Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9

2010-04-03 Thread Charles Chan
). Thanks, Charles --- On Sat, 4/3/10, Richard Birkby wrote: From: Richard Birkby Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9 To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Received: Saturday, April 3, 2010, 9:20 AM Hi Ryan, Looks great now. I've KDiff3'd the nant build output and c

Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9

2010-04-03 Thread Dominik Guder
Am 03.04.2010 15:30, schrieb Richard Birkby: > An MSBuild task isn't listed on: > http://nant.sourceforge.net/release/latest/help/tasks/ > > Is this new in 0.9a1? > > > Richard > I'm sorry, since I always compile nant and nantcontrib together I thought it was part of nant since 86 beta. Since

Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9

2010-04-03 Thread Richard Birkby
An MSBuild task isn't listed on: http://nant.sourceforge.net/release/latest/help/tasks/ Is this new in 0.9a1? Richard On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Dominik Guder wrote: > > > > The bug which I was unable to enter is that when I use Nant-Contrib's > > MSBuild task, all output from the task i

Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9

2010-04-03 Thread Dominik Guder
> The bug which I was unable to enter is that when I use Nant-Contrib's > MSBuild task, all output from the task is concatenated onto a single > line with no carriage returns. > Hi Richard, are you sure you are using Nant-Contrib's msbuild task? is part of nant itself. so far Dominik -- T

Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9

2010-04-03 Thread Gert Driesen
think the latter is more appropriate, as all files are available as child nodes. Gert From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: donderdag 1 april 2010 22:24 To: Richard Birkby; Gert Driesen Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker t

Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9

2010-04-03 Thread Richard Birkby
Hi Ryan, Looks great now. I've KDiff3'd the nant build output and can't see any problem versus 0.86b1 Cheers, Richard On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Ryan Boggs wrote: > Hey Richard, > > Would you mind giving the latest nightly file a try (04-02-2010)? We > believe that we were able to fix t

Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9

2010-04-02 Thread Ryan Boggs
Hey Richard, Would you mind giving the latest nightly file a try (04-02-2010)? We believe that we were able to fix the output issue you experienced. Let us know how it works for you. Thanks, Ryan On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Richard Birkby wrote: > Congrats on releasing 0.9a1. > I immediate

Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9

2010-04-01 Thread Ryan Boggs
Hi Richard, On Apr 1, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Richard Birkby wrote: Congrats on releasing 0.9a1. I immediately put it into our build process and found an issue - unfortunately, I can't enter the issue into Nant's bug tracker because a 0.9a1 tag is missing - any chance you could add one? I als

Re: [nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9

2010-04-01 Thread Charles Chan
e fix. Thanks, Charles --- On Thu, 4/1/10, Richard Birkby wrote: From: Richard Birkby Subject: [nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9 To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Received: Thursday, April 1, 2010, 8:06 PM Congrats on releasing 0.9a1. I immediately put it into our build process and fou

[nant-dev] Bug tracker tag for 0.9

2010-04-01 Thread Richard Birkby
Congrats on releasing 0.9a1. I immediately put it into our build process and found an issue - unfortunately, I can't enter the issue into Nant's bug tracker because a 0.9a1 tag is missing - any chance you could add one? I also noticed if I click on Releases->0.90 Alpha 1 in the left hand navigati