This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
Simon,
That is correct in most cases. Fabs are changing and the time needed to
manufacture is limited and most vendors are opt’ing to EoL/EoS gear early to
move to newer tech and cannot risk the time to manufacture older silicon and
spares that could be used for newer silicon.
On Fri, May 20,
_
APNIC 54 Conference - Call for Papers
_
The APNIC Program Committee is seeking presentations for the APNIC 54
Conference in Singapore (13-15 September 2022).
On 5/20/22 14:44, Simon Lockhart wrote:
I've heard that some vendors are prematurely EoS/EoL'ing kit as a result of
the silicon shortages - and redesigning kit to use silicon that's easier to
get hold of.
This was my suspicion, because we started using this box in 2017. I
can't remember
On Fri May 20, 2022 at 10:15:14am +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> We suddenly got told that they are now EoS/EoL some time back (I probably
> should have done a better job tracking this, but I tend to rely on vendor
> notifications for that based on my Cisco/Juniper experience).
I've heard that some
On 5/19/22 16:07, NetEquity Sales wrote:
As someone who works within the "secondary market" for networking
hardware, there is a ton of demand spilling over into the
"pre-owned/vendor refurbished" market.
Market prices on pre-owned equipment are rapidly increasing in step
with increased
On 5/19/22 15:27, Dave Taht wrote:
As I've been saying for a while, instead of buying new kit, perhaps we
could spend some time on getting better software onto our older kit?
Getting stuff to multiplex better, be more reliable, last longer?
So we've been running Arista's 7508E devices as
On 5/19/22 18:15, Dave Taht wrote:
So I kind of view recycling routers, with newer software, as a great
way to clean up the present ecosystem. And if you looked at the first
url I pasted above, with 4x more throughput, and 10x less latency, on
"obsolete", hw.
When I had my battle with
On Fri, 20 May 2022 at 11:21, Mark Tinka wrote:
> I can't fathom why a box like that has already been EoL'ed. It isn't long in
> the tooth, and still has plenty of bite in it. But, we also need to use
> common sense, and for us, swapping it out just to maintain "support" isn't
> worth the
On 5/18/22 11:30, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote:
Agreed - but wouldn't it be fair to say that, nonetheless, the
availability of an MSA
supports the development of network architecture?
Of course, it would. After all, we want two sides to be able to speak to
each other, to create this
On 5/20/22 10:24, Saku Ytti wrote:
That's engineering, understanding what risks and compromises are worth
carrying. If you do it by the book, you're not even needed, just
0-rate AS/PS services to your RFP and the vendor is happy to do it by
the book for you.
And fully agreed, in many cases
11 matches
Mail list logo
