Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

2003-10-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Philip Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > NAnt may be bound to the gpl because of things like the sharpcvslib. Yes, that may be an important issue. Please also note that the LGPL is rather difficult to understand in the context of late binding languages like Java (and I assu

RE: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

2003-10-08 Thread Mitch Denny
nal Message - > From: "Philip Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 10:50 AM > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle > next release) > > > > > > > Well, to be hon

RE: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

2003-10-08 Thread Clayton Harbour
Nelson Sent: Wed 10/8/2003 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release) > Well, to be honest : I don't have a clue ... That's perhaps why we're still > stuck with the GPL license :-) I am pretty su

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

2003-10-08 Thread Scott Hernandez
10:50 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release) > > > Well, to be honest : I don't have a clue ... That's perhaps why we're still > > stuck with the GPL license :-) > > I am pretty sure the copyright holder can do whatever they wan

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

2003-10-08 Thread Philip Nelson
> Well, to be honest : I don't have a clue ... That's perhaps why we're still > stuck with the GPL license :-) I am pretty sure the copyright holder can do whatever they want, so long as they aren't bound to the gpl by other source code or libraries in the application. NAnt may be bound to the g

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

2003-10-08 Thread Gert Driesen
> - Original Message - > From: "Clayton Harbour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:53 PM > Su

RE: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

2003-10-08 Thread Clayton Harbour
>In my opinion, the .NET community really lacks coordination right now .. >Which is something Apache does a terrific job at for the Java open-source >community . > >Gert I agree with you Gert, there is a lot going on at Apache but you can tell that there is one entity behind it all. I think the

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

2003-10-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Too bad there was no follow-up after that ... a missed opportunity > if you ask me ... This is not quite true. Both Gerry and Ian followed up, the cooperation just didn't work out somehow. Not enough time and all that. > We're plan

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

2003-10-08 Thread Gert Driesen
> - Original Message - > From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 7:32 AM > Subject: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release) > > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Drie

[nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

2003-10-07 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > great to see that one of the driving forces thanks > behind Ant is also interested in NAnt :) More and longer than you think. ;-) I'd think that Ian and Ge