RE: /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-06 Thread Adam Vitkovsky
So is it recommended now to go over all the NGN core routers and restore them to default with: no lawful-intercept disable cmd? :) adam

Re: /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Tom Taylor
I'm seriously not clear why Y.2770 is characterized as negotiated behind closed doors. Any drafts were available to all participants in the ITU-T, on exactly the same terms as drafts of other Recommendations. As an example, the draft coming out of the October, 2011 meeting can be seen at

Re: /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Tom Taylor tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com wrote: I'm seriously not clear why Y.2770 is characterized as negotiated behind closed doors. Any drafts were available to all participants in the ITU-T, on exactly the same terms as drafts of other Recommendations. As an

Re: /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Arturo Servin
Perhaps because you are addressing to a bunch of Internet engineers that (we) are used to create standards in open forums where everybody have a say. For the new Internet world available to all participants in the ITU-T, on exactly the same terms as drafts of other

Re: /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Owen DeLong
On Dec 5, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Tom Taylor tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com wrote: I'm seriously not clear why Y.2770 is characterized as negotiated behind closed doors. Any drafts were available to all participants in the ITU-T, on exactly the same terms as drafts of other Recommendations. As an

Re: /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Tom Taylor
On 05/12/2012 2:11 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote: On 2012-12-05 14:01, Tom Taylor wrote: I'm seriously not clear why Y.2770 is characterized as negotiated behind closed doors. Any drafts were available to all participants in the ITU-T, on exactly the same terms as drafts of other Recommendations. As

Re: /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Owen DeLong
On Dec 5, 2012, at 15:07 , Tom Taylor tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com wrote: On 05/12/2012 2:11 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote: On 2012-12-05 14:01, Tom Taylor wrote: I'm seriously not clear why Y.2770 is characterized as negotiated behind closed doors. Any drafts were available to all participants in

Re: /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

2012-12-05 Thread Alissa Cooper
On Dec 5, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Tom Taylor wrote: Agreed that the ITU-T is a membership organization, but the Questions and Study Group work programs are open to view (Q. 17/13 specifically covers DPI, and has more documents coming down the pipe). If you want to follow some Question you can