accoun
In message , George Herbert
writes:
> > On Nov 24, 2014, at 4:18 PM, Randy Epstein
> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, he didnât hack its records either. He exploited a bug in
> BIND.
>
>
> ...returned a legit response plus a tacked-on glue record for
> www.internic.net anytime you queried his nameser
On 11/24/14, 7:51 PM, "Mark Andrews" wrote:
>
>In message , Randy Epstein writes:
>> On 11/24/14, 7:16 PM, "George Herbert" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >He didn't hack the registry, he hijacked its records. And this is far
>> >from the first time a registry account was hacked. But, yeah, *still*
>> >n
It's pretty easy to roll out a Nagios box that checks on your domains,
NS results and SSL status.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> Jay Ashworth wrote:
>>
>> In light of the CL domain hijacking, it seems like a good time to ask
>> if everyone has an inventory system that ke
In message , Randy Epstein writes:
> On 11/24/14, 7:16 PM, "George Herbert" wrote:
>
> >
> >He didn't hack the registry, he hijacked its records. And this is far
> >from the first time a registry account was hacked. But, yeah, *still*
> >not secure enough.
>
> Actually, he didnât hack its rec
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 4:18 PM, Randy Epstein wrote:
>
> Actually, he didn’t hack its records either. He exploited a bug in BIND.
...returned a legit response plus a tacked-on glue record for www.internic.net
anytime you queried his nameserver, which he tricked people into doing with
mixt
On 11/24/14, 7:18 PM, "George Herbert" wrote:
>And that was July 1997 not 96, though that does nothing to make me feel
>younger ...
http://archive.wired.com/politics/law/news/1997/07/5325
Yep. He did it to one of my domains (besides internic.net).
>George William Herbert
>Sent from my iPhone
Jay Ashworth wrote:
In light of the CL domain hijacking, it seems like a good time to ask
if everyone has an inventory system that keeps track of all the details
(including renewal dates) for their domain registy and SSL certificate
accounts.
If you use a tool to keep track of this, which one?
And that was July 1997 not 96, though that does nothing to make me feel younger
...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 4:16 PM, George Herbert wrote:
>
>
> He didn't hack the registry, he hijacked its records. And this is far from
> the first time a registry ac
On 11/24/14, 7:16 PM, "George Herbert" wrote:
>
>He didn't hack the registry, he hijacked its records. And this is far
>from the first time a registry account was hacked. But, yeah, *still*
>not secure enough.
Actually, he didn’t hack its records either. He exploited a bug in BIND.
>George W
Xymon has a built in test to check SSL cert expiration.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Nov 24, 2014 7:14 PM, "Jay Ashworth" wrote:
> In light of the CL domain hijacking, it seems like a good time to ask
> if everyone has an inven
He didn't hack the registry, he hijacked its records. And this is far from the
first time a registry account was hacked. But, yeah, *still* not secure enough.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Randy Epstein wrote:
>
>> On 11/24/14, 5:08 PM, "Michael
In light of the CL domain hijacking, it seems like a good time to ask
if everyone has an inventory system that keeps track of all the details
(including renewal dates) for their domain registy and SSL certificate
accounts.
If you use a tool to keep track of this, which one?
Do you have things set
On 11/24/14, 5:08 PM, "Michael T. Voity" wrote:
>I hate to say this, But I think that Network Operators have not see the
>last of of this DNS Hijacking. Craigslist might have been a test to see
>how far they could get and how long it would take for it to be
>discovered. I hope the FBI and the o
It still seems broken in some areas. Mail is bouncing from Hotmail to
craigslist.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Michael T. Voity wrote:
> I hate to say this, But I think that Network Operators have not see the
> last of of this DNS Hijacking. Craigslist might have been a test to see how
> far
I hate to say this, But I think that Network Operators have not see the
last of of this DNS Hijacking. Craigslist might have been a test to see
how far they could get and how long it would take for it to be
discovered. I hope the FBI and the other Federal agencies out there
are involved with
On 11/24/2014 08:41 AM, Alain Hebert wrote:
> Well,
>
> NetSol?
>
> Is it just me or they came up a few times lately (past year) in high
> profil case of DNS Hijacking?
>
Someone was kind enough to break into one of my domains at Register.com
-- and to their credit Register.com dete
Well,
NetSol?
Is it just me or they came up a few times lately (past year) in high
profil case of DNS Hijacking?
On 11/23/14 23:06, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> yes it's been hijacked thru registrar level and someone was able to change
> name servers, now it's back to normal but you will ne
> Probably a good time to remind folks of HTTPS everywhere plugin for
> Chrome and Firefox :-)
what? and deter natural selection?
i have hope for this really being improved next year
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/11/certificate-authority-encrypt-entire-web
randy
Probably a good time to remind folks of HTTPS everywhere plugin for Chrome and
Firefox :-)
Cheers,
Harry
On Nov 24, 2014 1:04 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > and what tasty things did the hijacker's web site serve?
>
> probably not mu
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> and what tasty things did the hijacker's web site serve?
probably not much for very long... :( CL traffic is a bit crushy.
On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:51 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> and what tasty things did the hijacker's web site serve?
Firefox on my Mac started acting very strangely after encountering one of the
'unresponsive' versions of craigslist.ca. Apparent browser hangs, javascript
script timeouts, and odd things
I get the favicon.ico but Chrome says Error code: ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Brian Henson wrote:
> I did a cache flush at googledns and it started resolving to a diffe
and what tasty things did the hijacker's web site serve?
randy
Looking at San Diego. Suspecting an issue with Google DNS.
Google--> dig @8.8.8.8 cities.l.craigslist.org. +short
74.63.219.135
My resolver--> dig cities.l.craigslist.org. +short
208.82.238.226
Authoritative--> dig @208.82.236.210 cities.l.craigslist.org. +short +norec
208.82.236.242
On Sun, N
I did a cache flush at googledns and it started resolving to a different IP
than the one earlier. Thinking the DNS may have been compromised somewhere.
New IP is 208.91.197.27 old one was 74.63.219.135
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
> down for me and http://www.downforeveryon
yes it's been hijacked thru registrar level and someone was able to change
name servers, now it's back to normal but you will need to clear your
caches and perhaps your ISP too. (if you are using 8.8.8.8 , they have
already cleared the caches)
Sponsoring Registrar:Network Solutions, LLC (R63-LROR)
Im seeing it resolve to 74.63.219.135 on my network and on
http://whois.domaintools.com/craigslist.org
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:57 PM, Quinn Kuzmich
wrote:
> CoSprings list is coming up fine.
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Brian Henson wrote:
>
>> Is anyone else seeing their local craig
CoSprings list is coming up fine.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Brian Henson wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
> other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um.
>
Boston is just fine, and all the links from there, to other craigslist
sites seem to be working as well.
Chaim Rieger wrote:
Comes up normal for me in LA, on twc.
On Nov 23, 2014 7:43 PM, "Brian Henson" wrote:
Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
other than
On Nov 23, 2014, at 7:41 PM, Brian Henson wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
> other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um.
*.craigslist.ca and *.craigslist.org have been offline since about 16:40
Pacific Standard Time fr
On 24/11/14 13:41, Brian Henson wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
> other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um.
>
Over on [dns-operations]:
> On 24/11/14 13:38, Brad Volz wrote:>
>> The craigslist account at one of our r
down for me and http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/craigslist.org
/kc
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:45:35PM -0800, Chaim Rieger said:
>Comes up normal for me in LA, on twc.
>On Nov 23, 2014 7:43 PM, "Brian Henson" wrote:
>
>> Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to a
Maybe an area based issue. tons of reports here
http://www.isitdownrightnow.com/craigslist.org.html
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Brian Artschwager
wrote:
> Same here, New Jersey.
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:43 PM, aUser wrote:
>
>> I can't reach my local one or the Fresno one. Server u
Same here, New Jersey.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:43 PM, aUser wrote:
> I can't reach my local one or the Fresno one. Server unreachable.
>
> Sent from my iPhone 5S.
>
> > On Nov 23, 2014, at 7:41 PM, Brian Henson wrote:
> >
> > Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to anothe
strange when I go to Boise.craigslist or dayton.craigslist.org I get a site
that shows digital Gangster for life as the title. so do some of the other
tools outside my network.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Not seeing that here The local site and the general http;//
>
Not seeing that here The local site and the general http;//
www.craigslist.org both look to be going to the correct site.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Brian Henson wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
> other than craigslist? I see it loading htt
Comes up normal for me in LA, on twc.
On Nov 23, 2014 7:43 PM, "Brian Henson" wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
> other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um.
>
Not here, spyware maybe?
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Brian Henson wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
> other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um.
>
--
eSited LLC
(701) 390-9638
I can't reach my local one or the Fresno one. Server unreachable.
Sent from my iPhone 5S.
> On Nov 23, 2014, at 7:41 PM, Brian Henson wrote:
>
> Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
> other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um.
Is anyone else seeing their local craigslist redirected to another site
other than craigslist? I see it loading http://digitalgangster.com/5um.
42 matches
Mail list logo
