These days I think the idea is to use unnumbered or dynamic neighbors so
most of the configuration complexity goes away:
https://docs.cumulusnetworks.com/display/DOCS/Border+Gateway+Protocol+-+BGP#BorderGatewayProtocol-BGP-ConfiguringBGPUnnumberedInterfaces
In this case, your container would peer
Years back I ran ExaBGP inside a Docker container (when it wasn't
"production ready") to anycast a contained service both within a datacenter
and across them. To make routing work correctly I had to also run another
BGP daemon on the Docker host machine; I can't remember if I used bird for
this, bu
On Sat 2018-Jun-16 00:51:15 -0500, Jimmy Hess wrote:
Running the BGP application in a container on a shared storage system managed by
a host cluster would also make it easier to start the service up on a
different host when
the first host fails or requires maintenance.
On the other hand, run
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> So I have to ask, why is it advantageous to put this in a container rather
> than just run it directly > on the container's host?
There is no real reason not to run it in a container, and all the
advantages of running ALL applications in
Using BGP (Quagga) in containers is a great way to build a simulation of
your actual network. You can then test configuration changes in the
simulation before you make them in production.
You can even build this up into an automated test pipeline where new
configurations are tested in simulation b
On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 15:07 -0400, james jones wrote:
> Yes, that's it.
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:05 PM Michel 'ic' Luczak >
> wrote:
>
> I guess / hope what you’re trying to achieve is to announce services
> from
> the containers using BGP. If this is the case, what you’re looking
> for is
FRR, the modern fork of quagga, has a pre built docker container.
https://hub.docker.com/r/cumulusnetworks/frrouting/
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 10:41 PM Oliver O'Boyle
wrote:
> There's no reason why it shouldn't work well. It's just a minor paradigm
> shift that requires some solid testing and knowh
> Mike Hammett wrote :
> I wonder which part of the proposal people find offensive.
The intent of the original post was vague. Like a lot of people, I would not
run a full BGP router in a container. Now, if the purpose is to inject or learn
a handful of routes in order to do limited host routing
On Fri 2018-Jun-15 05:18:05 -0300, Raymond Burkholder
wrote:
On 06/14/2018 09:22 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
So I have to ask, why is it advantageous to put this in a container
rather than just run it directly
on the container's host?
Some bits similar to Raymond's comments, but in our case
On 06/14/2018 09:22 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
So I have to ask, why is it advantageous to put this in a container
rather than just run it directly
on the container's host?
Most any host now-a-days has quite a bit of horse power to run services.
All those services could be run natively all in
So I have to ask, why is it advantageous to put this in a container
rather than just run it directly
on the container's host?
Mike
On 06/14/2018 05:03 PM, Richard Hicks wrote:
I'm happy with GoBGP in a docker container for my BGP
Dashboard/LookingGlass project.
https://github.com/rhicks/bgp-da
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 10:41 PM Oliver O'Boyle
wrote:
> There's no reason why it shouldn't work well. It's just a minor paradigm
> shift that requires some solid testing and knowhow on the ops team.
>
>
and... XR or Junos are ... doing this under the covers for you anyway, so..
get used to the n
There's no reason why it shouldn't work well. It's just a minor paradigm
shift that requires some solid testing and knowhow on the ops team.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, 22:26 Eric Tykwinski, wrote:
> The funny part is I don’t like containers but love VMs, so kvm, vmware,
> citrix, hvm, et al.
> Not
The funny part is I don’t like containers but love VMs, so kvm, vmware, citrix,
hvm, et al.
Not much difference but I tend to like the separation of OS knowledge, with all
the bugs lately though I wonder if it’s worth it.
Sincerely,
Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-429-8300
> On Jun 14, 201
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 8:46 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> I wonder which part of the proposal people find offensive.
I have no idea. All - You know no one is trying to make *you* run BGP
inside of a container, right?
I wonder which part of the proposal people find offensive.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "james jones"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 1:56:09 PM
Subject:
I'm happy with GoBGP in a docker container for my BGP
Dashboard/LookingGlass project.
https://github.com/rhicks/bgp-dashboard
Its just piping RIB updates, as JSON, to script to feed into MongoDB
container.
At work we also looked at GoBGP as a route-server for a small IXP type of
setup, but ran in
I run BGP (bird) on containers in a high available production environment for
supporting multiple kubernetes clusters, among other very critical pieces of my
infrastructure.
As long as you know what you’re doing and have people that knows how to
troubleshoot, it's very reliable. the fact that y
re: Exa:
Our use case was both on exporting service IPs as well as receiving routes
from ToRs. Exa is more geared towards the former than the latter. Rather
then working on getting imports and route installation through Exa, we
found it simpler with BIRD exporting the service IP from it boun
2018-06-14 20:56 GMT+02:00 james jones :
> I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
> option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
> and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not over looking
> any other options before
there's actually a not insignificant part of the 'network device' world
which is in fact just really a container and "quagga" (or similar).
James, do you care about being close to a 'cisco like' config world?
(quagga)
more programmatic? (exa-bgp, gobgp .. a few others)
something else?
On Thu, J
Have a peak at
https://osrg.github.io/gobgp/
and
https://github.com/osrg/dockerfiles
On 14 Jun 2018, at 20:56, james jones wrote:
> I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
> option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
> and docs re
bird is better than quagga!
(runs away) ;)
14.06.18 21:56, james jones пише:
> I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
> option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
> and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not ov
This is generally in the context of routing-on-the-host setups. We're
using BIRD for that in a kubernetes deployment.
--
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
On Thu 2018-Jun-14 13:05:58 -0600, Michael Crapse wrote:
I agree, i hope t
Yes, that's it.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:05 PM Michel 'ic' Luczak
wrote:
>
> > On 14 Jun 2018, at 20:56, james jones wrote:
> >
> > I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
> > option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot
> blogs
> > and
On 6/14/18 11:56 AM, james jones wrote:
I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not over looking
any other options before I di
I agree, i hope that this is for testing/testbench purposes only, or only
running iBGP, as no one in the world would like for you to be running a
public BGP through a docker instance.
On 14 June 2018 at 13:00, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> On 6/14/2018 12:56 PM, james jones wrote:
>
>> I am working on
> On 14 Jun 2018, at 20:56, james jones wrote:
>
> I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
> option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
> and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not over looking
> any other opt
I know of a telco that has been doing this it helps them be able to move
around containers and not have constantly configure IP's on servers.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> On 6/14/2018 12:56 PM, james jones wrote:
>
>> I am working on an personal experiment and was wo
On 6/14/2018 12:56 PM, james jones wrote:
I am working on an personal experiment and was wondering what is the best
option for running BGP in a docker base container. I have seen a lot blogs
and docs referencing Quagga. I just want to make sure I am not over looking
any other options before I div
30 matches
Mail list logo
