Re: Can it really be this quiet?

Q4 of 2021 is over, I think that the list is taking a well-deserved break (if you know what I mean). Jokes aside, this is the first time I've really seen the NANOG list this quiet which is great news meaning everything is a-OK. Happy New Year everyone, hope you all have a safe one! Regards,

Re: "Permanent" DST

> > 2) Move every square inch of US territory 15 degrees to the east. Mind if I ask where you got this? Nowhere can I find an article or bill referencing this specific point. This article

Re: Docusign

Hey Bruno, Would be better to describe what you're looking for instead of just asking if someone from Docusign is here, that way if they are here or if someone passes on your message to them they know what you need. Just my 2c. Regards, Peter On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:29 AM Bruno Vane wrote:

Re: Geolocation Data : MAX MIND - Out of Sync

Hey Paschal, I've had this same issue previously with some geolocation DBs not reflecting locations correctly. I managed to fix the issue by maintaining a public RFC8805 geofeed and submitting it to the various DB providers via email and allowing

Re: Routes to twitter via 8359 8359 8342

I'm seeing the same thing from my edge routers in Toronto and New York but am discarding the route on each due to it being RPKI invalid. Looks like a potential hijack by a Russian ISP based on the origin ASN. NLNOG RING also shows some of their peers accepting the invalid announcement while

Re: Any interpol contact

Have you tried contacting them through the form on their website? https://www.interpol.int/en/Contacts/Contact-INTERPOL ~ Peter On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 8:27 AM Lu Heng wrote: > Hi > > We receive some network abuse request allegedly from Interpol, any contact > from Interpol would be

Re: ARIN whois contact abuse from ipv4depot aka Silicon Desert International Inc

Definitely have received this same spam multiple times and so have a few others I know. It's ridiculous that they resort to scraping public lists and DBs to try and achieve what they're attempting to do. Regards, Peter Potvin | Executive Director

Re: Cogent & Google reachability stable?

I've had zero issues reaching Google via Cogent, however Google didn't pick up transit from Cogent themselves: They got transit from Tata, which makes them reachable via Cogent due to the peering relationship between Cogent and Tata. Regards, Peter On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 6:45 PM David Hubbard

Re: Bgpmon alternative

I second this recommendation, I use BGPalerter for all of my BGP announcement and RPKI monitoring. It is a great application to have added to any Network Operator's toolkit. Regards, Peter On Wed., Jun. 15, 2022, 9:55 a.m. Job Snijders via NANOG, wrote: > Hi, > > I recommend taking a look at >

Re: Test email

Why did moderation let this through the filters? I don't believe that testing email functionality is the intended use case of the NANOG mailing list. Also worth noting that the website for the domain this came from says the owner of the site specializes in "anti-spam", which based on this email

Re: Announcement of Experiments

In my honest opinion, it's the fact that they're going to be using random AS's without prior consent from those that hold said AS's, and only giving operators a week to opt-out of something that they never opted into in the first place. Regards, Peter On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 2:10 PM Lars Prehn

Re: cogent and henet not peering

Hey all, Removing Cogent personnel and peering departments from this thread as I'm sure they don't appreciate the nonsense coming from this list. Regards, Peter Potvin | Executive Director -- *Accuris Technologies Ltd.*

Re: ROA Will Expire Soon - ARIN

I have been wondering the same thing when it comes to how ARIN's hosted RPKI ROAs handle renewal. Do they automatically renew by default, do we need to delete and re-create the ROA or do we have to reach out to the helpdesk every time one is due to expire? ~ Peter On Fri., Sep. 9, 2022, 10:12

Re: Facebook IP Geolocation

Operations Center: +1 (877) 321-1662 On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 6:21 AM TJ Trout wrote: > Have you checked these? > > https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/ > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023, 1:58 AM Peter Potvin via NANOG > wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >>

Facebook IP Geolocation

Hey all, Recently a customer reached out to us regarding an IP of ours in Canada that Facebook is somehow placing within China, despite our geolocation in other databases showing up correctly as they're ingesting our geofeeds as we had requested. Does anyone know which geolocation databases

Re: Peering Contact at AS16509

nterest on their side. > > > On Feb 18, 2024, at 13:09, Peter Potvin via NANOG > wrote: > > > >  > > If a contact who manages North American peering at AS16509 could reach > out off-list, that would be appreciated. Myself and a few colleagues have > attempted to r

Peering Contact at AS16509

If a contact who manages North American peering at AS16509 could reach out off-list, that would be appreciated. Myself and a few colleagues have attempted to reach out via the contacts listed on PeeringDB on multiple occasions over the last couple of months and have not been successful in reaching

Re: Diversity of MUAs (was Re: How threading works (was Re: Root Cause Re: 202401102221.AYC ...))

*audible sigh* Yet another useless thread added to my Gmail inbox because of a changed subject line. Can we please stop doing this for conversations that are about the same topic? Numerous users on this list have clearly shown they are annoyed by this, and frankly is something that the list

Re: Issue with Geolocation in Lasvegas

For Google-related sites specifically and if you haven't already, it's worth publishing an RFC8805-compliant geofeed and submitting it to them via their ISP portal at https://isp.google.com/ if you have an account with the announcing ASN affiliated to it. This is assuming that the IP you specified

Fastly Peering Contact

Looking for someone on the Fastly peering team to reach out regarding peering on a couple mutual IXPs - sent an email to the peering contact as listed on PeeringDB and never heard back, and also have a few colleagues who have experienced the same issue. Regards, Peter Potvin | Executive Director

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

Did a bit of digging on Google's developer site and came across this: https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq#locations_of_ip_address_ranges_google_public_dns_uses_to_send_queries Looks like the IPs you mentioned belong to Google's public DNS resolver based on that list on their site.

Re: Why are paper LOAs still used?

I can’t speak for all providers but when it comes to some downstream networks we will usually request an LOA as additional proof that the customer is authorized to announce the prefixes, in addition to the IRR objects and (where possible) RPKI ROAs. Mainly only a thing where RPKI is not possible

Re: List of GMAIL DNS *clients*?

Google has a list of IPs for their services in a JSON format available in their support section. Legitimate requests from Google should almost always come from an IP within those subnets. https://support.google.com/a/answer/10026322 https://support.google.com/a/answer/60764