Re: Nashorn deprecation

2018/7/3 16:19:48 -0700, Charles Oliver Nutter : > I was going to start another thread, but I thought it made sense to > reply here. > > I see the justification for deprecating Nashorn is given as "it's too > hard to maintain". I'd like to understand if that's the real > justification or if the re

Re: Nashorn deprecation

y allow us to run on JDK8,9,10,11 >> and Graal. >> >> >> Cheers, >> Paulo >> >> Original Message >> From: tonyzak...@gmail.com >> Sent: June 15, 2018 22:29 >> To: jlu...@riotgames.com >> Cc: yikesar...@gmail.com; nashorn-dev@openjdk.java

Re: Nashorn deprecation

12 > https://github.com/reactiverse/es4x/pull/16 > > This is what we're experimenting to smoothly allow us to run on JDK8,9,10,11 > and Graal. > > > Cheers, > Paulo > > Original Message > From: tonyzak...@gmail.com > Sent: June 15, 2018 22:29 > To: jlu...

Re: Nashorn deprecation

we're experimenting to smoothly allow us to run on JDK8,9,10,11 and Graal. Cheers, Paulo   Original Message   From: tonyzak...@gmail.com Sent: June 15, 2018 22:29 To: jlu...@riotgames.com Cc: yikesar...@gmail.com; nashorn-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: Nashorn deprecation Also replied to

Re: Nashorn deprecation

Also replied to the thread. Our entire platform is built on Nashorn. Assumed it was the Java answer for JS on the Java runtime. On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 8:57 PM Jesus Luzon wrote: > Is there any way to reply to a thread before I was subscribed? I'm pretty > much a noob when it comes to this mai

Re: Nashorn deprecation

Subscribe first, then go to that mailing list archive link, and click on the message author link (first link on the top of the page). It’s actually a mailto: link that should open your mail client with an empty e-mail message accordingly configured as a thread response. Attila. > On 2018. Jun

Re: Nashorn deprecation

Is there any way to reply to a thread before I was subscribed? I'm pretty much a noob when it comes to this mailing list process. As for the deprecation, we use Nashorn heavily for our Edge transformation layers and would need to find something that's at least backwards compatible with our use cas

Re: Nashorn deprecation

Hey folks, the best thing you can do is answer to this thread on jdk-dev mailing list: . The JEP is a candidate, and they’re gathering feedback there. If there’s a lot of community feedback saying people use and depend on Nas

Re: Nashorn deprecation

Hi, As the "core" developer of JS support for Vert.x this is quite some shocking news as the project really relies on Nashorn for JS support. I've been spending many hours to get GraalVM.js working and to some extent we can run some unmodified application with it, but we're not there yet. For examp

Re: Nashorn deprecation

Hello Yikes. Well pointed... that is a drag indeed. Any news on those questions? We are completely reliant to this feature in our platform, a lot of software customization is made using ECMAScript and runs on top of Nashorn/JDK8 currently. I was surprised and scared when I saw that. Hopefully, J

Nashorn deprecation

Hi i just read that Nashorn is being deprecated (JEP 335 ). First of all, that is a drag. Two (ish) questions: 1) So what is the last planned release of Nashorn? J9? It wasnt' clear from the JEP. 2) Is this deprecation specifically to make room for GraalJS? That