Re: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt

2010-02-04 Thread Chris Howell
Ok perhaps I should have phrased my question a little better, I am looking for 
CI and daily builds.  I've used CC.Net before exclusively without NANT. My 
question was more why would I choose to use the functionality exposed in NANT, 
such a executing tasks, copying files etc When CC.NET also has utilities 
for doing the same thing ? There seems to be quite a bit of over lap between 
the tasks that CC.Net can don and the tasks that NANT can do. Therefore what is 
the benefit ? Of combining the two ?

From: Stephan King [mailto:sk...@inquesttechnologies.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:56 PM
To: Chris Howell
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt

You don't choose one over the other, they go hand in hand.  CC.NET will handle 
all of your source control operations, scheduling, emailing, publishing, etc, 
and CC.NET will call into your NANT scripts to do things like run MSBuild, copy 
files, etc.

Stephan

From: Chris Howell [mailto:chris.how...@padresoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:33 PM
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt

Hi All,

I am looking to introduce a Continuous Integration/build environment to my dev 
team which currently has none. What would be the primary advantage(s) to 
choosing a NANT too over CC.NET ?

Chris
--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com___
NAnt-users mailing list
NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users


Re: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt

2010-02-04 Thread Stephan King
Well, for one thing, each does some things better than the other, so we
like to take advantage of that.

 

We have customized CC.NET heavily with custom tasks that have allowed to
us fully integrate git with CC.NET.

 

Some things make sense to do in CC.NET, others in nant, still others
with custom C# tasks or calls out to the console.  The decision becomes
obvious on what technology to use as you become more familiar with both
platforms, but I would never choose one over the other.  Both have been
essential to the success of a very well developed and highly customized
continuous integration system for us here.

 

Stephan

 

From: Chris Howell [mailto:chris.how...@padresoft.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 5:10 PM
To: Stephan King
Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt

 

Ok perhaps I should have phrased my question a little better, I am
looking for CI and daily builds.  I've used CC.Net before exclusively
without NANT. My question was more why would I choose to use the
functionality exposed in NANT, such a executing tasks, copying files
etc When CC.NET also has utilities for doing the same thing ? There
seems to be quite a bit of over lap between the tasks that CC.Net can
don and the tasks that NANT can do. Therefore what is the benefit ? Of
combining the two ? 

 

From: Stephan King [mailto:sk...@inquesttechnologies.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:56 PM
To: Chris Howell
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt

 

You don't choose one over the other, they go hand in hand.  CC.NET will
handle all of your source control operations, scheduling, emailing,
publishing, etc, and CC.NET will call into your NANT scripts to do
things like run MSBuild, copy files, etc.

 

Stephan

 

From: Chris Howell [mailto:chris.how...@padresoft.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:33 PM
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt

 

Hi All, 

 

I am looking to introduce a Continuous Integration/build environment to
my dev team which currently has none. What would be the primary
advantage(s) to choosing a NANT too over CC.NET ?

 

Chris

--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com___
NAnt-users mailing list
NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users


Re: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt

2010-02-04 Thread Phil Sayers
Think of ccnet as the trigger that fires your nant scripts.

 

Ccnet will continuously watch something.  That something could be the
current time, one or more source control repositories, the filesystem, or
you can write your own code to monitor whatever you want.

 

When something changes (a commit, new file, changed file, time of day),
ccnet will execute actions that you specify.

 

Those actions are typically nant scripts, the same scripts you would use
locally to build your product.  You could use batch files, .vbs files,
powershell scripts I guess if you wanted too.

 

This allows you to have unattended server builds of your code.

 

However if you hack away at the ccnet engine hard enough, you could probably
make it do robo dialing for a politician based on when a list of phone
numbers change.

 

 

From: Chris Howell [mailto:chris.how...@padresoft.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 5:10 PM
To: Stephan King
Cc: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt

 

Ok perhaps I should have phrased my question a little better, I am looking
for CI and daily builds.  I've used CC.Net before exclusively without NANT.
My question was more why would I choose to use the functionality exposed in
NANT, such a executing tasks, copying files etc.. When CC.NET also has
utilities for doing the same thing ? There seems to be quite a bit of over
lap between the tasks that CC.Net can don and the tasks that NANT can do.
Therefore what is the benefit ? Of combining the two ? 

 

From: Stephan King [mailto:sk...@inquesttechnologies.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:56 PM
To: Chris Howell
Subject: RE: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt

 

You don't choose one over the other, they go hand in hand.  CC.NET will
handle all of your source control operations, scheduling, emailing,
publishing, etc, and CC.NET will call into your NANT scripts to do things
like run MSBuild, copy files, etc.

 

Stephan

 

From: Chris Howell [mailto:chris.how...@padresoft.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:33 PM
To: nant-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [NAnt-users] Nant VS CC.NEt

 

Hi All, 

 

I am looking to introduce a Continuous Integration/build environment to my
dev team which currently has none. What would be the primary advantage(s) to
choosing a NANT too over CC.NET ?

 

Chris

--
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com___
NAnt-users mailing list
NAnt-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users