Hello,
I'm currently in the process of setting up a near identical network to our own
in GNS3 for testing purposes. Has anyone here tried this before to any success?
We need to buy the Cisco IOSv image to continue with the sim so I figured I
would inquire here first before diving in.
All info
On 10/16/19 12:09 PM, Jeff Shultz wrote:
Interesting! And so primitive! So they go to all of the expense of
laying fiber, but not power too?
Note: small local telco experience speaking below:
Telco's tend to have experience with fiber, but probably not the
construction and transmission of
After some poking around, I found this gizmo. It says that it can use
between 1-8 pairs to power it from the co. If there was already a home
run to the co (which is almost certainly true in my case), it seems like
that would be a cheaper option? Then you just have one diesel generator
at the
EVE-NG is also really good. Just an FYI, GNS3 went through a major refresh
about 18 months ago or so and it's so much better now. Either way, you
can't go wrong with GNS3 or EVE-NG.
- Mike Bolitho
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:18 AM Aaron Gould wrote:
> Oh, forgot the links…
>
>
>
>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 4:26 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>
> On 10/14/19 4:16 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Oct 2019, Michael Thomas wrote:
> >> Of course this is a lot of conjecture on my part... be glad to be
> >> clued in by folks in know.
> >
> > An old news story, but telco's usually
Thanks Mike for the info on GNS3…. My info is old, I’ll have to take a look at
the recent GNS3 sometime soon…
-Aaron
From: Mike Bolitho [mailto:mikeboli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 1:22 PM
To: Aaron Gould
Cc: Tom Beecher; Ryland Kremeier; nanog@nanog.org
Just like any broadband deployed by a Telco gets called "DSL" these
days - even if it's 1G fiber. And even by those in the industry who
should know better.
Annoying.
But I'm confused a bit by the below - G.Fast is a twisted pair
standard, last I saw - why would a cable (presumably coax) company
Oh, forgot the links…
http://www.eve-ng.net/
http://www.eve-ng.net/documentation/howto-s
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 1:14 PM
To: 'Mike Bolitho'; 'Tom Beecher'; 'Ryland Kremeier'
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Can anyone share resources on deploying IPv6 in a provider network?
Most all documentation I find is from the customer perspective; which is great
and all, but what about setting up dhcpv6-pd, what about the relay agent, or
what about an equivalent of dhcp option 82?
Nich
I heard good stuff about Cisco Virl. It's like an ESX for network devices.
On 2019-10-16 15:23, Jason Kuehl wrote:
I use the server version of GNS and I love it. I just need to VPN
into my DC and use my client to connect to GNS.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:22 PM Mike Bolitho
I’ve used GNS3 some years ago for a lot of simulation and testing. But, I’m
blown away at how much more I like EVE-NG (emulated virtual environment
next-gen)
I use the community free version… lots of vendor OS support… of which, I’ve
actually work with the following….
-XRv
-
I use the server version of GNS and I love it. I just need to VPN into my
DC and use my client to connect to GNS.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:22 PM Mike Bolitho wrote:
> EVE-NG is also really good. Just an FYI, GNS3 went through a major refresh
> about 18 months ago or so and it's so much better
We use 12 and 48 port VDSLAM's similar to that at some of our remote
locations, and we do generally line power those.
But before those came on the market we were putting out remote
cabinets that could support up to 144 subscribers fed off the same
sort of cards you would find in the CO.
I don't
Well, the cable company here is offering 500 megs to the entire 5 story
building. My guess is that this G fast standard is what is being deployed here
and they loosely call it 'VDSL'.
From: NANOG on behalf of Brandon Martin
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019
On 10/15/19 1:51 PM, Rod Beck wrote:
These are large 19th century buildings with courtyards. I have seen lots
of activity on this street - fiber being pulled from manhole and gear
being installed in cable manholes. Corning on the cables.
Sounds like a fiber-to-the-curb deployment with G.FAST
On 10/15/19 8:25 PM, Brielle wrote:
Its actually got pretty heavy use in a lot of CenturyLink areas, like
here in Boise. Fiber is only now starting to become the norm, so
everyone is on VDSL2 in single or bonded modes, speeds all the way up to
around 50mbit down.
AT U-Verse in ex-SBC
WISPs:
>From where do you find information on various tower locations, pricing, and
available connectivity? More specifically, are you consulting directly with
tower companies when searching for locations or is there someone/a service
who provides this information more generally?
Thanks.
--
Am 15.10.19 um 19:51 schrieb Eric Dugas:
Bell Canada still uses a lot of VDSL2 last-miles in Quebec and Ontario.
Max speed is 100/10 over bonded pairs and 50/10 over a single pair over
short distances. Generally served from a fiber-fed DSLAM and less than
500 meters.
In Germany 250/40 is
>I believe we have found 1 customer that is infected with a botnet or malware.
I've dealt with plenty of botnets working as a repair technician in the past
but never had one change the public IP address of the user. Not entirely sure
what this would accomplish aside from making it much easier
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:50:17 -, Ryland Kremeier said:
> >I believe we have found 1 customer that is infected with a botnet or malware.
> I've dealt with plenty of botnets working as a repair technician in the past
> but never had one change the public IP address of the user. Not entirely sure
I've got a Cisco 881 with the "Advanced IP features" This will do for what I'm
trying to accomplish.
I think I'm going to go with a BGP tunnel.
No one at RCN has any clue about this - they may not even provide the server.
The sales
droids only know how to sell their pre-packaged plans.
Does
You might find this Google Earth plugin useful for locating towers. I have used
it a few times.
https://www.fccinfo.com/fccinfo_google_earth.php
Thank you,
Kevin McCormick
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Aden Dragulescu
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 3:54 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Tower
Hello,
At my day job, we are considering going Full MVNO. Which means building a
mobile core network.
I was wondering if some of you would have feedback or advices on the
solutions currently available?
We would like to avoid the big providers (Ericsson & such).
Ideally, something opensource,
I believe we have found 1 customer that is infected with a botnet or malware.
His public ip address during speedtest or similar actually shows a Chinese ip
address. We are contacting him to try to get that resolved and then put in a
request to all the geolocation databases to update their
Crown, American, maybe SBA have KMLs and I turn them on when looking for a
new site.
FCC db is fantastic as well, that's all 200+ and some smaller ones.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019, 5:26 AM Aden Dragulescu
Most wisps put up their own towers or install on grain Mills etc, a small
percent use commercial towers they pay rent on.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019, 5:25 AM Aden Dragulescu wrote:
> WISPs:
>
> From where do you find information on various tower locations, pricing,
> and available connectivity? More
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 22:52:11 -0400, Rodney Joffe
wrote:
>Twenty-one years ago today, Jon Postel passed away in Santa Monica, CA.
>
>Almost all of us get to do what we do today, because of his vision, guidance,
>and leadership. He is one of many giants on whose shoulders we stand today
>(some
Twenty-one years ago today, Jon Postel passed away in Santa Monica, CA.
Almost all of us get to do what we do today, because of his vision, guidance,
and leadership. He is one of many giants on whose shoulders we stand today
(some are still active here in NANOG), but he was the compass that
On 10/16/19 4:04 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
After some poking around, I found this gizmo. It says that it can use
between 1-8 pairs to power it from the co. If there was already a home
run to the co (which is almost certainly true in my case), it seems like
that would be a cheaper option? Then
On 10/16/19 2:42 PM, Jeff Shultz wrote:
But I'm confused a bit by the below - G.Fast is a twisted pair
standard, last I saw - why would a cable (presumably coax) company be
offering it? Are they just taking over the PTT's inside wiring?
G.fast has definitions for both twisted pair and coax
If you're okay with a tunnel, you may want to check out http://bgp.services.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 8:36 AM John Palmer wrote:
> I've got a Cisco 881 with the "Advanced IP features" This will do for what
> I'm
> trying to accomplish.
>
> I think I'm going to go with a BGP tunnel.
>
> No one at
GNS3 can do a heck of a lot, and the price is definitely right.
I have used it extensively for initial fleshing out of designs or ideas,
protocol nerding, automation interaction testing, etc. There certainly
other tools out there, but being able to visually draw a topology out,
connect the dots,
Totally agree with Tom here. It's going to work really well for most
things. But if you're testing code for bugs you NEED to do it on the same
hardware you have in your environment in an actual lab.
- Mike Bolitho
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:56 AM Tom Beecher wrote:
> GNS3 can do a heck of a
I did this at my current company with also using VM Palo Alto.
Greeting of testing out a plan to make sure its insane.
The key it keeping its all up todate down to the firmware version (I know
its not possible for some because virtual)
The things this wont find are hardware related faults or
This also depends on your scale. If you have lots of routers, you would end up
with lots of compute to run the VM instances. If you get the compute (which is
cheap comparing to actual network hardware), you would need a "cloud
orchestration” tool and a a system to connections from host to
The alternative or complementary approach is something like batfish[1], for
validation vs. emulation.
--
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
[1] https://www.batfish.org/
On Wed 2019-Oct-16 12:19:31 -0400, Yan Filyurin wrote:
This
36 matches
Mail list logo
