Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
Hello Matt, I agree, trying to bite off too much is difficult in an OSS project -- we just don't have the capacity to stay focus on it (full time). As a result, I am using a agile approach to keep the cycle short and to generate faster turnarounds into the hands of the users. Perhaps in the future, when there are more active members, we can look into developing more formal planning process and organization. (I am not a PM by profession, so I am sure there are more experienced people who can do a better job than me.) Regards, Charles --- On Sun, 2/28/10, Matt Chatterley matt.chatter...@gmail.com wrote: From: Matt Chatterley matt.chatter...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x? To: Charles Chan cchan...@users.sourceforge.net Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Received: Sunday, February 28, 2010, 12:12 PM Hi Charles, I'm with you now - yes I misunderstood slightly! Having looked at the roadmap I think the timescale is good, too, as long as we (collectively) don't bite off too much work to be done (which it doesn't seem we are). :) Sitting here waiting for more news (and trying to juggle things to make a bit of spare time). Cheers, -- Matt Chatterley Mattched IT Ltd http://www.mattchedit.com Skype: mattchedit UK Registered Company: 05861949 On 27 February 2010 04:47, Charles Chan cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Hello Matt, Great stuff! I think a lot of people would love to see VS2005 and VS2008 support in NAnt as well! (Based on what I have seen in the bug feature request section.) Let's get 0.8x and 1.0 out the door so we can work on exciting features for 2.0. For everyone's information: Gert Dreisen is one of the NAnt project admins and he has kindly configured MediaWiki on SF. I will use it put up a rough roadmap (what I have said in the email) for everyone to review / edit / comment. Then once the list is semi-final for the near term, and the tasks are assigned, the work can begin. Later on, we can also use the Wiki to document other information related to the project, roles, process, howtos, etc. I enjoy using Wiki because it's fast and it's collaborative. That's all for now, more to come. Regards, Charles - Original Message From: Martin Aliger martin_ali...@gordic.cz To: Charles Chan cchan...@users.sourceforge.net; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 3:30:09 AM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x? I'd love to see 1.0 out soon. Not sure, what 'soon' can be though :) VS solutions 2005 and 2008 should be supported (via MSBuild). I wrote that, and using it daily :) VS2010 is comming soon as well (c++ project revamped to msbuild) M. __ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/ -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers __ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/ -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
Same with me. Target 1.0/1.1 is important! M. -Original Message- From: Gert Driesen [mailto:gert.drie...@telenet.be] Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 7:36 AM To: 'Charles Chan'; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x? Hey Charles, I have no problem with dropping .NET 1.x as supported runtime, but I definitely want to retain .NET 1.x as target framework. There's no reason why we should drop support for that. Regards, Gert -Original Message- From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: vrijdag 26 februari 2010 4:39 To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x? Thanks for all of your replies! Sorry, I am a little busy today, so please excuse me for the quick answers. Gert: Based on my understanding: (please correct if I am wrong) Requires .NET-1.0 SDK / VS2002 to target .NET-1.0 -- The SDK is no longer available from MS, making it difficult to develop or provide further support for NAnt? Requires .NET-1.1 SDK / VS2003 to target .NET-1.1 Requires .NET 2.0 SDK / VS2005 to target .NET 2.0 So I am hoping to drop support for .NET 1.x (at least .NET 1.0) runtime AND target ASAP. Ryan, Matt: Your comments makes sense. FYI, I am planning to first release a new version 0.87-beta, rc, etc. (it's been too long since 0.86 and many changes since, so I want to use a new number to signify the differences) This is mainly a bugfix release. No new feature, but mainly to work towards a golden 1.0 version of NAnt to complete the 0.8x roadmap. Roadmap === 0.87 - bug fix only to stabilize the existing features; eg. Mono/.NET compatibilities issues. 1.00 - golden release, perhaps last version to support .NET 1.0 2.00 - add support for .NET 2.0, 3.5; VS solution 2005, 2008; update NUnit, etc. Thoughts? (Once we all reach a consensus, we can work on further breakdowns, divide up the work, scan the bug lists, etc). All: Thanks very much for you interest, unfortunately, I only have developer privilege so perhaps one of the project admins can help setup the permissions. (Gert? Gerry? Can you help?) I am interested in learning more about your backgrounds and why you are interested in helping NAnt. I assume most of you are using NAnt in the workplace? How much time can you spend on this project? Is there any aspect you are particularly interested in working in? If you know anyone who might be interested in contributing, please help spread the word! Cheers, Charles __ Connect with friends from any web browser - no download required. Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger for the Web BETA at http://ca.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2708 - Release Date: 02/25/10 20:57:00 -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
I'd love to see 1.0 out soon. Not sure, what 'soon' can be though :) VS solutions 2005 and 2008 should be supported (via MSBuild). I wrote that, and using it daily :) VS2010 is comming soon as well (c++ project revamped to msbuild) M. Roadmap === 0.87 - bug fix only to stabilize the existing features; eg. Mono/.NET compatibilities issues. 1.00 - golden release, perhaps last version to support .NET 1.0 2.00 - add support for .NET 2.0, 3.5; VS solution 2005, 2008; update NUnit, etc. Thoughts? (Once we all reach a consensus, we can work on further breakdowns, divide up the work, scan the bug lists, etc). -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
Hello Matt, Great stuff! I think a lot of people would love to see VS2005 and VS2008 support in NAnt as well! (Based on what I have seen in the bug feature request section.) Let's get 0.8x and 1.0 out the door so we can work on exciting features for 2.0. For everyone's information: Gert Dreisen is one of the NAnt project admins and he has kindly configured MediaWiki on SF. I will use it put up a rough roadmap (what I have said in the email) for everyone to review / edit / comment. Then once the list is semi-final for the near term, and the tasks are assigned, the work can begin. Later on, we can also use the Wiki to document other information related to the project, roles, process, howtos, etc. I enjoy using Wiki because it's fast and it's collaborative. That's all for now, more to come. Regards, Charles - Original Message From: Martin Aliger martin_ali...@gordic.cz To: Charles Chan cchan...@users.sourceforge.net; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 3:30:09 AM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x? I'd love to see 1.0 out soon. Not sure, what 'soon' can be though :) VS solutions 2005 and 2008 should be supported (via MSBuild). I wrote that, and using it daily :) VS2010 is comming soon as well (c++ project revamped to msbuild) M. __ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/ -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
Hi, On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Charles Chan cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Hello Matt, Great stuff! I think a lot of people would love to see VS2005 and VS2008 support in NAnt as well! (Based on what I have seen in the bug feature request section.) Let's get 0.8x and 1.0 out the door so we can work on exciting features for 2.0. For everyone's information: Gert Dreisen is one of the NAnt project admins and he has kindly configured MediaWiki on SF. I will use it put up a rough roadmap (what I have said in the email) for everyone to review / edit / comment. Then once the list is semi-final for the near term, and the tasks are assigned, the work can begin. Later on, we can also use the Wiki to document other information related to the project, roles, process, howtos, etc. I enjoy using Wiki because it's fast and it's collaborative. Pretty cool. Can't wait for the roadmap. Just out of curiosity, would fixing the remaining bugs listed in SF be required for the 1.0 release? That's all for now, more to come. Regards, Charles - Original Message From: Martin Aliger martin_ali...@gordic.cz To: Charles Chan cchan...@users.sourceforge.net; nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 3:30:09 AM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x? I'd love to see 1.0 out soon. Not sure, what 'soon' can be though :) VS solutions 2005 and 2008 should be supported (via MSBuild). I wrote that, and using it daily :) VS2010 is comming soon as well (c++ project revamped to msbuild) M. __ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/ -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers -- Thanks, Ryan -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
Hello Ryan, From: Ryan Boggs rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com To: Charles Chan cchan...@users.sourceforge.net Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Fri, February 26, 2010 10:18:14 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x? ... Just out of curiosity, would fixing the remaining bugs listed in SF be required for the 1.0 release? No, of course not. Fixing everything would take too long and prevent more critical features from being developed. This is why I want to start a roadmap and have the community contribute to what they think is most important a stable successful 1.0 release. The faster we can wrap up 1.0, the sooner we can work on the next major 2.0. For example, speaking for myself, I am generally happy with things the way they are, but want to fix a few minor bugs with the XML tasks. On the other hands, others might have different needs. I hope this helps. Regards, Charles __ The new Internet Explorer® 8 - Faster, safer, easier. Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/ -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
And since our competetive product MSBuild do not work on 1.0/1.1 platform, there could be some use of that. For, me personally, same as Ryan apply. Ing. Martin Aliger martin_ali...@gordic.cz -Original Message- From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmboggs.obsd.po...@gmail.com] Looking at the current state, I think it's too difficult to maintain support for all of the .NET frameworks. Can we drop support for .NET 1.x and beginning beginning .NET 2.0 as a minimum? If there are no objections, I am going to change the default release from set-net-1.0-framework-configuration to set-net-2.0-framework-configuration Speaking personally, I have no problem dropping .NET 1.X since all of my work as of late has been based on .NET 2.0 and greater. However, I -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
Hey Charles, You should make it clear if you want to drop sypport for .NET 1.x as a runtime environment (CLR), or as a target framework. Regards, Gert -- From: Charles Chan cchan...@users.sourceforge.net Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:20 AM To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x? Hello, Looking at the current state, I think it's too difficult to maintain support for all of the .NET frameworks. Can we drop support for .NET 1.x and beginning beginning .NET 2.0 as a minimum? If there are no objections, I am going to change the default release from set-net-1.0-framework-configuration to set-net-2.0-framework-configuration Also, I want to enlist the help of more developers to get more work done, faster. I think SF has a way of advertising for help, where is it? Regards, Charles __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com. -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
Thanks for all of your replies! Sorry, I am a little busy today, so please excuse me for the quick answers. Gert: Based on my understanding: (please correct if I am wrong) Requires .NET-1.0 SDK / VS2002 to target .NET-1.0 -- The SDK is no longer available from MS, making it difficult to develop or provide further support for NAnt? Requires .NET-1.1 SDK / VS2003 to target .NET-1.1 Requires .NET 2.0 SDK / VS2005 to target .NET 2.0 So I am hoping to drop support for .NET 1.x (at least .NET 1.0) runtime AND target ASAP. Ryan, Matt: Your comments makes sense. FYI, I am planning to first release a new version 0.87-beta, rc, etc. (it's been too long since 0.86 and many changes since, so I want to use a new number to signify the differences) This is mainly a bugfix release. No new feature, but mainly to work towards a golden 1.0 version of NAnt to complete the 0.8x roadmap. Roadmap === 0.87 - bug fix only to stabilize the existing features; eg. Mono/.NET compatibilities issues. 1.00 - golden release, perhaps last version to support .NET 1.0 2.00 - add support for .NET 2.0, 3.5; VS solution 2005, 2008; update NUnit, etc. Thoughts? (Once we all reach a consensus, we can work on further breakdowns, divide up the work, scan the bug lists, etc). All: Thanks very much for you interest, unfortunately, I only have developer privilege so perhaps one of the project admins can help setup the permissions. (Gert? Gerry? Can you help?) I am interested in learning more about your backgrounds and why you are interested in helping NAnt. I assume most of you are using NAnt in the workplace? How much time can you spend on this project? Is there any aspect you are particularly interested in working in? If you know anyone who might be interested in contributing, please help spread the word! Cheers, Charles __ Connect with friends from any web browser - no download required. Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger for the Web BETA at http://ca.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
Hi, On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Charles Chan cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Thanks for all of your replies! Sorry, I am a little busy today, so please excuse me for the quick answers. Gert: Based on my understanding: (please correct if I am wrong) Requires .NET-1.0 SDK / VS2002 to target .NET-1.0 -- The SDK is no longer available from MS, making it difficult to develop or provide further support for NAnt? Requires .NET-1.1 SDK / VS2003 to target .NET-1.1 Requires .NET 2.0 SDK / VS2005 to target .NET 2.0 So I am hoping to drop support for .NET 1.x (at least .NET 1.0) runtime AND target ASAP. Ryan, Matt: Your comments makes sense. FYI, I am planning to first release a new version 0.87-beta, rc, etc. (it's been too long since 0.86 and many changes since, so I want to use a new number to signify the differences) This is mainly a bugfix release. No new feature, but mainly to work towards a golden 1.0 version of NAnt to complete the 0.8x roadmap. Roadmap === 0.87 - bug fix only to stabilize the existing features; eg. Mono/.NET compatibilities issues. 1.00 - golden release, perhaps last version to support .NET 1.0 2.00 - add support for .NET 2.0, 3.5; VS solution 2005, 2008; update NUnit, etc. Thoughts? (Once we all reach a consensus, we can work on further breakdowns, divide up the work, scan the bug lists, etc). I think I am confused about your roadmap. Specifically the line 2.00 - add support for .NET 2.0, 3.5; VS solution 2005, 2008; update NUnit, etc. Doesn't NAnt, as it stands today, already support .NET 2.0, 3.5? Or am I misunderstanding something? Also, Are you planning on only bug fixes between 0.87 - 1.0 or will new features be introduced during that period? Don't get me wrong, planning this out is great. I just want to make sure I am understanding this path. All: Thanks very much for you interest, unfortunately, I only have developer privilege so perhaps one of the project admins can help setup the permissions. (Gert? Gerry? Can you help?) I am interested in learning more about your backgrounds and why you are interested in helping NAnt. I assume most of you are using NAnt in the workplace? How much time can you spend on this project? Is there any aspect you are particularly interested in working in? I can answer this in another email if needs be. If you know anyone who might be interested in contributing, please help spread the word! Cheers, Charles __ Connect with friends from any web browser - no download required. Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger for the Web BETA at http://ca.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php Let me know if there are any questions. -- Thanks, Ryan -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
Ryan, Roadmap === 0.87 - bug fix only to stabilize the existing features; eg. Mono/.NET compatibilities issues. 1.00 - golden release, perhaps last version to support .NET 1.0 2.00 - add support for .NET 2.0, 3.5; VS solution 2005, 2008; update NUnit, etc. Thoughts? (Once we all reach a consensus, we can work on further breakdowns, divide up the work, scan the bug lists, etc). I think I am confused about your roadmap. Specifically the line 2.00 - add support for .NET 2.0, 3.5; VS solution 2005, 2008; update NUnit, etc. Doesn't NAnt, as it stands today, already support .NET 2.0, 3.5? Or am I misunderstanding something? Yes, you are right. I meant adding support for VS2005, 2008 and .NET 4.0 fixing any outstanding issues in .NET 2.0, 3.5. Too many ideas on my mind. Also, Are you planning on only bug fixes between 0.87 - 1.0 or will new features be introduced during that period? Don't get me wrong, planning this out is great. I just want to make sure I am understanding this path. No more additions between 0.87 - 1.0. I just wanted to get a 1.0 release out so people can use a formal release. (ie. Some companies won't use a version less than 1.x) I am interested in learning more about your backgrounds and why you are interested in helping NAnt. I assume most of you are using NAnt in the workplace? How much time can you spend on this project? Is there any aspect you are particularly interested in working in? I can answer this in another email if needs be. It's non-compulsory. Just send me a private email if you feel like it, your choice. :) Regards, Charles __ Make your browsing faster, safer, and easier with the new Internet Explorer® 8. Optimized for Yahoo! Get it Now for Free! at http://downloads.yahoo.com/ca/internetexplorer/ -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
Hey Charles, I have no problem with dropping .NET 1.x as supported runtime, but I definitely want to retain .NET 1.x as target framework. There's no reason why we should drop support for that. Regards, Gert -Original Message- From: Charles Chan [mailto:cchan...@users.sourceforge.net] Sent: vrijdag 26 februari 2010 4:39 To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x? Thanks for all of your replies! Sorry, I am a little busy today, so please excuse me for the quick answers. Gert: Based on my understanding: (please correct if I am wrong) Requires .NET-1.0 SDK / VS2002 to target .NET-1.0 -- The SDK is no longer available from MS, making it difficult to develop or provide further support for NAnt? Requires .NET-1.1 SDK / VS2003 to target .NET-1.1 Requires .NET 2.0 SDK / VS2005 to target .NET 2.0 So I am hoping to drop support for .NET 1.x (at least .NET 1.0) runtime AND target ASAP. Ryan, Matt: Your comments makes sense. FYI, I am planning to first release a new version 0.87-beta, rc, etc. (it's been too long since 0.86 and many changes since, so I want to use a new number to signify the differences) This is mainly a bugfix release. No new feature, but mainly to work towards a golden 1.0 version of NAnt to complete the 0.8x roadmap. Roadmap === 0.87 - bug fix only to stabilize the existing features; eg. Mono/.NET compatibilities issues. 1.00 - golden release, perhaps last version to support .NET 1.0 2.00 - add support for .NET 2.0, 3.5; VS solution 2005, 2008; update NUnit, etc. Thoughts? (Once we all reach a consensus, we can work on further breakdowns, divide up the work, scan the bug lists, etc). All: Thanks very much for you interest, unfortunately, I only have developer privilege so perhaps one of the project admins can help setup the permissions. (Gert? Gerry? Can you help?) I am interested in learning more about your backgrounds and why you are interested in helping NAnt. I assume most of you are using NAnt in the workplace? How much time can you spend on this project? Is there any aspect you are particularly interested in working in? If you know anyone who might be interested in contributing, please help spread the word! Cheers, Charles __ Connect with friends from any web browser - no download required. Try the new Yahoo! Canada Messenger for the Web BETA at http://ca.messenger.yahoo.com/webmessengerpromo.php -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2708 - Release Date: 02/25/10 20:57:00 -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
Re: [nant-dev] Drop support for .NET-1.x?
Hi Charles, On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Charles Chan cchan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Hello, Looking at the current state, I think it's too difficult to maintain support for all of the .NET frameworks. Can we drop support for .NET 1.x and beginning beginning .NET 2.0 as a minimum? If there are no objections, I am going to change the default release from set-net-1.0-framework-configuration to set-net-2.0-framework-configuration Speaking personally, I have no problem dropping .NET 1.X since all of my work as of late has been based on .NET 2.0 and greater. However, I obviously can't speak for everyone out there and I can only imagine that there may be some projects out there that can't, or won't, upgrade beyond version 1.1. Do you think it would be possible/feasable to release a final version of 0.86 with the recent work you have been doing as the last version that supports .NET 1.X and then drop .NET 1.X support going forward? I would hate to leave .NET 1.X support on a beta. Thoughts? Also, I want to enlist the help of more developers to get more work done, faster. I think SF has a way of advertising for help, where is it? I would like to help but I wouldn't know where to start. Is there a roadmap or todo list out there somewhere? -- Thanks, Ryan Regards, Charles __ Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your favourite sites. Download it now http://ca.toolbar.yahoo.com. -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev ___ nant-developers mailing list nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers