Re: RFC: BOGONs over BGP, adding some ranges

> > I would like to make an effort to debogon 240/4 at least, or have an > authorized experiment to at least determine how fully bogon'd it is. > It would not be appropriate to 'debogon' 240/4 based on the currently accepted definition, because it is space not allocated to an RIR. I know that you

Re: RFC: BOGONs over BGP, adding some ranges

On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:17 AM James Shank wrote: > > Dear NANOG! > > As many of you know, Team Cymru runs a free service delivering updated > BOGONS to networks around the world. We've been doing this for decades > at this point. For more information about this service, please see >

Re: RFC: BOGONs over BGP, adding some ranges

I would love to see this via BGP personally Not sure of anything that it could cause - and folks could filter out something if needed/required *Glenn S. Kelley, *I am a Connectivity.Engineer Text and Voice Direct: 740-206-9624 a Division of CreatingNet.Works

Re: RFC: BOGONs over BGP, adding some ranges

Hi John! Thanks for the comments! If you're in Hollywood for N86, perhaps we can pour one our for multicast together... ;) Cheers! James On 8/30/22 4:21 PM, John Kristoff wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:15:40 -0400 James Shank wrote: 224/4 If any were to cause a problem, I'd think this

Re: RFC: BOGONs over BGP, adding some ranges

On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:15:40 -0400 James Shank wrote: > 224/4 If any were to cause a problem, I'd think this is the one that would be most likely. While inter-domain IP multicast is practically dead and so the impact might not be so great (sorry multicast-wg and mboned friends), there may be

RFC: BOGONs over BGP, adding some ranges

Dear NANOG! As many of you know, Team Cymru runs a free service delivering updated BOGONS to networks around the world. We've been doing this for decades at this point. For more information about this service, please see https://www.team-cymru.com/bogon. Recently, we've discussed internally