Any host connected to a reasonably well peered ISP (e.g. NOT Cogent) with IPv6
should be able to communicate with any other such host so long as the
administrative policies on both sides permit it.
I have no difficulty directly reaching a variety of IPv6 hosts from the /48 in
my home.
> On Jan 15, 2024, at 09:37, Abraham Y. Chen wrote:
>
> Hi, Christopher"
>
> 1)" IPv6 is designed to replace IPv4. ":
> Correct. But, this is not like Ten Commandments that God gave to his
> children. Even such had not worked out in most cases. In real life, technical
> backward
I think this is a new form of dDOS and it is sometimes performed by Bots.
What they are achieving is annoying you. From your post, it appears to be
working.
It’s also possible (depending on the account name) that it’s a mistype.
Owen
> On Jan 12, 2024, at 17:50, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> can
That seems to be what NANOG is good at. There is always a topic that seems to
drag on for weeks after all valid points of the discussion have been fully
discussed.
-richey
From: NANOG on behalf of
Christopher Morrow
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2024 at 11:29 PM
To: Christopher Hawker
Cc:
Hello,
trying to load the Cloudflare peering portal, once logged in, it starts
loading and then dies with a reactjs error. Tried on multiple browser
and OS with the same result.
Anyone from cloudflare that could help?
Application error: a client-side exception has occurred (see the
Hi, Owen:
0) Thanks for sorting out my vague memory, citing some consumer
electronics evolution history and an excellent overview of the current
IPv4/IPv6 landscape.
1) I believe that consumer electronics including PC related products
and services are in a separate category from the
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
UKNOF, TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
Hi, We have our own prefix assignment from ARIN. We have our infrastructure in
GCP (Google Cloud Platform) where we started using BYOIP functionality (Google
advertises our IPs). We followed their recommendation with ROA configuration in
ARIN cloud.google.com
Owen DeLong wrote:
> Some, but not a lot. In the case of the DTMF transition, the
> network and handsets were all under the central control of a
> single provider at a time when they could have forced the change
> if they really wanted to. After all, nobody was going to cancel
> their phone
Sounds like you’ve got a weird mix of route origination. Why wouldn’t you
advertise to Google via BGP and have your prefix originate from your own ASN?
Owen
> On Jan 19, 2024, at 02:39, kubanowy wrote:
>
> Hi,
> We have our own prefix assignment from ARIN. We have our infrastructure in
>
> On Jan 19, 2024, at 09:21, Charles Polisher wrote:
>
> Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> > Some, but not a lot. In the case of the DTMF transition, the
> > network and handsets were all under the central control of a
> > single provider at a time when they could have forced the change
> > if they
11 matches
Mail list logo
