On Wed, 13 Nov 2019, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
In any case, is it not recommended that users of anycast proxy packets
that arrive at the wrong place? To avoid this kind of issue.
In typical anycast deployments there is no feasible way to figure out
where the "right place" is.
It would be very
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Robert Blayzor wrote:
So as a happy medium of about 2048 ports per subscriber, that's roughly
a 32:1 NAT/IP over-subscription ?
Yes, around that.
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Robert Blayzor wrote:
One would think a 1000 ports would be enough, but if you have a dozen
devices at home all browsing and doing various things, and with IOT,
etc, maybe not?
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/nat-best-practices.html
On Wed, 13 May 2020, Elad Cohen wrote:
LOL funny seeing you changing your mind by 180 degrees when someone you
know in the community writing to you the exact same thing.
"In addition, the sockets API should be extended to support IPxl with a
new socket domain PF_IPXL which is identical to
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
Hi folks,
Was just wondering what are you folks using as production YANG data store
and what do you like about the particular one you're using? Or maybe folks
using OANP what is your YANG DS of choice?
Plan on using it as in memory DS
On Fri, 25 Dec 2020, Chris Adams wrote:
Queueing doesn't get me my next game in time to play it tonight. I've
always seen general queueing as a work-around for "not enough bandwidth
and can't add more"... but when more is available, why not just use
more?
I de-bloat my 1000/1000 with
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Mark Tinka wrote:
No one argued that Sony could build a half-decent console. Wired via
Ethernet, that's unlikely to be the bottleneck.
Considering my PC often saturates my 1000/1000 Internet access when
downloading, I don't see why the 1GE NIC on PS5 wouldn't be the
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
That is why. The RTT to the source can not be larger than the minimum
buffer size in the transport path. Otherwise the speed will start
decreasing.
This is no longer correct. There has been lots of TCP innovation since
this was true.
Please stop
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Mark Tinka wrote:
My experience with customers who've bought 1Gbps FTTH service is that on a
good day, they may see 500Mbps. On average, they'll live somewhere between
180Mbps - 350Mbps, with a random spot-check. It's alright for providers who
offer this to let their
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
It is true there have been TCP improvements but you can very easily verify
for yourself that it is very hard to get anywhere near 1 Gbps of actual
transfer speed to destinations just 10 ms away. Try the nlnog ring network
like this:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
I demonstrated that it is about buffers by showing the same download
from a server that paces the traffic indeed gets the full 930 Mbps with
exactly the same settings, including starting window size, and the same
path (Copenhagen to Stockholm).
On Fri, 25 Dec 2020, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, Ben Cannon wrote:
Anyone else doing it? Do you like your gear?
Haven't tested it myself, but the 10GE residential provider here in Sweden is
using some kind of Huawei HGW that typically is used for XGPON but has had
its
On Thu, 24 Dec 2020, Ben Cannon wrote:
Anyone else doing it? Do you like your gear?
Haven't tested it myself, but the 10GE residential provider here in Sweden
is using some kind of Huawei HGW that typically is used for XGPON but has
had its WAN MAC swapped out for 10GBASE-LR use.
--
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Mark Tinka wrote:
Which is the Stokab model.
Does it use single star?
The city should provide base infrastructure, lease it to operators atthe
same price, and get out of the way. End of.
With single star topology, that's fine.
On Thu, 3 Jun 2021, Mark Tinka wrote:
I'll let Mikael confirm, but last time I checked, Stokab was mostly (if
not all) Active-E.
Sweden is mostly Active-e. There is some PON nowadays though.
Stokab typically only rents out dark fiber, so they don't have any of it.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021, Masataka Ohta wrote:
As cabling cost is mostly independent of the number of cores in a cable,
as long as enough number of cores for single star are provided, which
means core cost is mostly cabling cost divided by number of subscribers,
single star does not cost so much.
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
If it's the latter, does that mean that you have to constantly keep
changing /where/ messages are sent to in order to keep up with the
latest and greatest or at least most popular (in your audience) flavor
of the day / week / month / year
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, Sean Donelan wrote:
Strange the massive shortages and failures are only in one state.
The extreme cold weather extends northwards across many states, which aren't
reporting rolling blackouts.
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021, John Kristoff wrote:
Friends,
I'd like to start a thread about the most famous and widespread Internet
operational issues, outages or implementation incompatibilities you
have seen.
Which examples would make up your top three?
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021, Sean Donelan wrote:
1. The “Emergency Power Off” button did not have a protective cover at the
time of the shutdown or the following WSP investigation.
Aka "molly-guard".
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/molly-guard
--
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021, David Conrad wrote:
Ah. Cogent. I suspect IPv6 peering policies. Somebody should bake a
cake.
According to https://twitter.com/Benjojo12/status/1452673637606166536
Cogent<->Google IPv6 now works. A cake is in order, but perhaps a
celebratory one!?
--
Mikael
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022, Sean Donelan wrote:
What's the goto SOHO-class switch for IPv6?
Zyxel/Netgear/TP-Link all have switches in the 100-200USD range that can
do some basic stuff (filter on ethertype, some DHCPv6/RA inspection, SNMP
polling via IPv6 etc).
I was surprised by what I found
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023, Jared Mauch wrote:
We are willing to do 100G-LR1 if someone asks these days. It lets us be
able to roll it up into 400G optics on our side as appropriate.
I hope the industry moves to 100G-LR1, as doing 2x100GBASE-LR4 in a 400G
port is quite meh when it comes to
23 matches
Mail list logo
