t
- Original Message -
From: "Tomas Restrepo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 4:23 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] .NET Framework 1.1 version of nant
> Actually, what I'd like to see is for us to have a way to use NAnt
Gert,
What's the benefit of shipping a version built specifically against the
1.1 libraries?
Thanks.
--b
- Original Message -
From: Gert Driesen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:35 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] .NET Framework 1.1 version of nant
Hi,
Are there
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] .NET Framework 1.1 version of nant
> Gert,
>
> Do you mean "built on 1.1" ? If so then I would say
Gert,
Do you mean "built on 1.1" ? If so then I would say no - at least untill
1.1 becomes the platform most users are running on. If its really needed
you ca always grab the dource and build it yourself on 1.1
Ian
Hi,
Are there plans to release a separate .NET Framework 1.1 version of NAnt
TED]
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 7:35
AM
Subject: [nant-dev] .NET Framework 1.1
version of nant
Hi,
Are there plans to release a separate .NET
Framework 1.1 version of NAnt (possibly in the same distribution)
?
Does anyone knwo if there be .NET Framework 1.1
ve
Hi,
Are there plans to release a separate .NET
Framework 1.1 version of NAnt (possibly in the same distribution) ?
Does anyone knwo if there be .NET Framework 1.1
versions off NDoc, SharpZipLib and NUnit ?
Thansk,
Gert
