Re: [nant-dev] solution task bug in nested build

2003-11-04 Thread Gert Driesen
What version of NAnt are you using ? This should actually already be fixed in the 0.8.4 nightly builds, but not by that patch you supplied ... Earlier versions of the solution task did not resolve the solution filename to a full path in SolutionTask.cs, this was fixed since ... Can you try one

[nant-dev] documentation

2003-11-04 Thread Martin Aliger
Hi all, I notice that our current docs do not say anything about nant.exe.config. I this there should be section about it discussing frameworks settings, possibility to add global properties, and logger. What do you think? [sorry I do not write it right now...] Martin

Re: [nant-dev] FYI

2003-11-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, as you are new to this list, Alex, let me introduce myself to you quickly. I'm not a NAnt developer, but rather - a bit like you - a visitor from a very similar product. I'm one of the developers of Apache Ant, the product that inspired NAnt's birth. On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Alex Kipman [EMAIL

Re: [nant-dev] FYI

2003-11-04 Thread Scott Hernandez
Stefan, just to clarify, not that I am involved with Microsoft marketing and distribution for the .Net Framework, but I think the plan is to roll MSBuild (engine and some basic tasks) into the framework distribution (but probably not into the Base Class Libraries that are defined in the public

Re: [nant-dev] FYI

2003-11-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the plan is to roll MSBuild (engine and some basic tasks) into the framework distribution (but probably not into the Base Class Libraries that are defined in the public ECMA spec). OK, makes sense from a certain perspective,

Re: [nant-dev] FYI

2003-11-04 Thread Martin Aliger
I'm not sure about the details of how and where microsoft is planning on inserting the build stuff. I suspect it will probably go into the System.Build.* namespaces (or somewhere around there) making it something that is logically an extension of the BCL, but will not be in the BCL spec that

Re: [nant-dev] FYI

2003-11-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When talking about the .net core, we really need context. I thought so, thanks for the details. I'm not sure about the details of how and where microsoft is planning on inserting the build stuff. I suspect it will probably go into

RE: [nant-dev] FYI

2003-11-04 Thread Alex Kipman
Lots of great questions. Let me try to answer all of them. MSBuild namespace == Microsoft.Build.* Under Build there are a few other namespaces like Tasks.*, Framework.*, Utilities.* and Engine.* MSBuild shipping vehicle == We will be shipping as part of the .NET redistributable (aka with the