Curious if someone can point me in the right direction. In the last three
days our core router (Cisco 7609) has logged the following events:
Dec 16 19:04:59.027 CST: %CRYPTO-4-RECVD_PKT_INV_SPI: decaps: rec'd IPSEC
packet has invalid spi for destaddr=, prot=50,
spi=0xEF7ED795(4018067349), srcaddr=
I've already emailed the HE NOC, but curious if anyone else this morning has
noticed any of their prefixes going missing from Hurricane Electric attached
networks.
BGPmon sent me these alerts, happening at different times:
Withdraw of Prefix (Code: 97)
Your prefix: 104.192.56.0/22:
Upda
My google-fu is failing me - I'm looking to find out which GeoIP service
Square uses, or a path to work through a GeoIP issue with them. A client of
ours uses Square and unfortunately one of the blocks (23.247.204.0/22) we
received at ARIN was at one time associated with France. As you can imagine
It recently changed from being a handful of IXPs to testing to a server that’s
in the same building as one of 40+ ASNs:
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-360069A1.pdf (page 35ff)
The concern is that many RLEC buy transit from “Tier 2” providers that may are
not on that list of ASNs
Being discussed on outages, too.
Our monitoring system saw access to www.amazon.com and www.cablelabs.com
(over v6) down via HE ... amazon came back up for me via Zayo, but when
www.cablelabs.com came back up, it was on HE. So the same as you.
So I suspect HE had a hiccup.
Frank
-Original
We recently purchased some generic optics from a reputable reseller that
were marketed to reach 60 km.
But what we found, based on the spec sheets, is that it could only reach
that distance if the optics were transmitting on the high side of the
transmit power range.
For example, if the TX range
My google fu is failing me, but I believe there was a NANOG posting a year
or two ago that mentioned that if the top x providers would implement BCP 38
then y% of the traffic (or Internet) would be de-spoofed. The point was
that we don't even need everyone to implement BCP 38, but if the largest
(
Emails to NOC have gone unanswered (I did have success with that a year or
two ago).
Have had a handful of business customers in the last week contact us about
B2B web sites they can't reach anymore ... of the eight documented websites,
five are using Incapusla address space and others might be us
Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2018 5:39 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Looking for Incapsula contact
Emails to NOC have gone unanswered (I did have success with that a year or
two ago).
Have had a handful of business customers in the last week contact us about
B2B web sites they c
I have a low-cost/high interest rate account at one of the Canadian bank and
each "assisted" transaction is $5.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 3:35 AM
To: George Michaelson
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Sub
I wonder if we'll see a decrease in hijacked space because there's less
unassigned space, or if because of the IPv4 block scarcity, it will occur
more often.
I can see aggressive hijackers looking for unused (but assigned) blocks as
small as a /24 and advertising them.
Frank
-Original Messag
I've been tracking Internet bandwidth usage for several schools (RESNET-L
reports), and I've seen it as low at 2.1 kbps/FTE (5+ years ago) to higher
than 300 kbps/FTE. Most of the schools are between 30 to 60 kbps/FTE at
this time. Very broadly speaking, rural and smaller schools are on the low
e
Makes we wonder if Level3's contract with Netflix has certain performance
requirements that would preclude Level3 sending Netflix traffic to Comcast
the long way around.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/235645-akamai-to-lose-netflix-as-a-customer-
level-3-and-limelight-pick-up-the-business
I
er 02, 2010 8:28 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's
Actions
[Changed long CC list to BCC]
On 12/2/10 12:49 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> George Ou touches on a similar point at the end of his article:
>
http://www.digitalsociety.org
I guess the USG's cyberwar program does work (very dryly said).
-Original Message-
From: Paul Ferguson [mailto:fergdawgs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 1:39 AM
To: Jack Bates
Cc: North American Network Operators Group
Subject: Re: wikileaks dns (was Re: Blocking Internation
The primary reason for the lack of a la carte is that the content providers tie
groups of channels together, sometimes for prices less than one of those
channels on a stand-a-lone basis.
The secondary reason is the one you list as your first, and that's keeping
track of what customer has what
A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had made
a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE,
Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the point that a full view might take multiple
feeds. I think that website also had text files with the comparisons.
Maybe this is a good place to start..
http://www.sixxs.net/tools/grh/compare/
- Jared
On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:32 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had
made
> a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE,
>
ANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
On 12/21/2010 11:32, Frank Bulk wrote:
> A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had
made
> a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE,
> Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the poin
ut a quick peek at what we
send on a customer session I see:
NTT (2914) sends 3868 prefixes.
If the route server contacts me in private, we can likely set up a view from
2914 or 2914-customer perspective.
- Jared
On Dec 21, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> There are 4,035 routes in th
lto:o...@delong.com]
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 12:05 AM
To: frnk...@iname.com
Cc: NANOG; Jared Mauch
Subject: Re: Muni Fiber Last Mile - a contrary opinion
On Dec 26, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
>>> You are likely already at the mercy of some local hut for your dia
Relay nodes are always protecting themselves by rate-limiting, aren't they?
And isn't most media traffic relayed? I'm not seeing how the NAT64 scenario
would *dramatically* increase Skype's global relay traffic. NAT64 would
currently be a very small percentage of all Skype traffic.
We can alwa
Maybe HE would volunteer to host some Skype servers at their various POPS
for this purpose.
Skype has to start somewhere. While the v6-only population is still very
small, why not dual-stack the clients now with a heavily weighted preference
towards v4, track and understand the volume and capabil
I hope the engineers in the organization will just tell their marketing folk
that it's not possible to hand out just one IPv6 address. "Our hardware
doesn't support it."
I think there's still room for ISPs to charge $10/month for a static prefix,
though. And that's technically possible.
Frank
This is all hearsay, but I learned from a shared vendor that AT&T is putting
pressure on them to complete their IPv6 support, so that the vendor is
moving up completion from Q4 to Q2. This was a sales person talking, so who
knows.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Charles N Wyble [mailto:ch
Two good lists are here:
http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=native
http://www.sixxs.net/wiki/IPv6_Enabled_Service_Providers
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Charles N Wyble [mailto:char...@knownelement.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:52 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: What
All the leading MSOs are actively working towards IPv6 trials and
deployments, they're just at different stages. Comcast, as we all can see,
is publicly leading, but there are others who are not too far behind.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Querubin [mailto:t...@lava.net]
Sent:
Have you looked at D-Link's DIR-825? It has most of the things you're
looking for. The DIR-655 is a more affordable option.
In regards to (2), is it even possible to do DHCPv6-PD on with a SLAAC WAN?
In regards to (3), I have that working on SRE, but with an external DHCP
server.
Frank
-O
If Cisco won't do a good job of RBE on the 7206VXR, I may just need to stick
with PPPoEv6 on the SR train. I have that successfully working in a test bed.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:04 PM
To: nanog@nanog.o
By IA_TA support, do you mean the ability for the 7206VXR to act as the DHCPv6
server? If I understand you correctly, I have it working well with DHCPv6
relay.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:04 PM
To: nanog@n
We were a mostly PPPoA shop, and were doing PPPoE on our FTTH but moved to
DHCP because of our desire to move to v6 without waiting for the access
vendor and to get rid of supporting that username/password combo. And DSL
modems that we're replacing in the field we're moving from PPPoA to PPPoE
bec
Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 8:18 AM
To: frnk...@iname.com
Cc: Owen DeLong; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Future of the IPv6 CPE survey on RIPE Labs - Your Input Needed
On 1/27/2011 12:57 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Have yo
Agreed, the DSL stuff is horrid. When using PPPoE it asks me to enter the
default IPv6 gateway. You got to be kidding me.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jack Bates [mailto:jba...@brightok.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:34 AM
To: Dan White
Cc: frnk...@iname.com; nanog@nanog.org
Configure your DNS server so that speedtest.net and every variation to point
to the Speedtest that you host...
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 12:01 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: help needed - state of california ne
Write the RFPs asking for L3 -- I don't think they're asking for L3.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Byrne [mailto:cb.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 2:55 PM
To: Mikael Abrahamsson
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: EPC backhaul networks
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:5
We've sold routers for years, but make it clear to our customer that we are
doing this as a convenience to the customer and that we are not responsible
for it.
It's worked for hardware failure, and since we end up providing initial
support for home wireless routers, having a model we're familiar w
In our vendor's implementation, the main access shelf hands out IPs to the
"ATAs" integrated in the ONTs over a separate VLAN. No PPPoE required.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Francois Mezei [mailto:jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 10:53 PM
To: nanog
This doesn't address the full-mesh part, but this discussion suggests at
least four servers, but better to have five.
http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/SelectingOffsiteNTPServers#Section_5
.3.3.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
Sent: Thursday, February
And then you need MACFF to overcome the split-horizon to that customers in
the same subnet can talk to each other. =)
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 8:09 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: SIP on FTTH systems
On
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
- Original Message -
> From: "Frank Bulk"
> And then you need MACFF to overcome the split-horizon to that
> customers in the same subnet can talk to each other. =)
In my not-at-all humble opinion, in an eyeball network, you almost *never*
want to
In the scenario you're describing does each PC get its own /64 (or /56 or
/48) directly from the service provider? Or are they in the same netblock?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Anders Löwinger [mailto:and...@abundo.se]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 6:33 PM
To: Mikael Abrahamsson
C
It's my understanding and experience that most gov't jurisdictions will give
CLECs and other telecommunication providers access to the RoW -- generally
speaking it's not exclusive to ILECs or MSOs. Now the challenge may be
finding room in the existing RoW for another provider, but the challenges
a
Not sure which rural LECs are exempt from competition. Some areas are
effectively exempt from facilities-based (i.e. wireline) competition because
it's unaffordable, without subsidy, to build a duplicate wireline
infrastructure. There are also wireless carriers and WISPs the compete
against RLECs
nt.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Naslund, Steve [mailto:snasl...@medline.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 10:16 PM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Level 3 blames Internet slowdowns on Technica
Many rural LECs are not required to provide unbundled network elements. As
a
And MSOs, wireless carriers, and satellite providers aren't competitors to
RLECs?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 9:05 PM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: Naslund, Steve; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Level 3 blames Internet slowdow
At the bottom of one of their pages it says this:
If you would like us to not scan your network, please let us know
and we will remove your networks from the scan.
Likewise, if you have anymore questions please feel free to send us
an email at: dnsscan [at] shadowserver [dot] org.
I received a similar notification about one of our prefixes also a few
minutes ago. I couldn't find a looking glass for AS4761 or AS4651. But I
also couldn't hit the websites for either AS, either.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Jenkins [mailto:j...@breathe-underwater.com]
Sent:
bgpmon has tweeted that "We're currently observing a large hijack event.
Indosat AS4761 originating many prefixes not assigned to them."
Let's hope that AS4651 can quickly apply filters.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: David Hubbard [mailto:dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
If we would front our HTTPS services with a (OpenSSL vulnerable)
load-balancer that does the SSL work and we just use HTTP to the service,
will that mitigate information loss that's possible with this exploit? Or
will the OpenSSL code on the load-balancer also store or "cache" content?
Frank
---
I'm not sure if anyone of you has access to those automated tools, but I'd
be interested in learning if any of them do catch the bug.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 7:50 PM
To: Matt Palmer
Cc: nanog@nan
We use H.248 in our CLEC area. The voice service for that ONT runs on a
specified VLAN for that ONT, so if we had to share our infrastructure with
other CLECs we could do that.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Francois
Mezei
Sent: Fr
Calix's indoor ONT (836GE) come with RG functionality by default:
http://www.calix.com/systems/p-series/calix_residential_services_gateways.html
but they also have a software load for their 700GE-series ONTs:
http://www.calix.com/news/press_releases/press_release_20130611.html
Frank
-Original
FYI, Calix has GPON support for the 836GE ONT on the E7 today, and it will
be supported in GPON mode in Release 9.0 on the C7.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Pete@TCC
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 11:15 AM
To: Jean-Francois Mezei; nanog@nan
un...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jay Ashworth
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 9:01 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: CMTS/Public Wifi provisioning question
I expect Frank Bulk to have an opinion on this, all others welcome.
Hat tip to Bright House -- I've noticed lately that I don't have to go
through
Interesting, I may need to open a ticket with Moto to ask how that’s done.
Frank
From: Scott Helms [mailto:khe...@zcorum.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 7:58 AM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: Jay Ashworth; NANOG
Subject: Re: CMTS/Public Wifi provisioning question
>From talking to folks invol
These sites used to be dual-stacked:
www.cablelabs.com (over 180 days ago via ipv6.cablelabs.com)
www.att.net (over 44 days ago)
www.charter.com (over 151 days)
www.globalcrossing.com (over 802 days)
www.timewarnercable.com (over 593 days)
and www.t-online.de has been broken for over 33 days.
Fra
down again.
Fessler was chasing down www.att.net, but I've not received an update on
this (BCCing him this message).
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Lee Howard [mailto:l...@asgard.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 7:54 AM
To: Frank Bulk; 'Jared Mauch'
Cc: NANOG
Subject:
I'm looking for a new consumer router to offer our customers that has GigE
ports and supports IEEE 802.11ac, and all the products that our reseller and
their partners have suggested don't have IPv6 Ready certification or the vendor
can't confirm they meet RIPE's 554 document. D-Link has a long
Eyeballs works. =)
Frank
-Original Message-
From: George, Wes [mailto:wesley.geo...@twcable.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 4:58 PM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: NANOG; Donley, Chris (Cable Labs)
Subject: Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion
On 6/21/14, 3:20 PM, "Frank Bulk" wrote:
&g
Our own fiber access vendor now does have IPv6 support, but I haven't been
able to keep it in production because a ~7.8 Mbps traffic IPv6 ND traffic
loop (side effect of another bug) knocked out voice services. Turns out
that the traffic queue for IPv6 and DHCP (for the ONT's voice services) are
t
Did they ever explain why? Did the SMC function as a router, and act as the
customer side of a stub network that allowed that /29 to hang off the
router? If that was the case, and the Motorola D3 modem was L2-only, that
might explain the change in capability.
Frank
-Original Message-
F
Thanks for sharing Ben, that's 450 kbps/sub at peak times! We see numbers in
our network closer to 300 kbps per subscriber.
Assuming peak usage levels of 450 kbs/sub, that would be 15.75 Gbps for Toney's
customer base, and possibly more if they really have a 240 Mbps offerings. But
if there
IPv6 access to TW Telecom's website, www.twtelecom.com, has been down almost
continuously since Wednesday evening. For dual-stacked users browsing their
site but not using Google Chrome this can results in timeouts. I reached
out to their NOC twice. The second time the site did come back up for
I'd like to see someone develop a plugin that had some kind of battery-meter
style display of what percentage of the page and its elements (in bytes)
were obtained via v4 versus v6.
Google Chrome's pseudo-happy eyeballs (HE) implementation helps with it
loading almost right away.
Frank
-Orig
: Saturday, July 02, 2011 6:00 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Looking for tw telecom folk to resolve IPv6 access to their
site
On 2011-07-02 12:40, Frank Bulk wrote:
> I'd like to see someone develop a plugin that had some kind of
battery-meter
> style display of what percentag
Which version of Exchange are you talking about, and can you share what
about it doesn't support IPv6?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com]
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 10:56 PM
To: Doug Barton; Tim Franklin
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subjec
It's old, but at the time I thought it was a great article:
http://www.networkcomputing.com/wan-optimization-and-application-acceleratio
n/229623159?pgno=2
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Edigarov [mailto:g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 1:53 AM
To: nanog@nan
This might be a resource:
http://blog.ine.com/2009/12/31/oerpfr-its-always-watching/
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Eric Hileman [mailto:na...@magemojo.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 8:55 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Is Performance Routing, PfR a dead duck?
Very cool, t
More good stuff here: http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Resolvers/
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Dobbins, Roland [mailto:rdobb...@arbor.net]
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 5:40 PM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: DNS DoS ???
On Jul 30, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Elliot Finley wrote:
> my DNS servers
Are you looking for an xPON ONT?
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:ja...@lixfeld.ca]
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:58 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: FTTH CPE landscape
This isn't necessarily operational content, so I apologize in advance for
the noise and thus en
Let's clarify -- /48 is much preferred by Owen, but most ISPs seem to be
zeroing in on a /56 for production. Though some ISPs are using /64 for
their trials.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:21 PM
To: Brian Mengel
Cc: n
This same Vendor C wants us to upgrade our 7206VXR's to ASR1K's just so we
have the (hopefully working) IPv6 features in IOS-XE that are broken in
12.x.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Mark Newton [mailto:new...@internode.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:12 PM
To: Cameron Byrne
The IPv6 version of www.qwest.com has been down for 10 days. Wget shows a
301 to www.centurylink.com, but that also fails. Emails to the nocs at both
companies have gone unanswered. Unless HE is deployed in a web browser,
this behavior leads to a bad end-user experience.
If anyone can prod eith
FYI, the issue is not resolved and I've not heard from either of the
companies suggesting that they're working on it.
Note their commitment to IPv6 in these releases:
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/centurylink-joins-internet-community
-in-world-ipv6-day-123089908.html
http://news.centuryl
ling their sites
again.
Frank
-Original Message-----
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 11:14 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: IPv6 version of www.qwest.com/www.centurylink.com has been down
for 10 days
FYI, the issue is not resolved and I've
You can order custom-made patch cables that are outdoor rated from any
decent company that sells fiber patch cables for a living. If you want it
to be locatable, make sure it includes some kind of metal strip.
Here's some pre-made armored options:
http://goo.gl/sJ9NQ
http://www.jemcables.com/eco
g.org
Subject: Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 43, Issue 53
On 08/19/2011 11:14 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> You can order custom-made patch cables that are outdoor rated from any
> decent company that sells fiber patch cables for a living. If you want it
> to be locatable, make sure it includes some
#x27;m not sure when that happened, but our
monitoring system couldn't get the for www.qwest.com about half an hour
ago.
Hopefully CenturyLink is actively working towards IPv6-enabling their sites
again.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
Sent:
The copper technologies of DOCSIS and xDSL are well established in
residential deployments and they are asymmetric by design. I don't think
near-symmetric speeds are on the CableLab's and Broadband Forum's short list
of future features. Even GPON is 1:4. As more fiber is deployed, I believe
depl
Here's a very timely article on the topic of DOCSIS upstream:
http://accessintelligence.imirus.com/Mpowered/book/vcomm11/i8/p18
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Michael Thomas [mailto:m...@mtcc.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 6:06 PM
To: Mohacsi Janos
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: s
A Chrome plugin alerted me to the fact that savvis.com has an for
www.savvis.com. Unfortunately access to that host over IPv6 is down, too.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 5:03 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject
, September 05, 2011 8:55 PM
To: frnk...@iname.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 version of www.qwest.com/www.centurylink.com has been down
for 10 days
In message <007f01cc6c37$0f4ac060$2de04120$@iname.com>, "Frank Bulk" writes:
> A Chrome plugin alerted me to the fact tha
...and the 's are back! And port 80 responds.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 5:03 PM
To: 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: RE: IPv6 version of www.qwest.com/www.centurylink.com has been down
for 10 da
Where I live in rural America, I would not be surprised that someone who wanted
to start an ISP might only be able to cost-justify one upstream. When one
Internet T-1 is $1,200/month, getting a second T-1 for that price from another
provider just to get an AS or PI is definitely cost-prohibitiv
:leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 6:37 PM
To: frnk...@iname.com; 'Charles N Wyble'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building a
nationwide network
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frn
[mailto:t...@lavanauts.org]
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 9:27 PM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: 'Leigh Porter'; 'Charles N Wyble'; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper seeking advice on building a
nationwide network
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Frank Bulk wrote:
> I un
ms
8 bdr01tncomo-tge1-1.mo.tnco.charter.com (2001:506:100:23::2) 60.018 ms
59.597 ms 59.586 ms
9 2001:506:100:6c::2 (2001:506:100:6c::2) 60.251 ms 60.245 ms 60.236 ms
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Frank Bulk wrote:
The IPv6 side of www
gt; 14 * * *
>
> 15 * * *
>
> 16 * * *
>
> 17 * * *
>
> 18 *
>
>
> Nick Olsen
>
> Network Operations
> (855) FLSPEED x106
>
>
>
> From: "Frank Bulk"
>
> Sent: M
been down since Friday,
September 16 5:12 am Central
It looks like we have identified the issue, and we are currently working to
resolve as quickly as possible.
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 12:09 PM
To: nanog
There's also DPS Telecom (http://www.dpstele.com).
Frank
-Original Message-
From: eric clark [mailto:cabe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 9:06 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Environmental monitoring options
I'd like to ask the list what products people are using to monitor t
Then the RFP for the meeting needs to be more specific with some basic SLAs
that result in a smaller bill if not met.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 9:44 AM
To: Randy Carpenter
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Su
In the EDU world go to EDUCAUSE' WIRELESS-LAN listserv -- archives are
online.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: James M Keller [mailto:jmkel...@houseofzen.org]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 10:02 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Enterprise WiFi list recommendations?
All,
I'm looking for
Holding the last 10% of the meeting room payment seems like a good start for
any venue.
But as others have indicated, the market may be too small for free-market
principles to be fully effective.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: JC Dill [mailto:jcdill.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, Octobe
t business.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: JC Dill [mailto:jcdill.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 3:26 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: meeting network
On 10/10/11 3:41 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Holding the last 10% of the meeting room payment seems like a good start
fo
Wget shows that it flops back and forth between 200 and 503. My guess is
that the v6 address is on a load-balancer and that one of the two web
servers is down.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Chris Curwick [mailto:christopher.curw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 4:29 AM
To
Good news: access to the v6 version of www.qwest.com came up at 12:30 pm
today -- it redirects to www.centurylink.com, but at least it's working.
Only www.savvis.com remains in my list of service provider websites that
have non-working IPv6.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank
Yes, the outages listserv, on a good day:
http://www.outages.org/index.php/Main_Page#Outages_Mailing_Lists
-Original Message-
From: Piotr [mailto:piotr.1...@interia.pl]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2011 7:25 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: actual problems in networks
Hello
There is some
On this slower-than-normal day I was cleaning up my office and found this
article from 2006 making predictions for 2010. It's now a year later, and
while many of these did not happen, some of them did and for others we are a
step closer.
Frank
http://bpastudio.csudh.edu/fac/lpress/471/hout/nanog
Well, sometime yesterday www.centurylink.com removed it record(s).
www.qwest.com still has them.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 1:47 PM
To: 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: RE: IPv6 version of www
and IPv6 access to www.centurylink.com were restored around 11:30 am
U.S. Central.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 6:59 AM
To: 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: RE: IPv6 version of www.qwest.com/www.centu
1 - 100 of 526 matches
Mail list logo
