On 12/6/10 6:55 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Jeff Johnstone wrote:
Speaking of IPV6 security, is there any movement towards any open
source IPV6 firewall solutions for the consumer / small business?
Almost all the info I've managed to find to date indicates no
On 12/6/10 5:35 AM, Jeff Johnstone wrote:
Speaking of IPV6 security, is there any movement towards any open source
IPV6 firewall solutions for the consumer / small business?
Almost all the info I've managed to find to date indicates no support, nor
any planned support in upcoming releases.
Speaking of IPV6 security, is there any movement towards any open
source
IPV6 firewall solutions for the consumer / small business?
Almost all the info I've managed to find to date indicates no
support, nor
any planned support in upcoming releases.
Any info would be helpful.
On Dec 9, 2010, at 9:39 PM, George Bonser wrote:
Speaking of IPV6 security, is there any movement towards any open
source
IPV6 firewall solutions for the consumer / small business?
Almost all the info I've managed to find to date indicates no
support, nor
any planned support in
On 12/10/2010 12:52 AM, Wil Schultz wrote:
On Dec 9, 2010, at 9:39 PM, George Bonser wrote:
Speaking of IPV6 security, is there any movement towards any open
source
IPV6 firewall solutions for the consumer / small business?
Almost all the info I've managed to find to date indicates no
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Owen DeLong wrote:
Seriously, though, you're welcome to use fd00::/8 for exactly that
purpose. The problem is that you (and hopefully it stays this way) won't
have much luck finding a vendor that will provide the NAT for you to do
it with.
[with my flame-retardant hat
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:18:31AM -0500, david raistrick wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Owen DeLong wrote:
Seriously, though, you're welcome to use fd00::/8 for exactly that
purpose. The problem is that you (and hopefully it stays this way)
won't have much luck finding a vendor that will
On Dec 7, 2010, at 6:05 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:18:31AM -0500, david raistrick wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Owen DeLong wrote:
Seriously, though, you're welcome to use fd00::/8 for exactly that
purpose. The problem is that you (and hopefully it stays this way)
On 12/7/10 5:18 AM, david raistrick wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Owen DeLong wrote:
Seriously, though, you're welcome to use fd00::/8 for exactly that
purpose. The problem is that you (and hopefully it stays this way)
won't have much luck finding a vendor that will provide the NAT for
you to
On Saturday, 4 December 2010 at K:40:50 -0500, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Probably a case of something being blindingly obvious but...
I have seen plenty of information on IPv6 from a internal network
standpoint. I have seen very little with respect to how a ISP is
supposed to handle routing
On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Chris Nicholls wrote:
I found the following very helpful, Hardest thing for me was nailing
DHCPv6-PD without an DHCP server :)
This is the best/most complete work on IPv6 security to date, IMHO:
http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=1587055945
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Chris Nicholls wrote:
I found the following very helpful, Hardest thing for me was nailing
DHCPv6-PD without an DHCP server :)
This is the best/most complete work on IPv6 security to
On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Jeff Johnstone wrote:
Speaking of IPV6 security, is there any movement towards any open source
IPV6 firewall solutions for the consumer / small business?
Almost all the info I've managed to find to date indicates no support, nor
any planned support in upcoming
On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Jeff Johnstone wrote:
Speaking of IPV6 security, is there any movement towards any open source
IPV6 firewall solutions for the consumer / small business?
Almost all the info I've managed to find to date
On 12/6/2010 9:07 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Seriously, though, you're welcome to use fd00::/8 for exactly that
purpose. The problem is that you (and hopefully it stays this way)
won't have much luck finding a vendor that will provide the NAT for
you to do it with.
Corporate IT community
First, let's clarify things a bit. I don't think unintended routing is =
what concerns your IT guys. Afterall, even with the NAT
box today, there's routing from the outside to the inside. It's just =
controlled by stateful inspection.
It might be better stated differently.
With NAT, routing
On Dec 6, 2010, at 10:49 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
So does NAT add to security? Yes; just not very much.
It adds nothing which can't be added in another, better way, and it subtracts a
great deal in terms of instantiating unnecessary DoSable stateful chokepoints
in the network, not to mention
On 6 Dec 2010, at 11:07 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 6:55 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Dec 6, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Jeff Johnstone wrote:
Speaking of IPV6 security, is there any movement towards any open source
IPV6 firewall solutions for the consumer / small business?
Almost
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 19:52, Ben Jencks b...@bjencks.net wrote:
DHCPv6-PD (prefix delegation) with the relay installing static routes
is probably the most straightforward way.
Apparently that has it's own problems right now actually:
In article
xs4all.aanlktin5aoqklbixfn9elnpodlbcdxn1e0ati7wbu...@mail.gmail.com you write:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 19:52, Ben Jencks b...@bjencks.net wrote:
DHCPv6-PD (prefix delegation) with the relay installing static routes
is probably the most straightforward way.
Apparently that has it's
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote:
of running RIPng. The thought of letting Belkin routers (if you can call
them that) into the routing table scares me no end.
I think that indeed looks scary. I wouldn't be too concerned about the
Belkin routers.
How many SP
On 06/12/2010, at 6:54 AM, Bill Fehring wrote:
Apparently that has it's own problems right now actually:
http://blog.ioshints.info/2010/10/dhcpv6-relaying-another-trouble-spot.html
In our deployment mode, the CEs are running PPP sessions to the
BRAS, so they know when it reboots and can
In article
xs4all.aanlktikm-=0xt8kjv0_0gbc7fzxofobn+fh8oil6v...@mail.gmail.com you write:
If there is an inexpensive CPE with an implementation of DHCPv6 PD
that works without issues,
I would love to hear about who makes it, and what the device is...
AVM Fritzbox 7270/7340/7390
Draytek Vigor
On Dec 5, 2010, at 1:32 PM, James Hess wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote:
of running RIPng. The thought of letting Belkin routers (if you can call
them that) into the routing table scares me no end.
I think that indeed looks scary. I wouldn't be
On 5 dec 2010, at 23:19, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
In article
xs4all.aanlktikm-=0xt8kjv0_0gbc7fzxofobn+fh8oil6v...@mail.gmail.com you
write:
If there is an inexpensive CPE with an implementation of DHCPv6 PD
that works without issues,
I would love to hear about who makes it, and
Probably a case of something being blindingly obvious but...
I have seen plenty of information on IPv6 from a internal network
standpoint. I have seen very little with respect to how a ISP is
supposed to handle routing to residential consumer networks. I have seen
suggestions of running
On 12/04/2010 07:40 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Probably a case of something being blindingly obvious but...
I have seen plenty of information on IPv6 from a internal network
standpoint. I have seen very little with respect to how a ISP is
supposed to handle routing to residential consumer
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 22:40, Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote:
Probably a case of something being blindingly obvious but...
I have seen plenty of information on IPv6 from a internal network
standpoint. I have seen very little with respect to how a ISP is supposed
to handle routing to
On 12/4/10 10:52 PM, Ben Jencks wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 22:40, Mark Radabaughm...@amplex.net wrote:
Probably a case of something being blindingly obvious but...
I have seen plenty of information on IPv6 from a internal network
standpoint. I have seen very little with respect to how a
On 05/12/2010, at 2:29 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
On 12/4/10 10:52 PM, Ben Jencks wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 22:40, Mark Radabaughm...@amplex.net wrote:
Probably a case of something being blindingly obvious but...
I have seen plenty of information on IPv6 from a internal network
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:40:50 -0500
Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote:
Probably a case of something being blindingly obvious but...
I have seen plenty of information on IPv6 from a internal network
standpoint. I have seen very little with respect to how a ISP is
supposed to handle
On Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:40:50 -0500
Mark Radabaugh m...@amplex.net wrote:
Probably a case of something being blindingly obvious but...
I have seen plenty of information on IPv6 from a internal network
standpoint. I have seen very little with respect to how a ISP is
supposed to handle
32 matches
Mail list logo
