Re: [nant-dev] TypeFactory refactoring
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 6:12 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] TypeFactory refactoring Gert Driesen wrote: Hi, I guess we should refactor the TypeFactory class, as we currently scan all types for all task/extension assemblies three times : for tasks, types and functionsets ((four times when I've committed support for filter types), and this is really starting to add up ... So we just need to take a single pass thru all types rather than one for each type of extensions as we do now ? Yeah, I think that just about sums it all up ;-) The only problem is that the script task needs to know how many (or if any) functions are in a scanned assembly. Not sure if that's really necessary though. Gert --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
[nant-dev] NAnt Namespaces
Hi, Currently the NAnt support for namespaces is very limited, definitely when compared to Ant (http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTypes/namespace.html). Just want to get the discussion on this topic going ... Gert --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] NAnt Namespaces
My vote: let's NOT support it - I'd say more - let's disallow it. Simplicity is an important thing. The only advantage of XML namespaces I see is technical beauty and XSD schema support for extensible intellisense - IMHO it's not worth it. From my experience I can say that it's really difficult to explain the concept of XML namespaces and URNs to first-time users of XML. Based on this, I think that using URIs as xml namespaces is the most confusing thing on the planet (what? there's no file under http://tempuri.org/;) . Most people are well off without namespaces. XSDs can be generated usign schema task today, and I think it's good enough for most cases. Jarek - Original Message - From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 11:58 AM Subject: [nant-dev] NAnt Namespaces Hi, Currently the NAnt support for namespaces is very limited, definitely when compared to Ant (http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTypes/namespace.html). Just want to get the discussion on this topic going ... Gert --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com ___ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
