Re: internet - sparkle

: "Jared Geiger" <ja...@compuwizz.net> To: "Aaron Gould" <aar...@gvtc.com>, Nanog@nanog.org Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 2:31:35 PM Subject: Re: internet - sparkle If most of your traffic is for US based destinations, you might see worse performance since Sparkle d

Re: internet - sparkle

I assumed your AS number is 16527 and looked up who you currently are peering with. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Aaron Gould wrote: > Thanks. > > What's an eyeball network ? > > How do you know my "current mix is decent" ? > > Btw, I have onsite the cdn's aanp, ggc, oca,

Re: internet - sparkle

Agree with this  Traffic engineering is non existent making it a pain to move your traffic besides not advertising the prefix to them Sent from my iPhone > On May 16, 2018, at 12:33 PM, Ca By wrote: > >> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:14 AM Michael Crapse

Re: internet - sparkle

--- aar...@gvtc.com wrote: From: Aaron Gould What's an eyeball network ? --- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyeball_network scott

Re: internet - sparkle

Thanks. What's an eyeball network ? How do you know my "current mix is decent" ? Btw, I have onsite the cdn's aanp, ggc, oca, fna, so only about ~60% of my customer traffic is from Internet uplinks... ~40% is served from local cdn's Aaron > On May 16, 2018, at 2:31 PM, Jared Geiger

Re: internet - sparkle

Hello, Also Sparkle (AS6762) has a significant footprint in South America, I'd say even bigger than Level 3 because they have mobile telco and broadband ISP in Brazil. I wouldn't worry much with latency in NA because at least in South America they do hot potato (as everyone does) and all their

Re: internet - sparkle

If most of your traffic is for US based destinations, you might see worse performance since Sparkle doesn't seem to have many US POPs/Peering locations compared to Centurylink/Level3 or HE. You'd probably benefit more by pulling in some peering from Dallas than adding or replacing a transit

Re: internet - sparkle

On 16/May/18 16:54, Aaron Gould wrote: > .written in 12/2015 - do y'all think this is accurate, and, in 2018, is it > still accurate ? (asking since my next question is related to Sparkle, since > they are listed in that previous article as a significant Internet presence) I don't know about

Re: internet - sparkle

On 16/05/2018 19:12, Michael Crapse wrote: HE listed currently in 7th place: http://as-rank.caida.org/ -Hank > Additionally, whilst not "technically" a tier 1 provider, Hurricane > electric should be high on that list. Especially as one of the best > providers of and proponents for IPv6. We'll

Re: internet - sparkle

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:14 AM Michael Crapse wrote: > Additionally, whilst not "technically" a tier 1 provider, Hurricane > electric should be high on that list. Especially as one of the best > providers of and proponents for IPv6. We'll see into the future, HE may > have

Re: internet - sparkle

Additionally, whilst not "technically" a tier 1 provider, Hurricane electric should be high on that list. Especially as one of the best providers of and proponents for IPv6. We'll see into the future, HE may have one of the most critical infrastructures, and should be a "part-owner" of the

Re: internet - sparkle

Replace Level3 with CenturyLink as they're basically taking over AS33566. Would add Zayo (AS6461) to the list. I'm not familiar with Sparkle/Seabone to be honest as we're operating an eyeball network exclusively in the NA. On May 16 2018, at 10:54 am, Aaron Gould wrote: > >

internet - sparkle

http://icaruswept.com/2016/06/28/who-owns-the-internet/ .written in 12/2015 - do y'all think this is accurate, and, in 2018, is it still accurate ? (asking since my next question is related to Sparkle, since they are listed in that previous article as a significant Internet presence) Also,