On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Charles N Wyble wrote:
I am simply suggesting it is dangerous and irresponsible to run an IRR
with only MAIL-FROM authentication, and quite easy to also support
CRYPT-PW. ARIN should either support passwords or immediately make
The trouble is, since the DES crypt
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, Charles N Wyble wrote:
I am simply suggesting it is dangerous and irresponsible to run an IRR
with only MAIL-FROM authentication, and quite easy to also support
CRYPT-PW. ARIN should either support
On Jan 5, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
I would like to note that RADB had route6: support in about 2004 or
so, if my memory serves me; while the ARIN database did not accept
route6 objects until about a year ago. So it is not exactly a high
priority for ARIN.
The priority of IRR
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011, John Curran wrote:
Should IRR services be part of the ARIN mission?
If that's a serious question, why does rr.arin.net exist at all?
--
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
Senior Network Engineer
On Jan 9, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
Should IRR services be part of the ARIN mission?
If that's a serious question, why does rr.arin.net exist at all?
Jon -
Existence of not in and of itself proof that the services are
presently desired by the community, nor that there are
Do you: 1) want IRR services, and if so, with what features?
2) believe IRR services should be provided by ARIN?
the irr is slightly useful today. so, iff it is cheap and easy, arin
providing an open and free instance is a public good. again, iff it is
easy and cheap. and please
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Do you: 1) want IRR services, and if so, with what features?
2) believe IRR services should be provided by ARIN?
the irr is slightly useful today. so, iff it is cheap and easy, arin
providing an open and free
Do you: 1) want IRR services, and if so, with what features?
2) believe IRR services should be provided by ARIN?
the irr is slightly useful today. so, iff it is cheap and easy, arin
providing an open and free instance is a public good. again, iff it is
easy and cheap. and
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
jeff, i do not disagree that running an irr instance with only mail-from
is s 1980s. and, as mans points out, there is free software out
there to do it (i recommend irrd). but i do not see good cause for arin
to spend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2011 03:41 PM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Do you: 1) want IRR services, and if so, with what features?
2) believe IRR services should be provided by ARIN?
I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2011 03:48 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Do you: 1) want IRR services, and if so, with what features?
I think so. In theory it seems useful. In practice...
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2009/05/keeping-score.shtml
not so much.
2)
I had a vague concept of IRR before this thread, and have researched
them as a result of it. They seem quite useful. I didn't know anything
about RPKI before this thread. I'm looking into that now.
So I don't think ARIN should spend it's limited resources on anything to
do with it's copy of
12 matches
Mail list logo
