How do you specify multiple reference paths for msbuild task
I tried the following
This didn't work
any ideas?
THanks,
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you
t: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 7:27:57 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] MSBuild
Hi Eric.
> I don't see much use for NAnt except for legacy stuff.
For what it's worth, I see a place for both tools.
In a significant project I'm working on at the moment, we use MSBuild to
do the actua
AIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] MSBuild
To: "Eric Fetzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "NAnt Developers"
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
What about builds targeted towards multiple f
On 25/10/06, Bevan Arps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Eric.
>
> > I don't see much use for NAnt except for legacy stuff.
>
> For what it's worth, I see a place for both tools.
>
> In a significant project I'm working on at the moment, we use MSBuild to
> do the actual builds ... But we control
d Archiving (copying to a known archive directory)
Hope this helps,
Bevan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric
Fetzer
Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2006 4:34 a.m.
To: NAnt Developers
Subject: [nant-dev] MSBuild
Does it bug anyone else
006 9:34 AM
To: NAnt Developers
Subject: [nant-dev] MSBuild
Does it bug anyone else that MSBuild is almost identical to NAnt with
slight modifications like $( instead of ${ to access properties... I
remember the manager of MSBuild coming in and acting like MS was going
to play so nice with NAnt,
Does it bug anyone else that MSBuild is almost identical to NAnt with slight
modifications like $( instead of ${ to access properties... I remember the
manager of MSBuild coming in and acting like MS was going to play so nice with
NAnt, when in reality, he was using it as a project to copy beca
You can download the MSBuild PowerPoint slides, samples, and how-to
documents, like HowToWriteATask.doc.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/events/pdc/agendaandsessions/sessions/default.aspx
-- look for session number TLS347.
--
sig://boB
http://foobob.com
---
Hello Clayton,
>>#1 difference - the source availability! :)
CH> Very, very good point! :-)
Or more precisely, its unavailability :-)
It's probably better to restate this one: source should be Open
(in the meaning of OSD).
If it is an MS Shared Source initiative, it is evil, IMO.
--
Best regar
>#1 difference - the source availability! :)
Very, very good point! :-)
<>
#1 difference - the source availability! :)
John Lam wrote:
I've spent a fair amount of time recently with MSBuild, and have the
following set of observations about its relationship to [N]Ant:
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net G
MSBuild is obviously a child of Embrace & Extend philosophy; being built-in
in the next version of the framework will do wonders in terms of promoting
the process of automated builds, which are critical to quality in our line
of work. That is a good thing. Nant is already doing it. And that is even
I've spent a fair amount of time recently with MSBuild, and have the
following set of observations about its relationship to [N]Ant:
1) There is an inter-target dependency engine. Targets can declare their
inputs and their outputs, which are in turn fed to the dependency engine
to determine the mi
13 matches
Mail list logo
