On 4 Aug 2010, at 17:58, Thomas Weible wrote:
Cisco did a quite good job on implementing the DDM characteristics of the
optics. So why not to take a 32dB or even 41dB power budget SFP and make it
workable in the switch / router. Works like charm in some setups and you see
straight the
On 16/10/10 10:02, Warren Bailey wrote:
While we are on the subject of the godfathers of the Internet, when is a
documentary coming out that tells the story? There was a really long
documentary done on the BBS, surely someone (myself included) would find it
interesting.
I can recommend Where
On 20/10/10 17:47, Brielle Bruns wrote:
Not to stir an already boiling over pot and all, but is there any kind of
report or documentation on releasing of space from countries other then the
North American region?
Really it's mainly US govt agencies, defence contractors, etc from the dawn of
for
a concise description. :-)
--
Will Hargrave
Technical Director
LONAP Ltd
On 7 Nov 2010, at 08:24, George Bonser wrote:
It will happen on its own as more and more networks configure internally
for larger frames and as more people migrate out of academia where 9000
is the norm these days into industry.
I used to run a large academic network; there was a vanishingly
On 29 Nov 2012, at 20:53, George Herbert george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
The assertion being made here, that it's somehow illegal (or immoral,
or scary) for there to be not-completely-traceable internet access in
the US, is absurd.
The real issue here is *not* the legality of the act of
Joe Maimon wrote:
Anyone else having trouble with that?
Not had any luck on either the unicast or multicast RTSP feeds. Flash works
fine, though.
On 13 Sep 2012, at 17:32, Tim Franklin t...@pelican.org wrote:
You'll need a beefy NAT box. Linux with Xeon CPU and 4GB RAM minimum.
Or not. The CCC presentation is showing *real* Internet for everyone, unless
I'm very much mistaken…
Absolutely. NAT is too fragile/expensive/non-performant
HRH Sven Olaf Prinz von CyberBunker-Kamphuis MP wrote:
as for peering agreements, just implement an open peering policy
(doesn't nessesarily have to take place over an ix, also applies to pieces
of ethernet running from your network to others).
those basically are contracts that force
Paul Stewart wrote:
We have multiple transit providers today and are already present on a couple
of smaller peering exchanges with an open peering policy... our experience
with them has been very positive.
As an IX operator I'm glad to hear it :-)
The redundancy perspective is that you now
David Schwartz wrote:
The ratio argument is nonsense. If your customers want to receive mostly,
and receiving is expensive, they should pay you more to cover your higher
costs in receiving traffic. If my customers mostly want to send, and sending
is cheap, then I should pay less, since I want
On 19 Sep 2013, at 12:32, Niels Bakker niels=na...@bakker.net wrote:
I know you're a busy man so the tl;dr is that by encouraging local peering
more networks will start to peer, and by partnering with one or more local
carriers those new networks as well as established players in those
On 5 Apr 2015, at 04:29, Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org wrote:
I worked for a provider until recently that happened to get an IP assignment
at an IXP that was transitioning from /25 to /24. It was painful chasing
down peers to get them to change their netmask just so we could connect.
On 17 Jun 2016, at 1:15, Daniel Golding wrote:
You said that LONAP's distributed strategy "kept datacenters honest"
to use
your exact quote. That implied some sort of benefit for members in
acting
as some sort of counterweight to (rapacious?) data center providers.
I rely primarily on
On 15 Jun 2016, at 19:23, Sander Steffann wrote:
So here we are now... Where do we want to go?
I think IXPs have indeed become too much like ISPs, providing more
services but also increasing complexity and cost. I prefer simple,
scalable and cheap solutions!
I want to go to an IXP being a
On 06/10/10 15:42, Randy Whitney wrote:
As I am reading through Matt's notes since I cannot attend NANOG in
person this time, I'm pondering whether it may make sense in the future
for NewNOG to set aside budget to employ stenographers to cover at least
the plenary of the conference. Matt has
16 matches
Mail list logo
